Does Drain Position and Duration Influence Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Burr-Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma? Lessons from a UK Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

Passive or active drainage system for chronic subdural haematoma-a single-center retrospective follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative drainage systems have become a standard treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). We previously compared treatment results from three Scandinavian centers using three different postoperative drainage systems and concluded that the active subgaleal drainage was associated with lower recurrence and complication rates than the passive subdural drainage. We consequently changed clinical practice from using the passive subdural drainage to the active subgaleal drainage.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to assess a potential change in reoperation rates for CSDH after conversion to the active subgaleal drainage.

METHODS

This single-center cohort study compared the reoperation rates for recurrent same-sided CSDH and postoperative complication rates between patients treated during two study periods (passive subdural drainage cohort versus active subgaleal drainage cohort).

RESULTS

In total, 594 patients were included in the study. We found no significant difference in reoperation rates between the passive subdural drain group and the active subgaleal drain group (21.6%, 95% CI 17.5-26.4% vs. 18.0%, 95% CI 13.8-23.2%; p = 0.275). There was no statistical difference in the rate of serious complications between the groups. The operating time was significantly shorter for patients operated with the active subgaleal drain than patients with the passive subdural drain (32.8 min, 95% CI 31.2-34.5 min vs. 47.6 min, 95% CI 44.7-50.4 min; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from the passive subdural to the active subgaleal drainage did not result in a clear reduction of reoperation rates for CSDH in our center.

Efficacy of intraoperative irrigation with artificial cerebrospinal fluid in chronic subdural hematoma surgery: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The surgical techniques for treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), a common neurosurgical condition, have been discussed in a lot of clinical literature. However, the recurrence proportion after CSDH surgery remains high, ranging from 10 to 20%. The standard surgical procedure for CSDH involves a craniostomy to evacuate the hematoma, but irrigating the hematoma cavity during the procedure is debatable. The authors hypothesized that the choice of irrigation fluid might be a key factor affecting the outcomes of surgery. This multicenter randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether intraoperative irrigation using artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACF) followed by the placement of a subdural drain would yield superior results compared to the placement of a subdural drain alone for CSDH.

METHODS

The study will be conducted across 19 neurosurgical departments in Japan. The 1186 eligible patients will be randomly allocated to two groups: irrigation using ACF or not. In either group, a subdural drain is to be placed for at least 12 h postoperatively. Similar to what was done in previous studies, we set the proportion of patients that meet the criteria for ipsilateral reoperation at 7% in the irrigation group and 12% in the non-irrigation group. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who meet the criteria for ipsilateral reoperation within 6 months of surgery (clinical worsening of symptoms and increased hematoma on imaging compared with the postoperative state). The secondary endpoints are the proportion of reoperations within 6 months, the proportion being stratified by preoperative hematoma architecture by computed tomography (CT) scan, neurological symptoms, patient condition, mortality at 6 months, complications associated with surgery, length of hospital stay from surgery to discharge, and time of the surgical procedure.

DISCUSSION

We present the study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial to investigate our hypothesis that intraoperative irrigation with ACF reduces the recurrence proportion after the removal of chronic subdural hematomas compared with no irrigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov jRCT1041220124. Registered on January 13, 2023.

Reducing morbidity associated with subdural drain placement after burr-hole drainage of unilateral chronic subdural hematomas: a retrospective series comparing conventional and modified Nelaton catheter techniques

PURPOSE

Placement of a subdural drain after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) significantly reduces risk of its recurrence and lowers mortality at 6 months. Nonetheless, measures to reduce morbidity related to drain placement are rarely addressed in the literature. Toward reducing drain-related morbidity, we compare outcomes achieved by conventional insertion and our proposed modification.

METHODS

In this retrospective series from two institutions, 362 patients underwent burr-hole drainage of unilateral cSDH with subsequent subdural drain insertion by conventional technique or modified Nelaton catheter (NC) technique. Primary endpoints were iatrogenic brain contusion or new neurological deficit. Secondary endpoints were drain misplacement, indication for computed tomography (CT) scan, re-operation for hematoma recurrence, and favorable Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score (≥ 4) at final follow-up.

RESULTS

The 362 patients (63.8% male) in our final analysis included drains inserted in 56 patients by NC and 306 patients by conventional technique. Brain contusions or new neurological deficits occurred significantly less often in the NC (1.8%) than conventional group (10.5%) (P = .041). Compared with the conventional group, the NC group had no drain misplacement (3.6% versus 0%; P = .23) and significantly fewer non-routine CT imaging related to symptoms (36.5% versus 5.4%; P < .001). Re-operation rates and favorable GOS scores were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

We propose the NC technique as an easy-to-use measure for accurate drain positioning within the subdural space that may yield meaningful benefits for patients undergoing treatment for cSDH and vulnerable to complication risks.

Comparison of subperiosteal or subgaleal drainage and subdural drainage in patients with chronic subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a relatively common disease, especially in the elderly, for which there is no clear standard of treatment available. The authors systematically evaluated the efficacy of various surgical procedures for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma.

