Recognition of tRNAGln by Helicobacter pylori GluRS2--a tRNAGln-specific glutamyl-tRNA synthetase

Evolution and variation in amide aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis

The amide proteogenic amino acids, asparagine and glutamine, are two of the twenty amino acids used in translation by all known life. The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases for asparagine and glutamine, asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase and glutaminyl tRNA synthetase, evolved after the split in the last universal common ancestor of modern organisms. Before that split, life used two-step indirect pathways to synthesize asparagine and glutamine on their cognate tRNAs to form the aminoacyl-tRNA used in translation. These two-step pathways were retained throughout much of the bacterial and archaeal domains of life and eukaryotic organelles. The indirect routes use non-discriminating aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase and non-discriminating glutamyl-tRNA synthetase) to misaminoacylate the tRNA. The misaminoacylated tRNA formed is then transamidated into the amide aminoacyl-tRNA used in protein synthesis by tRNA-dependent amidotransferases (GatCAB and GatDE). The enzymes and tRNAs involved assemble into complexes known as transamidosomes to help maintain translational fidelity. These pathways have evolved to meet the varied cellular needs across a diverse set of organisms, leading to significant variation. In certain bacteria, the indirect pathways may provide a means to adapt to cellular stress by reducing the fidelity of protein synthesis. The retention of these indirect pathways versus acquisition of asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase and glutaminyl tRNA synthetase in lineages likely involves a complex interplay of the competing uses of glutamine and asparagine beyond translation, energetic costs, co-evolution between enzymes and tRNA, and involvement in stress response that await further investigation.

Signatures of tRNAGlx -specificity in proteobacterial glutamyl-tRNA synthetases

The canonical function of glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) is to glutamylate tRNAGlu . Yet not all bacterial GluRSs glutamylate tRNAGlu ; many glutamylate both tRNAGlu and tRNAGln , while some glutamylate only tRNAGln and not the cognate substrate tRNAGlu . Understanding the basis of the unique specificity of tRNAGlx is important. Mutational studies have hinted at hotspot residues, both on tRNAGlx and GluRS, which play crucial roles in tRNAGlx -specificity. However, its underlying structural basis remains unexplored. The majority of biochemical studies related to tRNAGlx -specificity have been performed on GluRS from Escherichia coli and other proteobacterial species. However, since the early crystal structures of GluRS and tRNAGlu -bound GluRS were from non-proteobacterial species (Thermus thermophilus), proteobacterial biochemical data have often been interpreted in the context of non-proteobacterial GluRS structures. Marked differences between proteobacterial and non-proteobacterial GluRSs have been demonstrated; therefore, it is important to understand tRNAGlx -specificity vis-a-vis proteobacterial GluRS structures. To this end, we solved the crystal structure of a double mutant GluRS from E. coli. Using the solved structure and several other currently available proteo- and non-proteobacterial GluRS crystal structures, we probed the structural basis of the tRNAGlx -specificity of bacterial GluRSs. Specifically, our analyses suggest a unique role played by the tRNAGlx D-helix contacting loop of GluRS in the modulation of tRNAGln -specificity. While earlier studies have identified functional hotspots on tRNAGlx that control the tRNAGlx -specificity of GluRS, this is the first report of complementary signatures of tRNAGlx -specificity in GluRS.

The tRNA identity landscape for aminoacylation and beyond

tRNAs are key partners in ribosome-dependent protein synthesis. This process is highly dependent on the fidelity of tRNA aminoacylation by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and relies primarily on sets of identities within tRNA molecules composed of determinants and antideterminants preventing mischarging by non-cognate synthetases. Such identity sets were discovered in the tRNAs of a few model organisms, and their properties were generalized as universal identity rules. Since then, the panel of identity elements governing the accuracy of tRNA aminoacylation has expanded considerably, but the increasing number of reported functional idiosyncrasies has led to some confusion. In parallel, the description of other processes involving tRNAs, often well beyond aminoacylation, has progressed considerably, greatly expanding their interactome and uncovering multiple novel identities on the same tRNA molecule. This review highlights key findings on the mechanistics and evolution of tRNA and tRNA-like identities. In addition, new methods and their results for searching sets of multiple identities on a single tRNA are discussed. Taken together, this knowledge shows that a comprehensive understanding of the functional role of individual and collective nucleotide identity sets in tRNA molecules is needed for medical, biotechnological and other applications.

