Intermittent saline flushes during haemodialysis do not alleviate coagulation and clot formation in stable patients receiving reduced doses of dalteparin

Micro-vibration assisted dual-layer spiral microneedles to rapidly extract dermal interstitial fluid for minimally invasive detection of glucose

Various hydrogels have been explored to create minimally invasive microneedles (MNs) to extract interstitial fluid (ISF). However, current methods are time-consuming and typically require 10-15 min to extract 3-5 mg of ISF. This study introduces two spiral-shaped swellable MN arrays: one made of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and the other incorporating a combination of PVA, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and hyaluronic acid (HA) for fast ISF extraction. These MN arrays demonstrated a rapid swelling ratio of 560 ± 79.6% and 370 ± 34.1% in artificial ISF within 10 min, respectively. Additionally, this study proposes a novel method that combines MNs with a custom-designed Arduino-based applicator vibrating at frequency ranges (50-100 Hz) to improve skin penetration efficiency, thereby enhancing the uptake of ISF in ex vivo. This dynamic combination enables GelMA/PVA MNs to rapidly uptake 6.41 ± 1.01 mg of ISF in just 5 min, while PVA/PVP/HA MNs extract 5.38 ± 0.77 mg of ISF within the same timeframe. To validate the capability of the MNs to recover glucose as the target biomarker, a mild heating procedure is used, followed by determining glucose concentration using a D-glucose content assay kit. The efficient extraction of ISF and glucose detection capabilities of the spiral MNs suggest their potential for rapid and minimally invasive biomarker sensing.

Calcium-Free Dialysate Hemodialysis: A Simplified Approach

Intermittent hemodialysis (HD) in high-bleeding-risk patients presents a challenge as circuit anticoagulation using heparin is contraindicated in such cases. Recently, the use of calcium-free citrate-containing dialysate with calcium supplementation emerged as a viable alternative to heparin-circuit anticoagulation. This is a retrospective, monocentric study to evaluate dialysis efficacy using calcium-free citrate-containing dialysate with calcium reinjection into the venous line in hemodialysis patients at risk of bleeding. A total of 53 patients were analyzed: 52 had a temporary contraindication to systemic anticoagulation (active bleeding or surgical intervention), and 1 chronic HD patient had prolonged bleeding time due to inoperable arteriovenous fistula stenosis. Only 7 out of 79 dialysis sessions performed were prematurely terminated (vascular access dysfunction). The median dialysis time was 240 min (range: 150-300). The chronic dialysis patient had 108 sessions with no premature termination. Frequent monitoring of ionized calcium was performed throughout the dialysis sessions: levels remained stable at T0 and T + 60 min (1.08 ± 0.08 mmol/L) and slightly increased at the end of the dialysis session (1.19 ± 0.13 mmol/L), remaining within normal limits. Target postfilter ionized calcium <0.4 mmol/L was achieved in all sessions (0.31 ± 0.07 mmol/L). There were no cases of symptomatic hypo-/hypercalcemia and no need for calcium infusion rate adjustment throughout the sessions. Hemodialysis with calcium-free citrate-containing dialysate and calcium reinjection into the venous line is efficient and safe in HD patients with contraindications to systemic anticoagulation.

How biocompatible haemodialysers can conquer the need for systemic anticoagulation even in post-dilution haemodiafiltration: a cross-over study

Background

While systemic anticoagulation is most widely used in haemodialysis (HD), contraindications to its use might occur in particular settings. The Solacea^™ haemodialyser with an asymmetric triacetate membrane claims improved biocompatibility and has already shown promising results when used in combination with only half dose of anticoagulation. To quantify the performance of the Solacea^™ when further decreasing anticoagulation to zero, fibre blocking was assessed by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).

