Discordance of IDH mutational status between lesions in an adult patient with multifocal glioma

Two Patterns of White Matter Connection in Multiple Gliomas: Evidence from Probabilistic Fiber Tracking

Background: Multiple lesions are uncommon in brain gliomas, and their pathophysiology is poorly understood. Invasive growth along white matter tracts is an important clinicopathological characteristic of gliomas, and a major factor in a poor therapeutic outcome. Here, we used probabilistic fiber tracking and cluster analysis to investigate the inter-focal connectivity relationships of multiple gliomas, in order to seek inferential evidence of common origin. Methods: MRI scans of 46 patients with multiple gliomas were retrospectively analyzed. Before surgery, all patients underwent multimodal functional MR imaging, including diffusion tensor imaging, enhanced 3D T1-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, 1H MR spectroscopy, and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging. Probabilistic fiber tracking was used to quantify white matter connectivity between neoplastic foci. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to identify patterns of white matter connection. Results: Cluster analysis reveals two patterns of connectivity, one with smaller, and one with greater, connectivity (2675 ± 1098 versus 30432 ± 22707, p < 0.0001). The two subgroups show significant differences in relative cerebral blood volume (2.31 ± 0.95 versus 1.73 ± 0.48, p = 0.002) and lipid/creatine ratio (0.32 ± 0.22 versus 0.060 ± 0.051, p = 0.006). Conclusion: Two distinct patterns of white matter connection exist in multiple gliomas. Those with lower connectivity tend to have independent origins, and can be termed true multicentric glioma, whereas those with greater connectivity tend to share common origin, and spread along white matter tracts. True multicentric gliomas have higher vascularity and more intratumoral necrosis. These findings may help to develop personalized therapeutic strategies for multiple gliomas.

Multiple and Diffuse Gliomas by 18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT: Two Sides of the Same Coin

ABSTRACT

Gliomas are characterized by an inherent diffuse and irregular morphology that prevents defining a boundary between tumor and healthy tissue, both in imaging assessment and surgical field. The effective identification of the extent of the disease in diffuse and multiple gliomas is crucial for their management but doing so by radiological means can be challenging. We present a broad spectrum of diffuse and multiple gliomas using 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT, demonstrating the potential of metabolic imaging in the evaluation of these gliomas, with implications in patient clinical management and outcome.

Comprehensive omics analyses profile genesets related with tumor heterogeneity of multifocal glioblastomas and reveal LIF/CCL2 as biomarkers for mesenchymal subtype

Rationale: Around 10%-20% patients with glioblastoma (GBM) are diagnosed with more than one tumor lesions or multifocal GBM (mGBM). However, the understanding on genetic, DNA methylomic, and transcriptomic characteristics of mGBM is still limited.

Methods: In this study, we collected nine tumor foci from three mGBM patients followed by whole genome sequencing, whole genome bisulfite sequencing, RNA sequencing, and immunohistochemistry. The data were further examined using public GBM databases and GBM cell line.

Results: Analysis on genetic data confirmed common features of GBM, including gain of chr.7 and loss of chr.10, loss of critical tumor suppressors, high frequency of PDGFA and EGFR amplification. Through profiling DNA methylome of individual tumor foci, we found that promoter methylation status of genes involved in detection of chemical stimulus, immune response, and Hippo/YAP1 pathway was significantly changed in mGBM. Although both CNV and promoter methylation alteration were involved in heterogeneity of different tumor foci from same patients, more CNV events than promoter hypomethylation events were shared by different tumor foci, implying CNV were relatively earlier than promoter methylation alteration during evolution of different tumor foci from same mGBM. Moreover, different tumor foci from same mGBM assumed different molecular subtypes and mesenchymal subtype was prevalent in mGBM, which might explain the worse prognosis of mGBM than single GBM. Interestingly, we noticed that LIF and CCL2 was tightly correlated with mesenchymal subtype tumor focus in mGBM and predicted poor survival of GBM patients. Treatment with LIF and CCL2 produced mesenchymal-like transcriptome in GBM cells.

Conclusions: Together, our work herein comprehensively profiled multi-omics features of mGBM and emphasized that components of extracellular microenvironment, such as LIF and CCL2, contributed to the evolution and prognosis of tumor foci in mGBM patients.

Brain low-grade gliomas with high-grade spinal localization. Report of a clinical case and systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Oncological aggressiveness and the ability to present distant localizations are known in high-grade gliomas (HGGs), but the knowledge about the possible aggressiveness of LGGs is scarce, especially concerning possible spinal localization.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search of LGGs with spinal localization on the three primary online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane) was conducted. We included adult patients with histological diagnosis of intracranial LGG and specified WHO grade showing a remote spinal localization during follow-up. Additionally, we present a case of a left temporal LGG presenting a spinal localization fourteen years after the first appearance. We compared the survival rates of LGGs in our series with those of LGGs without spinal localizations.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Seven articles dealing with the subject and eight patients were considered (including our case), with a mean age at diagnosis of 42.25 years (range 26-69 years). The mean latency between a diagnosis of intracranial LGGs and a spinal localization occurrence was 7.37 years (range 2-14 years), and an increased WHO grade of the spinal localization compared to the brain LGG was observed in all patients. There was no sign of intracranial progression at the time of spinal glioma diagnosis in four cases, including ours. Survival at ten years was 28% against a 10-year survival rate of 65-71% for LGGs without distant localization, as reported in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal metastasis of intracranial LGGs is an adverse prognostic factor. Surgical violation of ventricles can play a role in the pathophysiology of CSF spread of tumor cells in LGGs.

