Infective endocarditis in haemodialysis patients: 16-year experience at one institution

Infective Endocarditis in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: A Current Review

Background

Cardiovascular and infective complications are commonly observed in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) with cardiovascular events and infection-related complications being the first and second leading causes of death. Infective endocarditis (IE) is characterized by inflammation of the endocardium caused by infection, typically affecting the cardiac valves and can be in acute, subacute, or chronic forms. It is a serious complication within the HD population due to their predisposition for both infection and valvular damage. Considering the frailty and burden of comorbidities in those receiving HD, management of IE in the HD population is very challenging. There has been continuous discussion and debate on optimizing the diagnostic and treatment approach of IE in this patient group to improve their clinical outcomes. Currently, reported outcomes are relatively poor and there are updates from numerous guidelines relating to advances in IE management.

Summary

In this review, we will evaluate the evidence in relation to the epidemiology of HD-associated IE and discuss the important risk factors of IE in patients requiring dialysis. We will also evaluate the current recommendations regarding diagnosis and treatment for suspected or confirmed IE cases amongst HD patients and present the updated data regarding clinical outcomes relating to HD-associated IE.

Key Messages

The incidence of IE in HD patients is expected to increase going forward as HD becomes more easily accessible alongside an emerging uptake of home HD. A more thorough insight into this topic is required to improve clinical practice relating to IE prevention and management in the HD population, given relatively poor clinical outcomes.

In-Hospital and Long-Term Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis in Chronic Dialysis Patients

Purpose

To elucidate the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of infective endocarditis (IE) in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients on chronic dialysis and to analyze the risk factors of mortality.

Patients and Methods

The case files of 1,817 patients who were hospitalized for IE over a 14-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 116 ESKD patients on chronic dialysis were enrolled in this study. Cox’s proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the risk factors of mortality and long-term outcomes.

Results

The in-hospital mortality rate of the 116 enrolled patients was as high as 43.1%. Patients who survived the index admission had a three-year mortality rate of 33%. Univariate analysis was used to compare survivors and non-survivors; poor in-hospital outcomes were associated with the use of a tunneled cuffed catheter for dialysis access, a shorter duration hospitalization, shock or respiratory failure during hospitalization, a higher white blood count, a higher percentage of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, a higher C-reactive protein level, a lower serum albumin level, and a higher total bilirubin level. Following multivariate adjustment, shock (odds ratio, 9.29, with a 95% confidence interval [CI] of 2.78 to 34.24; p<0.001) or respiratory failure (odds ratio, 25.16, with a 95% CI of 5.63 to 153.54; p<0.001) during hospitalization was strongly associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Patients who underwent cardiac operations (odds ratio, 0.22, with a 95% CI of 0.052 to 0.86; p=0.031) had better in-hospital outcomes. Heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) at the time of initial hospitalization was an independent risk factor for 3-year mortality (hazard ratio, 3.48, with a 95% CI of 1.09 to 11.09; p=0.035).

Conclusion

The outcomes of IE for ESKD patients on chronic dialysis were poor. Only 56.9% of these patients survived the index admission and their mortality rate over three years was 33%. Shock or respiratory failure during hospitalization was associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Patients who underwent cardiac operations had better in-hospital outcomes. HFrEF at the time of initial hospitalization was an independent risk factor for three-year mortality.

Reevaluation of the impact of methicillin-resistance on outcomes in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is highly prevalent in hospitals, and has recently emerged in the community. The impact of methicillin-resistance on mortality and medical costs for patients with S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) requires reevaluation.

METHODS

We searched studies with SAB or endocarditis using electronic databases including Ovid-Medline, Embase-Medline, and Cochrane Library, as well as five local databases for published studies during the period January 2000 to September 2011.

RESULTS

A total of 2,841 studies were identified, 62 of which involved 17,563 adult subjects and were selected as eligible. A significant increase in overall mortality associated with MRSA, compared to that with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), was evidenced by an odds ratio (OR) of 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.73 to 2.21; p < 0.01). In 13 endocarditis studies, MRSA increased the risk of mortality, with an OR of 2.65 (95% CI, 1.46 to 4.80). When three studies, which compared mortality rates between CA-MRSA and CA-MSSA, were combined, the risk of methicillin-resistance increased 3.23-fold compared to MSSA (95% CI, 1.25 to 8.34). The length of hospital stay in the MRSA group was 10 days longer than that in the MSSA group (95% CI, 3.36 to 16.70). Of six studies that reported medical costs, two were included in the analysis, which estimated medical costs to be $9,954.58 (95% CI, 8,951.99 to 10,957.17).

