1
|
Galldiks N, Lohmann P, Fink GR, Langen KJ. Amino Acid PET in Neurooncology. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:693-700. [PMID: 37055222 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
For decades, several amino acid PET tracers have been used to optimize diagnostics in patients with brain tumors. In clinical routine, the most important clinical indications for amino acid PET in brain tumor patients are differentiation of neoplasm from nonneoplastic etiologies, delineation of tumor extent for further diagnostic and treatment planning (i.e., diagnostic biopsy, resection, or radiotherapy), differentiation of treatment-related changes such as pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis after radiation or chemoradiation from tumor progression at follow-up, and assessment of response to anticancer therapy, including prediction of patient outcome. This continuing education article addresses the diagnostic value of amino acid PET for patients with either glioblastoma or metastatic brain cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany; and
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany; and
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Celli M, Caroli P, Amadori E, Arpa D, Gurrieri L, Ghigi G, Cenni P, Paganelli G, Matteucci F. Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential of 18F-FET PET in the Differential Diagnosis of Glioma Recurrence and Treatment-Induced Changes After Chemoradiation Therapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:721821. [PMID: 34671551 PMCID: PMC8521061 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.721821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background MRI-based differential diagnosis of glioma recurrence (GR) and treatment-induced changes (TICs) remain elusive in up to 30% of treated glioma patients. We aimed to determine 18F-FET PET diagnostic performance in this clinical scenario, its outcome dependency on established prognostic factors, optimal 18F-FET semi-quantitative thresholds, and whether 18F-FET parameters may instantly predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 45 glioma patients treated with chemoradiation therapy (32 males; mean age: 51 years, glioma grade: n=26 WHO4; n=15 WHO3; n=4 WHO2) who underwent 18F-FET PET to resolve differential diagnosis of GR and TICs raised by MRI performed in the preceding 2 weeks and depicting any of the following changes in their radiation field: volumetric increase of contrast-enhancing lesions; new contrast-enhancing lesion; significant increase in T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesion without reducing corticosteroids. 18F-FET PET outcome relied on evaluation of maximum tumor-to-brain ratio (TBRmax), time-to-peak (TTP), and time-activity curve pattern (TAC). Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total tumor metabolism (TTM) were calculated for prognostic purposes. Standard of reference was repeat MRI performed 4–6 weeks after the previous MRI. Non-parametric statistics tested 18F-FET-based parameters for dependency on established prognostic markers. ROC curve analysis determined optimal cutoff values for 18F-FET semi-quantitative parameters. 18F-FET parameters and prognostic factors were evaluated for PFS and OS by Kaplan-Meier, univariate, and multivariate analyses. Results 18F-FET PET sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value were 86.2, 81.3, 89.3, 76.5%, respectively; higher diagnostic accuracy was yielded in IDH-wild-type glioma patients compared to IDH-mutant glioma patients (sensitivity: 81.8 versus 88.9%; specificity: 80.8 versus 81.8%). KPS was the only prognostic factor differing according to 18F-FET PET outcome (negative versus positive). Optimal 18F-FET cutoff values for GR were TBRmax ≥ 2.1, SUVmax ≥ 3.5, and TTP ≤ 29 min. PFS differed based on 18F-FET outcome and related metrics and according to KPS; a different OS was observed according to KPS only. On multivariate analysis, 18F-FET PET outcome was the only significant PFS factor; KPS and age the only significant OS factors. Conclusion 18F-FET PET demonstrated good diagnostic performance. 18F-FET PET outcome and metrics were significantly predictive only for PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Celli
- Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Paola Caroli
- Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Elena Amadori
- Radiology MRI Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Donatella Arpa
- Radiation Therapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Lorena Gurrieri
- Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Giulia Ghigi
- Radiation Therapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Patrizia Cenni
- Radiology MRI Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Giovanni Paganelli
- Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Federica Matteucci
- Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heinzel A, Müller D, Yekta-Michael SS, Ceccon G, Langen KJ, Mottaghy FM, Wiesmann M, Kocher M, Hattingen E, Galldiks N. O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for evaluation of brain metastasis recurrence after radiotherapy: an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis. Neuro Oncol 2018; 19:1271-1278. [PMID: 28204572 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Conventional MRI is the standard method to diagnose recurrence of brain metastases after radiation. However, following radiation therapy, reactive transient blood-brain barrier alterations with consecutive contrast enhancement can mimic brain metastasis recurrence. Recent studies have suggested that O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET improves the correct differentiation of brain metastasis recurrence from radiation injury. Based on published evidence and clinical expert opinion, we analyzed effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the use of FET PET in addition to MRI compared with MRI alone for the diagnosis of recurrent brain metastases. Methods A decision-tree model was designed to compare the 2 diagnostic strategies from the perspective of the German Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) system. Effectiveness was defined as correct diagnosis of recurrent brain metastasis and was compared between FET PET with MRI and MRI alone. Costs were calculated for a baseline scenario and for a more expensive scenario. Robustness of the results was tested using sensitivity analyses. Results Compared with MRI alone, FET PET in combination with MRI increases the rate of correct diagnoses by 42% (number needed to diagnose of 3) with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2821 (baseline scenario) and €4014 (more expensive scenario) per correct diagnosis. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusions The model suggests that the additional use of FET PET with conventional MRI for the diagnosis of recurrent brain metastases may be cost-effective. Integration of FET PET has the potential to avoid overtreatment with corresponding costs as well as unnecessary side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Heinzel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Germany
| | - Dirk Müller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Germany
| | - Sareh Said Yekta-Michael
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Germany
| | - Garry Ceccon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Germany
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Germany
| | - Martin Wiesmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Institute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Imaging of amino acid transport in brain tumours: Positron emission tomography with O-(2-[ 18 F]fluoroethyl)- L -tyrosine (FET). Methods 2017; 130:124-134. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Revised: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 05/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
|
5
|
Tscherpel C, Dunkl V, Ceccon G, Stoffels G, Judov N, Rapp M, Meyer PT, Kops ER, Ermert J, Fink GR, Shah NJ, Langen KJ, Galldiks N. The use of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET in the diagnosis of gliomas located in the brainstem and spinal cord. Neuro Oncol 2017; 19:710-718. [PMID: 28039366 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite an increasing number of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET studies in supratentorial gliomas, studies regarding the usefulness of 18F-FET PET in brainstem and spinal cord gliomas to date remain scarce. Methods Thirty-six 18F-FET PET scans were performed in 29 patients with brainstem (n = 29 scans) or spinal cord glioma (n = 7 scans). In 32 of 36 PET scans, a dynamic acquisition was performed. Fifteen scans in 15 patients were performed to assess newly diagnosed lesions, and 21 scans were obtained during follow-up: for diagnosing tumor progression (n = 15 scans in 14 patients) as well as for treatment monitoring (n = 6 scans in 3 patients). Four patients underwent additional serial scans (range, 1-2), and 3 of these 4 patients were examined for more than one indication. Maximum and mean tumor/brain ratios (TBRmax/mean) of 18F-FET uptake (20-40 min post injection) as well as kinetic 18F-FET uptake parameters were determined. Final diagnoses were confirmed histologically (54%) or by clinical follow-up (46%). Results In all newly diagnosed high-grade (n = 3 patients) and in 5 of 11 patients with low-grade gliomas, 18F-FET uptake was increased (TBRmax ≥2.5 and/or TBRmean ≥1.9). In 2 patients with newly diagnosed gliomas without MR contrast enhancement, 18F-FET PET nevertheless showed increased metabolism. At suspected progression, the combination of TBRs with kinetic 18F-FET parameters correctly identified presence or absence of progressive disease in 9 of 11 patients (82%). Conclusions This preliminary study suggests that 18F-FET PET adds valuable diagnostic information in brainstem and spinal cord glioma, particularly when the diagnostic information derived from MRI is equivocal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Tscherpel
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Veronika Dunkl
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Garry Ceccon
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gabriele Stoffels
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Natalie Judov
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Marion Rapp
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Philipp T Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Elena Rota Kops
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Johannes Ermert