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases in the Bacterial World

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are modular enzymes globally conserved in the three kingdoms of life. All catalyze the same two-step reaction, i.e., the attachment of a proteinogenic amino acid on their cognate tRNAs, thereby mediating the correct expression of the genetic code. In addition, some aaRSs acquired other functions beyond this key role in translation. Genomics and X-ray crystallography have revealed great structural diversity in aaRSs (e.g., in oligomery and modularity, in ranking into two distinct groups each subdivided in 3 subgroups, by additional domains appended on the catalytic modules). AaRSs show huge structural plasticity related to function and limited idiosyncrasies that are kingdom or even species specific (e.g., the presence in many Bacteria of non discriminating aaRSs compensating for the absence of one or two specific aaRSs, notably AsnRS and/or GlnRS). Diversity, as well, occurs in the mechanisms of aaRS gene regulation that are not conserved in evolution, notably between distant groups such as Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteria. The review focuses on bacterial aaRSs (and their paralogs) and covers their structure, function, regulation, and evolution. Structure/function relationships are emphasized, notably the enzymology of tRNA aminoacylation and the editing mechanisms for correction of activation and charging errors. The huge amount of genomic and structural data that accumulated in last two decades is reviewed, showing how the field moved from essentially reductionist biology towards more global and integrated approaches. Likewise, the alternative functions of aaRSs and those of aaRS paralogs (e.g., during cell wall biogenesis and other metabolic processes in or outside protein synthesis) are reviewed. Since aaRS phylogenies present promiscuous bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryal features, similarities and differences in the properties of aaRSs from the three kingdoms of life are pinpointed throughout the review and distinctive characteristics of bacterium-like synthetases from organelles are outlined.

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases in the Bacterial World

Aminoacyl-tRNAsynthetases (aaRSs) are modular enzymesglobally conserved in the three kingdoms of life. All catalyze the same two-step reaction, i.e., the attachment of a proteinogenic amino acid on their cognate tRNAs, thereby mediating the correct expression of the genetic code. In addition, some aaRSs acquired other functions beyond this key role in translation.Genomics and X-ray crystallography have revealed great structural diversity in aaRSs (e.g.,in oligomery and modularity, in ranking into two distinct groups each subdivided in 3 subgroups, by additional domains appended on the catalytic modules). AaRSs show hugestructural plasticity related to function andlimited idiosyncrasies that are kingdom or even speciesspecific (e.g.,the presence in many Bacteria of non discriminating aaRSs compensating for the absence of one or two specific aaRSs, notably AsnRS and/or GlnRS).Diversity, as well, occurs in the mechanisms of aaRS gene regulation that are not conserved in evolution, notably betweendistant groups such as Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteria.Thereview focuses on bacterial aaRSs (and their paralogs) and covers their structure, function, regulation,and evolution. Structure/function relationships are emphasized, notably the enzymology of tRNA aminoacylation and the editing mechanisms for correction of activation and charging errors. The huge amount of genomic and structural data that accumulatedin last two decades is reviewed,showing how thefield moved from essentially reductionist biologytowards more global and integrated approaches. Likewise, the alternative functions of aaRSs and those of aaRSparalogs (e.g., during cellwall biogenesis and other metabolic processes in or outside protein synthesis) are reviewed. Since aaRS phylogenies present promiscuous bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryal features, similarities and differences in the properties of aaRSs from the three kingdoms of life are pinpointedthroughout the reviewand distinctive characteristics of bacterium-like synthetases from organelles are outlined.

