Coordination of DNA synthesis and replicative unwinding by the S-phase checkpoint pathways

In and out of Replication Stress: PCNA/RPA1-Based Dynamics of Fork Stalling and Restart in the Same Cell

Replication forks encounter various impediments, which induce fork stalling and threaten genome stability, yet the precise dynamics of fork stalling and restart at the single-cell level remain elusive. Herein, we devise a live-cell microscopy-based approach to follow hydroxyurea-induced fork stalling and subsequent restart at 30 s resolution. We measure two distinct processes during fork stalling. One is rapid PCNA removal, which reflects the drop in DNA synthesis. The other is gradual RPA1 accumulation up to 2400 nt of ssDNA per fork despite an active intra-S checkpoint. Restoring the nucleotide pool enables a prompt restart without post-replicative ssDNA and a smooth cell cycle progression. ATR, but not ATM inhibition, accelerates hydroxyurea-induced RPA1 accumulation nine-fold, leading to RPA1 exhaustion within 20 min. Fork restart under ATR inhibition led to the persistence of ~600 nt ssDNA per fork after S-phase, which reached 2500 nt under ATR/ATM co-inhibition, with both scenarios leading to mitotic catastrophe. MRE11 inhibition had no effect on PCNA/RPA1 dynamics regardless of ATR activity. E3 ligase RAD18 was recruited at stalled replication forks in parallel to PCNA removal. Our results shed light on fork dynamics during nucleotide depletion and provide a valuable tool for interrogating the effects of replication stress-inducing anti-cancer agents.

Diallyl disulfide induces DNA damage and growth inhibition in colorectal cancer cells by promoting POU2F1 ubiquitination

Previous studies have demonstrated that diallyl disulfide (DADS) exhibits potent anti-tumor activity. However, the pharmacological actions of DADS in inhibiting the growth of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells have not been clarified. Herein, we show that DADS treatment impairs the activation of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) to decrease PRPP (5-phosphate ribose-1-pyrophosphate) production, enhancing DNA damage and cell apoptosis, and inhibiting the growth of CRC cells. Mechanistically, DADS treatment promoted POU2F1 K48-linked ubiquitination and degradation by attenuating the PI3K/AKT signaling to up-regulate TRIM21 expression in CRC cells. Evidently, TRIM21 interacted with POU2F1, and induced the K272 ubiquitination of POU2F1. The effects of DADS on the enhanced K272 ubiquitination of POU2F1, the PPP flux, PRPP production, DNA damage and cell apoptosis as well as the growth of CRC tumors in vivo were significantly mitigated by TRIM21 silencing or activating the PI3K signaling in CRC cells. Conversely, the effects of DADS were enhanced by TRIM21 over-expression or inhibiting the PI3K/AKT signaling in CRC cells. Collectively, our findings reveal a novel mechanism by which DADS suppresses the growth of CRC by promoting POU2F1 ubiquitination, and may aid in design of novel therapeutic intervention of CRC.

Chromatin regulators in DNA replication and genome stability maintenance during S-phase

The duplication of genetic information is central to life. The replication of genetic information is strictly controlled to ensure that each piece of genomic DNA is copied only once during a cell cycle. Factors that slow or stop replication forks cause replication stress. Replication stress is a major source of genome instability in cancer cells. Multiple control mechanisms facilitate the unimpeded fork progression, prevent fork collapse and coordinate fork repair. Chromatin alterations, caused by histone post-translational modifications and chromatin remodeling, have critical roles in normal replication and in avoiding replication stress and its consequences. This text reviews the chromatin regulators that ensure DNA replication and the proper response to replication stress. We also briefly touch on exploiting replication stress in therapeutic strategies. As chromatin regulators are frequently mutated in cancer, manipulating their activity could provide many possibilities for personalized treatment.

Analysis of the Sequence Preference of Saporin by Deep Sequencing

Ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs) are RNA:adenosine glycosidases that inactivate eukaryotic ribosomes by depurinating the sarcin-ricin loop (SRL) in 28S rRNA. The GAGA sequence at the top of the SRL or at the top of a hairpin loop is assumed to be their target motif. Saporin is a RIP widely used to develop immunotoxins for research and medical applications, but its sequence specificity has not been investigated. Here, we combine the conventional aniline cleavage assay for depurinated nucleic acids with high-throughput sequencing to study sequence-specific depurination of oligonucleotides caused by saporin. Our data reveal the sequence preference of saporin for different substrates and show that the GAGA motif is not efficiently targeted by this protein, neither in RNA nor in DNA. Instead, a preference of saporin for certain hairpin DNAs was observed. The observed sequence-specific activity of saporin may be relevant to antiviral or apoptosis-inducing effects of RIPs. The developed method could also be useful for studying the sequence specificity of depurination by other RIPs or enzymes.

