Long-term effects of the iron-based phosphate binder, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, in dialysis patients

Serum Phosphorus Management with Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide as a First-Line Phosphate Binder within the First Year of Hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

Sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO), a non-calcium, chewable, iron-based phosphate binder (PB), effectively lowers serum phosphorus (sP) concentrations while reducing pill burden relative to other PBs. To date, SO studies have largely examined treatment-experienced, prevalent hemodialysis populations. We aimed to explore the role of first-line SO initiated during the first year of dialysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed deidentified data from adults receiving in-center hemodialysis who were prescribed SO monotherapy within the first year of hemodialysis as part of routine clinical care. All patients continuing SO monotherapy for 12 months were included. Changes from baseline in sP, achievement of sP ≤5.5 and ≤4.5 mg/dL, and other laboratory parameters were analyzed quarterly for 1 year.

RESULTS

The overall cohort included 596 patients, 286 of whom had a dialysis vintage ≤3 months. In the 3 months preceding SO initiation, sP rapidly increased (mean increases of 1.02 and 1.65 mg/dL in the overall cohort and incident cohort, respectively). SO treatment was associated with significant decreases in quarterly sP (mean decreases of 0.26-0.36; p < 0.0001 for each quarter and overall). While receiving SO, 55-60% of patients achieved sP ≤5.5 mg/dL and 21-24% achieved sP ≤4.5 mg/dL (p < 0.0001 for each quarter and overall vs. baseline). Daily PB pill burden was approximately 4 pills. Serum calcium concentrations increased and intact parathyroid hormone concentrations decreased during SO treatment (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients on hemodialysis, initiating SO as a first-line PB resulted in significant reductions in sP while maintaining a relatively low PB pill burden.

Regulatory effects of nutritional and metabolic disorders on vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Vascular calcification (VC) is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes. This study aims to review nutritive pro-calcifying factors of CKD.

Methods

Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched from 2001 as at July 26, 2022, to select and summarize the basic and clinical studies reporting the effects of malnutrition or metabolic disorders on VC in CKD and the evolving treatments for these nutrient metabolic disorders.

Key Content and Findings

Hyperphosphatemia, calcium load, hypomagnesemia, iron deficiency, lipoprotein(a) abnormalities, protein malnutrition, and vitamin K deficiency secondary to CKD were closely associated with the occurrence and development of VC. Elevated phosphate and calcium levels were essential contributors to VC, yet current phosphate binders with good phosphate-lowering effects had not been shown to delay VC progression in CKD, and it remained challenging on how to identify and prevent calcium overload. Magnesium supplementation was the most promising treatment for mitigating VC, as supported by in vitro and in vivo studies and clinical trials. Correction of iron and vitamin K deficiency might contribute to VC attenuation, yet there was a lack of clinical evidence on CKD patients.

Conclusions

This review highlighted the effects of nutrient metabolism disorders on CKD-VC, and additional studies are needed to further address optimal nutrition strategies for mitigating VC in CKD.

Progress in pharmacotherapy for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in renal failure

INTRODUCTION

Among the clinical and metabolic complications of progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD), CKD-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality. While overt and persistent hyperphosphatemia is typical of advanced CKD and requires treatment, other abnormalities of calcium/phosphate metabolism begin to occur since the early stages of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

We searched on the PubMed database, without restrictions for language or time range, for randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses investigating phosphate-lowering therapies. The various phosphate binders show different safety profiles and diverse effects on calcium/phosphate metabolism and vascular calcification. The in-depth knowledge of the characteristics of these drugs is crucial to ensure adequate treatment to CKD patients.

EXPERT OPINION

A proper control of serum phosphate can be achieved using phosphate binders. These medications may induce side effects. Moreover, data on their impact on clinical outcomes are partly controversial or scarce, especially for the new generation drugs. Hyperphosphatemia favors cardiovascular disease and increases the risk for CKD progression. These effects are partially mediated by fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), a phosphaturic hormone that raises to maintain normal serum phosphate. Since there are no data supporting the use of phosphate-lowering agents when phosphataemia is normal, a key role is played by reducing dietary phosphate intake with the aim to control serum phosphate and the compensatory FGF23 and parathyroid hormone (PTH) increase.

Efficacy and Safety of Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide Compared with Sevelamer Carbonate in Chinese Dialysis Patients with Hyperphosphataemia: A Randomised, Open-Label, Multicentre, 12-Week Phase III Study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH) versus sevelamer carbonate in controlling serum phosphorus (sP) in adult Chinese dialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia (sP >1.78 mmol/L).

METHODS

Open-label, randomised (1:1), active-controlled, parallel group, multicentre, phase III study of SFOH and sevelamer at starting doses corresponding to 1,500 mg iron/day and 2.4 g/day, respectively, with 8-week dose titration and 4-week maintenance (NCT03644264). Primary endpoint was non-inferiority analysis of change in sP from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints included sP over time and safety.

RESULTS

415 patients were screened; 286 were enrolled and randomised (142 and 144 to SFOH and sevelamer, respectively). Mean (SD) baseline sP: 2.38 (0.57) and 2.38 (0.52) mmol/L, respectively. Mean (SD) change in sP from baseline to week 12: - 0.71 (0.60) versus -0.63 (0.52) mmol/L, respectively; difference (sevelamer minus SFOH) in least squares means (95% CI): 0.08 mmol/L (-0.02, 0.18) with the lower limit of 95% CI above the non-inferiority margin of -0.34 mmol/L. The SFOH group achieved target sP (1.13-1.78 mmol/L) earlier than the sevelamer group (56.5% vs. 32.8% at week 4) and with a lower pill burden (mean 3.7 vs. 9.1 tablets/day over 4 weeks of maintenance, respectively). Safety and tolerability of SFOH was consistent with previous studies, and no new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSION

SFOH effectively reduced sP from baseline and was non-inferior to sevelamer after 12 weeks of treatment but had a lower pill burden in Chinese dialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia; SFOH benefit-risk profile is favourable in Chinese patients.

Phosphate Control in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Issues, Solutions, and Open Questions

Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication in advanced chronic kidney disease and contributes to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The present narrative review focuses on the management of phosphatemia in uremic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. These patients frequently develop hyperphosphatemia since phosphate anion behaves as a middle-size molecule despite its low molecular weight. Accordingly, patient transporter characteristics and peritoneal dialysis modalities and prescriptions remarkably influence serum phosphate control. Given that phosphate peritoneal removal is often insufficient, especially in lower transporters, patients are often prescribed phosphate binders whose use in peritoneal dialysis is primarily based on clinical trials conducted in hemodialysis because very few studies have been performed solely in peritoneal dialysis populations. A crucial role in phosphate control among peritoneal dialysis patients is played by diet, which must help in reducing phosphorous intake while preventing malnutrition. Moreover, residual renal function, which is preserved in most peritoneal dialysis patients, significantly contributes to maintaining phosphate balance. The inadequate serum phosphate control observed in many patients on peritoneal dialysis highlights the need for large and well-designed clinical trials including exclusively peritoneal dialysis patients to evaluate the effects of a multiple therapeutic approach on serum phosphate control and on hard clinical outcomes in this high-risk population.

A real-world analysis of the influence of age on maintenance hemodialysis patients: managing serum phosphorus with sucroferric oxyhydroxide as part of routine clinical care

OBJECTIVE

Despite the growing number of elderly hemodialysis patients, the influence of age on nutritional parameters, serum phosphorus (sP), and use of phosphate-binder (PB) medications has not been well characterized. We aimed to describe age-related differences in patient characteristics in a large, real-world cohort of maintenance hemodialysis patients, and to examine the impact of age on sP management with sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed de-identified data from 2017 adult, in-center hemodialysis patients who switched from another PB to SO monotherapy as part of routine clinical care. Changes in baseline PB pill burden, sP levels, and nutritional and dialytic clearance parameters were assessed across varying age groups through 6 months.

RESULTS

At baseline, older patients had lower mean sP, serum albumin, and pre-dialysis weights compared with younger patients. Prescription of SO was associated with a 62% increase in the proportion of patients achieving sP ≤ 5.5 mg/dl and a 42% reduction in daily pill burden. The proportion of patients achieving sP ≤ 5.5 mg/dl after transitioning to SO increased by 113, 96, 68, 77, 61, 37 and 40% among those aged 19-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and ≥ 80 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients had worse nutritional parameters, lower pill burden, and lower sP at baseline versus younger counterparts. Prescription of SO was associated with improved sP control and reduced pill burden across all ages.

Safety and effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in Spanish patients on dialysis: sub-analysis of the VERIFIE study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In this study, we show the results of the subset of Spanish patients of the VERIFIE study, the first post-marketing study assessing the long-term safety and effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH) in patients with hyperphosphatemia undergoing dialysis during clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis with indication of SFOH treatment were included. Follow-up duration was 12-36 months after SFOH initiation. Primary safety variables were the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), medical events of special interest (MESIs), and variations in iron-related parameters. SFOH effectiveness was evaluated by the change in serum phosphorus levels.