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Nadim J Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.,Departments of Neurology, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.,Section JARA-Brain, Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA), Jülich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.,Section JARA-Brain, Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA), Jülich, Germany.,Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stegmayr C, Oliveira D, Niemietz N, Willuweit A, Lohmann P, Galldiks N, Shah NJ, Ermert J, Langen KJ. Influence of Bevacizumab on Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability and O-(2- 18F-Fluoroethyl)-l-Tyrosine Uptake in Rat Gliomas. J Nucl Med 2017; 58:700-705. [PMID: 28153956 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.187047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2016] [Accepted: 12/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Restoration of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) after antiangiogenic therapy of gliomas with bevacizumab may result in a decrease in contrast enhancement on MRI despite tumor progression. This so-called pseudoresponse is difficult to differentiate from a true tumor response with conventional MRI. Initial patient studies have indicated that PET using O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) may be helpful for solving this diagnostic problem. This study was performed to investigate the effects of bevacizumab on BBB permeability and 18F-FET uptake in a human xenograft model. Methods: Human U87 glioblastoma cells were implanted into the striatum of immunodeficient RNU rats. 18F-FET PET scans and ex vivo autoradiography were performed in animals receiving a single high dose of bevacizumab (45 mg/kg 2 d before PET; n = 9) or in animals receiving 2 lower doses (10 mg/kg 9 and 2 d before PET; n = 10) to evaluate short-term and long-term effects on the BBB, respectively, and in control animals without bevacizumab treatment (n = 8). Time-activity curves, slope, and tumor-to-brain ratios of 18F-FET uptake (18-61 min after injection) were evaluated using a volume-of-interest analysis. After PET scanning, Evans blue dye (EBD) was injected into animals, and cryosections of the brains were evaluated by autoradiography, by histology, and for EBD fluorescence to assess BBB permeability. Results: Compared with the control, short-term bevacizumab therapy resulted in a trend toward BBB restoration (P = 0.055) and long-term therapy resulted in a significant decrease (P = 0.004) in BBB permeability, as assessed by EBD fluorescence. In contrast, no significant differences in tumor-to-brain ratios or slope of 18F-FET uptake were observed in PET and autoradiography (P > 0.05). Conclusion:8F-FET uptake in glioblastomas seems to be largely independent of BBB permeability and reflects the viability of tumor tissue during antiangiogenic therapy more reliably than contrast-enhanced MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Stegmayr
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Dennis Oliveira
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Nicole Niemietz
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Antje Willuweit
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - N Jon Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, RWTH University, Aachen, Germany.,Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA)-Section JARA-Brain, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; and
| | - Johannes Ermert
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5, INM-11), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany .,Department of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zinnhardt B, Pigeon H, Thézé B, Viel T, Wachsmuth L, Fricke IB, Schelhaas S, Honold L, Schwegmann K, Wagner S, Faust A, Faber C, Kuhlmann MT, Hermann S, Schäfers M, Winkeler A, Jacobs AH. Combined PET Imaging of the Inflammatory Tumor Microenvironment Identifies Margins of Unique Radiotracer Uptake. Cancer Res 2017; 77:1831-1841. [PMID: 28137769 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-2628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Revised: 01/12/2017] [Accepted: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment is highly heterogeneous. For gliomas, the tumor-associated inflammatory response is pivotal to support growth and invasion. Factors of glioma growth, inflammation, and invasion, such as the translocator protein (TSPO) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), may serve as specific imaging biomarkers of the glioma microenvironment. In this study, noninvasive imaging by PET with [18F]DPA-714 (TSPO) and [18F]BR-351 (MMP) was used for the assessment of localization and quantification of the expression of TSPO and MMP. Imaging was performed in addition to established clinical imaging biomarker of active tumor volume ([18F]FET) in conjunction with MRI. We hypothesized that each imaging biomarker revealed distinct areas of the heterogeneous glioma tissue in a mouse model of human glioma. Tracers were found to be increased 1.4- to 1.7-fold, with [18F]FET showing the biggest volume as depicted by a thresholding-based, volumes of interest analysis. Tumor areas, which could not be detected by a single tracer and/or MRI parameter alone, were measured. Specific compartments of [18F]DPA-714 (14%) and [18F]BR-351 (11%) volumes along the tumor rim could be identified. [18F]DPA-714 (TSPO) and [18F]BR-351 (MMP) matched with histology. Glioma-associated microglia/macrophages (GAM) were identified as TSPO and MMP sources. Multitracer and multimodal molecular imaging approaches may allow us to gain important insights into glioma-associated inflammation (GAM, MMP). Moreover, this noninvasive technique enables characterization of the glioma microenvironment with respect to the disease-driving cellular compartments at the various disease stages. Cancer Res; 77(8); 1831-41. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bastian Zinnhardt
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany.