Methods

Ten maintenance HD patients underwent six dialysis sessions at midweek using a Solacea^™ 19H dialyser, consecutively in pre-dilution haemodiafiltration (pre-HDF), HD and post-dilution HDF (post-HDF). After the first three sessions with only a quarter of their regular anticoagulation dose (one-quarter), the last three sessions were performed without anticoagulation (zero). Dialyser fibre blocking was quantified in the dialyser outlet potting using a 3D micro-CT scanning technique post-dialysis.

Results

Even in case of reduced (one-quarter) anticoagulation, the relative number of open fibres post-dialysis was almost optimal, i.e. 0.96 (0.87-0.99) with pre-HDF, 0.99 (0.97-0.99) with HD and 0.97 (0.92-0.99) with post-HDF. Fibre patency was mildly decreased for pre-HDF and HD when anticoagulation was decreased from one-quarter to zero, i.e. to 0.76 (0.61-0.85) with pre-HDF (P = 0.004) and to 0.80 (0.77-0.89) with HD (P = 0.013). Comparing the results for zero anticoagulation, post-HDF [i.e. 0.94 (0.82-0.97)] performed as well as HD and pre-HDF.

Conclusions

The Solacea^™ dialyser provides promising results for use in conditions where systemic anticoagulation is contraindicated. Post-HDF, although inducing haemoconcentration in the dialyser, is equally effective for fibre patency in case of zero anticoagulation as pre-HDF and HD when using Solacea^™.

Hemodialysis without anticoagulation: Less clotting in conventional hemodialysis than in predilution hemodiafiltration

INTRODUCTION

Hemodialysis patients with contraindication to systemic anticoagulation require a heparin-free hemodialysis technique. Among several alternatives to heparin, predilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) is often used, albeit without any confirmation of its effectiveness.

METHODS

Patients hospitalized in a nephrology ICU and hemodialysed for stage 5 CKD or AKI and with contraindication to systemic anticoagulation were randomized to either standard HD with a polysulfone membrane, or to predilution HDF with the same membrane. Coagulation activation was evaluated clinically by the need for premature termination and by the measurement of D-dimers.

FINDINGS

Two hundred dialysis sessions were performed in 155 patients. Survival curves showed better circuit survival in HD (P = 0.046). In HD, 12% of sessions were interrupted for coagulation versus 23% in predilution HDF (P = 0.04).

DISCUSSION

Predilution HDF was associated with more premature clotting than conventional HD without improvement in dialysis duration or performance epuration indices. When aiming for a 4-hour duration session, conventional heparin-free hemodialysis can be safely proposed in most patients with high bleeding risk.

Heparin-free renal replacement therapy for chronic hemodialyzed patients at high risk for bleeding: a comparison of on-line predilution hemodiafiltration with conventional hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

In chronic hemodialysis patients with high risk of bleeding, optimal anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit is challenging. Heparin-free hemodialysis (HD) with heparin-coated AN69ST dialyzer is now considered as a good option and recommended by experts. Predilutional hemodiafiltration (HDF) may represent also a feasible alternative but has been poorly investigated. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the performance of on-line automated predilution heparin-free HDF as compared to conventional heparin-free HD with a heparin-coated membrane.

METHODS

We prospectively studied chronic hemodialysis patients at high risk of bleeding consecutively admitted to hospital who underwent heparin-free renal replacement therapy (RRT) in our nephrology department. During 1 year, we routinely used heparin-free HD and on-line HDF in these settings. By using a propensity score, we compared HDF to HD regarding to session failure and efficiency.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-nine patients were included in the study. Clotting phenomena necessitating premature termination of RRT sessions were encountered in 19% of them. After propensity score matching, the comparison of 77 HD and 77 HDF sessions showed no significant differences in duration of the sessions and in dialyzer clotting. By multivariate analysis, a blood flow less than 250 mL/min and recent surgery were the only parameters associated with extracorporeal circuit thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

Heparin-free on-line predilutional HDF is a safe and effective technique for chronic hemodialysis patients with increased bleeding risk. The use of an automatic substitution volume that avoids filters hemoconcentration and of a blood flow above 250 mL/min strongly contribute to the observed performance. Further studies are, however, intended to confirm these results.

