1
|
Sener U, Wilcox JA, Boire AA. Leptomeningeal Disease: Current Approaches and Future Directions. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2025; 25:25. [PMID: 40100294 PMCID: PMC11920312 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-025-01412-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/02/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Leptomeningeal disease (LMD), or spread of cancer cells into the pia and arachnoid membranes encasing the brain and spinal cord, is associated with high symptom burden and poor survival at 2 to 5 months. Conventional treatments including photon-based radiation therapy, systemic chemotherapy, and intrathecal chemotherapy demonstrate limited efficacy. Despite significant successes for a range of solid tumors, immunotherapy has not yet demonstrated significant efficacy in management of LMD. Advances in understanding of LMD pathophysiology, improved diagnostics, and novel therapeutics are shifting this paradigm. In this article, we review diagnostic and treatment challenges associated with LMD. RECENT FINDINGS We discuss the use of novel cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis techniques such as circulating tumor cell and CSF cell-free DNA assessment to overcome limitations of conventional diagnostic modalities. We then review advances in treatment including clinical trial data demonstrating efficacy of proton craniospinal radiation to treat the entire neuroaxis. We discuss emerging data regarding targeted therapeutics conferring durable survival benefit. Novel therapeutics and combinatorial treatment approaches will likely further improve outcomes for patients with LMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugur Sener
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jessica A Wilcox
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adrienne A Boire
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Brain Tumor Center, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Narjoux G, Mainguené J, Guilhaume MN, Brenet O, Borcoman E, Escalup L, Salaun H, Moreau P, Bouyer AS, Cottu P. Development of a Prognostic Score in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Treated for Meningeal Carcinomatosis. Breast J 2025; 2025:5438600. [PMID: 40224951 PMCID: PMC11991760 DOI: 10.1155/tbj/5438600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2025] [Indexed: 04/15/2025]
Abstract
Purpose: Meningeal carcinomatosis (MC) has a dismal prognosis in patients with breast cancer and requires invasive therapies. The aim of the present retrospective study was to determine a prognostic score for overall survival (OS) in patients with breast cancer and treated for MC. Methods: The data of 109 patients with proven breast cancer MC treated with at least one intrathecal (IT) injection of methotrexate or thiotepa at Institut Curie were retrospectively recorded from 2011 to 2019. We developed prognostic clinical scores for OS and 24-week survival. Results: The diagnosis and evaluation of MC were based on a combination of clinical, imaging, and laboratory studies. Three significant prognostic factors for OS were identified. Clinical response or stabilization after one month of IT therapy had a favorable independent prognostic value for both OS and 24-week survival. Additionally, a baseline CSF Cyfra 21-1 concentration lower than 79 ng/mL in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the absence of 1-month CSF malignant cells had borderline favorable independent prognostic value for OS and 24-week survival, respectively. We constructed 2-class and 3-class prognostic scores for each outcome, identifying a population with a very poor prognosis. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to develop a response-based prognosis score for patients with breast cancer-related MC. This one-month prognostic score may help to determine which patient could actually benefit from prolonged IT therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grégoire Narjoux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | - Juliette Mainguené
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | | | - Olivier Brenet
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | - Edith Borcoman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | | | - Hélène Salaun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | - Pauline Moreau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Bouyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sweed NT, Hsiao HC, Blouw B, Pircher TJ, Fisher D, Naluz KR, Mayer JA, Dugan MC, Sharma A, Carrillo J, Kesari S. A Microfluidic, Multi-Antibody Cell Capture Method to Evaluate Tumor Cells in Cerebrospinal Fluid in Patients With Suspected Leptomeningeal Metastases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2025; 149:242-252. [PMID: 38797516 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0295-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a clinical sequela of central nervous system metastasis involving the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), often seen in late-stage solid tumors. It has a grave prognosis without urgent treatment. Standard of care methodologies to diagnose LMD include CSF cytology, magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical evaluation. These methods offer limited sensitivity and specificity for the evaluation of LMD. Here, we describe the analytic performance characteristics of a microfluidic-based tumor cell enrichment and detection assay optimized to detect epithelial cells in CSF using both contrived samples as well as CSF from patients having suspected or confirmed LMD from carcinomas. OBJECTIVE.— To demonstrate the feasibility of using a microfluidic, multi-antibody cell capture assay to identify and quantify tumor cells in CSF. DESIGN.— An artificial CSF solution was spiked with 34 different human carcinoma cell lines at different concentrations and assayed for the ability to detect tumor cells to assess analytic accuracy. Two cell lines were selected to assess linearity, intra-assay precision, interinstrument precision, and sample stability. Clinical verification was performed on 65 CSF specimens from patients. Parameters assessed included the number of tumor cells, coefficient of variation percentage, and percentage of tumor cell capture (TCC). RESULTS.— Among contrived samples, average tumor cell capture ranged from 50% to 82% (261 of 522; 436 of 531), and coefficients of variation ranged from 7% to 67%. The cell capture assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 95% among clinical samples. CONCLUSIONS.— This assay demonstrated the ability to detect and enumerate epithelial cells in contrived and clinical specimens in an accurate and reproducible fashion. The use of cell capture assays in CSF may be useful as a sensitive test for the diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring of LMD from solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan T Sweed
