A universal transcription pause sequence is an element of initiation factor σ70-dependent pausing

Structural basis of AlpA-dependent transcription antitermination

AlpA positively regulates a programmed cell death pathway linked to the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by recognizing an AlpA binding element within the promoter, then binding RNA polymerase directly and allowing it to bypass an intrinsic terminator positioned downstream. Here, we report the single-particle cryo-electron microscopy structures of both an AlpA-loading complex and an AlpA-loaded complex. These structures indicate that the C-terminal helix-turn-helix motif of AlpA binds to the AlpA binding element and that the N-terminal segment of AlpA forms a narrow ring inside the RNA exit channel. AlpA was also revealed to render RNAP resistant to termination signals by prohibiting RNA hairpin formation in the RNA exit channel. Structural analysis predicted that AlpA, 21Q, λQ and 82Q share the same mechanism of transcription antitermination.

Structural and mechanistic basis of σ-dependent transcriptional pausing

In σ-dependent transcriptional pausing, the transcription initiation factor σ, translocating with RNA polymerase (RNAP), makes sequence-specific protein–DNA interactions with a promoter-like sequence element in the transcribed region, inducing pausing. It has been proposed that, in σ-dependent pausing, the RNAP active center can access off-pathway “backtracked” states that are substrates for the transcript-cleavage factors of the Gre family and on-pathway “scrunched” states that mediate pause escape. Here, using site-specific protein–DNA photocrosslinking to define positions of the RNAP trailing and leading edges and of σ relative to DNA at the λPR′ promoter, we show directly that σ-dependent pausing in the absence of GreB in vitro predominantly involves a state backtracked by 2–4 bp, and σ-dependent pausing in the presence of GreB in vitro and in vivo predominantly involves a state scrunched by 2–3 bp. Analogous experiments with a library of 47 (∼16,000) transcribed-region sequences show that the state scrunched by 2–3 bp—and only that state—is associated with the consensus sequence, T−3N−2Y−1G+1, (where −1 corresponds to the position of the RNA 3′ end), which is identical to the consensus for pausing in initial transcription and which is related to the consensus for pausing in transcription elongation. Experiments with heteroduplex templates show that sequence information at position T−3 resides in the DNA nontemplate strand. A cryoelectron microscopy structure of a complex engaged in σ-dependent pausing reveals positions of DNA scrunching on the DNA nontemplate and template strands and suggests that position T−3 of the consensus sequence exerts its effects by facilitating scrunching.

Transcriptional Pausing as a Mediator of Bacterial Gene Regulation

Cellular life depends on transcription of DNA by RNA polymerase to express genetic information. RNA polymerase has evolved not just to read information from DNA and write it to RNA but also to sense and process information from the cellular and extracellular environments. Much of this information processing occurs during transcript elongation, when transcriptional pausing enables regulatory decisions. Transcriptional pauses halt RNA polymerase in response to DNA and RNA sequences and structures at locations and times that help coordinate interactions with small molecules and transcription factors important for regulation. Four classes of transcriptional pause signals are now evident after decades of study: elemental pauses, backtrack pauses, hairpin-stabilized pauses, and regulator-stabilized pauses. In this review, I describe current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of these four classes of pause signals, remaining questions about how RNA polymerase responds to pause signals, and the many exciting directions now open to understand pausing and the regulation of transcript elongation on a genome-wide scale. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Microbiology, Volume 75 is October 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

A Tale of Good Fortune in the Era of DNA

Two strains of good fortune in my career were to stumble upon the Watson–Gilbert laboratory at Harvard when I entered graduate school in 1964, and to study gene regulation in bacteriophage λ when I was there. λ was almost entirely a genetic item a few years before, awaiting biochemical incarnation. Throughout my career I was a relentless consumer of the work of previous and current generations of λ geneticists. Empowered by this background, my laboratory made contributions in two areas. The first was regulation of early gene transcription in λ, the study of which began with the discovery of the Rho transcription termination factor, and the regulatory mechanism of transcription antitermination by the λ N protein, subjects of my thesis work. This was developed into a decades-long program during my career at Cornell, studying the mechanism of transcription termination and antitermination. The second area was the classic problem of prophage induction in response to cellular DNA damage, the study of which illuminated basic cellular processes to survive DNA damage.