Structural and functional consequences of mutating a proteobacteria-specific surface residue in the catalytic domain of Escherichia coli GluRS

Nucleotides whose mutations seriously affect glutamylation efficiency are experimentally known for Escherichia coli tRNA(Glu). However, not much is known about functional hotspots on the complementary enzyme, glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS). From structural and functional studies on an Arg266Leu mutant of E. coli GluRS, we demonstrate that Arg266 is essential for efficient glutamylation of tRNA(Glu). Consistent with this result, we found that Arg266 is a conserved signature of proteobacterial GluRS. In contrast, most non-proteobacterial GluRS contain Leu, and never Arg, at this position. Our results imply a unique strategy of glutamylation of tRNA(Glu) in proteobacteria under phylum-specific evolutionary compulsions.

Riboswitch (T-box)-mediated control of tRNA-dependent amidation in Clostridium acetobutylicum rationalizes gene and pathway redundancy for asparagine and asparaginyl-trnaasn synthesis

Analysis of the Gram-positive Clostridium acetobutylicum genome reveals an inexplicable level of redundancy for the genes putatively involved in asparagine (Asn) and Asn-tRNA(Asn) synthesis. Besides a duplicated set of gatCAB tRNA-dependent amidotransferase genes, there is a triplication of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase genes and a duplication of asparagine synthetase B genes. This genomic landscape leads to the suspicion of the incoherent simultaneous use of the direct and indirect pathways of Asn and Asn-tRNA(Asn) formation. Through a combination of biochemical and genetic approaches, we show that C. acetobutylicum forms Asn and Asn-tRNA(Asn) by tRNA-dependent amidation. We demonstrate that an entire transamidation pathway composed of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase and one set of GatCAB genes is organized as an operon under the control of a tRNA(Asn)-dependent T-box riboswitch. Finally, our results suggest that this exceptional gene redundancy might be interconnected to control tRNA-dependent Asn synthesis, which in turn might be involved in controlling the metabolic switch from acidogenesis to solventogenesis in C. acetobutylicum.

The asparagine-transamidosome from Helicobacter pylori: a dual-kinetic mode in non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase safeguards the genetic code

Helicobacter pylori catalyzes Asn-tRNA(Asn) formation by use of the indirect pathway that involves charging of Asp onto tRNA(Asn) by a non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (ND-AspRS), followed by conversion of the mischarged Asp into Asn by the GatCAB amidotransferase. We show that the partners of asparaginylation assemble into a dynamic Asn-transamidosome, which uses a different strategy than the Gln-transamidosome to prevent the release of the mischarged aminoacyl-tRNA intermediate. The complex is described by gel-filtration, dynamic light scattering and kinetic measurements. Two strategies for asparaginylation are shown: (i) tRNA(Asn) binds GatCAB first, allowing aminoacylation and immediate transamidation once ND-AspRS joins the complex; (ii) tRNA(Asn) is bound by ND-AspRS which releases the Asp-tRNA(Asn) product much slower than the cognate Asp-tRNA(Asp); this kinetic peculiarity allows GatCAB to bind and transamidate Asp-tRNA(Asn) before its release by the ND-AspRS. These results are discussed in the context of the interrelation between the Asn and Gln-transamidosomes which use the same GatCAB in H. pylori, and shed light on a kinetic mechanism that ensures faithful codon reassignment for Asn.

The kinase activity of the Helicobacter pylori Asp-tRNA(Asn)/Glu-tRNA(Gln) amidotransferase is sensitive to distal mutations in its putative ammonia tunnel