- From the Clinical Department (Sweed, Blouw, Dugan, Naluz, Mayer) and Research and Development (Hsiao, Pircher, Fisher), Biocept, Inc, San Diego, California
| | - Hao-Ching Hsiao
- From the Clinical Department (Sweed, Blouw, Dugan, Naluz, Mayer) and Research and Development (Hsiao, Pircher, Fisher), Biocept, Inc, San Diego, California
| | - Barbara Blouw
- From the Clinical Department (Sweed, Blouw, Dugan, Naluz, Mayer) and Research and Development (Hsiao, Pircher, Fisher), Biocept, Inc, San Diego, California
| | - Tony J Pircher
- From the Clinical Department (Sweed, Blouw, Dugan, Naluz, Mayer) and Research and Development (Hsiao, Pircher, Fisher), Biocept, Inc, San Diego, California
| | - Deanna Fisher
- From the Clinical Department (Sweed, Blouw, Dugan, Naluz, Mayer) and Research and Development (Hsiao, Pircher, Fisher), Biocept, Inc, San Diego, California
| | - Katrina Rose Naluz
- From the Clinical Department (Sweed, Blouw, Dugan, Naluz, Mayer) and Research and Development (Hsiao, Pircher, Fisher), Biocept, Inc, San Diego, California
| | - Julie Ann Mayer
- From the Clinical Department (Sweed, Blouw, Dugan, Naluz, Mayer) and Research and Development (Hsiao, Pircher, Fisher), Biocept, Inc, San Diego, California
| | - Michael C Dugan
- From the Clinical Department (Sweed, Blouw, Dugan, Naluz, Mayer) and Research and Development (Hsiao, Pircher, Fisher), Biocept, Inc, San Diego, California
| | - Akanksha Sharma
- Neuro-Oncology, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Providence Saint John' Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, California (Sharma, Carrillo, Kesari)
| | - Jose Carrillo
- Neuro-Oncology, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Providence Saint John' Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, California (Sharma, Carrillo, Kesari)
| | - Santosh Kesari
- Neuro-Oncology, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Providence Saint John' Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, California (Sharma, Carrillo, Kesari)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dhawan S, Mattathil F, Malik I, Khyathi M, Bhakar B. Leptomeningeal Disease Secondary to Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: A Rapidly Progressive and Fatal Complication. Cureus 2024; 16:e74421. [PMID: 39600551 PMCID: PMC11590165 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/25/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a rare yet serious complication of advanced malignancy, often seen in breast cancer and associated with a poor prognosis. This case report highlights the rapid progression and diagnostic challenges encountered in a woman in her 40s with advanced breast cancer who presented with severe headaches, absence seizures, and diplopia. The patient's complex past history included invasive ductal carcinoma, prior brain metastasis, and recent craniotomy, which added significant challenges to diagnosis and management. Clinical investigations included computed tomography (CT) of the head, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the orbit and head, electroencephalography (EEG), and lumbar puncture, which indicated optic nerve sheath enhancement, ventricular prominence, coating of facial and vestibulocochlear nerves, and cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities suggestive of LMD. Although empiric treatment for bacterial and tuberculous meningitis was initiated, the patient's rapid decline necessitated an aggressive multimodal approach. Management included high-dose corticosteroids, broad-spectrum antibiotics, antitubercular drugs, and anticonvulsants, though her seizures persisted. Ultimately, comfort-focused care was prioritized as her condition remained refractory to interventions, and she was transitioned to palliative care. This case emphasizes the need for early suspicion, prompt multidisciplinary involvement, and the challenges in managing complex oncological cases with atypical neurological manifestations. The poor prognosis associated with LMD reflects the limitations of current therapeutic strategies and the need for a nuanced approach to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurav Dhawan
- Internal Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR
| | - Fredwin Mattathil
- Internal Medicine, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, GBR
| | - Isha Malik
- Diabetes and Endocrinology, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, GBR
| | | | - Bhawna Bhakar
- Internal Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wilcox JA, Chukwueke UN, Ahn MJ, Aizer AA, Bale TA, Brandsma D, Brastianos PK, Chang S, Daras M, Forsyth P, Garzia L, Glantz M, Oliva ICG, Kumthekar P, Le Rhun E, Nagpal S, O'Brien B, Pentsova E, Lee EQ, Remsik J, Rudà R, Smalley I, Taylor MD, Weller M, Wefel J, Yang JT, Young RJ, Wen PY, Boire AA. Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: A Society for Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus review on clinical management and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1781-1804. [PMID: 38902944 PMCID: PMC11449070 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are increasingly becoming recognized as a treatable, yet generally incurable, complication of advanced cancer. As modern cancer therapeutics have prolonged the lives of patients with metastatic cancer, specifically in patients with parenchymal brain metastases, treatment options, and clinical research protocols for patients with LM from solid tumors have similarly evolved to improve survival within specific populations. Recent expansions in clinical investigation, early diagnosis, and drug development have given rise to new unanswered questions. These include leptomeningeal metastasis biology and preferred animal modeling, epidemiology in the modern cancer population, ensuring validation and accessibility of newer leptomeningeal metastasis diagnostics, best clinical practices with multimodality treatment options, clinical trial design and standardization of response assessments, and avenues worthy of further research. An international group of multi-disciplinary experts in the research and management of LM, supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology, were assembled to reach a consensus opinion on these pressing topics and provide a roadmap for future directions. Our hope is that these recommendations will accelerate collaboration and progress in the field of LM and serve as a platform for further discussion and patient advocacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Wilcox