METHODS

Electronic databases of PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science, Medicine, and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically. Based on the PRISMA template, we finally selected and analyzed 13 eligible papers to evaluate the effect of different drainage methods on CSDH. The primary outcomes were recurrence and clinical outcomes. Secondary outcomes were mortality and postoperative complications and other parameters.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 3 randomized controlled trials and 10 retrospective studies (non-randomized controlled trials) involving 3619 patients. The pooled results showed no statistically significant difference between non-subdural drainage (NSD) and subdural drainage (SD) in mortality and complication rates (P > 0.05). Additionally, overall pooled results showed that the use of NSD (10.9%) has a lower recurrence rate than the use of SD (11.7%), but the results were not statistically significant (relative risk ratio [RR] = 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-1.45; I2 = 47%; P = .92). However, the difference between NSD and SD in postoperative bleeding rate reached statistical significance (RR = 2.39; 95% CI = 1.31-4.36; I2 = 0 %; P = .004). Subgroup analysis showed that SD was associated with similar recurrent CSDH (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.52-1.09; I2 = 0%; P = .14), good recovery (RR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.93-1.04; I2 = 0%; P = .50), and mortality (RR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.37-2.57; I2 = 0%; P = .96), compared to NSD.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that NSD and SD are equally effective in the treatment of patients with CSDH, with no difference in final clinical characteristics and radiologic outcomes. However, in patients with limited subdural space after evacuation of a hematoma, NSD may be the preferred strategy to avoid iatrogenic brain injury.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors as a risk factor for chronic subdural hematoma recurrence: A matter of debate

OBJECTIVES

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common central nervous system condition. Recent reports indicate that cSDH affects long-term prognosis; however, its definitive risk factors remain unknown. An antihypertensive drug, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi), can affect vascular permeability and cell proliferation processes, which may suppress the recurrence of cSDH. However, several studies have reported negative results to this effect. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate antihypertensive drugs, including RAASi, as risk factors for recurrent cSDH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 203 consecutive cases of surgically treated cSDH were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and radiological parameters were compared between the groups with and without cSDH recurrence to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

Of the included cases, 68 (33.5%) used RAASi and 37 (18.2%) developed recurrence within 60 days of surgery. In the multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted by composite risk score, the odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of RAASi, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, β and α blockers, for the recurrent risk of cSDH after surgery were 2.49 (1.16, 5.42), 1.79 (0.84, 3.82), 1.83 (0.62, 4.87), 0.90 (0.28, 2.44), and 0.96 (0.21, 3.20), respectively. The Cox proportional hazard model also demonstrated that RAASi-use was an independent risk factor for cSDH recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Present series suggests RAASi-use as a risk factor for cSDH recurrence, although the role of RAASi-use in cSDH remains debatable. Further studies for deeper understanding of the microenvironment of hematoma and the surroundings are preferable. (235 words).

Subperiosteal/subgaleal drainage vs. subdural drainage for chronic subdural hematoma: A meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is commonly treated via surgical removal of the hematoma, placement of a routine indwelling drainage tube, and continuous drainage to ensure that the blood does not re-aggregate following removal. However, the optimal location for placement of the drainage tube remains to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

To aid in establishing a reference for selecting the optimal method, we compared the effects of different drainage tube placements on CSDH prognosis via a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous clinical studies.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We searched for clinical studies comparing the outcomes of subperiosteal/subgaleal drainage (SPGD) and subdural drainage (SDD) for CSDH published in English prior to April 1, 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

The final analysis included 15 studies involving 4,318 patients.

RESULTS

Our analysis of the pooled results revealed no significant differences in recurrence rate between the SDD and SPGD groups. We also observed no significant differences in mortality or rates of postoperative complications (infection, pneumocephalus, or epilepsy) between the SDD and SPGD groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the choice of SDD vs. SPGD has no significant effect on CSDH prognosis, highlighting SPGD as an alternative treatment option for CSDH.

Surgical techniques for evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: a mini-review

Chronic subdural hematoma is one of the most common neurosurgical pathologies with over 160,000 cases in the United States and Europe each year. The current standard of care involves surgically evacuating the hematoma through a cranial opening, however, varied patient risk profiles, a significant recurrence rate, and increasing financial burden have sparked innovation in the field. This mini-review provides a brief overview of currently used evacuation techniques, including emerging adjuncts such as endoscopic assistance and middle meningeal artery embolization. This review synthesizes the body of available evidence on efficacy and risk profiles for each critical aspect of surgical technique in cSDH evacuation and provides insight into trends in the field and promising new technologies.

Predictors of revision surgery after bedside subdural drain placement for chronic subdural hematomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

For chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH), bedside subdural drains (SDD) provide a useful alternative to more invasive neurosurgical techniques, including evacuation through multiple burr holes or formal craniotomy. However, no scale currently exists adequately predicting SDD candidacy or treatment response. The present study sought to characterize predictors of revision surgery after initial treatment with bedside SDD for cSDH.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case control study of cSDH patients treated with bedside SDD at a level one trauma center between 2018 and 2022. Binomial regression was used to compare SDD patients and generate odds ratios associated with revision surgery, which were compared using a binary random effects model.

RESULTS

Ninety six cSDH patients were included, of whom 13 (13.5%) required a revision surgery after initial treatment failure with bedside SDD. Patients requiring revision surgery demonstrated an increased male predominance (84.6% vs. 69.9% of SDD patients not requiring revision surgery), tended to be younger (67.8 vs. 70.5 years) with a greater body mass index (28.7 vs. 25.6 kg/m²), and have a lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on presentation of 12.5 (versus 14). Patients with an initial GCS score less than 13 (OR 11.0 95% CI 2.8 - 43.3), midline shift greater than 10 mm on CT (OR 6.5 95% CI 1.7 - 25.7), or duration of SDD placement longer than 3 days (OR 10.5 95% CI 2.6 - 41.9) demonstrated a greater likelihood of needing a revision surgery after initial treatment with bedside SDD.

