Dietary treatment of diabetic nephropathy with chronic renal failure

Supplemented Very Low Protein Diet (sVLPD) in Patients with Advanced Chronic Renal Failure: Clinical and Economic Benefits

The supplemented very low-protein diet (sVLPD) has proven effective in slowing the progression of stage 5 chronic renal failure and postponing the start of the dialysis treatment. However, sVLPD could expose the patient to the risk of malnutrition. This diet is also difficult to implement due to the required intake of large number of keto-analogue/amino acid tablets. In our Center, the Department of Nephrology and Dialysis of Azienda Sanitaria Territoriale n 1, Pesaro-Urbino, of Italy, respecting the guidelines of normal clinical practice, we prescribed sVLPD (0.3 g/prot/day) supplemented with only essential amino acids without the use of ketoanalogues in stage 5 patients and verified its efficacy, safety and clinical and economic effects. Over the 24 months period of observation the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) slowed down (mean eGFR 11.6 ± 3.3 vs. 9.3 ± 2.7 mL/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.001) and the start of the dialysis treatment (adjusted HR = 0.361, CI 0.200-0.650, p = 0.001) was delayed without evidence of malnutrition, in compliant vs. non-compliant patients. This led to a substantial cost reduction for the National Health System. This non-interventional longitudinal observational study is part of standard clinical practice and suggests that VLPD supplemented with essential amino acids could be extensively used to reduce the incidence of dialysis treatments, with a favorable economic impact on the NHS.

Ketoanalogue Supplementation in Patients with Non-Dialysis Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

The effects of supplemental ketoanalogues (KA) in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are not well characterized. Several databases for peer-reviewed articles were systematically searched to identify studies reporting outcomes associated with the effects of a low-protein diet (LPD) or very-low protein diet (VLPD) in combination with supplemental KA in adults with DKD. Meta-analyses were conducted when feasible. Of 213 identified articles, 11 could be included in the systematic review. Meta-analyses for renal outcomes (4 studies examining glomerular filtration rate; 5 studies examining 24-h urinary protein excretion), metabolic outcomes (5 studies examining serum urea; 7 studies examining blood glucose), clinical outcomes (6 studies examining blood pressure; 4 studies examining hemoglobin), and nutritional outcomes (3 studies examining serum albumin; 4 studies examining body weight) were all in favor of KA use in DKD patients. Data from individual studies that examined other related parameters also tended to show favorable effects from KA-supplemented LPD/VLPD. The regimens were safe and well tolerated, with no evidence of adverse effects on nutritional status. In conclusion, LPD/VLPD supplemented with KA could be considered effective and safe for patients with non-dialysis dependent DKD. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these observations.

Diabetic Kidney Disease Benefits from Intensive Low-Protein Diet: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

A dietary protein intake (DPI) of between 0.6 and 0.8 g protein per kilogram body weight per day (g/kg/day) is frequently recommended for adults with moderate-to-advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, evidence on whether patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) actually benefit from a DPI of ≤ 0.8 g/kg/day and from a low-protein diet (LPD) at CKD stages 1-3 has not been consistent. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Knowledge, as well as the bibliographies of articles identified in the search, for eligible randomized controlled trials that had investigated the effects of LPD (prescribed DPI < 0.8 g/kg/day) versus control diet on the progression of DKD. Nine trials that included 506 participants and follow-up periods varying from 4.5 to 60 months were included in the subsequent systematic review and meta-analysis. The data showed that patients with DKD who consumed < 0.8 g protein/kg/day had a significantly reduced decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (mean difference [MD] 22.31 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.19, 27.42; P  < 0.01) and a significant decrease in proteinuria (standard mean difference [SMD] - 2.26 units, 95% CI - 2.99, - 1.52; P  < 0.001) versus those on the control diet. The benefits of LPD to patients with DKD at CKD stages 1-3 were a markedly decreased proteinuria (SMD - 0.96 units, 95% CI - 1.81, - 0.11; P  = 0.03) and slight but significant decreases in glycated hemoglobin (- 0.42%) and cholesterol levels (- 0.22 mmol/L). Our meta-analysis indicated that a DPI of < 0.8 g/kg/day was strongly associated with a slow decline in GFR and decreased proteinuria in the patients with DKD. Patients with CKD stages CKD 1-3 benefited from LPD in terms of a marked decrease of proteinuria and slight but significant improvements in lipid and glucose control.