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ugonma N Chukwueke
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Myung-Ju Ahn
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital / Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tejus A Bale
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dieta Brandsma
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan Chang
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, University of San Francisco California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mariza Daras
- Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Peter Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Livia Garzia
- Developmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Glantz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- The Lou and Jean Malnati Brain Tumor Institute, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Seema Nagpal
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Barbara O'Brien
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elena Pentsova
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eudocia Quant Lee
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jan Remsik
- Laboratory for Immunology of Metastatic Ecosystems, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
- Department of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto and Treviso Hospitals, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy
| | - Inna Smalley
- Department of Tumor Biology, The Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Michael D Taylor
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Neuro-oncology Research Program, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jeffrey Wefel
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jonathan T Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert J Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adrienne A Boire
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bardhan M, Dey D, Suresh V, Javed B, Venur VA, Joe N, Kalidindi R, Ozair A, Khan M, Mahtani R, Lo S, Odia Y, Ahluwalia MS. An overview of the therapeutic strategies for neoplastic meningitis due to breast cancer: when and why? Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:77-103. [PMID: 38145503 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2293223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoplastic meningitis (NM), also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, is characterized by the infiltration of tumor cells into the meninges, and poses a significant therapeutic challenge owing to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. Breast cancer is a common cause of NM among solid tumors, further highlighting the urgent need to explore effective therapeutic strategies. This review aims to provide insights into the evolving landscape of NM therapy in breast cancer by collating existing research, evaluating current treatments, and identifying potential emerging therapeutic options. AREAS COVERED This review explores the clinical features, therapeutic strategies, recent advances, and challenges of managing NM in patients with breast cancer. Its management includes multimodal strategies, including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and supportive care. This review also emphasizes targeted drug options and optimal drug concentrations, and discusses emerging therapies. Additionally, it highlights the variability in treatment outcomes and the potential of combination regimens to effectively manage NM in breast cancer. EXPERT OPINION Challenges in treating NM include debates over clinical trial end points and the management of adverse effects. Drug resistance and low response rates are significant hurdles, particularly inHER2-negative breast cancer. The development of more precise and cost-effective medications with improved selectivity is crucial. Additionally, global efforts are needed for infrastructure development and cancer control considering the diverse nature of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mainak Bardhan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Vinay Suresh
- King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Binish Javed
- Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Vyshak Alva Venur
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Neha Joe
- St John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | | | - Ahmad Ozair
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Reshma Mahtani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Simon Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yazmin Odia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pellerino A, Bertero L, Pronello E, Rudà R, Soffietti R. The early recognition and diagnosis of neoplastic meningitis. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:105-116. [PMID: 38145502 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2295999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The diagnosis and monitoring of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from solid tumors are challenging, and the combination of neurological symptoms, MRI findings, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology does not always allow to achieve a definitive diagnosis. AREAS COVERED This review summarizes the studies that have investigated CSF liquid biopsy to improve the initial diagnosis of LM in case the CSF cytology is negative or only suspicious for tumor cells, and monitoring of tumor response following targeted therapies or immunotherapy. In this regard, the early detection of LM recurrence and the development of resistant mutations are critical issues. Moreover, the early identification of subgroups of patients with a higher risk of LM progression, as well as the correlation of LM burden with survival, are discussed. EXPERT OPINION There is an urgent need of prospective studies to monitor longitudinally LM using CSF liquid biopsy and investigate the role of CTC, ctDNA or novel assays. The optimal setting for the longitudinal CSF and blood collection can be clinical trials focused on the molecular diagnosis of LM as well as the response and monitoring following targeted agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Pellerino
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Bertero
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Edoardo Pronello