Single-stranded DNA damage: Protecting the single-stranded DNA from chemical attack

Cellular processes, such as DNA replication, recombination and transcription, require DNA strands separation and single-stranded DNA is formation. The single-stranded DNA is promptly wrapped by human single-stranded DNA binding proteins, replication protein A (RPA) complex. RPA binding not only prevent nuclease degradation and annealing, but it also coordinates cell-cycle checkpoint activation and DNA repair. However, RPA binding offers little protection against the chemical modification of DNA bases. This review focuses on the type of DNA base damage that occurs in single-stranded DNA and how the damage is rectified in human cells. The discovery of DNA repair proteins, such as ALKBH3, AGT, UNG2, NEIL3, being able to repair the damaged base in the single-stranded DNA, renewed the interest to study single-stranded DNA repair. These mechanistically different proteins work independently from each other with the overarching goal of increasing fidelity of recombination and promoting error-free replication.

Biochemical Basis of APOBEC3 Deoxycytidine Deaminase Activity on Diverse DNA Substrates

The Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing complex (APOBEC) family of enzymes contains single-stranded polynucleotide cytidine deaminases. These enzymes catalyze the deamination of cytidine in RNA or single-stranded DNA, which forms uracil. From this 11 member enzyme family in humans, the deamination of single-stranded DNA by the seven APOBEC3 family members is considered here. The APOBEC3 family has many roles, such as restricting endogenous and exogenous retrovirus replication and retrotransposon insertion events and reducing DNA-induced inflammation. Similar to other APOBEC family members, the APOBEC3 enzymes are a double-edged sword that can catalyze deamination of cytosine in genomic DNA, which results in potential genomic instability due to the many mutagenic fates of uracil in DNA. Here, we discuss how these enzymes find their single-stranded DNA substrate in different biological contexts such as during human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) proviral DNA synthesis, retrotransposition of the LINE-1 element, and the "off-target" genomic DNA substrate. The enzymes must be able to efficiently deaminate transiently available single-stranded DNA during reverse transcription, replication, or transcription. Specific biochemical characteristics promote deamination in each situation to increase enzyme efficiency through processivity, rapid enzyme cycling between substrates, or oligomerization state. The use of biochemical data to clarify biological functions and alignment with cellular data is discussed. Models to bridge knowledge from biochemical, structural, and single molecule experiments are presented.

Activation of new replication foci under conditions of replication stress

DNA damage, binding of drugs to DNA or a shortage of nucleotides can decrease the rate or completely halt the progress of replication forks. Although the global rate of replication decreases, mammalian cells can respond to replication stress by activating new replication origins. We demonstrate that a moderate level of stress induced by inhibitors of topoisomerase I, commencing in early, mid or late S-phase, induces activation of new sites of replication located within or in the immediate vicinity of the original replication factories; only in early S some of these new sites are also activated at a distance greater than 300 nm. Under high stress levels very few new replication sites are activated; such sites are located within the original replication regions. There is a large variation in cellular response to stress - while in some cells the number of replication sites increases even threefold, it decreases almost twofold in other cells. Replication stress results in a loss of PCNA from replication factories and a twofold increase in nuclear volume. These observations suggest that activation of new replication origins from the pool of dormant origins within replication cluster under conditions of mild stress is generally restricted to the original replication clusters (factories) active at a time of stress initiation, while activation of distant origins and new replication factories is suppressed.

DNA polymerase ε and its roles in genome stability

DNA Polymerase Epsilon (Pol ε) is one of three DNA Polymerases (along with Pol δ and Pol α) required for nuclear DNA replication in eukaryotes. Pol ε is comprised of four subunits, the largest of which is encoded by the POLE gene and contains the catalytic polymerase and exonuclease activities. The 3'-5' exonuclease proofreading activity is able to correct DNA synthesis errors and helps protect against genome instability. Recent cancer genome sequencing efforts have shown that 3% of colorectal and 7% of endometrial cancers contain mutations within the exonuclease domain of POLE and are associated with significantly elevated levels of single nucleotide substitutions (15-500 per Mb) and microsatellite stability. POLE mutations have also been found in other tumor types, though at lower frequency, suggesting roles in tumorigenesis more broadly in different tissue types. In addition to its proofreading activity, Pol ε contributes to genome stability through multiple mechanisms that are discussed in this review.

The DNA damage checkpoint response to replication stress: A Game of Forks

Conditions challenging replication fork progression, collectively referred to as replication stress, represent a major source of genomic instability and are associated to cancer onset. The replication checkpoint, a specialized branch of the DNA damage checkpoint, monitors fork problems, and triggers a cellular response aimed at preserving genome integrity. Here, we review the mechanisms by which the replication checkpoint monitors and responds to replication stress, focusing on the checkpoint-mediated pathways contributing to protect replication fork integrity. We discuss how cells achieve checkpoint signaling inactivation once replication stress is overcome and how a failure to timely revert checkpoint-mediated changes in cellular physiology might impact on replication dynamics and genome integrity. We also highlight the checkpoint function as an anti-cancer barrier preventing cells malignant transformation following oncogene-induced replication stress.