Low-protein diets for chronic kidney disease patients: the Italian experience

BACKGROUND

Nutritional treatment has always represented a major feature of CKD management. Over the decades, the use of nutritional treatment in CKD patients has been marked by several goals. The first of these include the attainment of metabolic and fluid control together with the prevention and correction of signs, symptoms and complications of advanced CKD. The aim of this first stage is the prevention of malnutrition and a delay in the commencement of dialysis. Subsequently, nutritional manipulations have also been applied in association with other therapeutic interventions in an attempt to control several cardiovascular risk factors associated with CKD and to improve the patient's overall outcome. Over time and in reference to multiple aims, the modalities of nutritional treatment have been focused not only on protein intake but also on other nutrients.

DISCUSSION

This paper describes the pathophysiological basis and rationale of nutritional treatment in CKD and also provides a report on extensive experience in the field of renal diets in Italy, with special attention given to approaches in clinical practice and management. Italian nephrologists have a longstanding tradition in implementing low protein diets in the treatment of CKD patients, with the principle objective of alleviating uremic symptoms, improving nutritional status and also a possibility of slowing down the progression of CKD or delaying the start of dialysis. A renewed interest in this field is based on the aim of implementing a wider nutritional therapy other than only reducing the protein intake, paying careful attention to factors such as energy intake, the quality of proteins and phosphate and sodium intakes, making today's low-protein diet program much more ambitious than previous. The motivation was the reduction in progression of renal insufficiency through reduction of proteinuria, a better control of blood pressure values and also through correction of metabolic acidosis. One major goal of the flexible and innovative Italian approach to the low-protein diet in CKD patients is the improvement of patient adherence, a crucial factor in the successful implementation of a low-protein diet program.

Better preservation of residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients treated with a low-protein diet supplemented with keto acids: a prospective, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

While a low-protein diet may preserve residual renal function (RRF) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients before the start of dialysis, a high-protein intake is usually recommended in dialysis patients to prevent protein-energy wasting. Keto acids, which were often recommended to pre-dialysis CKD patients treated with a low-protein diet, had also been reported to be associated with both RRF and nutrition maintenance. We conducted a randomized trial to test whether a low-protein diet with or without keto acids would be safe and associated with a preserved RRF during peritoneal dialysis (PD).

METHODS

To assess the safety of low protein, we first conducted a nitrogen balance study in 34 incident PD patients randomized to receive in-centre diets containing 1.2, 0.9 or 0.6 g of protein/kg ideal body weight (IBW)/day for 10 days. Second, 60 stable PD patients [RRF 4.04 +/- 2.30 ml/ min/1.73 m(2), urine output 1226 +/- 449 ml/day, aged 53.6 +/- 12.8 years, PD duration 8.8 (1.5-17.8) months] were randomized to receive either a low- (LP: 0.6-0.8 g/kg IBW/day), keto acid-supplemented low- (sLP: 0.6-0.8 g/kg IBW/day with 0.12 g/kg IBW/day of keto acids) or high-protein (HP: 1.0-1.2 g/kg IBW/day) diet. The groups were followed for 1 year and RRF as well as nutritional status was evaluated serially.