RESULTS

A total of 286 patients were recruited and data from 282 were analyzed. Among those 282 patients, 161 (57.1%) withdrew the study prematurely and 52.5% received concomitant treatment with other phosphate binders. ADRs were observed in 35.1% of patients, the most common of which were gastrointestinal disorders (77.1%) and mild/moderate in severity (83.7%). MESIs were reported in 14.2% of patients, and 93.7% were mild/moderate. An increase in ferritin (386.66ng/mL vs 447.55ng/mL; p=0.0013) and transferrin saturation (28.07% vs 30.34%; p=0.043) was observed from baseline to the last visit (p=0.0013). Serum phosphorus levels progressively decreased from 5.69mg/dL at baseline to 4.84mg/dL at the last visit (p<0.0001), increasing by 32.2% the proportion of patients who achieved serum phosphorus levels ≤5.5mg/dL, with a mean daily SFOH dose of 1.98 pills/day.

CONCLUSIONS

SFOH showed a favorable effectiveness profile, a similar safety profile to that observed in the international study with most adverse events of mild/moderate severity, and a low daily pill burden in Spanish patients in dialysis.

Evaluation of cerium oxide as a phosphate binder using 5/6 nephrectomy model rat

BACKGROUND

The number of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients continues to increase worldwide. CKD patients need to take phosphate binders to manage serum phosphorus concentrations. Currently, several types of phosphate binder, including lanthanum carbonate, are used. However, they each have disadvantages.

METHODS

In this study, we evaluated cerium oxide as a new phosphate binder in vitro and in vivo. First, cerium oxide was mixed with phosphoric acid at pH 2.5 or 7.0, and residual phosphoric acid was measured by absorption photometry using colorimetric reagent. Second, cerium oxide was fed to 5/6 nephrectomy model rats (5/6Nx), a well-known renal damage model. All rats were measured food intake, water intake, feces volume, and urine volume, and collected serum and urine were analyzed for biochemical markers.

RESULTS

Cerium oxide can adsorb phosphate at acidic and neutral pH, while lanthanum carbonate, which is a one of popular phosphate binder, does not dissolve at neutral pH. Cerium oxide-treatment reduced serum phosphate concentrations of 5/6Nx rats without an increase in serum alanine transaminase levels that would indicate hepatotoxicity, and cerium oxide-treatment maintained serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels, while those of normal 5/6Nx rats increased slightly.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that cerium oxide can be a potential phosphate binder. Decreased body weight gain and increased water intake and urine volume in 5/6Nx rats were thought to be an effect of nephrectomy because these changes did not occur in sham operation rats. Additional investigations are needed to evaluate the longer-term safety and possible accumulation of cerium oxide in the body.

A 6-Month clinical practice pilot study of sucroferric oxyhydroxide on nutritional status in patients on peritoneal dialysis

Background

Hyperphosphatemia is common in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD). Restricting dietary phosphorus often leads to a decrease in protein intake, which may result in hypoalbuminemia. The high pill burden of phosphate binders may also contribute to compromised appetite and dietary intake. Hypoalbuminemia is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality in PD patients. The goal of this study was to determine if sucroferric oxyhydroxide improves albumin and self-reported measures of appetite in PD patients.

Methods

We performed a prospective, open-label, 6-month, pilot study of 17 adult PD patients from the Denver Metro Area. Patients had to use automated peritoneal dialysis for ≥ 3 months, have a serum albumin ≤ 3.8 g/dL, and have serum phosphate ≥ 5.5 mg/dL or ≤ 5.5 mg/dL on a binder other than SO. SO was titrated to a goal serum phosphate of < 5.5 mg/dL. The primary outcome was change in serum phosphate, albumin, and phosphorus-attuned albumin (defined as albumin divided by phosphorus) over 6 months.

Results

The mean (SD) age and dialysis vintage was 55 ± 13 years and 3.8 ± 2.7 years, respectively. Participants’ serum phosphate significantly decreased with fewer phosphate binder pills/day after switching to SO. There was no change in serum albumin, appetite, or dietary intake. However, participants had significant improvements in phosphorus-attuned albumin.

Conclusion

The transition to SO improved phosphorus control, phosphorus-attuned albumin, and pill burden. There were no significant changes in self-reported appetite or dietary intake during the study. These findings suggest that PD patients maintained nutritional status with SO therapy.

Trial registration

First registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04046263) on 06/08/2019.

EOS789, pan-phosphate transporter inhibitor, ameliorates the progression of kidney injury in anti-GBM-induced glomerulonephritis rats

Hyperphosphatemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not only dysregulates mineral metabolism and bone diseases, but also strongly contributes to the progression of kidney disease itself. We have identified a novel drug for hyperphosphatemia, EOS789, that interacts with several sodium-dependent phosphate transporters (NaPi-IIb, PiT-1, and PiT-2) known to contribute to intestinal phosphate absorption. In this study, we investigated whether EOS789 could ameliorate kidney disease progression in glomerulonephritis rats. Anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) nephritis was induced in rats by intravenously administering two types of anti-rat GBM antibodies. We evaluated the effect of EOS789 administered in food admixture on hyperphosphatemia and kidney disease progression. In an anti-GBM nephritis rats, which exhibit a significant increase in serum phosphate and a decline in renal function, EOS789 dose-dependently improved hyperphosphatemia and EOS789 at 0.3% food admixture significantly ameliorated kidney dysfunction as shown in the decline of serum creatinine and BUN. Renal histopathology analysis showed that EOS789 significantly decreased crescent formation in glomeruli. To elucidate the mechanism underlying glomerular disease progression, human mesangial cells were used. High phosphate concentration in media significantly increased the expression of Collagen 1A1, 3A1, and αSMA mRNA in human mesangial cells and EOS789 dose-dependently suppressed these fibrotic markers. These results indicate that EOS789 prevented glomerular crescent formation caused by mesangial fibrosis by ameliorating hyperphosphatemia. In conclusion, EOS789 would not only be useful against hyperphosphatemia but may also have the potential to relieve mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis with crescent formation.

Serum Phosphorus and Pill Burden Among Hemodialysis Patients Prescribed Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide: One-Year Follow-Up on a Contemporary Cohort

Purpose

In prior analyses of real-world cohorts of hemodialysis patients switched from one phosphate binder (PB) to sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO), SO therapy has been associated with improvements in serum phosphorus (sP) and reductions in daily PB pill burden. To characterize how SO initiation patterns have changed over time, we examined the long-term effectiveness of SO in a contemporary (2018–2019) cohort.

Patients and Methods

Adult Fresenius Kidney Care hemodialysis patients first prescribed SO monotherapy as part of routine care between May 2018 and May 2019 (N = 1792) were followed for 1 year. All patients received a non-SO PB during a 91-day baseline period before SO prescription. Mean PB pills/day and laboratory parameters were compared before and during SO treatment. Results were divided into consecutive 91-day intervals (Q1–Q4) and analyzed using linear mixed-effects regression and Cochran’s Q test. These results were contrasted with findings from a historical (2014–2015) cohort (N = 530).

Results

The proportion of patients achieving sP ≤5.5 mg/dl increased after switching to SO (from 27.0% at baseline to 37.8%, 45.1%, 44.7%, and 44.0% at Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4, respectively; P < 0.0001 for all). The mean daily PB pill burden decreased from a baseline of 7.7 to 4.4, 4.6, 4.8, and 4.9, respectively, across quarters (P < 0.0001 for all). Patients in the contemporary cohort had improved sP control (27.0% achieving sP ≤5.5 mg/dl vs 17.7%) and lower daily PB pill burden (mean 7.7 vs 8.5 pills/day) at baseline than those in the historical cohort. Overall use of active vitamin D was similar between cohorts, although higher use of oral active vitamin D (63.9% vs 15.7%) and lower use of IV active vitamin D lower (23.4% vs 74.2%) was observed in the contemporary cohort.

Conclusion

Despite evolving treatment patterns, switching to SO resulted in improved sP control with fewer pills per day in this contemporary hemodialysis cohort.

An update on phosphate binders for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis: a review of safety profiles

INTRODUCTION

Hyperphosphatemia is an inevitable complication for patients undergoing dialysis, as is the resulting need for treatment with phosphate binders. Currently, various phosphate binders are clinically available. In addition to their phosphate-lowering activity, individual phosphate binders have differing safety profiles and off-target actions.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the safety of phosphate binders and issues to be resolved.

EXPERT OPINION

Calcium-based phosphate binders are well tolerated but may increase calcium overload risk. Sevelamer reduces serum cholesterol levels and exerts anti-inflammatory effects. Compared to sevelamer, bixalomer is associated with fewer gastrointestinal symptoms. Aluminum-containing binders, lanthanum carbonate, and sucroferric oxyhydroxide exhibit strong phosphate-lowering activity. Although ferric citrate reduces erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron doses, its use requires monitoring of iron metabolic markers to avoid overload. Occasionally, combined use of multiple phosphate binders can offer the advantages of each phosphate binder while minimizing their drawbacks; thus, this may be desirable according to individual patients' conditions and comorbidities. However, increased pill burden and nonadherence to phosphate binders emerge as new problems. We expect that novel therapeutic strategies will be developed to resolve these issues.