Vitamin E-Coated and Heparin-Coated Dialyzer Membranes for Heparin-Free Hemodialysis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Trial

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis requires effective anticoagulation to avoid blood circuit clotting. In patients at high risk for bleeding, several alternative methods have been developed.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective, randomized, crossover study evaluating the noninferiority of vitamin E-coated compared with heparin-coated dialyzers in a 4-hour heparin-free hemodialysis strategy.

SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS

32 adult long-term hemodialysis patients from 2 French hemodialysis units with well-functioning fistulas or double-lumen catheters.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly allocated to a first period using either vitamin E- or heparin-coated dialyzers. After a washout period of 2 hemodialysis sessions, each patient was switched to the alternative dialyzer for a second period. Each study period started with 2 hemodialysis sessions with reduced heparin dose (50% and 25% of usual heparin dose, respectively, for sessions 1 and 2) followed by 2 heparin-free sessions.

OUTCOMES

The primary end point was the percentage of successful study periods, defined as no circuit-clotting event leading to premature interruption of any of the 4 dialysis sessions. Secondary end points included total number and cumulative duration of hemodialysis sessions without clotting, number of saline solution flushes, dialysis circuit bubble trap status and dialyzer membrane status by visual inspection, and dialysis adequacy.

RESULTS

The percentage of success with vitamin E-coated dialyzers (25/32 study periods [78%]) was not inferior to that with heparin-coated dialyzers (26/32 study periods [81%]). Visual inspection showed equal numbers of clean dialysis circuit bubble traps (vitamin E-coated, 34/121; heparin-coated, 32/120), whereas clean fiber bundles were more frequently noted with the vitamin E-coated compared with heparin-coated dialyzers (25/121 vs 2/120; P=0.002).

LIMITATIONS

Results may not extrapolate to critically ill patients. Differences in dialyzer transparency may account for visual inspection scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The success rate of 4-hour heparin-free hemodialysis sessions is lower than that previously claimed in uncontrolled studies. Vitamin E-coated and heparin-coated dialyzers exposed patients to similar and unacceptable high failure rates. Further studies are required to improve heparin-free hemodialysis.

Regional citrate anticoagulation in hemodialysis: an observational study of safety, efficacy, and effect on calcium balance during routine care

BACKGROUND

Regional citrate hemodialysis anticoagulation is used when heparin is contraindicated, but most protocols require large infusions of calcium and frequent intradialytic plasma ionized calcium measurements.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine the safety, efficacy, and effect on calcium balance of regional citrate anticoagulation using sparse plasma ionized calcium sampling.

DESIGN

The design of this study was observational.

SETTING

The setting of this study was the hospital hemodialysis center.

PATIENTS

The subjects of this study were the hospital hemodialysis patients.

MEASUREMENTS

Dialysate calcium concentration by atomic absorption spectroscopy and total dialysate weight were used as measurements.

METHODS

Regional citrate anticoagulation was introduced using zero calcium dialysate, pre-dialyzer citrate infusion, and post-dialyzer calcium infusion. Infusions were adjusted based on pre- and post-dialyzer calcium measurements obtained at least twice during a 4-h dialysis. The protocol was simplified after the first 357 sessions to dispense with post-dialyzer calcium measurements. Heparin-anticoagulated sessions were performed using acetate-acidified 1.25 mmol/L calcium or citrate-acidified 1.5 mmol/L calcium dialysate. Calcium balance assessment was by complete dialysate recovery. Safety and efficacy were assessed prospectively using a point-of-care database to record ionized calcium and clinical events. Groups were compared using t test, ANOVA, Wilcoxon rank sum, or Kruskal-Wallis as appropriate.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients received regional citrate-anticoagulated dialysis over 1051 dialysis sessions. Of these, 357 dialysis sessions were performed using the original citrate anticoagulation protocol and 694 using the simplified protocol. Dialysis was effective and safe. Only 3 dialyzers clotted; 1 patient suffered symptomatic hypercalcemia and none suffered symptomatic hypocalcemia. Calcium balance was assessed in 15 regional citrate-anticoagulated dialysis sessions and 30 heparin-anticoagulated sessions. The median calcium loss was 0.8 mmol/h dialyzed in both groups (p = 0.43), and end of treatment ionized calcium was the same in both groups (1.07 ± 0.04 mmol/L).

