Rapid formylation of the cellular initiator tRNA population makes a crucial contribution to its exclusive participation at the step of initiation

Genetic analysis of translation initiation in bacteria: An initiator tRNA-centric view

Translation of messenger RNA (mRNA) in bacteria occurs in the steps of initiation, elongation, termination, and ribosome recycling. The initiation step comprises multiple stages and uses a special transfer RNA (tRNA) called initiator tRNA (i-tRNA), which is first aminoacylated and then formylated using methionine and N10 -formyl-tetrahydrofolate (N10 -fTHF), respectively. Both methionine and N10 -fTHF are produced via one-carbon metabolism, linking translation initiation with active cellular metabolism. The fidelity of i-tRNA binding to the ribosomal peptidyl-site (P-site) is attributed to the structural features in its acceptor stem, and the highly conserved three consecutive G-C base pairs (3GC pairs) in the anticodon stem. The acceptor stem region is important in formylation of the amino acid attached to i-tRNA and in its initial binding to the P-site. And, the 3GC pairs are crucial in transiting the i-tRNA through various stages of initiation. We utilized the feature of 3GC pairs to investigate the nuanced layers of scrutiny that ensure fidelity of translation initiation through i-tRNA abundance and its interactions with the components of the translation apparatus. We discuss the importance of i-tRNA in the final stages of ribosome maturation, as also the roles of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence, ribosome heterogeneity, initiation factors, ribosome recycling factor, and coevolution of the translation apparatus in orchestrating a delicate balance between the fidelity of initiation and/or its leakiness to generate proteome plasticity in cells to confer growth fitness advantages in response to the dynamic nutritional states.

Methionyl-tRNA formyltransferase utilizes 10-formyldihydrofolate as an alternative substrate and impacts antifolate drug action

Methionyl-tRNA formyltransferase (Fmt)-mediated formylation of Met-tRNA^fMet to fMet-tRNA^fMet is crucial for efficient initiation of translation in bacteria and the eukaryotic organelles. Folate dehydrogenase-cyclohydrolase (FolD), a bifunctional enzyme, carries out conversion of 5,10-methylene tetrahydrofolate (5,10-CH₂-THF) to 10-formyl-THF (10-CHO-THF), a metabolite utilized by Fmt as a formyl group donor. In this study, using in vivo and in vitro approaches, we show that 10-CHO-DHF may also be utilized by Fmt as an alternative substrate (formyl group donor) to formylate Met-tRNA^fMet. Dihydrofolate (DHF) formed as a by-product in the in vitro assay was verified by LC-MS/MS analysis. FolD-deficient mutants and Fmt over-expressing strains were more sensitive to trimethoprim (TMP) than the ∆fmt strain, suggesting that the domino effect of TMP leads to inhibition of protein synthesis and strain growth. Antifolate treatment to Escherichia coli showed a decrease in the reduced folate species (THF, 5,10-CH₂-THF, 5-CH₃-THF, 5,10-CH⁺-THF and 5-CHO-THF) and increase in the oxidized folate species (folic acid and DHF). In cells, 10-CHO-DHF and 10-CHO-folic acid were enriched in the stationary phase. This suggests that 10-CHO-DHF is a bioactive metabolite in the folate pathway for generating other folate intermediates and fMet-tRNA^fMet.

Regulation of translation by one-carbon metabolism in bacteria and eukaryotic organelles

Protein synthesis is an energetically costly cellular activity. It is therefore important that the process of mRNA translation remains in excellent synchrony with cellular metabolism and its energy reserves. Unregulated translation could lead to the production of incomplete, mistranslated, or misfolded proteins, squandering the energy needed for cellular sustenance and causing cytotoxicity. One-carbon metabolism (OCM), an integral part of cellular intermediary metabolism, produces a number of one-carbon unit intermediates (formyl, methylene, methenyl, methyl). These OCM intermediates are required for the production of amino acids such as methionine and other biomolecules such as purines, thymidylate, and redox regulators. In this review, we discuss how OCM impacts the translation apparatus (composed of ribosome, tRNA, mRNA, and translation factors) and regulates crucial steps in protein synthesis. More specifically, we address how the OCM metabolites regulate the fidelity and rate of translation initiation in bacteria and eukaryotic organelles such as mitochondria. Modulation of the fidelity of translation initiation by OCM opens new avenues to understand alternative translation mechanisms involved in stress tolerance and drug resistance.

Metabolic Flux of N10-Formyltetrahydrofolate Plays a Critical Role in the Fidelity of Translation Initiation in Escherichia coli

One-carbon metabolism produces methionine and N¹⁰-formyl-tetrahydrofolate (N¹⁰-fTHF) required for aminoacylation and formylation of initiator tRNA (i-tRNA), respectively. In Escherichia coli, N¹⁰-fTHF is made from 5, 10-methylene-THF by a two-step reaction using 5,10-methylene-THF dehydrogenase/cyclohydrolase (FolD). The i-tRNAs from all domains of life possess a highly conserved sequence of three consecutive G-C base pairs (3GC pairs) in their anticodon stem. A 3GC mutant i-tRNA (wherein the 3GC pairs are mutated to those found in elongator tRNA^Met) is incompetent in initiation in E. coli (even though it is efficiently aminoacylated and formylated). Here, we show that E. coli strains having mutations in FolD (G122D or C58Y or P140L) allow a plasmid encoded 3GC mutant i-tRNA to participate in initiation. In vitro, the FolD mutants are highly compromised in their dehydrogenase/cyclohydrolase activities leading to reduced production of N¹⁰-fTHF and decreased rates of i-tRNA formylation. The perturbation of one-carbon metabolism by trimethoprim (inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase) phenocopies FolD deficiency and allows initiation with the 3GC mutant i-tRNA. This study reveals an important crosstalk between one-carbon metabolism and the fidelity of translation initiation via formylation of i-tRNA, and suggests that augmentation of the age old sulfa drugs with FolD inhibitors could be an important antibacterial strategy.

Hijacking Translation Initiation for Synthetic Biology

Genetic code expansion (GCE) has revolutionized the field of protein chemistry. Over the past several decades more than 150 different noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs) have been co-translationally installed into proteins within various host organisms. The vast majority of these ncAAs have been incorporated between the start and stop codons within an open reading frame. This requires that the ncAA be able to form a peptide bond at the α-amine, limiting the types of molecules that can be genetically encoded. In contrast, the α-amine of the initiating amino acid is not required for peptide bond formation. Therefore, including the initiator position in GCE allows for co-translational insertion of more diverse molecules that are modified, or completely lacking an α-amine. This review explores various methods which have been used to initiate protein synthesis with diverse molecules both in vitro and in vivo.

The Variety in the Common Theme of Translation Inhibition by Type II Toxin-Antitoxin Systems

Type II Toxin–antitoxin (TA) modules are bacterial operons that encode a toxic protein and its antidote, which form a self-regulating genetic system. Antitoxins put a halter on toxins in many ways that distinguish different types of TA modules. In type II TA modules, toxin and antitoxin are proteins that form a complex which physically sequesters the toxin, thereby preventing its toxic activity. Type II toxins inhibit various cellular processes, however, the translation process appears to be their favorite target and nearly every step of this complex process is inhibited by type II toxins. The structural features, enzymatic activities and target specificities of the different toxin families are discussed. Finally, this review emphasizes that the structural folds presented by these toxins are not restricted to type II TA toxins or to one particular cellular target, and discusses why so many of them evolved to target translation as well as the recent developments regarding the role(s) of these systems in bacterial physiology and evolution.