The Helicobacter pylori (Hp) Asp-tRNA(Asn)/Glu-tRNA(Gln) amidotransferase (AdT) plays important roles in indirect aminoacylation and translational fidelity. AdT has two active sites, in two separate subunits. Kinetic studies have suggested that interdomain communication occurs between these subunits; however, this mechanism is not well understood. To explore domain-domain communication in AdT, we adapted an assay and optimized it to kinetically characterize the kinase activity of Hp AdT. This assay was applied to the analysis of a series of point mutations at conserved positions throughout the putative AdT ammonia tunnel that connects the two active sites. Several mutations that caused significant decreases in AdT's kinase activity (reduced by 55-75%) were identified. Mutations at Thr149 (37 Å distal to the GatB kinase active site) and Lys89 (located at the interface of GatA and GatB) were detrimental to AdT's kinase activity, suggesting that these mutations have disrupted interdomain communication between the two active sites. Models of wild-type AdT, a valine mutation at Thr149, and an arginine mutation at Lys89 were subjected to molecular dynamics simulations. A comparison of wild-type, T149V, and K89R AdT simulation results unmasks 59 common residues that are likely involved in connecting the two active sites.

Rational design of an evolutionary precursor of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase

The specificity of most aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases for an amino acid and cognate tRNA pair evolved before the divergence of the three domains of life. Glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) evolved later and is derived from the archaeal-type nondiscriminating glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS), an enzyme with relaxed tRNA specificity capable of forming both Glu-tRNA(Glu) and Glu-tRNA(Gln). The archaea lack GlnRS and use a specialized amidotransferase to convert Glu-tRNA(Gln) to Gln-tRNA(Gln) needed for protein synthesis. We show that the Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus GluRS is active toward tRNA(Glu) and the two tRNA(Gln) isoacceptors the organism encodes, but with a significant catalytic preference for tRNA(Gln2)(CUG). The less active tRNA(Gln1)(UUG) responds to the less common CAA codon for Gln. From a biochemical characterization of M. thermautotrophicus GluRS variants, we found that the evolution of tRNA specificity in GlnRS could be recapitulated by converting the M. thermautotrophicus GluRS to a tRNA(Gln) specific enzyme, solely through the addition of an acceptor stem loop present in bacterial GlnRS. One designed GluRS variant is also highly specific for the tRNA(Gln2)(CUG) isoacceptor, which responds to the CAG codon, and shows no activity toward tRNA(Gln1)(UUG). Because it is now possible to eliminate particular codons from the genome of Escherichia coli, additional codons will become available for genetic code engineering. Isoacceptor-specific aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases will enable the reassignment of more open codons while preserving accurate encoding of the 20 canonical amino acids.

Exit strategies for charged tRNA from GluRS

For several class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), the rate-determining step in aminoacylation is the dissociation of charged tRNA from the enzyme. In this study, the following factors affecting the release of the charged tRNA from aaRSs are computationally explored: the protonation states of amino acids and substrates present in the active site, and the presence and the absence of AMP and elongation factor Tu. Through molecular modeling, internal pK(a) calculations, and molecular dynamics simulations, distinct, mechanistically relevant post-transfer states with charged tRNA bound to glutamyl-tRNA synthetase from Thermus thermophilus (Glu-tRNA(Glu)) are considered. The behavior of these nonequilibrium states is characterized as a function of time using dynamical network analysis, local energetics, and changes in free energies to estimate transitions that occur during the release of the tRNA. The hundreds of nanoseconds of simulation time reveal system characteristics that are consistent with recent experimental studies. Energetic and network results support the previously proposed mechanism in which the transfer of amino acid to tRNA is accompanied by the protonation of AMP to H-AMP. Subsequent migration of proton to water reduces the stability of the complex and loosens the interface both in the presence and in the absence of AMP. The subsequent undocking of AMP or tRNA then proceeds along thermodynamically competitive pathways. Release of the tRNA acceptor stem is further accelerated by the deprotonation of the alpha-ammonium group on the charging amino acid. The proposed general base is Glu41, a residue binding the alpha-ammonium group that is conserved in both structure and sequence across nearly all class I aaRSs. This universal handle is predicted through pK(a) calculations to be part of a proton relay system for destabilizing the bound charging amino acid following aminoacylation. Addition of elongation factor Tu to the aaRS.tRNA complex stimulates the dissociation of the tRNA core and the tRNA acceptor stem.