LIMITATIONS

Our findings for calcium balance, efficacy, and safety are valid only for the protocol studied, which excluded patient with severe liver dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional citrate dialysis can be performed safely and effectively using a sparse plasma calcium sampling protocol. The calcium balance induced by this protocol is not different to that seen in standard heparin-anticoagulated dialysis, but in the absence of prospective studies, it is unknown whether this is optimal for patient care.

The effect of citrate dialysate on intradialytic heparin dose in haemodialysis patients: study design of a randomised controlled trial

Background

Unfractionated heparin is the most common anticoagulant used in haemodialysis (HD), although it has many potential adverse effects. Citrate dialysate (CD) has an anticoagulant effect which may allow reduction in cumulative heparin dose (CHD) compared to standard acetate dialysate (AD).

Methods

This double-blinded, randomised, cross-over trial of chronic haemodialysis patients determines if CD allows reduction in CHD during HD compared with AD. After enrolment, intradialytic heparin is minimised during a two-week run-in period using a standardised protocol based on a visual clotting score. Patients still requiring intradialytic heparin after the run-in period are randomised to two weeks of HD with AD followed by two weeks of CD (Sequence 1) or two weeks of HD with CD followed by two weeks of AD (Sequence 2). The primary outcome is the change in CHD with CD compared with AD. Secondary outcomes include metabolic and haemodynamic parameters, and dialysis adequacy.

Discussion

This randomised controlled trial will determine the impact of CD compared with AD on CHD during HD.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01466959

Heparin and Albumin as Part of the Priming Solution Limits Exposure to Anticoagulation during Hemodialysis: In Vitro Studies

Background

Hemodialysis patients who are subject to increased risk of hemorrhage may need specific dialysis regimes to avoid bleeding. The aim of this study was to determine in vitro which of various anticoagulation options were most beneficial.

Materials and Method

60 in vitro hemodialyses (HD) were performed in parallel using blood from healthy donors. The dialysis circuits were rinsed with either 1 L of 0.9% NaCl alone (n = 6), or with 1 L saline and the addition of either 5 mL 20% albumin (Alb, n = 6), 5,000 U of heparin (Hep, n = 6), Hep and Alb in combination (HA, n = 30), 20,000 U of Hep and Alb (4H-A, n = 6), and finally Hep and 20 mL 20% albumin (H-4A, n = 6). The blood was recirculated for a maximum of 192 min. Clotting was graded.

Results

A 192 min dialysis was completed with all series of HA, 4H-A, and H-4A, all with a slight grade of clotting. In contrast to the above settings (p = 0.002, Fisher's test), a total clotting of the dialysis circuit occurred for all series using the NaCl rinsing alone (median time to stop: 21, range: 18–27 min, p = 0.026 compared to the HA setting) and for the Alb rinsing (median 26, range: 19–35 min, p = 0.028).

Conclusions

Priming using HA, Hep, 4H-A, and H-4A reduced clotting and allowed 192 min of HD. Clinical studies need to confirm these data in vivo.

Hemodialysis without systemic anticoagulation: a prospective randomized trial to evaluate 3 strategies in patients at risk of bleeding

Objective

In this clinical trial, we aimed to compare three means of performing chronic hemodialysis in patients with contra-indication to systemic heparinization.

