Preoperative Stratification of Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery Patients Based on Surgical Urgency

Determinants of visual and endocrinological outcome after early endoscopic endonasal surgery for pituitary apoplexy

Background:

Patients diagnosed with pituitary apoplexy and presenting with acute visual deterioration require urgent surgical resection. This is also commonly associated with pituitary hypopituitarism that requires hormonal replacement for correction. This study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical recovery of 45 patients diagnosed with symptomatic pituitary apoplexy who underwent early (within 72 h of symptom onset) endoscopic transsphenoidal surgical resection with an emphasis on visual, ocular craniopathy, and endocrinological outcome.

Methods:

This is a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with pituitary apoplexy between 2011 and 2020 treated by early (within 72 h of symptom onset) endoscopic transsphenoidal surgical resection. All tumors were histologically proven as pituitary adenomas. Clinical and neuro-ophthalmological examinations, imaging studies, and endocrinological evaluation were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were included in the study. The influence of patients’ demographics, extent of visual and ocular motility impairment, preoperative endocrinological dysfunction, tumor size and extent, degree of resection, and surgical complications were analyzed as potential prognostic factors for recovery.

Results:

Forty-five patients were included in this retrospective study. Ages ranged from 27 to 57 years (mean: 42 years). All patients presented with headache and variable degrees of visual loss and visual field deficit. Ophthalmoplegia was present in 22 (48.9%) patients with 17 (37.8%) having bilateral ocular cranial nerve palsy. All patients had variable degrees of endocrinological deficiencies. All patients showed evidence of low cortisol, 14 (31.1%) showed hypothyroidism and 11 (24.4%) showed hypogonadism. There was evidence of hyperprolactinemia in 16 (35.6%) patients. All patients harbored a pituitary macroadenoma. Tumor resection was complete in 33 (73%) of patients, with residual tumor related to cavernous sinus or retrosellar extension. Operative complications were mainly related to short-term nasal complications occurring in 14 (31%) patients. Cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring revision surgery occurred in only one patient harboring a modified SIPAP Grade 3s tumor. Transient diabetes insipidus occurred in 9 (20%) patients, with 2 (4.4%) requiring long-term hormonal replacement. The mean follow-up was 25 months. Baseline visual improvement was achieved in 39 (86.7%) patients. Ocular cranial nerve palsy showed complete recovery in 17 (77.2%) patients. Endocrine follow-up showed that patients with panhypopituitarism (11 [24.4%]) failed to recover.

Conclusion:

The current surgical series showed safety in terms of low complication rate and efficacy in terms of clinical outcome. The significant prognostic factor related to visual recovery was the degree of preoperative visual deficit. Recovery of ocular cranial neuropathy showed a higher recovery rate when it was unilateral as opposed to bilateral. Pituitary hormonal recovery was less favorable with pituitary panhypopituitarism being a poor prognostic factor.

Pituitary Adenomas: What Are the Key Features? What Are the Current Treatments? Where Is the Future Taking Us?

Pituitary tumors are a heterogeneous group of lesions (usually benign) and proper understanding of the anatomy, physiology, and pathology of the hypothalamic/pituitary region is essential to make an accurate diagnosis and define the essential treatment options (i.e., surgery, medical therapies, and radiotherapy, alone or in combination). Surgery is the primary treatment for acromegaly, Cushing disease, thyroid-stimulating hormone-secreting adenomas, resistant prolactinomas, and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas causing mass effect. Medical and radiation therapy are reserved in cases in which surgery is not possible or does not provide a complete cure. In the last decades, tremendous innovations (i.e., targeted drugs and refined surgical tools and techniques) have expanded the treatment strategies for pituitary adenomas. We herein report the current indications for and depiction of the surgical techniques in pituitary surgery, review current medical treatments, and provide a glimpse of future possibilities.

Pituitary Apoplexy: Results of Surgical and Conservative Management Clinical Series and Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

Pituitary apoplexy is associated with visual, cranial nerve, and endocrine dysfunction. In this article, the results of surgical and conservative management of pituitary apoplexy in a single center are evaluated and a review of the literature is presented.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was made of patients with pituitary apoplexy who underwent surgery or conservative management at our center between January 2007 and June 2017. Surgery was typically selected for patients who presented with acute deterioration of visual status and/or level of consciousness. Patients with no visual field deficit and those who had medical contraindications to undergo a surgical procedure because of previous comorbidities typically had conservative treatment. Baseline characteristics and clinical and radiologic outcomes were reviewed. A review of the literature (1990-2018) was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing the results of conservative and surgical management were identified. Visual, cranial nerve, and endocrine outcomes and tumor recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (73.1%) were managed surgically and 18 (26.9%) conservatively. After careful case selection, patients underwent surgical or conservative treatment. Patients who underwent conservative treatment had fewer visual deficits. At diagnosis, visual deficit (38.8% vs. 75.5%; P = 0.008) and cranial nerve palsy (27.7% vs. 51%; P = 0.058) were less common in the conservative group. Conservative and surgical treatments had similar visual and cranial nerve improvement rates (75% vs. 58.3%, P = 0.63 and 75% vs. 69.2%, P = 1.0, respectively). In the conservative group, tumor shrinkage was observed in 76.4% of cases. The systematic review retrieved 11 studies. No significant difference between conservative and surgical treatment for clinical outcomes (visual field recovery, odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-2.92; cranial nerve recovery, OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 0.93-5.65; and hypopituitarism, OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.64-1.74) or tumor recurrence (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.20-2.34) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

A tailored approach to pituitary apoplexy, one that does not include an absolute need for surgery, is appropriate. Conservative management is appropriate in selected patients presenting without visual deficits.