- Neurology Unit, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Oncology, Candiolo Institute for Cancer Research, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Candiolo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wilcox JA, Estrera R, Boire A. The Spectrum of Headache in Leptomeningeal Metastases: A Comprehensive Review with Clinical Management Guidelines. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:695-706. [PMID: 37874457 PMCID: PMC10713777 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01180-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Headaches are a common, oftentimes debilitating symptom in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. RECENT FINDINGS The third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders provides a useful diagnostic framework for headaches secondary to leptomeningeal metastases based on the temporal relationship of headache with disease onset, change in headache severity in correlation with leptomeningeal disease burden, and accompanying neurologic signs such as cranial nerve palsies and encephalopathy. However, headaches in patients with leptomeningeal metastases can be further defined by a wide range of varying cancer- and treatment-related pathophysiologies, each requiring a tailored approach. A thorough review of the literature and expert opinion on five observed headache sub-classifications in patients with leptomeningeal metastases is provided, with attention to necessary diagnostic testing, recommended first-line treatments, and prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Wilcox
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Estrera
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chew SM, Seidman AD. New strategies for the treatment of breast cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis. Curr Opin Oncol 2023; 35:500-506. [PMID: 37820086 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Leptomeningeal metastasis is a complication of metastatic breast cancer that has a rising incidence likely due to the increased availability of novel systemic therapies, which have improved survival with better extracranial disease control but with limited intracranial efficacy. A poor prognosis of less than 6 months has historically been associated with leptomeningeal metastasis and it is often an exclusion factor for enrollment in clinical trials. There are limited evidence-based data supporting use of therapeutics in leptomeningeal metastasis patients and recommendations are largely derived from retrospective reports and small prospective studies. However, in recent years, there has been a surge in effective modern therapeutics with promising intracranial activity. RECENT FINDINGS The study aims to review the most recent updates in the management of leptomeningeal metastasis in breast cancer. We discuss the effectiveness and limitations of intrathecal administration, predictive biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid, proton radiation therapy and promising new systemic therapies such as antibody drug conjugates. SUMMARY Ongoing development of clinical trials that allow inclusion of leptomeningeal metastasis are essential for establishing efficacy potential and discovering new treatment options in this population of great unmet need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonya M Chew
- Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Trifănescu OG, Mitrea D, Galeș LN, Ciornei A, Păun MA, Butnariu I, Trifănescu RA, Motaș N, Toma RV, Bîlteanu L, Gherghe M, Anghel RM. Therapies beyond Physiological Barriers and Drug Resistance: A Pilot Study and Review of the Literature Investigating If Intrathecal Trastuzumab and New Treatment Options Can Improve Oncologic Outcomes in Leptomeningeal Metastases from HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2508. [PMID: 37173973 PMCID: PMC10177464 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are a rare but rapidly fatal complication defined by the spread of tumor cells within the leptomeninges and the subarachnoid space, found in approximately 10% of patients with HER2-positive breast cancers. This pilot study evaluated the efficacy of local treatment with intrathecal Trastuzumab (IT) added to systemic treatment. The oncologic outcome of 14 patients with HER2-positive LM is reported. Seven received IT, and seven received standard of care (SOC). The mean number of IT cycles administered was 12.14 ± 4.00. The response rate to CNS after IT treatment + SOC was 71.4%, and three patients (42.8%) obtained durable responses lasting more than 12 months. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) after LM diagnosis was six months, and the median overall survival (mOS) was ten months. The mean values of the PFS in favor of IT therapy (10.6 mo vs. 6.6 mo) and OS (13.7 vs. 9.3 mo) suggest a non-negligible investigation direction in the sense of exploiting intrathecal administration as a possible treatment modality in these patients. Adverse events reported were local pain related to intrathecal administration and one case of arachnoiditis, hematoma, and CSF fistulae. Intrathecal administration of Trastuzumab, alongside systemic treatment and radiotherapy, might improve oncologic outcomes in LM HER2-positive breast cancer with manageable toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oana Gabriela Trifănescu
- Department of Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Radiotherapy II, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Dan Mitrea
- Department of Radiotherapy II, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Neuroaxis Neurology Clinic, 011302 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Laurenția Nicoleta Galeș
- Department of Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Medical Oncology II, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ana Ciornei
- Department of Radiotherapy II, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihai-Andrei Păun
- Department of Radiotherapy II, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioana Butnariu
- Department of Neurology, National Institute of Neurology and Neurovascular Diseases, 041914 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Raluca Alexandra Trifănescu
- Discipline of Endocrinology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 011863 Bucharest, Romania
- “C. I. Parhon” Institute of Endocrinology, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Natalia Motaș
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Radu Valeriu Toma
- Department of Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Radiotherapy I, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Liviu Bîlteanu
- Department of Radiotherapy I, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Mirela Gherghe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Rodica Maricela Anghel
- Department of Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Radiotherapy II, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|