Dissecting the splicing mechanism of the Drosophila editing enzyme; dADAR

Adenosine Deaminase Acting on RNA (ADAR) Enzymes: A Journey from Weird to Wondrous

The adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) enzymes that catalyze the conversion of adenosine to inosine in double-stranded (ds)RNA are evolutionarily conserved and are essential for many biological functions including nervous system function, hematopoiesis, and innate immunity. Initially it was assumed that the wide-ranging biological roles of ADARs are due to inosine in mRNA being read as guanosine by the translational machinery, allowing incomplete RNA editing in a target codon to generate two different proteins from the same primary transcript. In humans, there are approximately seventy-six positions that undergo site-specific editing in tissues at greater than 20% efficiency that result in recoding. Many of these transcripts are expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and edited by ADAR2. Exploiting mouse genetic models revealed that transgenic mice lacking the gene encoding Adar2 die within 3 weeks of birth. Therefore, the role of ADAR2 in generating protein diversity in the nervous system is clear, but why is ADAR RNA editing activity essential in other biological processes, particularly editing mainly involving ADAR1? ADAR1 edits human transcripts having embedded Alu element inverted repeats (AluIRs), but the link from this activity to innate immunity activation was elusive. Mice lacking the gene encoding Adar1 are embryonically lethal, and a major breakthrough was the discovery that the role of Adar1 in innate immunity is due to its ability to edit such repetitive element inverted repeats which have the ability to form dsRNA in transcripts. The presence of inosine prevents activation of the dsRNA sensor melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (Mda5). Thus, inosine helps the cell discriminate self from non-self RNA, acting like a barcode on mRNA. As innate immunity is key to many different biological processes, the basis for this widespread biological role of the ADAR1 enzyme became evident.Our group has been studying ADARs from the outset of research on these enzymes. In this Account, we give a historical perspective, moving from the initial purification of ADAR1 and ADAR2 and cloning of their encoding genes up to the current research focus in the field and what questions still remain to be addressed. We discuss the characterizations of the proteins, their localizations, posttranslational modifications, and dimerization, and how all of these affect their biological activities. Another aspect we explore is the use of mouse and Drosophila genetic models to study ADAR functions and how these were crucial in determining the biological functions of the ADAR proteins. Finally, we describe the severe consequences of rare mutations found in the human genes encoding ADAR1 and ADAR2.

Antisense oligonucleotides modulate dopa decarboxylase function in aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency

Aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency (AADCD), attributed to mutations in the dopa decarboxylase (DDC) gene, is a rare neurometabolic disease resulting from a defect in the biosynthesis of dopamine and serotonin. The DDC c.714+4A>T mutation is the most prevalent mutation among patients with AADCD, and is also a founder mutation among Taiwanese patients. In this study, the molecular consequences and function of this mutation were examined in AADCD patient-derived lymphoblastoid cells. We identified novel DDC mRNA isoforms spliced with a new exon (exon 6a) in normal and c.714+4A>T lymphoblastoid cells. In addition, we identified the SR proteins (SRSF9 and SRSF6), as well as cis-elements involved in modulating the splicing of this mutated transcript. Notably, we demonstrated that antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) were able to restore the normal mRNA splicing and increase the level of DDC protein, as well as its downstream product serotonin, in lymphoblastoid cells derived from the patient with AADCD, suggesting that these ASOs might represent a feasible alternative strategy for gene therapy of AADCD in patients with the common c.714+4A>T mutation.

Controlling the Editor: The Many Roles of RNA-Binding Proteins in Regulating A-to-I RNA Editing

RNA editing is a cellular process used to expand and diversify the RNA transcripts produced from a generally immutable genome. In animals, the most prevalent type of RNA editing is adenosine (A) to inosine (I) deamination catalyzed by the ADAR family. Throughout development, A-to-I editing levels increase while ADAR expression is constant, suggesting cellular mechanisms to regulate A-to-I editing exist. Furthermore, in several disease states, ADAR expression levels are similar to the normal state, but A-to-I editing levels are altered. Therefore, understanding how these enzymes are regulated in normal tissues and misregulated in disease states is of profound importance. This chapter will both discuss how to identify A-to-I editing sites across the transcriptome and explore the mechanisms that regulate ADAR editing activity, with particular focus on the diverse types of RNA-binding proteins implicated in regulating A-to-I editing in vivo.

The intricate relationship between RNA structure, editing, and splicing

Post-transcriptional modifications such as RNA editing and splicing diversify the proteome while limiting the necessary size of the genome. Although splicing globally rearranges existing information within the transcript, the conserved process of adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing recodes the message through single nucleotide changes, often at very specific locations. Because inosine is interpreted as guanosine by the cellular machineries, editing effectively results in the substitution of a guanosine for an adenosine in the primary RNA sequence. Precise control of editing is dictated by duplex structures in the transcript, formed between the exonic region surrounding the editing site and cis regulatory elements often localized in a nearby intron, suggesting that editing must precede splicing. However, the precise relationship between these post-transcriptional processes remains unclear. Here we present general commonalities of RNA editing substrates and consequential predictions regarding the interaction between editing and splicing. We also discuss anomalies and interesting cases of RNA editing that confound our understanding of the relationship between these post-transcriptional processes.