CONCLUSION

Among patients treated with SDD, we identified 3 independent factors predicting the need for revision surgery: GCS score, midline shift, and duration of drain placement. Craniotomy may be favored over bedside SDD in patients presenting with a GCS score less than 13 or midline shift greater than 10 mm and for SDD patients demonstrating inadequate clinical response after 3 days.

Exhaustive drainage versus fixed-time drainage for chronic subdural hematoma after one-burr hole craniostomy (ECHO): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematomas (CSDHs) are one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. The standard surgical technique includes burr-hole craniostomy, followed by intraoperative irrigation and placement of subdural closed-system drainage. The drainage is generally removed after 48 h, which can be described as fixed-time drainage strategy. According to literature, the recurrence rate is 5-33% with this strategy. In our retrospective study, postoperative hematoma volume was found to significantly increase the risk of recurrence. Based on these results, an exhaustive drainage strategy is conducted to minimize postoperative hematoma volume and achieve a low recurrence rate and good outcomes.

METHODS

This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, blinded endpoint randomized controlled trial designed to include 304 participants over the age of 18-90 years presenting with a symptomatic CSDH verified on cranial computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Participants will be randomly allocated to perform exhaustive drainage (treatment group) or fixed-time drainage (control group) after a one-burr hole craniostomy. The primary endpoint will be recurrence indicating a reoperation within 6 months.

DISCUSSION

This study will validate the effect and safety of exhaustive drainage after one-burr hole craniostomy in reducing recurrence rates and provide critical information to improve CSDH surgical management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04573387. Registered on October 5, 2020.

Adverse events in neurosurgery: a comprehensive single-center analysis of a prospectively compiled database

PURPOSE

To prospectively identify and quantify neurosurgical adverse events (AEs) in a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

From January 2021 to December 2021, all patients treated in our department received a peer-reviewed AE-evaluation form at discharge. An AE was defined as any event after surgery that resulted in an undesirable clinical outcome, which is not caused by the underlying disease, that prolonged patient stay, resulted in readmission, caused a new neurological deficit, required revision surgery or life-saving intervention, or contributed to death. We considered AEs occurring within 30 days after discharge. AEs were categorized in wound event, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) event, CSF shunt malfunction, post-operative infection, malpositioning of implanted material, new neurological deficit, rebleeding, and surgical goal not achieved and non-neurosurgical AEs.

RESULTS

2874 patients were included. Most procedures were cranial (45.1%), followed by spinal (33.9%), subdural (7.7%), CSF (7.0%), neuromodulation (4.0%), and other (2.3%). In total, there were 621 AEs shared by 532 patients (18.5%). 80 (2.8%) patients had multiple AEs. Most AEs were non-neurosurgical (222; 8.1%). There were 172 (6%) revision surgeries. Patients receiving cranial interventions had the most AEs (19.1%) although revision surgery was only necessary in 3.1% of patients. Subdural interventions had the highest revision rate (12.6%). The majority of fatalities was admitted as an emergency (81/91 patients, 89%). Ten elective patients had lethal complications, six of them related to surgery (0.2%).

CONCLUSION

This study presents the one-year results of a prospectively compiled AE database. Neurosurgical AEs arose in one in five patients. Although the need for revision surgery was low, the rate of AEs highlights the importance of a systematic AE database to deliver continued high-quality in a high-volume center.

Surgical treatment and outcome of chronic subdural hematoma: a comparative study between Ethiopia and Norway

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. Here, we studied differences in demographics, treatment, and outcome for CSDH patients in low-income (Ethiopia) and high-income (Norway) countries and assessed potential outcome determinants.

METHODS

We included patients from Addis Ababa University Hospitals (AAUH) and Haukeland University Hospital (HUH) who had surgery for CSDH (2013-2017). Patients were included prospectively in Ethiopia and retrospectively in Norway.

RESULTS

We enrolled 314 patients from AAUH and 284 patients from HUH, with a median age of 60 and 75 years, respectively. Trauma history was more common in AAUH (72%) than in HUH patients (64.1%). More patients at HUH (45.1%) used anticoagulants/antiplatelets than at AAUH (3.2%). Comorbidities were more frequent in HUH (77.5%) than in AAUH patients (30.3%). Burr hole craniostomy under local anesthesia and postoperative drainage was the standard treatment in both countries. Postoperative CT scanning was more common at HUH (99.3%) than at AAUH (5.2%). Reoperations were more frequent at HUH (10.9%) than at AAUH (6.1%), and in both countries, mostly due to hematoma recurrence. Medical complications were more common at HUH (6.7%) than at AAUH (1.3%). The 1-year mortality rate at HUH was 7% and at AAUH 3.5%. At the end of follow-up (> 3 years), the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) score was 8 in 82.9% of AAUH and 46.8% of HUH patients.

CONCLUSION

The surgical treatment was similar at AAUH and HUH. The poorer outcome in Norway could largely be explained by age, comorbidity, medication, and complication rates.

Mini-Perforated Craniotomy with Subperiosteal Drain for Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A New Technique and Clinical Study

Purpose Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a frequent disease of the elderly with favorable outcomes. The main choice of treatment is surgery. Along with many surgical techniques described for evacuation of cSDH, we are presenting the preliminary outcomes of a novel surgical method, mini-perforated craniotomy with a subperiosteal drain.

