Cyclosporin in primary haploidentical live-donor kidney transplantation: is it worthwhile?

Failure of cyclosporin a to rescue peripheral nerve allografts in acute rejection

Prevention and control of graft rejection remain essential in the investigation of peripheral nerve allotransplantation. Although use of cyclosporin A (CsA) has been shown to suppress successfully the rejection of nerve allografts, limited information exists concerning use of this drug to arrest rejection in progress, and thereby effect salvage of these grafts. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of CsA in the treatment of ongoing acute rejection of peripheral nerve allografts. Buffalo rats received posterior tibial nerve grafts from either Lewis or Buffalo donor animals and were divided into five groups: group 1 received isografts and no CsA treatment (n = 8), group 2 received allografts with continuous CsA therapy (n = 10), group 3 received allografts with no treatment (n = 7), group 4 received allografts with initiation of CsA therapy delayed until 3 weeks after the procedure (n = 11), and group 5 received allografts with an interrupted course of CsA (n = 15). All grafts were harvested at 10 weeks. Histomorphometric analysis demonstrated comparable nerve regeneration in groups 1 and 2 and good regeneration in group 3 animals, despite cellular infiltrate suggestive of rejection. At 3 weeks after surgery, group 4 animals showed early rejection and significantly less neuroregeneration than positive controls at 10 weeks after delayed initiation of CsA therapy. Finally, group 5 animals showed early regeneration at 3 weeks but significantly lesser regeneration by 10 weeks after interruption of therapy. In this experimental protocol, CsA was ineffective in rescuing histologically proven rejection in progress.

Cyclosporin A withdrawal in live related renal transplantation: long-term results

Cyclosporin A (CsA) withdrawal after 1 yr of stable graft function has been shown to be beneficial in cadaveric renal transplantation. This strategy could be even more suitable for 'immunologically advantaged' grafts as in live related renal transplantation. We report the long-term outcome of patients in a live related transplantation programme undergoing early (between 1989 and 1992) and late (1993 onwards) CsA withdrawal as compared with those on long-term low dose CsA (1993 onwards). Two-hundred and fifty-two patients were divided into three groups based on the following immunosuppressive protocol: group ECyW (n=99), early CsA withdrawal (9 months after transplantation); group LCyW (n=44), late CsA withdrawal (median 16 months, range 13--22 months after transplantation); and group LDCy (n=109), long-term low dose CsA. The median period of follow-up was 66 months after transplantation (range 43--84 months). There was no difference in the actuarial 6-yr patient or graft survival among the three groups. Acute rejection episodes were more frequent in ECyW (54.4%) than in LDCy (31.8%) and LCyW (23.8%) (p=0.001). The risk of developing late (> or =9 months) acute rejection was highest in ECyW 32/99 (32.3%) as compared with LCyW 8/44 (18.4%; p=0.08) and LDCy 8/109 (7.3%; p=0.0001). Of the 32 ECyW patients who developed acute rejection episodes after CsA withdrawal, 13 (40.6%) lost their grafts either due to uncontrolled acute rejection or to chronic rejection. Chronic rejection was higher in ECyW (24%) than in LCyW (11%; p=0.04) and LDCy (17%; p=0.17). Antihypertensive requirement was highest in patients maintained on low dose CsA. Graft function, as measured by serum creatinine levels, was significantly better in LCyW (1.24+/-0.4 mg%) as compared with ECyW (1.49+/-0.5 mg%) and LDCy (1.48+/-0.6 mg%). Early CsA withdrawal after live related renal transplantation is associated with a significant risk of acute rejection and subsequent chronic rejection. Slow withdrawal after 1 yr is safe and more economical than the long-term administration of low dose CsA.