Sucroferric oxyhydroxide for hyperphosphatemia: a review of real-world evidence

Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication in dialysis-dependent patients with chronic kidney disease. Most dialysis-dependent patients need oral phosphate binder therapy to control serum phosphorus concentrations. Most phosphate binders have a high daily pill burden, which may reduce treatment adherence and impair phosphorus control. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide is a potent iron-based phosphate binder approved for use in dialysis-dependent patients in 2013. A randomized controlled trial of sucroferric oxyhydroxide demonstrated its efficacy for reduction of serum phosphorus with a lower pill burden than sevelamer carbonate. Clinical trials carefully select patients, monitor adherence, and routinely titrate medications to a protocol-defined goal. Consequently, trials may not reflect real-world use of medications. Since its approval, we and others have performed retrospective and prospective analyses of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in real-world clinical practice in > 6400 hemodialysis and approximately 500 peritoneal dialysis patients in the USA and Europe. Consistent with the clinical trial data, real-world observational studies have demonstrated that sucroferric oxyhydroxide can effectively reduce serum phosphorus with a lower daily pill burden than most other phosphate binders. These studies have also shown sucroferric oxyhydroxide provides effective serum phosphorus control in different treatment settings, including as monotherapy in phosphate binder-naïve patients, in patients switching from other phosphate binders, or when used in combination with other phosphate binders. These observational studies indicate a favorable safety and tolerability profile, and minimal, if any, systemic iron absorption. This article reviews the key results from these observational studies of sucroferric oxyhydroxide and evaluates its role in the management of hyperphosphatemia in clinical practice.

Iron-based phosphorus chelator: Risk of iron deposition and action on bone metabolism in uremic rats

Phosphate chelators are frequently used in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). New iron-based chelators remain understudied and offer a promising therapeutic option for the control of bone and mineral disorders of chronic kidney disease (BMD-CKD). We assessed the effect of the phosphorus chelator, chitosan-iron III (CH-FeCl), compared to calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) in BMD-CKD and the potential iron overload in uremic rats. Thirty-two animals were divided into four groups, namely the control, CKD, CKD/CH-FeCl, and CKD/CaCO₃ groups. CKD was induced by adding 0.75% (4 weeks) and 0.1% (3 weeks) adenine to the diet. The chelators were administered from week 3 through week 7. The renal function, BMD-CKD markers, and histomorphometry of the femur were assessed at week 7. The CKD group showed a significant increase in creatinine (83.9 ± 18.6 vs. 41.5 ± 22.1 µmol/L; P = 0.001), phosphate (3.5 ± 0.8 vs. 2.2 ± 0.2 mmol/L; P = 0.001), fractional excretion of phosphorus (FEP) (0.71 ± 0.2 vs. 0.2 ± 0.17; P = 0.0001), and FGF23 (81.36 ± 37.16 pg/mL vs. 7.42 ± 1.96; P = 0.011) compared to the control group. There was no accumulation of serum or bone iron after the use of CH-FeCl. The use of chelators reduced the FEP (control: 0.71 ± 0.20; CKD/CH-FeCl: 0.40 ± 0.16; CKD/CaCO₃ 0.34 ± 0.15; P = 0.001), without changes in the serum FGF23 and parathyroid hormone levels. Histomorphometry revealed the presence of bone disease with high remodeling in the uremic animals without changes with the use of chelators. The CH-FeCl chelator was efficient in reducing the FEP without iron accumulation, thereby paving the way for the use of this class of chelators in clinical settings in the future.

A safety evaluation of sucroferric oxyhydroxide for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia

INTRODUCTION

Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication as chronic kidney disease (CKD) progresses and most patients undergoing dialysis are prescribed oral phosphate binder therapy to control serum phosphate concentrations. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide is an iron-based phosphate binder approved for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients on dialysis.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews key safety and effectiveness data for sucroferric oxyhydroxide from both prospective clinical trials and real-world observational studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Sucroferric oxyhydroxide potently binds dietary phosphate in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, resulting in effective reduction of serum phosphate concentrations with a relatively low daily pill burden. Data from clinical trials and real-world observational studies show sucroferric oxyhydroxide has a favorable safety and tolerability profile. The most frequent side effects observed with sucroferric oxyhydroxide are GI-related, mainly discolored (black) stools and mild or moderate transient diarrhea, both of which are manageable. There is minimal systemic iron absorption from sucroferric oxyhydroxide, and therefore the drug is associated with a low risk of iron accumulation. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide also displays low potential for drug-drug interactions with other commonly prescribed oral medications. Overall, sucroferric oxyhydroxide offers an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for the management of hyperphosphatemia.

Tailored synbiotic powder (functional food) to prevent hyperphosphataemia (kidney disorder)

Hyperphosphataemia is treated with phosphate binders, which can cause adverse effects. Spray-dried synbiotic powder (SP) composed of Lactobacillus casei JCM1134 (a phosphate-accumulating organism; PAO) and Aloe vera is potentially a safer alternative for efficient phosphate removal. In this study, a novel strategy was developed; lysine-derivatized deacetylated A. vera (DAVK) was synthesised and fabricated on phosphate-deficient PAO (PDP) for efficient phosphate transfer and then spray-dried with the supernatant of DAV centrifugation to form a sacrificial layer on PDP for SP integrity during gastric passage. In vitro experiments revealed that PAO removed only 1.6% of the phosphate from synthetic media, whereas SP removed 89%, 87%, and 67% (w/v) of the phosphate from milk, soft drink, and synthetic media, respectively, confirming the protective role of A. vera and efficient phosphate transport. Compared with commercial binders, SP effectively removed phosphate from synthetic media, whereas SP and CaCO3 exhibited comparative results for milk and soft drink. Importantly, CaCO3 caused hypercalcaemia. Thus, the described SP presents a promising tool to prevent hyperphosphataemia. This study also revealed a novel factor: diets of patients with chronic kidney disease should be monitored to determine the optimal phosphate binders, as phosphate removal performance depends on the accessible phosphate forms.

Gut Microbiome-Derived Uremic Toxin Levels in Hemodialysis Patients on Different Phosphate Binder Therapies

Introduction

Constipation is prevalent in patients with kidney failure partly due to the use of medication, such as phosphate binders. We hypothesized that serum levels of gut microbiome-derived uremic toxins (UTOX) may be affected by the choice of phosphate binder putatively through its impact on colonic transit time. We investigated two commonly prescribed phosphate binders, sevelamer carbonate (SEV) and sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFO), and their association with gut microbiome-derived UTOX levels in hemodialysis (HD) patients.

Methods

Weekly blood samples were collected from 16 anuric HD participants during the 5-week observational period. All participants were on active phosphate binder monotherapy with either SFO or SEV for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment. Eight UTOX (7 gut microbiome-derived) and tryptophan were quantified using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Serum phosphorus, nutritional, and liver function markers were also measured. For each substance, weekly individual levels, the median concentration per participant, and differences between SFO and SEV groups were reported. Patient-reported bowel movements, by the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS), and pill usage were assessed weekly.

Results

The SEV group reported a 3.3-fold higher frequency of BSS stool types 1 and 2 (more likely constipated, p < 0.05), whereas the SFO group reported a 1.5-fold higher frequency of BSS stool types 5–7 (more likely loose stool and diarrhea, not significant). Participants in the SFO group showed a trend toward better adherence to phosphate binder therapy (SFO: 87.6% vs. SEV: 66.6%, not significant). UTOX, serum phosphorus, nutritional and liver function markers, and tryptophan were not different between the two groups.

Conclusion

There was no difference in the gut microbiome-derived UTOX levels between phosphate binders (SFO vs. SEV), despite SFO therapy resulting in fewer constipated participants. This pilot study may inform study design of future clinical trials and highlights the importance of including factors beyond bowel habits and their association with UTOX levels.

Multidisciplinary Perspectives of Current Approaches and Clinical Gaps in the Management of Hyperphosphatemia

Population-based studies have shown that most patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) do not have optimal phosphate levels. Meta-analyses suggest that there is a morbidity and mortality benefit associated with the lowering of serum phosphate levels. However, to date there is no conclusive evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that lowering serum phosphate levels reduces the risk of morbidity and mortality. However, hyperphosphatemia may pose a risk to patients and treatment should be considered. We therefore sought to conduct a multidisciplinary review to help guide clinical decision-making pending results of ongoing RCTs. Restricting dietary phosphate intake is frequently the first step in the management of hyperphosphatemia. Important considerations when proposing dietary restriction include the patient’s socioeconomic status, lifestyle, dietary preferences, comorbidities, and nutritional status. While dietary phosphate restriction may be a valid strategy in certain patients, serum phosphate reductions achieved solely by limiting dietary intake are modest and should be considered in conjunction with other interventions. Conventional dialysis is also typically insufficient; however phosphate removal may be augmented by increased frequency or duration of dialysis, or through enhanced methods such as hemodiafiltration. Phosphate binders have been shown to reduce absorption of dietary phosphate and lower serum phosphate levels. There are several phosphate binders available, and while they all lower phosphate levels to variable degrees, they differ with respect to their pill burden, potential to induce or exacerbate vascular calcification or ectopic calcification, tissue accumulation, safety, and tolerability. The widespread treatment of hyperphosphatemia requires convincing data from RCTs to ascertain whether lowering serum phosphate levels improves patient-important outcomes, as well as the optimal method and degree of phosphate control. In the interim, the decision and approach used to treat hyperphosphatemia should be based on the best available data, as well as patient needs and clinical judgment.

The Importance of Phosphate Control in Chronic Kidney Disease

A series of problems including osteopathy, abnormal serum data, and vascular calcification associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are now collectively called CKD-mineral bone disease (CKD-MBD). The pathophysiology of CKD-MBD is becoming clear with the emerging of αKlotho, originally identified as a progeria-causing protein, and bone-derived phosphaturic fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) as associated factors. Meanwhile, compared with calcium and parathyroid hormone, which have long been linked with CKD-MBD, phosphate is now attracting more attention because of its association with complications and outcomes. Incidentally, as the pivotal roles of FGF23 and αKlotho in phosphate metabolism have been unveiled, how phosphate metabolism and hyperphosphatemia are involved in CKD-MBD and how they can be clinically treated have become of great interest. Thus, the aim of this review is reconsider CKD-MBD from the viewpoint of phosphorus, its involvement in the pathophysiology, causing complications, therapeutic approach based on the clinical evidence, and clarifying the importance of phosphorus management.