Materials and Methods Patients in whom cSDH with thickness of >10 mm was observed in computed tomography (CT) scans with parenchymal compression and/or midline shift were included in this study. Age, sex, complaint, neurological status, and medical history were recorded along with CT findings. Mini-perforated craniotomy was performed on all patients. A subperiosteal drain was used. The postoperative follow-up period was 3 months.

Results Ten cSDH patients who were admitted to Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital between December 2020 and May 2021 were included in this study. The mean age was 64.3 ± 6.272, and the most common admission complaint was a headache. Postoperatively, one patient showed acute rebleeding after the operation due to dual anticoagulant therapy. Besides, in 3 months follow-up, rebleeding, subdural or epidural effusion, wound infection, or cosmetic problems were not observed.

Conclusion Mini-perforated craniotomy with a subperiosteal drain may be an alternative method for evacuation of cSDH with low complication rates especially when the hematoma is suspected to be septated.

The Role of Active or Passive Drainage after Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials (cSDH-Drain-Trial and TOSCAN Trial)

The evacuation of a chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common procedures in neurosurgery. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of drainage suction in the surgical treatment of cSDH on the recurrence rate. Post hoc analysis was conducted on two randomized controlled trials (cSDH-Drain-Trial and TOSCAN trial) stratifying a total of 581 patients into active or passive drain type. Of the 581 patients, 359 (61.8%) and 220 (37.9%) were stratified into the active and passive drainage groups, respectively. The reoperation rate following postoperative recurrence was 23.1% and 14.1% in the active and passive drainage groups, respectively (p < 0.011). After propensity score matching, the differences in recurrence rate remained significant (26.6% versus 15.6%, p = 0.012). However, the functional outcome (mRS) at 6−12 months did not differ significantly (median [IQR]) between the 2 groups (passive drainage group 0.00 [0.00, 2.00], active drainage group 1.00 [0.00, 2.00], p = 0.431). Mortality was comparable between the groups (passive drainage group 12 (5.5%), active drainage group 20 (5.6%), p = 0.968). In the univariate analysis, active drainage, short (<48 h) duration of drainage, and early (<48 h) postoperative mobilization were significantly associated with a higher recurrence rate. However, the multivariate logistic regression model could not confirm that any of these parameters were significantly associated with recurrence. Our post hoc analysis proposes that using a passive instead of an active drain might be associated with a reduced recurrence rate after evacuation of a cSDH. We suggest gathering further evidence by means of a randomized controlled trial.

Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Scoping Review

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical entities, especially in the elderly population. Diagnosis is usually established via a head computed tomography, while an increasing number of studies are investigating biomarkers to predict the natural history of cSDH, including progression and recurrence. Surgical evacuation remains the mainstay of treatment in the overwhelming majority of cases. Nevertheless, many controversies are associated with the nuances of surgical treatment. We performed a systematic review of the literature between 2010 and 2022, aiming to identify and address the issues in cSDH surgical management where consensus is lacking. The results show ambiguous data in regard to indication, the timing and type of surgery, the duration of drainage, concomitant membranectomy and the need for embolization of the middle meningeal artery. Other aspects of surgical treatment-such as the use of drainage and its location and number of burr holes-seem to have been adequately clarified: the drainage of hematoma is strongly recommended and the outcome is considered as independent of drainage location or the number of burr holes.

Postoperative drainage for 6, 12, or 24 h after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma in symptomatic patients (DRAIN-TIME 2): study protocol for a nationwide randomized controlled trial

Background

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common acute or subacute neurosurgical condition, typically treated by burr-hole evacuation and drainage. Recurrent CSDH occurs in 5–20% of cases and requires reoperation in symptomatic patients, sometimes repeatedly. Postoperative subdural drainage of maximal 48 h is effective in reducing recurrent hematomas. However, the shortest possible drainage time without increasing the recurrence rate is unknown.

Methods

DRAIN-TIME 2 is a Danish multi-center, randomized controlled trial of postoperative drainage time including all four neurosurgical departments in Denmark. Both incapacitated and mentally competent patients are enrolled. Patients older than 18 years, free of other intracranial pathologies or history of previous brain surgery, are recruited at the time of admission or no later than 6 h after surgery. Each patient is randomized to either 6, 12, or 24 h of passive subdural drainage following single burr-hole evacuation of a CSDH. Mentally competent patients are asked to complete the SF-36 questionnaire. The primary endpoint is CSDH recurrence rate at 90 days. Secondary outcome measures include SF-36 at 90 days, length of hospital stay, drain-related complications, and complications related to immobilization and mortality.

Discussion

This multi-center trial will provide evidence regarding the shortest possible drainage time without increasing the recurrence rate. The potential impact of this study is significant as we believe that a shorter drainage period may be associated with fewer drain-related complications, fewer complications related to immobilization, and shorter hospital stays—thus reducing the overall health service burden from this condition. The expected benefits for patients’ lives and health costs will increase as the CSDH patient population grows.

Trial registration

ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN15186366. Registered in December 2020 and updated in October 2021. This protocol was developed in accordance with the SPIRIT Checklist and by use of the structured study protocol template provided by BMC Trials.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06150-x.

Comparative analysis of safety and efficacy in subperiosteal versus subdural drainage after burr-hole trephination for chronic subdural hematoma

PURPOSE

The treatment of choice for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has been established as burr-hole trephination with drain insertion; however, controversy remains over the best place for the drainage catheter. In this study, we compare the safety and efficacy of a subperiosteal drain (SPD) with that of a subdural drain (SDD) after one burr-hole trephination for CSDH.