CONCLUSION

MRSA is still associated with increased mortality, longer hospital stays and medical costs, compared with MSSA in SAB in studies published since the year 2000.

A retrospective epidemiologic study to define risk factors, microbiology, and clinical outcomes of infective endocarditis in a large tertiary-care teaching hospital

Objective:

This study aims to define risk factors as well as their association with microbiology and clinical outcomes in a large US infective endocarditis population.

Methods:

Hospital records were searched for appropriate infective endocarditis–related ICD codes from 16 July 2007 to 13 August 2015. A total of 363 cases were retrospectively identified that met definite Modified Duke Criteria for infective endocarditis and were analyzed by age group, causative organism, and associated risk factors for use of valvular surgical intervention, 30/90/180-day mortality after admission, and embolic phenomena.

Results:

Chronic hemodialysis was the most common risk factor (26.7% of cases). Of all age groups, those aged 78+ years had the lowest 30-day mortality but those aged 58–77 years had the highest mortality (p = 0.039). Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent causative organism. Those aged 78–97 years were more likely to have enterococcal infective endocarditis than those aged 18–27 years (p = 0.0144). Chronic hemodialysis associated infective endocarditis was more likely to be caused by coagulase-negative staphylococcus (p = 0.0121) and have a higher 30-day mortality (p = 0.141) than intravenous drug use associated infective endocarditis. Intravenous drug use and chronic hemodialysis were similarly likely to be caused by S. aureus. Intravenous drug use associated infective endocarditis was more likely to be caused by viridans group streptococci (p = 0.0001). Fungal infective endocarditis was most likely to embolize. Chronic hemodialysis patients were less likely to undergo valvular surgery (p = 0.001) and those with chronic hemodialysis who did had lower mortality than those only managed medically that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.2991). Infective endocarditis caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci had the greatest 30-day mortality at 31.3% but did not reach statistical significance over all other causative organisms (p = 0.060).

Conclusion:

In our infective endocarditis population, S. aureus is the predominant causative organism. Chronic hemodialysis is the most common risk factor present in infective endocarditis populations and has greater association with coagulase-negative staphylococci and 30-day mortality. Intravenous drug use had the lowest mortality among risk factors with a similar proportion of S. aureus infective endocarditis compared to chronic hemodialysis but a higher proportion of viridans group streptococci infective endocarditis cases. Further study will need to be performed on prevention and treatment of infective endocarditis in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Physiopathological approach to infective endocarditis in chronic hemodialysis patients: left heart versus right heart involvement

Infectious endocarditis (IE), a complication that is both cardiac and infectious, occurs frequently and is associated with a heavy burden of morbidity and mortality in chronic hemodialysis patients (CHD). About 2-6% of chronic hemodialysis patients develop IE and the incidence is 50-60 times higher among CHD patients than in the general population. The left heart is the most frequent location of IE in CHD and the different published series report a prevalence of left valve involvement varying from 80% to 100%. Valvular and perivalvular abnormalities, alteration of the immune system, and bacteremia associated with repeated manipulation of the vascular access, particularly central venous catheters, comprise the main factors explaining the left heart IE in CHD patients. While left-sided IE develops in altered valves in a high-pressure system, right-sided IE on the contrary, generally develops in healthy valves in a low-pressure system. Right-sided IE is rare, with its incidence varying from 0% to 26% depending on the study, and the tricuspid valve is the main location. Might the massive influx of pathogenic and virulent germs via the central venous catheter to the right heart, with the tricuspid being the first contact valve, have a role in the physiopathology of IE in CHD, thus facilitating bacterial adhesion? While the physiopathology of left-sided IE entails multiple and convincing mechanisms, it is not the case for right-sided IE, for which the physiopathological mechanism is only partially understood and remains shrouded in mystery.