mTERF5 Acts as a Transcriptional Pausing Factor to Positively Regulate Transcription of Chloroplast psbEFLJ

RNA polymerase transcriptional pausing represents a major checkpoint in transcription in bacteria and metazoans, but it is unknown whether this phenomenon occurs in plant organelles. Here, we report that transcriptional pausing occurs in chloroplasts. We found that mTERF5 specifically and positively regulates the transcription of chloroplast psbEFLJ in Arabidopsis thaliana that encodes four key subunits of photosystem II. We found that mTERF5 causes the plastid-encoded RNA polymerase (PEP) complex to pause at psbEFLJ by binding to the +30 to +51 region of double-stranded DNA. Moreover, we revealed that mTERF5 interacts with pTAC6, an essential subunit of the PEP complex, although pTAC6 is not involved in the transcriptional pausing at psbEFLJ. We showed that mTERF5 recruits additional pTAC6 to the transcriptionally paused region of psbEFLJ, and the recruited pTAC6 proteins could be assembled into the PEP complex to regulate psbEFLJ transcription. Taken together, our findings shed light on the role of transcriptional pausing in chloroplast transcription in plants.

Structural basis of Q-dependent antitermination

Lambdoid bacteriophage Q protein mediates the switch from middle to late bacteriophage gene expression by enabling RNA polymerase (RNAP) to read through transcription terminators preceding bacteriophage late genes. Q loads onto RNAP engaged in promoter-proximal pausing at a Q binding element (QBE) and adjacent sigma-dependent pause element (SDPE) to yield a Q-loading complex, and Q subsequently translocates with RNAP as a pausing-deficient, termination-deficient Q-loaded complex. Here, we report high-resolution structures of 4 states on the pathway of antitermination by Q from bacteriophage 21 (Q21): Q21, the Q21-QBE complex, the Q21-loading complex, and the Q21-loaded complex. The results show that Q21 forms a torus, a "nozzle," that narrows and extends the RNAP RNA-exit channel, extruding topologically linked single-stranded RNA and preventing the formation of pause and terminator hairpins.

Structural basis of Q-dependent transcription antitermination

Bacteriophage Q protein engages σ-dependent paused RNA polymerase (RNAP) by binding to a DNA site embedded in late gene promoter and renders RNAP resistant to termination signals. Here, we report a single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of an intact Q-engaged arrested complex. The structure reveals key interactions responsible for σ-dependent pause, Q engagement, and Q-mediated transcription antitermination. The structure shows that two Q protomers (Q^I and Q^II) bind to a direct-repeat DNA site and contact distinct elements of the RNA exit channel. Notably, Q^I forms a narrow ring inside the RNA exit channel and renders RNAP resistant to termination signals by prohibiting RNA hairpin formation in the RNA exit channel. Because the RNA exit channel is conserved among all multisubunit RNAPs, it is likely to serve as an important contact site for regulators that modify the elongation properties of RNAP in other organisms, as well.

Bacteriophage Q protein serves as a model regulator for the study of transcription elongation. Here the authors report a cryo-EM structure of an intact Q-engaged arrested complex, revealing the interactions responsible for σ-dependent pause, Q engagement, and Q-mediated transcription antitermination.

Mechanisms of Bacterial Transcription Termination

Bacterial transcription termination, described mostly for Escherichia coli, occurs in three recognized ways: intrinsic termination, an activity only of the core RNAP enzyme and transcript sequences that encode an RNA hairpin and terminal uridine-rich segment; termination by the enzyme Rho, an ATP-dependent RNA translocase that releases RNA by forcing uncharacterized structural changes in the elongating complex; and Mfd-dependent termination, the activity of an ATP-dependent DNA translocase that is thought to dissociate the elongation complex by exerting torque on a stalled RNAP. Intrinsic termination can be described in terms of the nucleic acid movements in the process, whereas the enzymatic mechanisms have been illuminated importantly by definitive structural and biochemical analysis of their activity.

Transcription elongation

This review is focused on recent progress in understanding how Escherichia coli RNAP polymerase translocates along the DNA template and the factors that affect this movement. We discuss the fundamental aspects of RNAP translocation, template signals that influence forward or backward movement, and host or phage factors that modulate translocation.