Regulation and functions of ADAR in drosophila

Drosophila melanogaster has a single Adar gene encoding a protein related to mammalian ADAR2 that edits transcripts encoding glutamate receptor subunits. We describe the structure of the Drosophila Adar locus and use ModENCODE information to supplement published data on Adar gene transcription, and splicing. We discuss the roles of ADAR in Drosophila in terms of the two main types of RNA molecules edited and roles of ADARs as RNA-binding proteins. Site-specific RNA editing events in transcripts encoding ion channel subunits were initially found serendipitously and subsequent directed searches for editing sites and transcriptome sequencing have now led to 972 edited sites being identified in 597 transcripts. Four percent of D. melanogaster transcripts are site-specifically edited and these encode a wide range of largely membrane-associated proteins expressed particularly in CNS. Electrophysiological studies on the effects of specific RNA editing events on ion channel subunits do not suggest that loss of RNA editing events in ion channels consistently produce a particular outcome such as making Adar mutant neurons more excitable. This possibility would have been consistent with neurodegeneration seen in Adar mutant fly brains. A further set of ADAR targets are dsRNA intermediates in siRNA generation, derived from transposons and from structured RNA loci. Transcripts with convergent overlapping 3' ends are also edited and the first discovered instance of RNA editing in Drosophila, in the Rnp4F transcript, is an example. There is no evidence yet to show that Adar antagonizes RNA interference in Drosophila. Evidence has been obtained that catalytically inactive ADAR proteins exert effects on microRNA generation and RNA interference. Whether all effects of inactive ADARs are due to RNA-binding or to even further roles of these proteins remains to be determined.

Engineered alterations in RNA editing modulate complex behavior in Drosophila: regulatory diversity of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) targets

Select proteins involved in electrical and chemical neurotransmission are re-coded at the RNA level via the deamination of particular adenosines to inosine by adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs). It has been hypothesized that this process, termed RNA editing, acts to "fine-tune" neurophysiological properties in animals and potentially downstream behavioral outputs. However, the extreme phenotypes resulting from deletions of adar loci have precluded investigations into the relationship between ADAR levels, target transcripts, and complex behaviors. Here, we engineer Drosophila hypomorphic for ADAR expression using homologous recombination. A substantial reduction in ADAR activity (>80%) leads to altered circadian motor patterns and abnormal male courtship, although surprisingly, general locomotor coordination is spared. The altered phenotypic landscape in our adar hypomorph is paralleled by an unexpected dichotomous response of ADAR target transcripts, i.e. certain adenosines are minimally affected by dramatic ADAR reduction, whereas editing of others is severely curtailed. Furthermore, we use a novel reporter to map RNA editing activity across the nervous system, and we demonstrate that knockdown of editing in fruitless-expressing neurons is sufficient to modify the male courtship song. Our data demonstrate that network-wide temporal and spatial regulation of ADAR activity can tune the complex system of RNA-editing sites and modulate multiple ethologically relevant behavioral modalities.

Spatial and temporal expression of dADAR mRNA and protein isoforms during embryogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster

Adenosine Deaminases Acting on RNA (ADARs) function to co-transcriptionally deaminate specific (or non-specific) adenosines to inosines within pre-mRNAs, using double-stranded RNAs as substrate. In both Drosophila and mammals, the best-studied ADAR functions are to catalyze specific nucleotide conversions within mRNAs encoding various ligand- or voltage-gated ion channel proteins within the adult brain. In contrast, ADARs within developing fly embryos have scarcely been studied, in part because they contain little or no editase activity, raising interesting questions as to their functional significance. Quantitative RT-PCR shows that two major developmentally regulated mRNA isoform classes are produced (full-length and truncated), which arise by alternative splicing and also alternative 3'-end formation. In situ localization of specific dADAR mRNA isoforms during embryogenesis reveals that the full-length class is found primarily within the developing germ band and central nervous system, whereas the truncated isoform is mostly located in gut endothelium. Developmental Western immunoblots show that both isoform classes are expressed into protein during embryogenesis. Both the rnp-4f 5'-UTR unspliced isoform and the full-length dADAR mRNA primarily localize in the embryonic germ band and subsequently throughout the developing central nervous system. Previous studies have shown that some rnp-4f pre-mRNAs are extensively edited by dADAR in the adult brain. Computer predictions suggest that intron-exon pairing promotes formation of an evolutionarily conserved secondary structure in the rnp-4f 5'-UTR, forming a 177-nt RNA duplex resembling an editing site complementary sequence, which is shown to be associated with splicing failure and to generate a long isoform. Taken together, these observations led us to explore the possibility that interaction between rnp-4f pre-mRNA and nuclear full-length dADAR protein may occur during embryogenesis. In dADAR null mutants, rnp-4f 5'-UTR alternative splicing is significantly diminished, suggesting a non-catalytic role for dADAR in splicing regulation. A working model is proposed which provides a possible molecular mechanism.