| | - Hayet Pigeon
- Imagerie Moléculaire In Vivo, Inserm, CEA, Univ. Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris Saclay, CEA - Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, Orsay, France
| | - Benoit Thézé
- Imagerie Moléculaire In Vivo, Inserm, CEA, Univ. Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris Saclay, CEA - Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, Orsay, France
| | - Thomas Viel
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany.,PARCC INSERM-U970, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Lydia Wachsmuth
- Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Inga B Fricke
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Sonja Schelhaas
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Lisa Honold
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Katrin Schwegmann
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Stefan Wagner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Andreas Faust
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Cornelius Faber
- Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.,DFG EXC 1003 Cluster of Excellence 'Cells in Motion', University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael T Kuhlmann
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Sven Hermann
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany.,DFG EXC 1003 Cluster of Excellence 'Cells in Motion', University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Schäfers
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.,DFG EXC 1003 Cluster of Excellence 'Cells in Motion', University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Alexandra Winkeler
- Imagerie Moléculaire In Vivo, Inserm, CEA, Univ. Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris Saclay, CEA - Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, Orsay, France
| | - Andreas H Jacobs
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging (EIMI), Westfälische Wilhelms-University Münster, Münster, Germany.,DFG EXC 1003 Cluster of Excellence 'Cells in Motion', University of Münster, Münster, Germany.,Department of Geriatrics, Johanniter Hospital, Evangelische Kliniken, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Unterrainer M, Galldiks N, Suchorska B, Kowalew LC, Wenter V, Schmid-Tannwald C, Niyazi M, Bartenstein P, Langen KJ, Albert NL. 18F-FET PET Uptake Characteristics in Patients with Newly Diagnosed and Untreated Brain Metastasis. J Nucl Med 2016; 58:584-589. [PMID: 27754904 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.180075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In patients with brain metastasis, PET using labeled amino acids has gained clinical importance, mainly regarding the differentiation of viable tumor tissue from treatment-related effects. However, there is still limited knowledge concerning the uptake characteristics in patients with newly diagnosed and untreated brain metastases. Hence, we evaluated the uptake characteristics in these patients using dynamic O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases without prior local therapy and 18F-FET PET scanning were retrospectively identified in 2 centers. Static and dynamic PET parameters (maximal/mean tumor-to-brain-ratio [TBRmax/TBRmean], biologic tumor volume [BTV], and time-activity curves with minimal time to peak [TTPmin]) were evaluated and correlated with MRI parameters (maximal lesion diameter, volume of contrast enhancement) and originating primary tumor. Results: Forty-five brain metastases in 30 patients were included. Forty of 45 metastases (89%) had a TBRmax ≥ 1.6 and were classified as 18F-FET-positive (median TBRmax, 2.53 [range, 1.64-9.47]; TBRmean, 1.86 [range, 1.63-5.48]; and BTV, 3.59 mL [range, 0.04-23.98 mL], respectively). In 39 of 45 brain metastases eligible for dynamic analysis, a wide range of TTPmin was observed (median, 22.5 min; range, 4.5-47.5 min). All 18F-FET-negative metastases had a diameter of ≤ 1.0 cm, whereas metastases with a > 1.0 cm diameter all showed pathologic 18F-FET uptake, which did not correlate with lesion size. The highest variability of uptake intensity was observed within the group of melanoma metastases. Conclusion: Untreated metastases predominantly show increased 18F-FET uptake, and only a third of metastases < 1.0 cm were 18F-FET-negative, most likely because of scanner resolution and partial-volume effects. In metastases > 1.0 cm, 18F-FET uptake intensity was highly variable and independent of tumor size (even intraindividually). 18F-FET PET might provide additional information beyond the tumor extent by reflecting molecular features of a metastasis and might be a useful tool for future clinical applications, for example, response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | | | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) & German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany; and.,JARA-Brain Section, Juelich-Aachen-Research-Alliance (JARA), Juelich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stegmayr C, Bandelow U, Oliveira D, Lohmann P, Willuweit A, Filss C, Galldiks N, Lübke JHR, Shah NJ, Ermert J, Langen KJ. Influence of blood-brain barrier permeability on O-(2- 18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine uptake in rat gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016; 44:408-416. [PMID: 27613541 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3508-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) is an established tracer for the diagnosis of brain tumors with PET. This study investigates the influence of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability on 18F-FET uptake in two rat glioma models and one human xenograft model. METHODS F98 glioma, 9L gliosarcoma or human U87 glioblastoma cells were implanted into the striatum of 56 Fischer or RNU rats. Thereafter, animals were divided into a control group and a group receiving injections of the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (Dex). After 12-13 days of tumor growth animals received injection of Evans blue dye (EBD) to visualize BBB disturbance and underwent 18F-FET PET followed by autoradiography. Time activity curves, standardized uptake values (SUV) and Tumor-to-brain ratios (TBR) of 18F-FET uptake [18-61 min post injection (p.i.)] were evaluated using a volume-of-Interest (VOI) analysis. BBB disturbance was quantitatively evaluated by EBD fluorescence. The membrane gaps of blood vessel endothelial tight junctions were measured using electron microscopy to visualize ultrastructural BBB alterations in one untreated and one Dex treated F98 glioma. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVAs. RESULTS In Dex treated animals EBD extravasation was significantly reduced in 9L (P < 0.001) and U87 (P = 0.008) models and showed a trend in F98 models (P = 0.053). In contrast, no significant differences of 18F-FET uptake were observed between Dex treated animals and control group except a decrease of the TBR in the 9L tumor model in PET (P < 0.01). Ultrastructural evaluation of tumor blood vessel endothelia revealed significant reduction of the cleft diameter between endothelial cells after Dex treatment in F98 model (P = 0.010). CONCLUSION Despite a considerable reduction of BBB permeability in rat gliomas after Dex treatment, no relevant changes of 18F-FET uptake were noted in this experimental study. Thus, 18F-FET uptake in gliomas appears to be widely independent of the permeability of the BBB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Stegmayr
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, D-52425, Jülich, Germany.