METHODS

This retrospective and comparative study includes all CSDH patients treated with burr-hole trephination at our institution between January 2015 and December 2019. 59 patients were treated with SPD insertion (SPD group), and 203 patients were treated with SDD insertion (SDD group).

RESULTS

The median hematoma thickness of the SPD group within 24 h after surgery was significantly thicker than that of the SDD group (9.5 mm vs. 7.5 mm, p = 0.003), but the midline shifting of the SPD group did not differ from that of the SDD group (3.8 mm vs. 3.5 mm, p = 0.280). The recurrence rate in the SPD group did not differ significantly from that in the SDD group (13.2% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.351). The frequency of bleeding events after surgery also did not differ significantly (5.1% vs. 3.5% p-value = 0.636). In contrast to surgery-related morbidities, medical morbidities such as pneumonia were significantly higher in the SDD group (4.4% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.044). The all-cause mortality rates during the perioperative period did not differ between the two groups (5.1% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.848).

CONCLUSION

Our findings may suggest that burr-hole trephination with SPD insertion had better surgical feasibility and fewer perioperative complications than SDD insertion. The type of anesthesia seems to be related with fewer medical complications at perioperative period. Larger, randomized clinical trials focusing not only the drain type but anesthesia type, are needed to validate our findings.

Burr hole craniostomy versus minicraniotomy in chronic subdural hematoma: a comparative cohort study

Background

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical diseases. In surgical management of CSDH, there is a lack of standardized guidelines concerning surgical techniques and a lack of consensus on which technique(s) are optimal. Neurosurgical centers have shown a wide variation in surgical techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare two different surgical techniques, one burr hole craniostomy with an active subgaleal drain (BHC) and minicraniotomy with a passive subdural drain (MC).

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study at two neurosurgical centers in Sweden which included patients with unilateral CSDHs that received surgical treatment with either BHC or MC. The primary outcomes in comparison of the techniques were 30-day mortality, recurrence rate, and complications according to the Landriel Ibañez grading system for complications.

Results

A total of 1003 patients were included in this study. The BHC subgroup included 560 patients, and the MC subgroup included 443 patients. A 30-day mortality when comparing BHC (2.3%) and MC (2.7%) was similar (p = 0.701). Comparing recurrence rate for BHC (8.9%) and MC (10.8%) showed no significant difference (p = 0.336). We found that medical complications were significantly more common in the MC group (p = 0.001). Surgical complications (type IIb) was also associated with the MC group (n = 10, p = 0.003). Out of the 10 patients with type IIb complications in the MC group, 8 had postoperative acute subdural hematomas.

Conclusions

BHC was comparable to MC concerning 30-day mortality rate and recurrence rates. We did, however, find that MC was significantly associated with medical complications and serious surgical postoperative complications.

Modified Burr-Hole Craniostomy for the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma in Adults

BACKGROUND

Burr-hole craniostomy (BHC) is considered to be the most effective method for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), and middle meningeal artery embolization is a new therapy used in clinical practice in recent years to treat CSDH. However, the optimal therapeutic effect of these 2 procedures is still controversial. This study prospectively designed a modified burr-hole craniostomy (mBHC) with drainage to treat CSDH.

METHODS

A total of 101 patients diagnosed with CSDH from January 2019 to April 2020 were prospectively included in this study. They were divided into BHC and mBHC groups. Among them, 40 selected CSDH patients received mBHC treatment. For comparison, 61 CSDH patients who received BHC treatment were used as the control group. Primary outcomes were hematoma recurrence and postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included midline recovery, hematoma clearance, operation time, and hospital stay. The Chi-square test was used to compare the 6-month follow-up results between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Among patients treated with mBHC, 39 patients had a good prognosis, and one 87-year-old patient with bilateral hematoma died of postoperative heart failure. Of the patients treated with BHC, 52 patients had good prognoses, and one 53-year-old patient with unilateral hematoma died of postoperative acute intracranial bleeding. During the 6-month follow-up period, no relapse occurred in the patients treated with mBHC, whereas 8 (13%) of the patients treated with BHC relapsed. There was a significant difference in the recurrence rate between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). In addition, midline recovery, hematoma clearance rate, operation time, and complications were found to be significantly different statistically (P < 0.05), and other characteristics of operation and outcome were not significantly different (P > 0.05) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified burr-hole craniostomy has a positive therapeutic effect on patients with CSDH and is more effective than conventional BHC therapy.

Subdural drainage techniques for single burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: two drains frontal-occipital position versus one drain frontal position

OBJECTIVE

Burr-hole craniostomy with a closed drainage system is the most commonly used technique for chronic subdural hematoma(CSDH), but the reoperation rate for hematoma recurrence is still high. This retrospective study aimed to compare the complications and recurrence of two subdural drains placement with tips frontal-occipital position (TFOP) versus one subdural drain placement with tip frontal position(OFP) following single burr-hole evacuation for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma(CSDH).