Multiple functions of the S-phase checkpoint mediator

There is mounting evidence that replication defects are the major source of spontaneous genomic instability in cells, and that S-phase checkpoints are the principal defense against such instability. The S-phase checkpoint mediator protein Mrc1/Claspin mediates the checkpoint response to replication stress by facilitating phosphorylation of effector kinase by a sensor kinase. In this review, the multiple functions and the regulation of the S-phase checkpoint mediator are discussed.

ING2 controls the progression of DNA replication forks to maintain genome stability

Inhibitor of growth 2 (ING2) is a candidate tumour suppressor gene the expression of which is frequently lost in tumours. Here, we identified a new function for ING2 in the control of DNA replication and in the maintenance of genome stability. Global replication rate was markedly reduced during normal S-phase in small interfering RNA (siRNA) ING2 cells, as seen in a DNA fibre spreading experiment. Accordingly, we found that ING2 interacts with proliferating cell nuclear antigen and regulates its amount to the chromatin fraction, allowing normal replication progression and normal cell proliferation. Deregulation of DNA replication has been previously associated with genome instability. Hence, a high proportion of siRNA ING2 cells presented endoreduplication of their genome as well as an increased frequency of sister chromatid exchange. Thus, we propose for the first time that ING2 might function as a tumour suppressor gene by directly maintaining DNA integrity.

Timeless Maintains Genomic Stability and Suppresses Sister Chromatid Exchange during Unperturbed DNA Replication

Genome integrity is maintained during DNA replication by coordination of various replisome-regulated processes. Although it is known that Timeless (Tim) is a replisome component that participates in replication checkpoint responses to genotoxic stress, its importance for genome maintenance during normal DNA synthesis has not been reported. Here we demonstrate that Tim reduction leads to genomic instability during unperturbed DNA replication, culminating in increased chromatid breaks and translocations (triradials, quadriradials, and fusions). Tim deficiency led to increased H2AX phosphorylation and Rad51 and Rad52 foci formation selectively during DNA synthesis and caused a 3-4-fold increase in sister chromatid exchange. The sister chromatid exchange events stimulated by Tim reduction were largely mediated via a Brca2/Rad51-dependent mechanism and were additively increased by deletion of the Blm helicase. Therefore, Tim deficiency leads to an increased reliance on homologous recombination for proper continuation of DNA synthesis. Together, these results indicate a pivotal role for Tim in maintaining genome stability throughout normal DNA replication.

A role for Chd1 and Set2 in negatively regulating DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Chromatin-modifying factors regulate both transcription and DNA replication. The yFACT chromatin-reorganizing complex is involved in both processes, and the sensitivity of some yFACT mutants to the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea (HU) is one indication of a replication role. This HU sensitivity can be suppressed by disruptions of the SET2 or CHD1 genes, encoding a histone H3(K36) methyltransferase and a chromatin remodeling factor, respectively. The additive effect of set2 and chd1 mutations in suppressing the HU sensitivity of yFACT mutants suggests that these two factors function in separate pathways. The HU suppression is not an indirect effect of altered regulation of ribonucleotide reductase induced by HU. set2 and chd1 mutations also suppress the HU sensitivity of mutations in other genes involved in DNA replication, including CDC2, CTF4, ORC2, and MEC1. Additionally, a chd1 mutation can suppress the lethality normally caused by disruption of either MEC1 or RAD53 DNA damage checkpoint genes, as well as the lethality seen when a mec1 sml1 mutant is exposed to low levels of HU. The pob3 defect in S-phase progression is suppressed by set2 or chd1 mutations, suggesting that Set2 and Chd1 have specific roles in negatively regulating DNA replication.

Replication origin plasticity, Taylor-made: inhibition vs recruitment of origins under conditions of replication stress

Among his many contributions to the field of chromosome structure and dynamics, J. Herbert Taylor showed that eukaryotic cells have many more potential replication origins than they use, which they can recruit when replication forks are slowed to complete S-phase in a timely fashion. Thirty years later, his findings raise an important but largely overlooked paradox. Although new data have confirmed his results, a larger body of data has revealed that slowing replication forks activates an S-phase checkpoint cascade that inhibits initiation from unfired origins until the stress is relieved. In this paper, in celebration of Taylor's work published in Chromosoma 30 years ago, I draw attention to this paradox and offer some plausible models to explain how replication stress can both inhibit and recruit new origins. I hope that this essay will stimulate further experimentation into the basis of Taylor's original findings.