| | - Ulrike Bandelow
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, D-52425, Jülich, Germany
| | - Dennis Oliveira
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, D-52425, Jülich, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, D-52425, Jülich, Germany
| | - Antje Willuweit
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, D-52425, Jülich, Germany
| | - Christian Filss
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, D-52425, Jülich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Neurology, RWTH/University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, D-52425, Jülich, Germany
| | - Joachim H R Lübke
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, D-52425, Jülich, Germany
| | - N Jon Shah
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, D-52425, Jülich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Neurology, RWTH/University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.,Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA) - Section JARA-Brain, Aachen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ermert
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, D-52425, Jülich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Neurology, RWTH/University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, D-52425, Jülich, Germany. .,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Neurology, RWTH/University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kebir S, Fimmers R, Galldiks N, Schäfer N, Mack F, Schaub C, Stuplich M, Niessen M, Tzaridis T, Simon M, Stoffels G, Langen KJ, Scheffler B, Glas M, Herrlinger U. Late Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma: Diagnostic Value of Dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 22:2190-6. [PMID: 26673798 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-1334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2015] [Accepted: 11/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pseudoprogression (PsP) is characterized by therapy-associated but not tumor growth-associated increases of contrast-enhancing glioblastoma lesions on MRI. Although typically occurring during the first 3 months after radiochemotherapy, PsP may occur later in the course of the disease and may then be particularly difficult to distinguish from true tumor progression. We explored PET using O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET-PET) to approach the diagnostic dilemma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Twenty-six patients with glioblastoma that presented with increasing contrast-enhancing lesions later than 3 months after completion of radiochemotherapy underwent (18)F-FET-PET. Maximum and mean tumor/brain ratios (TBRmax and TBRmean) of (18)F-FET uptake as well as time-to-peak (TTP) and patterns of the time-activity curves were determined. The final diagnosis of true progression versus late PsP was based on follow-up MRI using RANO criteria. RESULTS Late PsP occurred in 7 patients with a median time from radiochemotherapy completion of 24 weeks while the remaining patients showed true tumor progression. TBRmax and TBRmean were significantly higher in patients with true progression than in patients with late PsP (TBRmax 2.4 ± 0.1 vs. 1.5 ± 0.2, P = 0.003; TBRmean 2.1 ± 0.1 vs. 1.5 ± 0.2, P = 0.012) whereas TTP was significantly shorter (mean TTP 25 ± 2 vs. 40 ± 2 min, P < 0.001). ROC analysis yielded an optimal cutoff value of 1.9 for TBRmax to differentiate between true progression and late PsP (sensitivity 84%, specificity 86%, accuracy 85%, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET provides valuable information in assessing the elusive phenomenon of late PsP. Clin Cancer Res; 22(9); 2190-6. ©2015 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sied Kebir
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany. Stem Cell Pathologies, Institute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Rolf Fimmers
- Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMBIE), University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Bonn, Germany. Deptartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Niklas Schäfer
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany. Stem Cell Pathologies, Institute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frederic Mack
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany. Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Schaub
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany. Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Moritz Stuplich
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany. Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Michael Niessen
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany. Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Theophilos Tzaridis
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany. Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Matthias Simon
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Bonn, Germany. Department of Neurosurgery, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Gabriele Stoffels
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Björn Scheffler
- Stem Cell Pathologies, Institute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Martin Glas
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany. Stem Cell Pathologies, Institute of Reconstructive Neurobiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Bonn, Germany. Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Bonn, Germany. Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stegmayr C, Schöneck M, Oliveira D, Willuweit A, Filss C, Galldiks N, Shah NJ, Coenen HH, Langen KJ. Reproducibility of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine uptake kinetics in brain tumors and influence of corticoid therapy: an experimental study in rat gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015; 43:1115-23. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3274-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2015] [Accepted: 11/27/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|