METHODS

The authors analyzed data of all CSDH patients who underwent single burr-hole surgery with placement of subdural closed-drainage system(TFOP or OFP techniques) between January 2013 and December 2017. Data analysis included general patient data, complications, recurrence and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 331 patients were included(85 TFOP and 246 OFP). The TFOP group and OFP group were statistically comparable with respect to baseline characteristics except for preoperative Markwalder score (p = 0.019). Midline shift and subdural fluid thickness on first postoperative day were greater in OFP group than the TFOP group (p = 0.028; and p = 0.007, respectively). In addition, patients with OFP had a lower percent of hematoma change after surgery and much more residual subdural air than those with TFOP (p = 0.001; and p < 0.001, respectively). Postoperative complications and clinical outcome between the two groups showed no significant differences. During the 3-month follow-up, the rate of hematoma recurrence was significantly lower among patients treated with TFOP than those treated with OFP (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative complications rate did not differ between TFOP group and OFP group for patients with CSDH. Considering the lower rate of recurrence, TFOP following single burr-hole evacuation might be a safe and promising option for CSDH treatment.

A mapping review of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease

BACKGROUND

Pilonidal sinus is a hole in the natal cleft which may cause severe pain and become infected. The evidence base for management of pilonidal sinus is said to be poor quality, poorly focused and rapidly proliferating. We undertook a systematic mapping review to provide a broad overview of the field and support the identification of research priorities.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE from inception to 22nd Nov 2020 for primary research studies focused on the management of pilonidal sinus. We extracted data on study design and categorised studies under five major headings ('non-surgical treatment', 'surgical treatment', 'aftercare' and 'other'), producing frequency counts for different study designs. Gaps in research were identified from published systematic reviews and tabulated.

RESULTS

We identified 983 eligible studies, of which 36 were systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses; 121 were randomised controlled trials), and 826 observational studies of various design. The majority of studies evaluated surgical techniques (n = 665), or adjuvant medical interventions (n = 98). The literature on wound care has developed most recently, and the evidence base includes 30% randomised controlled trials. Gaps analysis highlighted comparison of surgical techniques including flaps, laser depilation, and wound care interventions as potential areas for randomised controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

This mapping review summarises eight decades of research on the management of pilonidal sinus. Further research is needed to identify front-running interventions, understand variation in practice and patient values, and to prioritise future research.

Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH): A review of the current state of the art

Introduction

Incidence of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH) is rising worldwide, partly due to an aging population, but also due to increased use of antithrombotic medication. Many recent studies have emerged to address current cSDH management strategies.

Research question

What is the state of the art of cSDH management.

Material and methods

Review.

Results

Head trauma, antithrombotic use and craniocerebral disproportion increase the risk of cSDH development. Most patients present with disorientation, GCS 13–15, and symptoms arising from cortical irritation and increased intracranial pressure. cSDH occurs bilaterally in 9–22%. CT allows assessment of cerebral compression (herniation, hematoma thickness, ventricle collapse, midline shift), hematoma age and presence of membranes, factors that ultimately determine treatment urgency and surgical approach. Recurrence remains the principle complication (9–33%), occurring more commonly with older age and bilateral cSDHs.

Discussion and conclusion

While incompletely understood, it is generally believed that injury in the dural cell layer results in bleeding from bridging veins, resulting in a hematoma formation, with or without a preceding hygroma, in a potential space approximating the junction between the dura and arachnoid. Neovascularization and leaking from the outer membrane are thought to propagate this process. Evidence that MMA embolization may reduce recurrence rates is a potentially exciting new treatment option, but also supports the theory that the MMA is implicated in the cSDH pathophysiology. The use of steroids remains a controversial topic without clear treatment guidelines. cSDH represents a common neurosurgical problem with burr-hole treatment remaining the gold standard, often in conjunction with subgaleal drains. MMA embolization to stop recurrence may represent an important evolution in understanding the pathophysiology of cSDH and improving treatment.

•

Incidence of cSDH is rising, partly due to the aging population and increased antithrombotic use.

•

cSDH occurs bilaterally in 9–22% of cases.

•

Recurrence remains the principle complication and has been estimated at 9–33%.

•

Risk factors for recurrence include old age and bilateral cSDHs.

•

MMA embolization may reduce recurrence, but its efficacy and target population remain unclear.

Risk of Recurrence of Chronic Subdural Hematomas After Surgery: A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study

Background: Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH) is a common condition in the elderly population. Recurrence rates after surgical evacuation range from 5 to 30%. Factors predicting recurrence remain debated and unclear.

Objective: To identify factors associated with increased risk of recurrence.

Methods: Cases of CSDHs that underwent surgical treatment between 2005 and 2018 in the Neurosurgery Units of two major Italian hospitals were reviewed. Data extracted from a prospectively maintained database included demographics, laterality, antithrombotic therapy, history of trauma, corticosteroid therapy, preoperative and postoperative symptoms, type of surgical intervention, use of surgical drain, and clinical outcomes.

Results: A total of 1313 patients was analyzed. The overall recurrence rate was 10.1%. The risk of recurrence was not significantly different between patients with unilateral or bilateral CSDH (10.4 vs. 8.8%, p = 0.39). The risk of recurrence was higher in patients that underwent surgical procedure without postoperative drainage (16.1 vs. 5.4%, p < 0.01). No relationship was found between recurrence rates and therapy with antithrombotic drugs (p = 0.97). The risk of recurrence was increasingly higher considering craniostomy, craniectomy, and craniotomy (9.3, 11.3, and 18.9%, respectively, p = 0.013). Lower recurrence rates following Dexamethasone therapy were recorded (p = 0.013).

Conclusion: No association was found between the risk of recurrence of CSDH after surgical evacuation and age, use of antithrombotic medication, or laterality. Burr-hole craniostomy was found to be associated with lower recurrence rates, when compared to other surgical procedures. Placement of surgical drain and Dexamethasone therapy were significantly associated with reduced risk of recurrence of CSDHs.