Methods

This open-label monocentric randomized « n-of-one » trial, conducted in a single tertiary care center, recruited chronic hemodialysis patients with a contra-indication to systemic heparinization for at least 3 consecutive sessions. All patients underwent hemodialysis with an AN69ST dialyzer, and were administered three alternative dialysis procedures in a random sequence: intermittent saline flushes, constant saline infusion, or pre-dialysis heparin coating of the membrane. The primary outcome was the need to interrupt the dialysis session because of clotting events due to either (i) a complete coagulation of the circuit; (ii) a partial coagulation of the circuit; (iii) a>50% rise over baseline in the venous pressure.

Results

At the end of the inclusion period (May, 2007 to December, 2008), the number of patients to include (n = 75) was not reached: only 46 patients were included and underwent randomization. The study was terminated, and statistical analysis took into account 224 hemodialysis sessions performed in 44 patients with analyzable data. Heparin adsorption was associated with a significant reduction of the need to interrupt the dialysis session because of clotting events: odds ratio 0.3 (CI 95% 0.2 to 0.6; p<0.001, versus intermittent saline flushes). Heparin adsorption was also associated with higher odds for performing >3 h dialysis sessions and for having complete blood restitution. There were no significant effects of the dialysis procedure on weight loss, online ionic dialysance, and adverse events.

Conclusion

Heparin-coated AN69ST dialysis membrane is a safe and effective method to avoid or delay per-dialytic clotting events in patients with contra-indication to systemic anticoagulation. However, results are not generalizable safely to patients with active bleeding, since weak heparinemia, not assessed in this study, may occur.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00473109.

Intermittent saline flushes or continuous saline infusion: what works better when heparin-free dialysis is recommended?

Introduction

Coagulation-free dialysis, also commonly known as “heparin-free” dialysis, can be a challenging procedure as it increases the risk of clotting the dialysis circuit. Utilizing a better saline flushing technique can lead to improved patient outcomes as well as huge financial benefits to the health institution. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of continuous saline infusion (CSI) and intermittent saline flushing (ISF) in preventing clotting of the dialysis extracorporeal circuit (ECC).

Methods

Fifty heparin-free treatments were randomized into two treatment arms, namely CSI and ISF. Predialysis full blood count and coagulation studies were performed for all patients. During ISF, 100 mL saline was infused via the arterial line every 30 minutes while occluding the blood inlet line. Normal saline was infused into the ECC at a rate of 200 mL/hour throughout the duration of dialysis under CSI. The ECC was inspected for clotting and graded accordingly post-dialysis.

Results

Seventy-six percent of the CSI treatments were completed without losing the ECC while 52% of the ISF treatments were also successful. Patients who were treated with CSI were less likely to have clotted ECCs (odds ratio 3.4, 95% CI, 1.04 to 11.2; P = 0.04). No significant differences existed between the two groups’ hematological factors that could influence clotting, such as hemoglobin and platelets.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that, when heparin-free dialysis is indicated, CSI might be a better method of preventing the ECC from clotting. There is a greater chance of realizing long-term benefits to patients and the health service with the CSI method since there is a likelihood of a reduction in the use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents and blood transfusions with the CSI method.

Variations in the Circulating Heparin Levels During Maintenance Hemodialysis in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease

Unfractionated heparin has remained the anticoagulant of choice in patients undergoing hemodialysis. However, wide variations in the heparinization responses have been observed in patients anticoagulated with this drug. The purpose of this investigation was to measure circulating heparin levels in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) prior to and after maintenance hemodialysis. This study included 119 patients with ESRD undergoing maintenance hemodialysis who received heparin during dialysis. Citrated blood samples were collected prior to and immediately after the dialysis session and analyzed utilizing clot-based methods such as activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), Heptest, and prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT). Circulating anti-Xa levels, antithrombin III levels, and thrombin generation (TG) were also measured. The circulating heparin levels ranged from 0 to 1.08 IU/mL with a mean of 0.07 ± 0.11 for the APTT and a range of 0 to 1.98 for the Heptest with a mean of 0.09 ± 0.26 U/mL. There was no significant difference in circulating levels of heparin between pre- and post-hemodialysis samples using APTT, Heptest, and PiCT, whereas the TG and anti-Xa tests showed a statistically significant P value <0.05 when comparing the 2 groups. The presence of detectable levels of heparin in the predialysis plasma samples for almost two-thirds (87 of 119) of the patients suggests that residual heparin circulates in these patients for a longer period of time. In all, 5% of postdialysis samples, 6 of 119, contained >0.25 U/mL of heparin, which may be related to a central catheter vascular access flushed with heparin. These findings suggest that patients on maintenance hemodialysis may accumulate a detectable amount of heparin due to the decreased renal clearance.