Evidence of an intestinal phosphate transporter alternative to type IIb sodium-dependent phosphate transporter in rats with chronic kidney disease

Background

Phosphate is absorbed in the small intestine via passive flow and active transport.NaPi-IIb, a type II sodium-dependent phosphate transporter, is considered to mediate active phosphate transport in rodents. To study the regulation of intestinal phosphate transport in chronic kidney disease (CKD), we analyzed the expression levels of NaPi-IIb, pituitary-specific transcription factor 1 (PiT-1) and PiT-2 and the kinetics of intestinal phosphate transport using two CKD models.

Methods

CKD was induced in rats via adenine orThy1 antibody injection. Phosphate uptake by intestinal brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV) and the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of NaPi-IIb, PiT-1 and PiT-2 were analyzed. The protein expression level of NaPi-IIb was measured by mass spectrometry (e.g. liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry).

Results

In normal rats, phosphate uptake into BBMV consisted of a single saturable component and its Michaelis constant (K_m) was comparable to that of NaPi-IIb. The maximum velocity (V_max) correlated with mRNA and protein levels of NaPi-IIb. In the CKD models, intestinal phosphate uptake consisted of two saturable components. The V_max of the higher-affinity transport, which is thought to be responsible for NaPi-IIb, significantly decreased and the decrease correlated with reduced NaPi-IIb expression. The K_m of the lower-affinity transport was comparable to that of PiT-1 and -2. PiT-1 mRNA expression was much higher than that of PiT-2, suggesting that PiT-1 was mostly responsible for phosphate transport.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the contribution of NaPi-IIb to intestinal phosphate absorption dramatically decreases in rats with CKD and that a low-affinity alternative to NaPi-IIb, in particular PiT-1, is upregulated in a compensatory manner in CKD.

Using iron-based phosphate binders in phosphate reduction and anemia improvement in patients receiving dialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

A study was conducted to determine whether iron-based phosphate binders (IBPBs) need to be preferred for hyperphosphatemia and anemia management in patients on dialysis.

METHODS

For this meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of IBPBs in decreasing phosphate and correcting anemia in dialysis patients.

RESULTS

Nineteen trials comprising 4719 participants were included. Compared with placebo, serum phosphate decreased significantly after treatment with ferric citrate (FC), fermagate (one study), and SBR759 (one study). Hemoglobin increased significantly after treatment with FC and sucroferric oxyhydroxide (PA21). In addition, FC and PA21 reduced serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and increased ferritin and transferrin saturation, but SBR759 did not. Compared with active treatment, the non-inferiority of IBPBs in reducing serum phosphate and iPTH was demonstrated. FC significantly improved serum hemoglobin and iron-related parameters and decreased the use of intravenous iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, whereas PA21 did not increase serum hemoglobin level. The incidences of infection and hospitalization were similar between the two groups, with FC having a higher risk of diarrhea than the placebo and active treatments.

CONCLUSION

FC was associated with the control of hyperphosphatemia and the improvement of anemia. However, PA21 did not show superiority for alleviating anemia compared with the active treatment. Other IBPBs, such as fermagate and SBR759, remained poorly understood due to the limited number of studies. Further trials are required to assess the effect of IBPBs on the risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.

Optimal Phosphate Control Related to Coronary Artery Calcification in Dialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

In patients on maintenance dialysis, cardiovascular mortality risk is remarkably high, which can be partly explained by severe coronary artery calcification (CAC). Hyperphosphatemia has been reported to be associated with the severity of CAC. However, the optimal phosphate range in patients on dialysis remains unknown. This study was planned to compare the effects on CAC progression of two types of noncalcium-based phosphate binders and of two different phosphate target ranges.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, open-label, multicenter, interventional trial with a two by two factorial design. A total of 160 adults on dialysis were enrolled and randomized to the sucroferric oxyhydroxide or lanthanum carbonate group, with the aim of reducing serum phosphate to two target levels (3.5-4.5 mg/dl in the strict group and 5.0-6.0 mg/dl in the standard group). The primary end point was percentage change in CAC scores during the 12-month treatment.

RESULTS

The full analysis set included 115 patients. We observed no significant difference in percentage change in CAC scores between the lanthanum carbonate group and the sucroferric oxyhydroxide group. On the other hand, percentage change in CAC scores in the strict group (median of 8.52; interquartile range, -1.0-23.9) was significantly lower than that in the standard group (median of 21.8; interquartile range, 10.0-36.1; P=0.006). This effect was pronounced in older (aged 65-74 years) versus younger (aged 20-64 years) participants (P value for interaction =0.003). We observed a similar finding for the absolute change in CAC scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Further study with a larger sample size is needed, but strict phosphate control shows promise for delaying progression of CAC in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

Evaluate the New Phosphate Iron-Based Binder Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide in Dialysis Patients with the Goal of Advancing the Practice of EBM (EPISODE), jRCTs051180048.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide for treatment of hyperphosphataemia in dialysis patients: a prospective observational study

Background

The iron-based phosphate binder (PB), sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH), is indicated to control serum phosphorus levels in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis.

Methods

This non-interventional, prospective, multicentre, cohort study conducted in seven European countries evaluated the safety and effectiveness of SFOH in dialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia in routine practice. Safety outcomes included adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and changes in iron-related parameters. SFOH effectiveness was evaluated by changes-from-baseline (BL) in serum phosphorus and percentage of patients achieving in-target phosphorus levels.

Results

The safety analysis set included 1365 patients (mean observation: 420.3 ± 239.3 days). Overall, 682 (50.0%) patients discontinued the study. Mean SFOH dose during the observation period was 1172.7 ± 539.9 mg (2.3 pills/day). Overall, 617 (45.2%) patients received concomitant PB(s) during SFOH treatment. ADRs and serious ADRs were observed for 531 (38.9%) and 26 (1.9%) patients. Most frequent ADRs were diarrhoea (194 patients, 14.2%) and discoloured faeces (128 patients, 9.4%). Diarrhoea generally occurred early during SFOH treatment and was mostly mild and transient. Small increases from BL in serum ferritin were observed (ranging from +12 to +75 µg/L). SFOH treatment was associated with serum phosphorus reductions (6.3 ± 1.6 mg/dL at BL versus 5.3 ± 1.8 mg/dL at Month 30; ΔBL: −1.0 mg/dL, P < 0.01). Percentage of patients achieving serum phosphorus ≤4.5 mg/dL increased from 12.0% at BL to 34.8% at Month 30, while the percentage achieving serum phosphorus ≤5.5 mg/dL increased from 29.9% to 63.0%.

Conclusions

SFOH has a favourable safety and tolerability profile in a real-world setting, consistent with results of the Phase 3 study. Moreover, SFOH improved serum phosphorus control with a low daily pill burden.

Real-world management of hyperphosphataemia with sucroferric oxyhydroxide: the VELREAL multicentre study

Background

The efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) have been reported in clinical trials. However, real-life data are scarce. This study presents data on the use, efficacy and safety of SO in real clinical practice.

Methods

We performed a retrospective multicentre study, without any influence on the prescription decisions, that included 220 patients from 11 Spanish centres. Demographic, treatment, analytical and nutritional parameters and adherence, side effects and dropout rates were collected during 6 months.

Results

SO was initiated due to inadequate control of serum phosphate (P) in 70% of participants and in 24.5% to reduce the number of tablets. Monotherapy with SO increased from 44% to 74.1%, with a reduction in the average daily number of sachets/tablets from six to two. Serum P decreased by 20% (4.6 ± 1.2 versus 5.8 ± 1.3 mg/dL; P < 0.001), with a significant reduction in intact parathyroid hormone levels (P < 0.01). The percentage of patients with adequate serum P control at threshold levels of 5 and 4.5 mg/dL increased by 45.4% and 35.9%, respectively. Serum ferritin was not modified, while the transferrin saturation index increased significantly (P = 0.04). Serum albumin and normalized protein catabolic rate, when normalized by serum P, increased, averaging 37% and 39%, respectively (P < 0.001). Adherent patients increased from 28.2% to 52.7%. Adverse effects were reported by 14.1% of participants, with abandonment of treatment in 9.5%.

Conclusions

The use of SO in real-life results in better control of serum P, a reduction in the number of tablets and an improvement in therapeutic adherence. In addition, it may be beneficial with regards to secondary hyperparathyroidism and nutritional status.

Efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in chronic kidney disease in Asturias. FOSFASTUR study

Alterations in bone and mineral metabolism are very common in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The increase in phosphate levels leads to bone disease, risk of calcification and greater mortality, so any strategy aimed at reducing them should be welcomed. The latest drug incorporated into the therapeutic arsenal to treat hyperphosphataemia in CKD is Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide (SFO).