RESULTS

A neutral or positive nitrogen balance was achieved in all three groups. RRF remained stable in group sLP (3.84 +/- 2.17 to 3.39 +/- 3.23 ml/min/1.73 m(2), P = ns) while it decreased in group LP (4.02 +/- 2.49 to 2.29 +/- 1.72 ml/min/1.73 m(2), P < 0.05) and HP (4.25 +/- 2.34 to 2.55 +/- 2.29 ml/min/1.73 m(2), P < 0.05). There was no change from baseline on nutritional status in any of the groups during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A diet containing 0.6-0.8 g of protein/kg IBW/day is safe and, when combined with keto acids, is associated with an improved preservation of RRF in relatively new PD patients without significant malnutrition or inflammation.

Effects of dietary protein restriction on albumin and fibrinogen synthesis in macroalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Diabetic nephropathy is associated with hypoalbuminaemia and hyperfibrinogenaemia. A low-protein diet has been recommended in patients with diabetic nephropathy, but its effects on albumin and fibrinogen synthesis are unknown.

METHODS

We compared the effects of a normal (NPD; 1.38 +/- 0.08 g kg(-1) day(-1)) or low (LPD; 0.81 +/- 0.04 g kg(-1) day(-1)) -protein diet on endogenous leucine flux (ELF), albumin and fibrinogen synthesis (L-[5,5,5,-2H3]leucine infusion), and markers of inflammation in nine type 2 diabetic patients with macroalbuminuria. Six healthy participants on NPD served as control participants.

RESULTS

In comparison with healthy participants, type 2 diabetic patients on an NPD had similar ELF, reduced serum albumin (38 +/- 1.1 vs 42 +/- 0.8 g/l; p < 0.05), similar fractional synthesis rates (FSR) and absolute synthesis rates (ASR) of albumin, and both increased plasma fibrinogen concentration [10.7 +/- 0.6 vs 7.2 +/- 0.5 micromol/l (3.64 +/- 0.22 vs 2.45 +/- 0.18 g/l); p < 0.05] and fibrinogen ASR [11.03 +/- 1.17 vs 6.0 +/- 1.8 micromol 1.73 m(-2) day(-1) (3.7 +/- 0.4 vs 1.9 +/- 0.3 g 1.73 m(-2) day(-1)); p < 0.01]. After LPD, type 2 diabetic patients had the following changes in comparison with NPD: reduced proteinuria (2.74 +/- 0.4 vs 4.51 +/- 0.8 g/day; p < 0.05), ELF (1.93 +/- 0.08 vs 2.11 +/- 0.08 micromol kg(-1) min(-1); p < 0.05) and total fibrinogen pool; increased serum albumin (42 +/- 1 vs 38 +/- 1 g/l; p < 0.01) and albumin ASR (14.1 +/- 1 vs 9.9 +/- 1 g 1.73 m(-2) day(-1); p < 0.05); and reduced plasma IL-6 levels, which were correlated with albumin ASR (r = -0.749; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

LPD in type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy reduces low-grade inflammatory state, proteinuria, albuminuria, whole-body proteolysis and ASR of fibrinogen, while increasing albumin FSR, ASR and serum concentration.

Protein restriction for diabetic renal disease

BACKGROUND

Diabetic renal disease (diabetic nephropathy) is a leading cause of end-stage renal failure. Once the process has started, it cannot be reversed by glycaemic control, but progression might be slowed by control of blood pressure and protein restriction.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of dietary protein restriction on the progression of diabetic nephropathy in patients with diabetes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Proceedings, Science Citation Index Expanded and bibliographies of included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and before and after studies of the effects of a modified or restricted protein diet on diabetic renal function in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes following diet for at least four months were considered.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers performed data extraction and evaluation of quality independently. Pooling of results was done by means of random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve studies were included, nine RCTs and three before and after studies. Only one study explored all-cause mortality and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as endpoints. The relative risk (RR) of ESRD or death was 0.23 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.72) for patients assigned to a low protein diet (LPD). Pooling of the seven RCTs in patients with type 1 diabetes resulted in a non-significant reduction in the decline of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 0.1 ml/min/month (95% CI -0.1 to 0.3) in the LPD group. For type 2 diabetes, one trial showed a small insignificant improvement in the rate of decline of GFR in the protein-restricted group and a second found a similar decline in both the intervention and control groups. Actual protein intake in the intervention groups ranged from 0.7 to 1.1 g/kg/day. One study noted malnutrition in the LPD group. We found no data on the effects of LPDs on health-related quality of life and costs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results show that reducing protein intake appears to slightly slow progression to renal failure but not statistically significantly so. However, questions concerning the level of protein intake and compliance remain. Further longer-term research on large representative groups of patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus is necessary. Because of the variability amongst patients, there might perhaps be a six month therapeutic trial of protein restriction in all individuals, with continuation only in those who responded best. Trials are required of different types of protein.

