Anaphylactic reaction during haemodialysis on AN69 membrane in a patient receiving angiotensin II receptor antagonist

Heparin-induced anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions: two distinct but overlapping syndromes

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions are of increasing clinical and scientific interest, particularly given the recent identification of a syndrome of heparin-induced anaphylaxis due to oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS), a contaminant in certain heparin preparations. However, heparin-induced anaphylactoid reactions also have been reported to be a consequence of immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the clinical features and pathophysiology of two distinct disorders, HIT-associated anaphylactoid reactions as well as anaphylaxis resulting from OSCS-contaminated heparin.

METHODS

We review literature describing these two types of heparin-induced anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions, and seek potential pathophysiologic links between them.

RESULTS

Intravenous bolus heparin administered to patients with circulating 'HIT antibodies', usually as a result of recent heparin therapy, can produce anaphylactoid reactions, probably as a consequence of in vivo activation of platelets and, possibly, leukocytes. Affected patients often evince fever/chills, hypertension and/or acute respiratory compromise ('pseudo-pulmonary embolism'). In contrast, heparin-induced anaphylaxis is caused by activation of the contact system, with formation of vasoactive kinins (bradykinin, des-arg(9)-bradykinin). This latter syndrome has been linked in an epidemic form to administration of OSCS-contaminated heparin; these reactions feature prominent hypotension and laryngeal edema. Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk for both syndromes. There is evidence that OSCS-contaminated heparin itself increases the risk of HIT compared with non-contaminated heparin.

CONCLUSION

Two distinct syndromes of heparin-induced anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions exist. These seem to share certain epidemiologic features, given that OSCS-contaminated heparin can produce anaphylaxis through contact system activation but also could increase risk of HIT and HIT-associated anaphylactoid reactions.

Haemodialysis-associated anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions

Anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions related to haemodialysis have been increasingly described for almost 3 decades. The majority of these cases used to occur with ethylene oxide sterilized, and complement-activating cellulose membranes. However, a considerable number of publications have focused on polyacrylonitrile AN69 high flux membranes, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and iron as other important causes of potentially severe haemodialysis-related anaphylactoid reactions. Clinical manifestations vary considerably and generally do not allow differentiation between IgE-mediated anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions (e.g. from nonspecific mediator release). Successful management of these patients requires multidisciplinary approach and involves prompt recognition and treatment by the attending physician, and identification of the offending agent(s) with subsequent avoidance of the incriminated compound(s). This review focuses on some major causes of anaphylactoid and anaphylactic reactions during haemodialysis. Special consideration is given to the therapeutic and diagnostic approach.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of angiotensin-receptor blockers in end-stage renal disease

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and more recently angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) have become popular therapies in the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient. The ability of either of these drug classes to reduce blood pressure in the ESRD patient is well accepted; however, there is considerably less information available to guide the clinician in the safe and effective use of these drugs in the ESRD patient with congestive heart failure and/or coronary artery disease. Head-to-head studies in the ESRD patient are lacking for both drug classes. Several pharmacokinetic factors can influence the selection of these drugs, including dialysability and the propensity for systemic accumulation. ACE inhibitors (ACE-Is) and ARBs are recognised as having a range of nonpressor effects that are pertinent to patients with ESRD. Such effects include their ability to decrease both thirst drive and erythropoiesis. These drug classes, though, are distinguishable by the unique adverse effect profile for ACE-Is. As is the case in patients without renal failure, ESRD patients can experience cough and, less frequently, angioneurotic oedema with ACE-Is. In the ESRD population, so-called anaphylactoid dialyser reactions can occur in conjunction with ACE-I use. The use of a drug from within the ARB class carries both less risk and permits a compound with a preferred pharmacokinetic profile limited dialysability and minimal systemic accumulation to be administered. These attributes would favour the increased use of ARBs in this population.