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the efficacy and safety of OSF in three cohorts of patients, one with advanced chronic kidney disease not on dialysis (CKD-NoD), another on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and the last on haemodialysis (HD), followed for six months.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, multicentre study in clinical practice. Clinical and epidemiological variables were analysed. The evolution of parameters relating to alterations in bone and mineral metabolism and anaemia was analysed.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were included in the study (62 ± 12 years, 64% male, 34% diabetic), 25 with CKD-NoD, 25 on PD and lastly, 35 on HD. In 66 patients (78%), SFO was the first phosphate binder; in the other 19, SFO replaced a previous phosphate binder due to poor tolerance or efficacy. The initial dose of SFO was 964 ± 323 mg/day. Overall, serum phosphate levels saw a significant reduction at three months of treatment (19.6%, P < 0.001). There were no differences in the efficacy of the drug when the different populations analysed were compared. Over the course of the study, there were no changes to levels of calcium, PTHi, ferritin, or the transferrin and haemoglobin saturation indices, although there was a tendency for the last two to increase. Twelve patients (14%) withdrew from follow-up, ten due to gastrointestinal adverse effects (primarily diarrhoea) and two were lost to follow-up (kidney transplant). The mean dose of the drug that the patients received increased over time, up to 1147 ± 371 mg/day.

CONCLUSIONS

SFO is an effective option for the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in patients with CKD both in the advanced phases of the disease and on dialysis. We found similar efficacy across the three groups analysed. The higher their baseline phosphate level, the greater the reduction in the serum levels. A notable reduction in phosphate levels can be achieved with doses of around 1000 mg/day. Diarrhoea was the most common side effect, although it generally was not significant.

State-of-the-Art Management of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients With CKD: An NKF-KDOQI Controversies Perspective

Phosphate binders are among the most common medications prescribed to patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis and are often used in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). In patients with CKD glomerular filtration rate category 3a (G3a) or worse, including those with kidney failure who are receiving dialysis, clinical practice guidelines suggest "lowering elevated phosphate levels towards the normal range" with possible strategies including dietary phosphate restriction or use of binders. Additionally, guidelines suggest restricting the use of oral elemental calcium often contained in phosphate binders. Nutrition guidelines in CKD suggest<800-1,000mg of calcium daily, whereas CKD bone and mineral disorder guidelines do not provide clear targets, but<1,500mg in maintenance dialysis patients has been previously recommended. Many different classes of phosphate binders are now available and clinical trials have not definitively demonstrated the superiority of any class of phosphate binders over another with regard to clinical outcomes. Use of phosphate binders contributes substantially to patients' pill burden and out-of-pocket costs, and many have side effects. This has led to uncertainty regarding the use and best choice of phosphate binders for patients with CKD or kidney failure. In this controversies perspective, we discuss the evidence base around binder use in CKD and kidney failure with a focus on comparisons of available binders.

Safety and efficacy of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are often prescribed oral phosphate binders (PBs) for the management of hyperphosphatemia. However, available PBs have limitations, including unfavorable tolerability and safety.

METHODS

This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label study investigated safety and efficacy of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH) in pediatric and adolescent subjects with CKD and hyperphosphatemia. Subjects were randomized to SFOH or calcium acetate (CaAc) for a 10-week dose titration (stage 1), followed by a 24-week safety extension (stage 2). Primary efficacy endpoint was change in serum phosphorus from baseline to the end of stage 1 in the SFOH group. Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

Eighty-five subjects (2-18 years) were randomized and treated (SFOH, n = 66; CaAc, n = 19). Serum phosphorus reduction from baseline to the end of stage 1 in the overall SFOH group (least squares [LS] mean ± standard error [SE]) was - 0.488 ± 0.186 mg/dL; p = 0.011 (post hoc analysis). Significant reductions in serum phosphorus were observed in subjects aged ≥ 12 to ≤ 18 years (LS mean ± SE - 0.460 ± 0.195 mg/dL; p = 0.024) and subjects with serum phosphorus above age-related normal ranges at baseline (LS mean ± SE - 0.942 ± 0.246 mg/dL; p = 0.005). Similar proportions of subjects reported ≥ 1 TEAE in the SFOH (75.8%) and CaAc (73.7%) groups. Withdrawal due to TEAEs was more common with CaAc (31.6%) than with SFOH (18.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

SFOH effectively managed serum phosphorus in pediatric patients with a low pill burden and a safety profile consistent with that reported in adult patients.

Hyperphosphatemia and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Major Daily Concern Both in Adults and in Children

Hyperphosphatemia is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Often seen as the "silent killer" because of its dramatic effect on vascular calcifications, hyperphosphatemia explains, at least partly, the onset of the complex mineral and bone disorders associated with CKD (CKD-MBD), together with hypocalcemia and decreased 1-25(OH)₂ vitamin D levels. The impact of CKD-MBD may be immediate with abnormalities of bone and mineral metabolism with secondary hyperparathyroidism and increased FGF23 levels, or delayed with poor growth, bone deformities, fractures, and vascular calcifications, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The global management of CKD-MBD has been detailed in international guidelines for adults and children, however, with difficulties to obtain an agreement on the ideal PTH targets. The clinical management of hyperphosphatemia is a daily challenge for nephrologists and pediatric nephrologists, notably because of the phosphate overload in occidental diets that is mainly due to the phosphate "hidden" in food additives. The management begins with a dietary restriction of phosphate intake, and is followed by the use of calcium-based and non-calcium-based phosphate binders, and/or the intensification of dialysis. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the pathophysiology of hyperphosphatemia in CKD, with a focus on its deleterious effects and a description of the clinical management of hyperphosphatemia in a more global setting of CKD-MBD.

Renoprotective effects of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in a rat model of chronic renal failure

Introduction

Sucroferric oxyhydroxide (PA21) is an efficacious, well-tolerated iron-based phosphate binder and a promising alternative to existing compounds. We compared the effects of PA21 with those of a conventional phosphate binder on renal function, mineral homeostasis and vascular calcification in a chronic kidney disease–mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) rat model.

Methods

To induce stable renal failure, rats were administered a 0.25% adenine diet for 8 weeks. Concomitantly, rats were treated with vehicle, 2.5 g/kg/day PA21, 5.0 g/kg/day PA21 or 3.0 g/kg/day calcium carbonate (CaCO₃). Renal function and calcium/phosphorus/iron metabolism were evaluated during the study course. Renal fibrosis, inflammation, vascular calcifications and bone histomorphometry were quantified.

Results

Rats treated with 2.5 or 5.0 g/kg/day PA21 showed significantly lower serum creatinine and phosphorus and higher ionized calcium levels after 8 weeks of treatment compared with vehicle-treated rats. The better preserved renal function with PA21 went along with less severe anaemia, which was not observed with CaCO₃. Both PA21 doses, in contrast to CaCO₃, prevented a dramatic increase in fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23 and significantly reduced the vascular calcium content while both compounds ameliorated CKD-related hyperparathyroid bone.

Conclusions

PA21 treatment prevented an increase in serum FGF-23 and had, aside from its phosphate-lowering capacity, a beneficial impact on renal function decline (as assessed by the renal creatinine clearance) and related disorders. The protective effect of this iron-based phosphate binder on the kidney in rats, together with its low pill burden in humans, led us to investigate its use in patients with impaired renal function not yet on dialysis.

The real-world effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in European hemodialysis patients: a 1-year retrospective database analysis

BACKGROUND

The iron-based phosphate binder (PB), sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH), demonstrated its effectiveness for lowering serum phosphate levels, with low daily pill burden, in clinical trials of dialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia. This retrospective database analysis evaluated the real-world effectiveness of SFOH for controlling serum phosphate in European hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

De-identified patient data were extracted from a clinical database (EuCliD®) for adult hemodialysis patients from France, Italy, Portugal, Russia and Spain who were newly prescribed SFOH for up to 1 year as part of routine clinical care. Serum phosphate and pill burden were compared between baseline (3-month period before starting SFOH) and four consecutive quarterly periods of SFOH therapy (Q1-Q4; 12 months) in the overall cohort and three subgroups: PB-naïve patients treated with SFOH monotherapy (mSFOH), and PB-pretreated patients who were either switched to SFOH monotherapy (PB → mSFOH), or received SFOH in addition to another PB (PB + SFOH).

RESULTS

1096 hemodialysis patients (mean age: 60.6 years; 65.8% male) were analyzed, including 796, 188 and 53 patients in, respectively, the PB + SFOH, mSFOH, and PB → mSFOH groups. In the overall cohort, serum phosphate decreased significantly from 1.88 mmol/L at baseline to 1.77-1.69 mmol/L during Q1-Q4, and the proportion of patients achieving serum phosphate ≤1.78 mmol/L increased from 41.3% at baseline to 56.2-62.7% during SFOH treatment. Mean PB pill burden decreased from 6.3 pills/day at baseline to 5.0-5.3 pills/day during Q1-Q4. The subgroup analysis found the proportion of patients achieving serum phosphate ≤1.78 mmol/L increased significantly from baseline during SFOH treatment in the PB + SFOH group (from 38.1% up to 60.9% [Q2]) and the mSFOH group (from 49.5% up to 75.2% [Q2]), but there were no significant changes in the PB → mSFOH group. For the PB + SFOH group, serum phosphate reductions were achieved with a similar number of PB pills prescribed at baseline prior to SFOH treatment (6.5 vs 6.2 pills/day at Q4). SFOH daily pill burden was low across all 3 subgroups (2.1-2.8 pills/day).

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study of European hemodialysis patients, prescription of SFOH as monotherapy to PB-naïve patients, or in addition to existing PB therapy, was associated with significant improvements in serum phosphate control and a low daily pill burden.

Iron kinetics following treatment with sucroferric oxyhydroxide or ferric citrate in healthy rats and models of anaemia, iron overload or inflammation

Background

The iron-based phosphate binders, sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH) and ferric citrate (FC), effectively lower serum phosphorus in clinical studies, but gastrointestinal iron absorption from these agents appears to differ. We compared iron uptake and tissue accumulation during treatment with SFOH or FC using experimental rat models.