Nutrition therapy for diabetic nephropathy

Human observational studies report no association between protein intakes less than 20% of energy intake and the development of renal disease. With protein intakes greater than 20% of energy intake there is an association between protein with increased albumin excretion rate. Once albuminuria is present, intervention studies suggest a beneficial effect on renal function with a reduction of protein to 0.8 to 1.0 g/kg/d with microalbuminuria and to 0.8 g/kg/d with macroalbuminuria. Restriction of sodium to 2400 mg/d or possibly for some to 2000 mg/d assists in the control of hypertension. In macroalbuminuria, there may be additional benefits in lowering phosphorus intake to 500 to 1000 mg/d. There is no strong evidence to suggest benefit from vegetable or plant proteins over animal protein, but there is evidence for benefit on renal function, glucose, lipids, and blood pressure from weight-maintaining diets meeting guidelines for a healthy diet.

Prevention of diabetic nephropathy in mice by a diet low in glycoxidation products

BACKGROUND

Reactive advanced glycation end products (AGEs), known to promote diabetic tissue damage, occur endogenously as well as in heated foods and are orally absorbed. The relative contribution of diet-derived AGEs to diabetic nephropathy (DN) remains unclear.

METHODS

We tested a standard mouse food (AIN-93G) found to be rich in AGEs (H-AGE diet) in parallel with a similar diet that contained six-fold lower AGE content (L-AGE), but equal calories, macronutrients, and micronutrients. Non-obese diabetic mice (NOD) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and db/db mice with type 2 diabetes (T2D) were randomly assigned to each formula for either 4 or 11 months, during which time renal parameters and AGE levels were assessed.

RESULTS

Compared to the progressive DN and short survival seen in NOD mice exposed to long-term H-AGE feeding, L-AGE-fed NOD mice developed minimal glomerular pathology and a modest increase in urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (p<0.005), and a significantly extended survival (p<0.0001), consistent with lower serum (p<0.025) and kidney AGEs (p<0.01). Also, in the 4-month study, and in contrast to the H-AGE-fed mice, L-AGE-fed NOD and db/db mice exhibited low levels of renal cortex TGF beta-1 (p<0.05), laminin B1 mRNA (p<0.01) and alpha 1 IV collagen mRNA (p<0.05) and protein, in concert with reduced serum and kidney AGEs (p<0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Intake of high-level, food-derived AGEs is a major contributor to DN in T1D and T2D mice. Avoidance of dietary AGEs provides sustained protection against DN in mice; providing the rationale for similar studies in human diabetic patients.

Severe dietary protein restriction in overt diabetic nephropathy: benefits or risks?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether restricting protein intake may delay the progression of chronic renal failure caused by overt diabetic nephropathy and also whether this increases the risk of malnutrition.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial.

SETTING

Nephrology outpatients.

PATIENTS

Sixty-nine patients (32 affected by type 1 and 37 by type 2 diabetes, all treated with insulin) affected by both overt diabetic nephropathy and hypertension.