Drain type after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma in geriatric patients: a subanalysis of the cSDH-Drain randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) occurs more frequently in elderly patients, while older patient age is associated with worse postoperative outcome following burr-hole drainage (BHD) of cSDH. The cSDH-Drain trial showed comparable recurrence rates after BHD and placement of either a subperiosteal drain (SPD) or subdural drain (SDD). Additionally, an SPD showed a significantly lower rate of infections as well as iatrogenic parenchymal injuries through drain misplacement. This post hoc analysis aims to compare recurrence rates and clinical outcomes following BHD of cSDH and the placement of SPDs or SDDs in elderly patients.

METHODS

The study included 104 patients (47.3%) 80 years of age and older from the 220 patients recruited in the preceding cSDH-Drain trial. SPDs and SDDs were compared with regard to recurrence rate, morbidity, mortality, and clinical outcome. A post hoc analysis using logistic regression, comparing the outcome measurements for patients < 80 and ≥ 80 years old in a univariate analysis and stratified for drain type, was further completed.

RESULTS

Patients ≥ 80 years of age treated with an SDD showed higher recurrence rates (12.8%) compared with those treated with an SPD (8.2%), without a significant difference (p = 0.46). Significantly higher drain misplacement rates were observed for patients older than 80 years and treated with an SDD compared with an SPD (0% vs 20%, p = 0.01). Comparing patients older than 80 years to younger patients, significantly higher overall mortality (15.4% vs 5.2%, p = 0.012), 30-day mortality (3.8% vs 0%, p = 0.033), and surgical mortality (2.9% vs 1.7%, p = 0.034) rates were observed. Clinical outcome at the 12-month follow-up was significantly worse for patients ≥ 80 years old, and logistic regression showed a significant association of age with outcome, while drain type had no association with outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial findings of the cSDH-Drain trial and the findings of this subanalysis suggest that SPD may be warranted in elderly patients. As opposed to drain type, patient age (> 80 years) was significantly associated with worse outcome, as well as higher morbidity and mortality rates.

Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Chronic subdural haematomas (CSDHs) are one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. The goal of surgery is to alleviate symptoms and minimise the risk of symptomatic recurrences. In the past, reoperation rates as high as 20%-30% were described for CSDH recurrences. However, following the introduction of subdural drainage, reoperation rates dropped to approximately 10%. The standard surgical technique includes burr-hole craniostomy, followed by intraoperative irrigation and placement of subdural drainage. Yet, the role of intraoperative irrigation has not been established. If there is no difference in recurrence rates between intraoperative irrigation and no irrigation, CSDH surgery could be carried out faster and more safely by omitting the step of irrigation. The aim of this multicentre randomised controlled trial is to study whether no intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage results in non-inferior outcome compared with intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage following burr-hole craniostomy of CSDH.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group, non-inferiority multicentre trial comparing single burr-hole evacuation of CSDH with intraoperative irrigation and evacuation of CSDH without irrigation. In both groups, a passive subdural drain is used for 48 hours as a standard of treatment. The primary outcome is symptomatic CSDH recurrence requiring reoperation within 6 months. The predefined non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome is 7.5%. To achieve a 2.5% level of significance and 80% power, we will randomise 270 patients per group. Secondary outcomes include modified Rankin Scale, rate of mortality, duration of operation, length of hospital stay, adverse events and change in volume of CSDH.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS/3035/2019 §238) and duly registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. We will disseminate the findings of this study through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04203550.

Drains result in greater reduction of subdural width and midline shift in burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma

BACKGROUND

Drain insertion following chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) evacuation reduces recurrence and improves outcomes. The mechanism of this improvement is uncertain. We assessed whether drains result in improved postoperative imaging, and which radiological factors are associated with recurrence and functional outcome.

METHODS

A multi-centre, prospective cohort study of CSDH patients was performed between May 2013 and January 2014. Patients aged > 16 years undergoing burr hole evacuation of primary CSDH with pre- and postoperative imaging were included in this subgroup analysis. Baseline and clinical details were collected. Pre- and postoperative maximal subdural width and midline shift (MLS) along with clot density were recorded. Primary outcomes comprised mRS at discharge and symptomatic recurrence requiring re-drainage. Comparisons were made using multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Three hundred nineteen patients were identified for inclusion. Two hundred seventy-two of 319 (85%) patients underwent drain insertion at the time of surgery versus 45/319 (14%) who did not. Twenty-nine of 272 patients who underwent drain insertion experienced recurrence (10.9%) versus 9 of 45 patients without drain insertion (20.5%; p = 0.07). Overall change in median subdural width was significantly greater in the drain versus 'no drain' groups (11 mm versus 6 mm, p < 0.01). Overall change in median midline shift (MLS) was also significantly greater in the drain group (4 mm versus 3 mm, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, change in maximal width and MLS were significant predictors of recurrence, although only the former remained a significant predictor for functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of subdural drains results in significantly improved postoperative imaging in burr hole evacuation of CSDH, thus providing radiological corroboration for their recommended use.

Gradation density hematoma is a predictor of chronic subdural hematoma recurrence associated with inflammation of the outer membrane

OBJECTIVES

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common form of intracranial hemorrhage with a high recurrence rate. This study aimed to determine the CSDH recurrence rate associated with preoperative computed tomography (CT) findings and the pathological examination of the dura and the outer membrane.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with CSDH who underwent surgery in our hospital between May 2010 and November 2019. CSDHs were classified into four groups according to the hematoma density on CT: low-density hematoma (LDH), gradation-density hematoma (GDH), iso-density-hematoma (IDH), and mixed-density hematoma (MDH). The postoperative recurrence rate was calculated for each group, and we examined whether the recurrence rate correlated with the CT findings. We also took samples of the dura to analyze inflammatory cell infiltration and the blood vessels.