Methods

Iron uptake was evaluated during an 8-h period following oral administration of SFOH, FC, ferrous sulphate (oral iron supplement) or control (methylcellulose vehicle) in rat models of anaemia, iron overload and inflammation. A 13-week study evaluated the effects of SFOH and FC on iron accumulation in different organs.

Results

In the pharmacokinetic experiments, there was a minimal increase in serum iron with SFOH versus control during the 8-h post-treatment period in the iron overload and inflammation rat models, whereas a moderate increase was observed in the anaemia model. Significantly greater increases (P < 0.05) in serum iron were observed with FC versus SFOH in the rat models of anaemia and inflammation. In the 13-week iron accumulation study, total liver iron content was significantly higher in rats receiving FC versus SFOH (P < 0.01), whereas liver iron content did not differ between rats in the SFOH and control groups.

Conclusions

Iron uptake was higher from FC versus SFOH following a single dose in anaemia, iron overload and inflammation rat models and 13 weeks of treatment in normal rats. These observations likely relate to different physicochemical properties of SFOH and FC and suggest distinct mechanisms of iron absorption from these two phosphate binders.

Efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in chronic kidney disease. FOSFASTUR study

INTRODUCTION

Alterations in bone and mineral metabolism are very common in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The increase in phosphate levels leads to bone disease, risk of calcification and greater mortality, so any strategy aimed at reducing them should be welcomed. The latest drug incorporated into the therapeutic arsenal to treat hyperphosphataemia in CKD is sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFO).

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the efficacy and safety of SFO in 3 cohorts of patients, one with advanced CKD not on dialysis, another on peritoneal dialysis and the last on haemodialysis, followed for 6 months.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, multicentre study in clinical practice. Clinical and epidemiological variables were analysed. The evolution of parameters relating to alterations in bone and mineral metabolism and anaemia was analysed.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were included in the study (62±12 years, 64% male, 34% diabetic), 25 with advanced CKD not on dialysis, 25 on peritoneal dialysis and lastly, 35 on haemodialysis. In 66 patients (78%), SFO was the first phosphate binder; in the other 19, SFO replaced a previous phosphate binder due to poor tolerance or efficacy. The initial dose of SFO was 964±323mg/day. Overall, serum phosphate levels saw a significant reduction at 3 months of treatment (19.6%; P<.001). There were no differences in the efficacy of the drug when the different populations analysed were compared. Over the course of the study, there were no changes to levels of calcium, PTHi, ferritin, transferrin saturation index or haemoglobin, although there was a tendency for the last 2 to increase. Twelve patients (14%) withdrew from follow-up, 10 due to gastrointestinal adverse effects (primarily diarrhoea) and 2 were lost to follow-up (kidney transplant). The mean dose of the drug that the patients received increased over time, up to 1,147±371mg/day.

CONCLUSIONS

SFO is an effective option for the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in patients with CKD both in the advanced phases of the disease and on dialysis. We found similar efficacy across the 3 groups analysed. The higher their baseline phosphate level, the greater the reduction in the serum levels. A notable reduction in phosphate levels can be achieved with doses of around 1,000mg/day. Diarrhoea was the most common side effect, although it generally was not significant.

Efficacy and safety of PT20, an iron-based phosphate binder, for the treatment of hyperphosphataemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, Phase IIb study in patients with haemodialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease

Background

Hyperphosphataemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). PT20 (ferric iron oxide adipate) is an investigational molecule engineered to offer enhanced phosphate-binding properties relative to other phosphate binders.

Methods

In this double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02151643), the efficacy and safety of 28 days of oral PT20 treatment were evaluated in patients with dialysis-dependent CKD. Participants were randomly assigned in an 8:8:8:13:13 ratio to receive PT20 (400, 800, 1600 or 3200 mg) or placebo three times daily.

Results

Among 153 participants, 129 completed treatment [7 discontinued because of adverse events (AEs), 2 because of hyperphosphataemia and 15 for other reasons]. PT20 treatment for 28 days resulted in a statistically significant and dose-dependent reduction in serum phosphate concentration. There were no statistically significant effects of PT20 treatment on changes in haemoglobin or ferritin concentrations or transferrin saturation between Days 1 and 29. The incidence of treatment-emergent AEs was broadly similar across the PT20 and placebo groups (42–59% versus 44%). The most common PT20 treatment-related AEs were gastrointestinal, primarily diarrhoea (13–18%) and discoloured faeces (3–23%). No serious AEs were considered to be related to study treatment. There were no clinically significant changes in laboratory results reflecting acid/base status or increases in ferritin that could indicate the absorption of components of PT20.

Conclusions

In this first study investigating the efficacy and safety of PT20 in patients with hyperphosphataemia and dialysis-dependent CKD, PT20 significantly lowered serum phosphate concentrations and was generally well tolerated.

Nutritional support for patients with chronic kidney disease at pre-dialysis stages

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by poor outcomes, an increasing frequency of new cases, the need for expensive method of renal replacement therapy at the terminal stage. The main task facing the doctor is slowing the progression of CKD and delay the start of dialysis by applying the nephroprotective strategy, of which diet therapy is an essential part. The key components of the diet for CKD patients are reducing sodium intake to 2.3 g per day in order to improve control of blood pressure (BP), dietary protein restriction adequate to renal function from 0.8 to 0.3 g/kg of body weight per day combined with the prescribing of ketoanalogues of essential amino acids, hyperglycemia control. With the progression of CKD, the main objectives of the diet therapy are the prevention/correction of complications: protein-energy waisting, metabolic acidosis, ensuring sufficient calories, corresponding to the bodys energy expenditures (3035 kcal/kg of body weight per day), limiting phosphate intake to 0.81 g a day, restriction of food potassium. Low-protein diet in combination with ketoanalogues of amino acids, regular monitoring and correction of the nutritional status of patients at the pre-dialysis stages of CKD is an effective and safe method of nephroprotection, which allows delaying the start of dialysis.

Characteristics of Patients Who Achieve Serum Phosphorus Control on Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide or Sevelamer Carbonate: A post hoc Analysis of a Phase 3 Study

INTRODUCTION

Control of hyperphosphatemia in patients on dialysis remains a major challenge.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated predictors of serum phosphorus (sP) control among dialysis patients treated with noncalcium, oral phosphate binder therapy in a phase 3 clinical trial.

METHODS

Post hoc analyses were performed using data for patients with hyperphosphatemia who received 52 weeks of treatment with sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH) or sevelamer carbonate (sevelamer). Patients were categorized into those who achieved sP control (n = 302; defined as sP ≤ 5.5 mg/dL at week 52), and those with uncontrolled sP (n = 195; sP >5.5 mg/dL at week 52). Because SFOH and sevelamer have previously demonstrated similar effects on chronic kidney disease-mineral-bone disorder parameters in this study, the treatment groups were pooled.

RESULTS

Average age at baseline was higher among sP-controlled versus sP-uncontrolled patients (56.9 vs. 53.4 years; p = 0.005). Baseline sP levels were significantly lower among sP-controlled versus sP-uncontrolled patients (7.30 vs. 7.85 mg/dL; p < 0.001), and sP reductions from baseline were significantly greater in the sP-controlled group (-2.89 vs. -0.99 mg/dL at week 52; p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified higher baseline sP levels (odds ratio [OR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.765-0.960), no concomitant active vitamin D therapy use (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.328-0.804), and higher body mass index at baseline (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.937-0.992) as significant predictors of uncontrolled sP.

CONCLUSION

This analysis indicates that sP control may be more challenging in younger patients with high sP levels. Closer monitoring and management of serum phosphorus levels may be required in this population.

How to improve adherence the captors of phosphorus on hemodialysis: Experience in real life with sucroferric oxyhydroxide

INTRODUCTION

The lack of adherence to phosphate -binders (PB) is the most important factor in not achieving the objectives of serum phosphorus (sP). Studies in the real-world population are needed to understand the influence of PBs on adherence and how to modify it.

METHODS

Prospective study conducted during 3 months in usual clinical practice. Out of 105 hemodialysis patients, 57 were switched to SFOH and 48 maintained their baseline treatment (control group). sP levels and the percentage of patients with sP levels <5mg/dl were compared. Adherence before and after introduction of SFOH, number of pills of PB, preferences in the administration mode and side effects were analyzed.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with controlled sP (<5mg/dl) increased significantly in the SFOH users' group (62.1-92.9%, p<0.001), but not in the control group (83-83.3%, p=NS). The average of daily tablets decreased significantly in the SFOH group (7.2-2.3 comp, p<0.001), but not in the control group (5.6-5.6, p=NS) and 100% of the patients used only one PB in SFOH group. The use of SFOH increased the adherence according to the SMAQ questionnaire (57.8-84.3%; OR 13.1, p<0.001). The possibility to choose the preferred mode of administration (split-swallowing 89% compared to chewing 11%), improved the acceptance (44.7-78%). 14% of the patients experienced side effects and in 5.2% SFOH was discontinued for this reason.

CONCLUSIONS

SFOH controlled serum sP in 93% of patients, 100% in monotherapy, and with fewer tablets. The exploration and adaptation of preferences in the mode of administration influenced the acceptance of the drug by the patient and, probably, the future adherence.