INTERVENTION

The study was started once hypertension and glycemia had been under control for at least 3 months. Two groups of patients, matched for similar mean glomerular filtration rate value and nutritional status, were studied: a low-protein diet (0.6 g/kg/d) was randomly prescribed to 35 patients, whereas in the other 34 patients a free diet intake was maintained for 12 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Renal function and nutritional status.

RESULTS

The protein intake was significantly different in the 2 groups of patients, whereas the average decline of glomerular filtration rate during the follow-up was comparable. In the low-protein diet group, serum prealbumin concentration significantly decreased after 9 months, whereas serum albumin decreased at the end of the study.

CONCLUSION

Severe dietary protein restriction does not seem to delay the progression of renal disease in patients with overt diabetic nephropathy, whereas it may induce malnutrition.

Higher intakes of fish protein are related to a lower risk of microalbuminuria in young Swedish type 1 diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

To examine the influence of dietary intake from various protein and fat sources on the occurrence of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetic patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this nested case control study, 1,150 patients with diabetes duration >5 years reported dietary habits for the previous 12 months and submitted urinary samples for the analysis of albumin excretion rate (AER). A total of 75 cases of albuminuria (overnight AER > or = 15 microg/min) were identified and compared with 225 duration-matched control subjects.

RESULTS

Neither mean protein, fat intake, average fish protein intake (control subjects 4.56 +/- 3.83 g/day and cases 3.82 +/- 2.87 g/day; P = 0.12), nor intake of meat and vegetable protein differed between the cases of albuminuria and the control subjects. High consumers of fish protein (greater than the 75th percentile) (12 cases and 63 control subjects, mean intake 9.35 g fish protein/day, i.e., approximately 53 g fish/day) had lower odds ratios (ORs) for microalbuminuria than individuals consuming less fish protein (mean 2.72 g/day) (crude OR 0.49 and 95% CI 0.25-0.97). When adjusted for known confounding factors, such as HbA1c, mean arterial pressure, diabetes duration, age, sex, smoking, BMI, country region, and total energy, individuals with a high intake of fish protein and fish fat showed a reduction in the risk for microalbuminuria (OR 0.22 and 0.31, respectively; 95% CI 0.09-0.56 and 0.13-0.76, respectively). When fish protein and fat were adjusted for each other, a high intake of fish protein but not of fish fat was still significantly associated with a decrease in the risk for microalbuminuria.

CONCLUSIONS

Total protein and fat intake were not associated with the presence of microalbuminuria, but a diet including a high amount of fish protein seemed to lessen the risk.

Treatment of advanced renal failure: low-protein diets or timely initiation of dialysis?

Until 1996, no guidelines existed for the initiation of dialysis in patients with progressive renal failure. The publication of the National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines has generated a debate on the management of advanced renal failure and the role of low-protein diets (LPDs). We performed a review of the literature to identify articles on the initiation of dialysis and LPDs, particularly those since 1996. Delayed referral of patients is widespread in both the United States and Europe, and almost 25% of patients are started on dialysis at a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of <5 mL/min/1.73 m2. There is a high prevalence of malnutrition at the time of first dialysis, which progressively improves upon initiation of dialysis. There is no evidence regarding the efficacy or safety of LPDs in nondiabetic patients younger than 70 years old [approximately 40% of U.S. incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients] and in diabetics with GFR <25 mL/min/1.73 m2 (>40% of incident U.S. ESRD). In nondiabetics who are younger than 70 years old, adherence to LPD for four to five years can be estimated to result in a delay in dialysis by 6 to 11 months. However, suboptimal energy intake is widespread in advanced renal failure, which declines further upon institution of LPD. Even nutritionally sound patients develop subclinical nutritional decline despite intense counseling. There are no data on the efficacy or safety of LPD in subgroups that constitute approximately 80% of incident ESRD patients. Concerns still exist regarding their nutritional safety in the remainder. Initiation of dialysis results in improved nutritional status and should be considered in a timely fashion.