Multifocal glioblastoma-two case reports and literature review

Background

Multifocal glioblastoma is a rare type of glioblastoma with worse prognosis. In this article, we aimed to report two cases of classical multifocal glioblastoma.

Case presentation

In case 1, a 47-year-old male presented with dizziness, and once had a sudden loss of consciousness accompanied by convulsion of limbs. Contrast-enhanced MRI showed multiple lesions with heterogeneously ring-enhanced characters in the left hemisphere, diagnosed as multifocal glioblastoma. He underwent a craniotomy of all lesions, concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy as well as additional chemotherapy of temozolomide. After 2 cycles, repeat MRI showed that the new lesions already occurred and progressed. Eventually, he abandoned the chemotherapy after the 2 cycles and died 1 year later. In case 2, a 71-year-old male presented with a history of headache, left limb weakness, and numbness. Discontinuous convulsion of limbs once occurred. Contrast-enhanced MRI showed multiple lesions located in the right hemisphere, diagnosed as multifocal glioblastoma. He underwent a right frontoparietal craniotomy of the main lesion. Hemorrhage of the residual tumor and pulmonary artery embolism occurred synchronously. Eventually, his family decided not to pursue any further treatment and opted for hospice care and he passed away within 11 days of surgery.

Conclusions

We reported two cases of typical multifocal glioblastoma. Valid diagnosis is crucial; then, resection of multiple lesions and canonical radio-chemotherapy probably bring survival benefits.

A systematic review of multifocal and multicentric glioblastoma

Multiple glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is classified as multifocal and multicentric GBM according to whether there is communication between the lesions. Multiple GBM is more genetically heterogeneous, aggressive and resistant to chemoradiotherapy than unifocal GBM, and has a worse prognosis. There is no international consensus on the treatment of multiple GBM. This review discusses some paradigms of multiple GBM and focuses on the heterogeneity spread pathway, imaging diagnosis, pathology, molecular characterization and prognosis of multifocal and multicentric GBM. Several promising therapeutic methods of multiple GBM are also recommended.

Characteristics of IDH-mutant gliomas with non-canonical IDH mutation

BACKGROUND

Approximately 10% of IDH-mutant gliomas harbour non-canonical IDH mutations (non-p.R132H IDH1 and IDH2 mutations).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyse the characteristics of non-canonical IDH-mutant gliomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the characteristics of 166 patients with non-canonical IDH mutant gliomas and compared them to those of 155 consecutive patients with IDH1 p.R132H mutant gliomas.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 38 years in patients with non-canonical IDH mutant gliomas and 43 years in glioma patients with IDH1 p.R132H-mutant tumours. Family history of cancer was more frequent among glioma patients harbouring non-canonical IDH mutations than in patients with IDH1 p.R132H mutations (22.2% vs 5.1%; P < 0.05). Tumours were predominantly localised in the frontal lobe regardless of the type of IDH mutation. Compared to IDH1 p.R132H-mutant gliomas, tumours with non-canonical IDH mutations were more frequently found in the infratentorial region (5.5% vs 0%; P < 0.05) and were often multicentric (4.8% vs 0.9%; P < 0.05). Compared to IDH1 P.R132H-mutant gliomas, tumours with non-canonical IDH1 mutations were more frequently astrocytomas (65.6% vs 43%, P < 0.05), while those with IDH2 mutations were more frequently oligodendrogliomas (85% vs 48.3%; P < 0.05). The median overall survival was similar in patients with IDH1 p.R132H-mutant gliomas and patients with non-canonical IDH-mutant gliomas.

CONCLUSION

Gliomas with non-canonical IDH mutations have distinct radiological and histological characteristics. The presence of such tumours seems to be associated with genetic predisposition to cancer development.

Histological, molecular, clinical and outcomes characteristics of Multiple Lesion Glioblastoma. A retrospective monocentric study and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Multiple lesion glioblastoma (M-GBM) represent a group of GBM patients in which there exist multiple foci of tumor enhancement. The prognosis is poorer than that of single-lesion GBM patients, but this actually is a controversial data. Is unknown whether multifocality has a genetic and molecular basis. Our specific aim is to identify the molecular characteristics of M-GBM by performing a comprehensive multidimensional analysis.

METHODS

The surgical, radiological and clinical outcomes of patients that underwent surgery for GBM at our institution for 2 years have been retrospectively reviewed. We compared the overall survival (OS), progression free survival and extent of resection (EOR) between M-GBM tumors (type I) and S-GBM (single contrast-enhancing lesion, type II).

RESULTS

A total of 177 patients were included in the final cohort, 12 patients had M-GBM and 165 patients had S-GBM. Although patients with M-GBM had higher tumor volumes and midline location, the EOR was not different between both type of lesions. Higher percentage of tumors with EGFR overexpression was detected in M-GBM. PFS and OS was significantly shorter in M-GBM.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering no differences in EOR, patients with M-GBM showed shorter PFS and OS in comparison with S-GBM. Evidences about the M-GBM origin as a multifocal lesion because its molecular profile are suggested.