Management of Hyperphosphatemia in End-Stage Renal Disease: A New Paradigm

Bone and mineral metabolism becomes dysregulated with progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and increasing levels of parathyroid hormone serve as an adaptive response to maintain normal phosphorus and calcium levels. In end-stage renal disease, this response becomes maladaptive and high levels of phosphorus may occur. We summarize strategies to control hyperphosphatemia based on a systematic literature review of clinical trial and real-world observational data on phosphorus control in hemodialysis patients with CKD-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD). These studies suggest that current management options (diet and lifestyle changes; regular dialysis treatment; and use of phosphate binders, vitamin D, calcimimetics) have their own benefits and limitations with variable clinical outcomes. A more integrated approach to phosphorus control in dialysis patients may be necessary, incorporating measurement of multiple biomarkers of CKD-MBD pathophysiology (calcium, phosphorus, and parathyroid hormone) and correlation between diet adjustments and CKD-MBD drugs, which may facilitate improved patient management.

Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study

Rationale & Objective

High pill burden associates with reduced phosphate-binder adherence among dialysis patients, contributing to elevated serum phosphorus levels. We compared the real-world effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) versus other phosphate binders in hemodialysis patients over 2 years.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting & Participants

Adult in-center hemodialysis patients prescribed 2 years of uninterrupted SO therapy (maintenance SO; n = 222) compared with patients who discontinued SO therapy (discontinued SO; n = 596) within 90 days of first prescription and switched to other phosphate binder(s) for 2 years.

Exposures

Phosphate binders.

Outcomes

Achievement of serum phosphorus levels ≤ 5.5 mg/dL, pill burden, and hospitalizations.

Analytical Approach

Comparisons were made quarterly (Q1-Q8) between maintenance SO and discontinued SO using Poisson and mixed-effects linear regression.

Results

Patients achieving serum phosphorus levels ≤ 5.5 mg/dL increased from baseline in maintenance SO (46 [20.7%] to a maximum of 104 [46.8%; P < 0.001]) and discontinued SO (96 [16.1%] to a maximum of 201 [33.7%]; P < 0.001). 100 (45%) maintenance SO patients achieved target serum phosphorus levels at Q8 with 3.1 fewer pills per day from baseline (7.5 to 4.4 pills per day; P < 0.001), and 190 (31.9%) discontinued SO patients achieved serum phosphorus levels ≤ 5.5 mg/dL at Q8 with pill burden unchanged (9.1 to 9.3 pills per day; P = 0.3). Among all patients during 2 years, mean serum phosphorus levels decreased by -0.66 mg/dL and -0.45 mg/dL (maintenance SO vs discontinued SO; P = 0.014), and mean pill burden decreased in maintenance SO (8.5 to 5.1 pills per day; P < 0.001), but not in discontinued SO (11.6 to 10.9 pills per day; P = 0.2). The serum phosphorus level decrease with SO was confirmed in a sensitivity analysis including patients with SO therapy for 2 or fewer years. Compared with discontinued SO, maintenance SO patients had 35.6 fewer hospitalizations per 100 patient-years (incidence rate ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58-0.96]).

Limitations

No data for treatment indication, tolerance, or adherence.

Conclusions

Patients maintained on SO therapy were more likely to achieve target serum phosphorus levels, use 50% fewer phosphate-binder pills per day, and have fewer hospital admissions than patients switched to treatment with other binders.

Effects of sucroferric oxyhydroxide and sevelamer carbonate on chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder parameters in dialysis patients

Background

Treatment of hyperphosphataemia is the primary goal of chronic kidney disease–mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) management. This post hoc analysis of a randomized, Phase 3 study evaluated the effects of 1-year treatment with the phosphate binders sucroferric oxyhydroxide or sevelamer carbonate (‘sevelamer’) on CKD-MBD indices among dialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia.

Methods

After a 2- to 4-week washout from previous phosphate binders, 1059 patients were randomized 2:1 to sucroferric oxyhydroxide 1.0–3.0 g/day (n = 710) or sevelamer 2.4–14.4 g/day (n = 349) for up to 24 weeks. Eligible patients enrolled in a 28-week extension. This post hoc analysis was performed for patients who completed ≥1 year of continuous treatment (n = 549). As the treatment groups showed similar CKD-MBD outcomes, the data were pooled for this analysis.

Results

Phosphate-binder therapy was associated with significant and sustained 30% reductions in serum phosphorus (P < 0.001). Median intact fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) also significantly decreased (P < 0.001) by 64% over 1 year. Intact parathyroid hormone decreased significantly after 24 weeks (P < 0.001), but levels returned to near baseline values by Week 52; minimal changes in serum calcium were observed. Of the bone resorption markers evaluated, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAP5b) decreased significantly (P < 0.001), whereas CTx increased transiently but returned to baseline levels by Week 52. The bone formation markers bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin both increased over 1 year of treatment.

Conclusions

Overall, 1 year of sucroferric oxyhydroxide or sevelamer treatment significantly reduced serum FGF-23, which has been associated with clinical benefit in patients with CKD. The trend towards increased bone formation marker levels indicates a beneficial effect on bone metabolism.

Phosphate Binders and Nonphosphate Effects in the Gastrointestinal Tract

Phosphate binders are commonly prescribed in patients with end-stage kidney disease to prevent and treat hyperphosphatemia. These binders are usually associated with gastrointestinal distress, may bind molecules other than phosphate, and may alter the gut microbiota, altogether having systemic effects unrelated to phosphate control. Sevelamer is the most studied of the available binders for nonphosphate-related effects including binding to bile acids, endotoxins, gut microbiota-derived metabolites, and advanced glycation end products. Other binders (calcium- and noncalcium-based binders) may bind vitamins, such as vitamin K and folic acid. Moreover, the relatively new iron-based phosphate binders may alter the gut microbiota, as some of the iron or organic ligands may be used by the gastrointestinal bacteria. The objective of this narrative review is to provide the current evidence for the nonphosphate effects of phosphate binders on gastrointestinal function, nutrient and molecule binding, and the gut microbiome.

Mechanism of Action and Clinical Attributes of Auryxia® (Ferric Citrate)

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major cause of morbidity and premature mortality and represents a significant global public health issue. Underlying this burden are the many complications of CKD, including mineral and bone disorders, anemia, and accelerated cardiovascular disease. Hyperphosphatemia and elevated levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) have been identified as key independent risk factors for the adverse cardiovascular outcomes that frequently occur in patients with CKD. Auryxia^® (ferric citrate; Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston, MA, USA) is an iron-based compound with distinctive chemical characteristics and a mechanism of action that render it dually effective as a therapy in patients with CKD; it has been approved as a phosphate binder for the control of serum phosphate levels in adult CKD patients treated with dialysis and as an iron replacement product for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in adult CKD patients not treated with dialysis. This review focuses on Auryxia, its mechanism of action, and the clinical attributes that differentiate it from other, non-pharmaceutical-grade, commercially available forms of ferric citrate and from other commonly used phosphate binder and iron supplement therapies for patients with CKD. Consistent with the chemistry and mechanism of action of Auryxia, multiple clinical studies have demonstrated its efficacy in both lowering serum phosphate levels and improving iron parameters in patients with CKD. Levels of FGF23 decrease significantly with Auryxia treatment, but the effects associated with the cardiovascular system remain to be evaluated in longer-term studies.

Changes in serum albumin and other nutritional markers when using sucroferric oxyhydroxide as phosphate binder among hemodialysis patients: a historical cohort study

Background

Elevated serum phosphorus concentrations are common among maintenance hemodialysis patients. Protein is a major source of dietary phosphate, but restriction of protein intake can result in hypoalbuminemia and protein-energy wasting. We hypothesized that sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO), a potent phosphate binder with a low pill burden, may reduce serum phosphorus levels in hemodialysis patients with hypoalbuminemia without adversely impacting albumin levels or dietary intake of protein.

Methods

We retrospectively examined de-identified data from 79 adult, in-center hemodialysis patients with baseline hypoalbuminemia (≤ 3.5 g/dL) switched to SO as part of routine clinical care for at least 1 year. Temporal changes (3-month intervals from baseline through Q4) in phosphate binder pill burden, serum phosphorous levels, nutritional markers, and equilibrated Kt/V were analyzed. Data from a matched reference group of non-hypoalbuminemic patients (N = 79) switched to SO were also examined.

Results

SO therapy was associated with a mean reduction of 45.7 and 45.1% in daily phosphate binder pill burden, and a mean reduction of 0.4 mg/dL and 0.51 mg/dL in serum phosphorus levels for the hypoalbuminemic and non-hypoalbuminemic patients, respectively. Hypoalbuminemic patients demonstrated significant increases in mean serum albumin levels from 3.50 mg/dL at baseline to 3.69, 3.74, 3.70, and 3.69 mg/dL during Q1 through Q4, respectively (P < 0.0001), whereas serum albumin levels remained unchanged in the non-hypoalbuminemic group.

Conclusions

Both hypoalbuminemic and non-hypoalbuminemic patients switching to SO exhibited significant reductions in serum phosphorus concentrations and daily phosphate binder pill burden. Among hypoalbuminemic patients, the initiation of SO therapy was also associated with increases in serum albumin, suggesting therapy may have allowed patients to increase their dietary intake of protein.

