UNMASC: tumor-only variant calling with unmatched normal controls

Detection of mutant antigen-specific T cell receptors against multiple myeloma for T cell engineering

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable hematological neoplasm. Neoantigen-specific T cell receptor (TCR)-engineered T (TCR-T) cell therapy is a potential alternative treatment. Particularly, TCRs derived from a third-party donor may cover broad ranges of neoantigens, whereas TCRs in patients suffering from immune disorders are limited. However, the efficacy and feasibility of treating MM have not been evaluated thoroughly. In this study, we established a system for identifying immunogenic mutant antigens on MM cells and their corresponding TCRs using healthy donor-derived peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Initially, the immune responses to 35 candidate peptides predicted by the immunogenomic analysis were investigated. Peptide-reactive T lymphocytes were enriched, and subsequently, TCR repertoires were determined by single-cell TCR sequencing. Eleven reconstituted TCRs showed mutation-specific responses against 4 peptides. Particularly, we verified the HLA-A∗24:02-binding QYSPVQATF peptide derived from COASY S55Y as the naturally processed epitope across MM cells, making it a promising immune target. Corresponding TCRs specifically recognized COASY S55Y⁺HLA-A∗24:02⁺ MM cells and augmented tumoricidal activity. Finally, adoptive cell transfer of TCR-T cells showed objective responses in the xenograft model. We initiatively proposed the utility of tumor mutated antigen-specific TCR genes to suppress MM. Our unique strategy will facilitate further identification of neoantigen-specific TCRs.

DeepSom: a CNN-based approach to somatic variant calling in WGS samples without a matched normal

MOTIVATION

Somatic mutations are usually called by analyzing the DNA sequence of a tumor sample in conjunction with a matched normal. However, a matched normal is not always available, for instance, in retrospective analysis or diagnostic settings. For such cases, tumor-only somatic variant calling tools need to be designed. Previously proposed approaches demonstrate inferior performance on whole-genome sequencing (WGS) samples.

RESULTS

We present the convolutional neural network-based approach called DeepSom for detecting somatic single nucleotide polymorphism and short insertion and deletion variants in tumor WGS samples without a matched normal. We validate DeepSom by reporting its performance on five different cancer datasets. We also demonstrate that on WGS samples DeepSom outperforms previously proposed methods for tumor-only somatic variant calling.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

DeepSom is available as a GitHub repository at https://github.com/heiniglab/DeepSom.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Systematic assessment and optimizing algorithm of tumor mutational burden calculation and their implications in clinical decision-making

Tumor mutation burden (TMB) has been validated as a biomarker to predict the response of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment in various cancers. However, the effects of different sequencing platforms, cancer types, and calculation algorithms on TMB as well as its cut-off value for predicting immunotherapy efficacy in the East Asian population still need to be further investigated. In this study, the data of 4126 samples generated by targeted panel sequencing or whole-exome sequencing (WES) in different platforms and public sequencing data from 3680 samples that contained targeted panel sequencing, WES and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) were obtained. The impact of different sequencing platforms and methods on TMB calculation was assessed. No significant bias was found in TMB calculated by different platforms. However, TMB calculated from WGS was significantly lower than those calculated from targeted panel sequencing and WES. The distribution of TMB at different sequencing depths and tumor purity were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the distribution of TMB when the sequencing depth was greater than 500, the tumor purity estimated by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining was between 0.1-1.0 or estimated by next-generation sequencing (NGS) was greater than 0.4. In addition, the somatic-germline-zygosity (SGZ) algorithm was optimized to calculate TMB from tumor-only sequencing samples in the East Asian population. The correlation coefficient of TMB calculated with the optimized SGZ algorithm and paired normal-tumor sequencing is 0.951. Furthermore, the optimal cut-off value of TMB in East Asian lung cancer patients treated with ICIs was determined to be 7 mut/Mb instead of 10 mut/Mb through the ROC curve and Log-rank analysis in the training cohort and validated in the test cohort. Patients with TMB ≥ 7 mut/Mb had better outcomes than patients with TMB<7 mut/Mb. In conclusion, this study systematically analyzed the factors that influenced the TMB calculation and optimized the SGZ algorithm to calculate TMB from tumor-only sequencing samples in the East Asian population. More importantly, the cut-off value of TMB for predicting immunotherapy efficacy was determined to be 7 mut/Mb instead of 10 mut/Mb in East Asian lung cancer patients, which can help in clinical decision-making.

Cancer Neoantigens: Challenges and Future Directions for Prediction, Prioritization, and Validation

Prioritization of immunogenic neoantigens is key to enhancing cancer immunotherapy through the development of personalized vaccines, adoptive T cell therapy, and the prediction of response to immune checkpoint inhibition. Neoantigens are tumor-specific proteins that allow the immune system to recognize and destroy a tumor. Cancer immunotherapies, such as personalized cancer vaccines, adoptive T cell therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibition, rely on an understanding of the patient-specific neoantigen profile in order to guide personalized therapeutic strategies. Genomic approaches to predicting and prioritizing immunogenic neoantigens are rapidly expanding, raising new opportunities to advance these tools and enhance their clinical relevance. Predicting neoantigens requires acquisition of high-quality samples and sequencing data, followed by variant calling and variant annotation. Subsequently, prioritizing which of these neoantigens may elicit a tumor-specific immune response requires application and integration of tools to predict the expression, processing, binding, and recognition potentials of the neoantigen. Finally, improvement of the computational tools is held in constant tension with the availability of datasets with validated immunogenic neoantigens. The goal of this review article is to summarize the current knowledge and limitations in neoantigen prediction, prioritization, and validation and propose future directions that will improve personalized cancer treatment.