[Predilution online hemodiafiltration: which dose of anticoagulation?]

INTRODUCTION

Patients in end stage renal disease on hemodialysis are in higher risk of bleeding related to the anticoagulation used during a session, so only the lowest effective dose of anticoagulation must be used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of predilution in hemodiafiltration with reduced dose of anticoagulation compared to hemodialysis in preventing coagulation of circuits.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in stable hemodialysis patients without high bleeding risk. All patients were treated by two different treatments: (A) conventional hemodialysis, (B) predilution hemodiafiltration with the half dose of anticoagulation used during treatment (A). Other confounding parameters were kept constant during the study. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major thrombotic events judged on a subjective visual score.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included (105 sessions for each treatment). Major incidents are occurring more frequently in predilution hemodiafiltration with reduced dose of anticoagulation (P=0.03). The premature discontinuation of sessions was more frequent in predilution hemodiafiltration, this difference was not significant (P=0.07). Duration of sessions was significantly shorter in predilution hemodiafiltration (P=0.03). The higher frequency of thrombotic events in predilution hemodiafiltration has no effect on net ultrafiltration volume achieved in both treatments.

CONCLUSION

Predilution hemodiafiltration with a lower dose of anticoagulation did not prevent major clotting of extracorporeal circuit manner at least equivalent to a reference method.

Hemodialysis without heparin: a randomized, controlled, crossover study of two dialysis membranes (AN69ST and polysulfone F60)

PURPOSE

It has been suggested that clotting of the extracorporeal circuit during hemodialysis (HD) without heparin could be reduced by using the polyacrylonitrile AN69ST membrane. However, this has never been demonstrated in a controlled study. The objective of this study was to compare the AN69ST with a polysulfone membrane during HD without heparin in a controlled study.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, crossover study. Each patient had two 3-h test sessions without heparin, one with polysulfone F60 (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany), and the other with AN69ST (Hospal-Gambro, Meyzieu, France). The extracorporeal circuit was pre-rinsed with saline containing unfractionated heparin. The order of the test sessions was randomized. The test sessions were performed one week apart, during the midweek day. The participants were stable HD patients without bleeding risk. The measurements were the number of sessions with partial or complete circuit clotting.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included in the study. The number of sessions interrupted for circuit clotting was 8 (15%) with AN69ST, and 10 (19%) with polysulfone (p=0.60). Complete circuit clotting occurred in 3 (6%) sessions with the two dialyzers. Partial circuit clotting manifested by a persistent increase in venous pressure occurred in 5 (9%) sessions with AN69ST, and in 7 (13%) sessions with polysulfone (p=0.54). Mean urea reduction ratio was 62±7% for AN69ST, and 63±7% for polysulfone (p=0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

The AN69ST membrane did not decrease the rate of circuit clotting during HD without heparin compared to the polysulfone F60 membrane.