Strategies for Phosphate Control in Patients With CKD

Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly in those requiring renal replacement therapy. The importance of controlling serum phosphate has long been recognized based on observational epidemiological studies that linked increased phosphate levels to adverse outcomes and higher mortality risk. Experimental data further supported the role of phosphate in the development of bone and cardiovascular diseases. Recent advances in our understanding of the mechanisms involved in phosphate homeostasis have made it clear that the serum phosphate concentration depends on a complex interplay among the kidneys, intestinal tract, and bone, and is tightly regulated by a complex endocrine system. Moreover, the source of dietary phosphate and the use of phosphate-based additives in industrialized foods are additional factors that are of particular importance in CKD. Not surprisingly, the management of hyperphosphatemia is difficult, and, despite a multifaceted approach, it remains unsuccessful in many patients. An additional issue is the fact that the supposedly beneficial effect of phosphate lowering on hard clinical outcomes in interventional trials is a matter of ongoing debate. In this review, we discuss currently available treatment approaches for controlling hyperphosphatemia, including dietary phosphate restriction, reduction of intestinal phosphate absorption, phosphate removal by dialysis, and management of renal osteodystrophy, with particular focus on practical challenges and limitations, and on potential benefits and harms.

Effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide in patients on on-line hemodiafiltration in real-world clinical practice: A retrospective study

Introduction:

Hyperphosphatemia is a serious consequence of chronic kidney disease and has been associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Controlling serum phosphorus levels in patients on dialysis is a challenge for the clinicians and implies, in most cases, the use of phosphate binders (PB). Part of the reason for this challenge is poor adherence to treatment because of the high pill burden in this patient group.

Objective:

To assess the real-world effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) in controlling serum phosphorus levels and determine the associated pill burden.

Methods:

A multicenter, quantitative, retrospective, before-after study was conducted with patients receiving online hemodiafiltration. Patients who switched to SO as a part of routine care were included in the study. PB treatment, number of pills, serum phosphorus levels, and intravenous iron medication and dosage were collected monthly during the six months of treatment with either PB or SO.

Results:

A total of 42 patients were included in the study. After switching from a PB to SO, the prescribed pills/day was reduced 67% from 6 pills/day to 2 pills/day (p < 0.001) and the frequency of pill intake was lowered from 3 times/day to 2 times/day (p < 0.001). During the treatment with SO, the proportion of patients with serum phosphorus ≤ 5.5 mg/dL increased from 33.3% at baseline to 45% after six months of treatment.

Conclusion:

During the six-month follow-up with SO, serum phosphorus levels were controlled with one third of the pills/day compared to other PB.

Phosphate binder pill burden, adherence, and serum phosphorus control among hemodialysis patients converting to sucroferric oxyhydroxide

Background

Phosphate binders are widely used to achieve serum phosphorus control in patients with end-stage renal disease. However, the large pill burden associated with these medications may decrease adherence to therapy. In clinical trials, sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) demonstrated equivalent control of serum phosphorus to sevelamer, with a lower daily pill burden. We examined changes in phosphate binder pill burden, medication possession ratio (MPR), and phosphorus control among in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) patients converting to SO from another phosphate binder as part of routine care.

Materials and methods

Patients included in this retrospective analysis (N=490) were ≥18 years old, received ICHD at a large dialysis organization (LDO), and were enrolled in the LDO’s pharmacy service. Patients converting to SO were those who had supply of another phosphate binder, received a first prescription fill for SO, and subsequently did not refill the non-SO phosphate binder. Patients were followed over the 6 months before and 6 months following the first SO fill and were censored from the analysis upon modality change, loss to follow-up, discontinuation of SO, or fill of a prescription for another phosphate binder after SO initiation (number censored=361). Outcome measures assessed were total phosphate binder pill burden and MPR, serum phosphorus, and percentage of patients with serum phosphorus ≤5.5 mg/dL.

Results

Among patients converting to SO, mean phosphate binder pill burden was 10.8 pills/day during baseline; this decreased to 5.5 pills/day during follow-up (P<0.001). The percentage of patients with serum phosphorus ≤5.5 mg/dL increased from 22.0% to 30.0% (P<0.001). Among patients not using the LDO pharmacy’s automated refill management service (N=30), mean phosphate binder MPR increased from 0.68 during baseline to 0.80 during follow-up (P=0.01).

Conclusion

In a cohort of ICHD patients, conversion to SO was associated with a reduction in pill burden, better adherence, and improvements in phosphorus control.

One-Year Historical Cohort Study of the Phosphate Binder Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis

Objective:

The high pill burden of many phosphate binders (PBs) may contribute to increased prevalence of hyperphosphatemia and poor nutritional status observed among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis therapy. We examined the real-world effectiveness of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO), a PB with low pill burden, in managing serum phosphorus in patients with prevalent hemodialysis over a 1-year period.

Design:

Historical cohort analyses of de-identified electronic medical records.

Subjects:

In-center hemodialysis patients switched from another PB to SO therapy as part of routine care with 12 months of uninterrupted SO prescriptions recorded, and documented serum phosphorus levels were eligible for inclusion. Clinical data were extracted from a pharmacy service, FreseniusRx, database and Fresenius Kidney Care clinical data warehouse.

Main outcome measures:

Comparisons were made between the 91-day period before SO initiation (i.e., baseline) and the 4 consecutive 91-day intervals of SO treatment (Q1-Q4). Clinical measures included achievement of target phosphorus levels (#5.5 mg/dL) and mean number of PB pills/day.

Results:

Among 530 analyzed patients, the proportion achieving target serum phosphorus levels increased by >100% 1 year after switching to SO therapy, that is, from 17.7% at baseline to 24.5%, 30.5%, 36.4%, and 36.0% at Q1 through Q4, respectively (P < .0001 for all). Reductions in serum phosphorus were observed at all follow-up timepoints (P <.0001), irrespective of baseline PB. From a mean baseline PB pill burden of 8.5 pills/day, patients experienced an average 50% pill burden reduction during SO treatment (P <. 0001). Phosphorus-attuned albumin and phosphorus-attuned protein intake (normalized protein catabolic rate) improved significantly after transition to SO (P < .0001). The effectiveness of SO was evident in prespecified subgroups of interest (i.e., black/African-American patients, Hispanic/Latino patients, and women).

Conclusion:

Among patients on hemodialysis, switching to SO resulted in a 2-fold greater likelihood of achieving target phosphorus levels while halving daily PB pill burden. Increases in phosphorus-attuned albumin and protein intake suggest improved nutritional status.

[Short-term effects with sucroferric oxyhydroxide in hemodialysis patients: Experience in NephroCare France]

INTRODUCTION

Despite a better management of hyperphosphatemia in haemodialysis patients observed during the past years, most of them remain insufficiently treated and exposed to bone and cardiovascular complications that are associated with this biological abnormality. The availability of calcium-free phosphate binders among therapeutical options is confirmed to significantly reduce serum phosphate levels without the risk of excess exposure to calcium. Currently sucroferric oxyhydroxyde (SO) is the only iron-based phosphate binder available in France.

METHODS

A cohort of patients prescribed OHS has been extracted from the EUCLID 5 database between June 2016 and December 2017. The effects on bone mineral metabolism and ferritin have been retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-two patients with OHS prescription have been identified. The OHS treatment duration median was 4.3 months (1.84-10.99). The average midweek phosphatemia decreased significantly after OHS prescription (from 1.99 to 1.83 mmol/L ; P<0.0001) with a significant increase of the proportion of patients (12.1 to 25.7% ; P<0.0001) reaching the phosphate target of 1.5 mmol/L, without significant change in calcemia and PTH. Ferritinemia significantly increased from 362 to 427 μg/L in 3 months (P=0.0049). OHS therapy has been stopped and replaced in 18% of the cases.

DISCUSSION

Among the NephroCare cohort, OHS therapy was efficient to decrease phosphatemia and to increase significantly the proportion of patients in target. There were no short term changes in calcemia and PTH. The slight increase in ferritin confirms the findings of the phase III study and its extension. The effects on the pills count and the OHS side-effects are analyzed from literature. The risk of iron overload and the impact on the anemia management including EPO sparing are currently under study.

CONCLUSION

OHS therapy appears to be a new efficient alternative to non-calcium phosphate binders. A better knowledge of its side effects will help the patients and the physician to optimize the phosphate balance management. The slight increase in ferritin can be considered as an epiphenomenon because of the important iron needs and frequent check of this parameter in the anemia management.

Evaluation of changes in ferritin levels during sucroferric oxyhydroxide treatment

Background

A sub-analysis of a Phase III study was conducted to identify factors that might predict increased ferritin levels during long-term sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) treatment in hemodialysis patients.

Methods

The open-label, multicenter, Phase III study assessed the efficacy and safety of SO 750–3000 mg/day for 52 weeks in Japanese patients with chronic renal failure and hyperphosphatemia. A total of 125 of 161 patients from the Phase III trial, and who had data for ferritin levels after 28 weeks of SO treatment, were evaluated.

Results

Baseline ferritin was the strongest contributor (P < 0.0001) to ferritin increases during SO treatment. By Week 28, there were significant differences (P < 0.05/3) in ferritin increases between patients with higher [quartile 4 (Q4)] versus lower (Q1, Q2 and Q3) baseline ferritin. An erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dosage reduction was observed in patients with the lowest baseline ferritin level (Q1), and only slight reductions were noted in the other patient subsets. SO dosages administered to patients in baseline ferritin quartiles Q2, Q3 and Q4 were comparable throughout the study with slight fluctuations. SO dosages in Q1 were considerably lower than those in the other quartiles.

Conclusions

In summary, of the baseline variables found to predict increased ferritin, and changes in iron-related parameters, during SO treatment in Japanese chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis, baseline ferritin was the most relevant variable.