Unfractionated heparin for hemodialysis: still the best option

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the anticoagulant of choice for most maintenance hemodialysis units in the United States. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is the norm in Western Europe, but is not approved for this indication in the United States. UFH is likely to remain the agent of choice in the United States because of its relative ease of use, safety, and low cost. Coating tubing and dialyzers with heparin is now possible, but systemic anticoagulation with heparin is usually still required. The additional cost of this innovation does not yet justify its use. Side effects of both UFH and LMWH include heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hyperkalemia. It is uncertain whether osteoporosis is an important side effect, as vitamin D deficiency, secondary hyperparathyroidism, age, and debility are confounding factors. When UFH poses a risk or its use is contraindicated, e.g., after development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, the use of direct thrombin inhibitors, regional citrate anticoagulation, citrate dialysate, and heparin-free dialysis may be appropriate.

Monitoring of low molecular weight heparin anticoagulation during haemodialysis with a Sonoclot Analyzer

OBJECTIVES

Sonoclot was used in this study to monitor low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) during haemodialysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two different intravenous doses (standard / half-dose) of dalteparin were studied in eight patients. Blood was sampled for coagulation analyses with Sonoclot, thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) and anti-Xa. A visual fibrin deposition score (VFS) in the venous drip chamber was also evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients completed their dialysis. There was a progressive increase in TAT levels, which correlated to the dalteparin dose. Significant differences (p<0.05) were found for TAT, VFS and Sonoclot celite-activated clotting time (SonACT) between the different LMWH dosages. TAT and Sonoclot correlated to each other, but not to the VFS. SonACT was significantly increased at two hours, with the high dalteparin dose compared to the lower dose.

CONCLUSION

Both Sonoclot and TAT failed to predict the VFS. No patient had any clinical clotting events and all dialyses were completed successfully.

Low Dose of Argatroban Saline Flushes Anticoagulation in Hemodialysis Patients With High Risk of Bleeding

Background: Anticoagulation in hemodialysis (HD) patients with high risk of bleeding is still an intractable problem. Method: A total of 80 HD sessions with high risk of bleeding were completed with either heparin-free (HF) or low dose of argatroban saline flushes (LASF) anticoagulation. Clinical clot formation in the pipeline and dialyzer was inspected to evaluate the local anticoagulation efficiency; prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and D-dimer were tested to investigate the influence on the whole body coagulation system; urea reduction ratio (URR) and Kt/V were used to evaluate the efficiency of dialysis. Results: Comparing with HF, LASF showed a satisfactory efficiency in reducing the clot formation and the URR and Kt/V of it were also higher. Conclusions: Low dose of argatroban saline flushes is a feasible and safe alternative anticoagulation protocol in HD patients with high risk of bleeding.

[Thrombocytopathy and blood complications in uremia]

Bleeding diathesis and thrombotic tendencies are characteristic findings in patients with end-stage renal disease. The pathogenesis of uremic bleeding tendency is related to multiple dysfunctions of the platelets. The platelet numbers may be reduced slightly, while platelet turnover is increased. The reduced adhesion of platelets to the vascular subendothelial wall is due to reduction of GPIb and altered conformational changes of GPIIb/IIIa receptors. Alterations of platelet adhesion and aggregation are caused by uremic toxins, increased platelet production of NO, PGI(2), calcium and cAMP as well as renal anemia. Correction of uremic bleeding is caused by treatment of renal anemia with recombinant human erythropoietin or darbepoetin alpha, adequate dialysis, desmopressin, cryoprecipitate, tranexamic acid, or conjugated estrogens. Thrombotic complications in uremia are caused by increased platelet aggregation and hypercoagulability. Erythrocyte-platelet-aggregates, leukocyte-platelet-aggregates and platelet microparticles are found in higher percentage in uremic patients as compared to healthy individuals. The increased expression of platelet phosphatidylserine initiates phagocytosis and coagulation. Therapy with antiplatelet drugs does not reduce vascular access thrombosis but increases bleeding complications in endstage renal disease patients. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT type II) may develop in 0-12 % of hemodialysis patients. HIT antibody positive uremic patients mostly develop only mild thrombocytopenia and only very few thrombotic complications. Substitution of heparin by hirudin, danaparoid or regional citrate anticoagulation should be decided based on each single case.