RESULTS

A total of 388 patients were analyzed. The total recurrence rate was 13.7%. CT findings at admission showed LDH in 50, GDH in 136, IDH in 110, and MDH in 92 patients. The recurrence rate of GDH (23.5%, 32/136) was comparable to the rate of the other CSDH types (11.5%, 61/388). Univariate and multivariate analyses found GDH to be an independent risk factor for the recurrence of CSDH. GDH patients displayed much more angiogenesis and inflammatory cell infiltration in the outer membrane and the dura.

CONCLUSION

GDH is an independent predictor for CSDH recurrence. The presence of inflammation in GDH might be the primary cause of CSDH recurrence.

Type of Drain in Chronic Subdural Hematoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical diseases, while burr-hole drainage is the most frequently used surgical treatment. Strong evidence exists that subdural drain (SDD) placement reduces recurrence rates. However, the insertion of a subperiosteal drain (SPD) was shown to lead to similar recurrence rates and less complications than SDD. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review of the literature and conduct a meta-analysis of studies comparing SPD with SDD after burr-hole drainage of cSDH.

Methods: Pubmed and Embase databases were searched using a systematic search strategy to identify studies on drain location up to December 2019. Two independent researchers assessed the studies for inclusion and quality. Primary outcome measure was recurrence, while secondary outcome measures were drain misplacement, morbidity, mortality, and clinical outcome. Besides randomized controlled trials (RCT), we included non-randomized prospective cohort studies, as well as retrospective cohort studies. A fixed effects model was used if low heterogeneity (I² < 50%) was present, otherwise a random effects model was used.

Results: Following removal of duplicates, we screened 1109 articles of which 10 articles were included in our qualitative and quantitative analyses. One study was an RCT, three were non-randomized prospective cohort studies, and the remaining articles were retrospective cohort studies or subgroup analysis. In these 10 articles, 1,553 patients were treated with SPD and 1782 patients with SDD. Comparing the recurrence rate of cSDH a significant difference was found between SPD and SDD insertion (11.9 and 12.3%; RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.67–0.97, I² = 0%, z = −2.27, p = 0.02). SPD had significantly lower rates of drain misplacement and parenchymal injuries (1.2 and 7.8%; RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07–0.42, I² = 0%, z = −3.4, p = 0.0001), as well as morbidity (6.4 and 8.2%; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.5–0.84, I² = 44.5%, z = −3.32, p =0.0009). Mortality rates (5.0 and 4.6%; RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.6–1.14, I² = 0%, z = −1.2, p = 0.25) and favorable clinical outcome (89.6 and 88.9%; RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.89–1.24, I² = 54.2%, t = 0.98, p = 0.40) were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion: The insertion of SPD after burr-hole drainage of cSDH showed lower rates of recurrence, drain misplacements and parenchymal injuries, as well as overall morbidity, while clinical outcome and mortality were comparable to SDD. Therefore, the insertion of SPD after surgical drainage of cSDH should be encouraged.

Subdural Drain versus Subdural Evacuating Port System for the Treatment of Nonacute Subdural Hematomas: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Subdural drain (SDD) and Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS) are bedside options for management of nonacute subdural hematomas (SDHs). These interventions have not been compared with each other. Our objective is to compare the need for second bedside procedure, need for craniotomy, complication rate, and other outcomes related to bedside drainage of SDH with SDD or SEPS. We hypothesized that SDD would be associated with superior outcomes to SEPS.

METHODS

Database queries and direct patient chart reviews were used to gather patient data. t-Tests, Fisher exact tests, and proportional odds models were performed.

RESULTS

Of 41 SDDs and 25 SEPS, baseline characteristics were similar except more isodense SDHs were present in SDD (P = 0.0312). SEPS was associated with significant risk of requiring a second bedside procedure (odds ratio, 3.2381; 99% confidence interval, 1.0345-10.1355) relative to SDD. Need for craniotomy did not differ between groups (12.1% SDD vs. 16% SEPS; P = 0.721). The complication rate was similar between groups (2.4% SDD vs. 12% SEPS; P = 0.1484). Symptom resolution, condition at latest follow-up, and posthospital disposition were similar between groups, but SEPS was associated with longer intensive care unit and total hospital length of stay (P = 0.02 and 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

SEPS was associated with higher risk for need of second bedside procedure and longer intensive care unit and hospital length of stay than SDD, although not increased need for craniotomy. Additional studies are needed to confirm our findings and determine if SDD may be more effective than SEPS for the treatment of nonacute SDH.

Subperiosteal versus subdural drainage after burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The evidence for subperiosteal drainage (SPD) versus subdural drainage (SDD) in chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) remains controversial, and most surgeons prefer to use SDD over SPD. We aim to assess the latest evidence on the use of SPD compared to SDD in patients with CSDH undergoing burr hole evacuation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search on topics that assesses the use of SPD compared to SDD in patients with CSDH up until November 2019 from PubMed, EuropePMC, Cochrane Central Database, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The primary outcome was recurrent CSDH, and the secondary outcomes were mortality, surgical morbidities, and modified Rankin Score (mRS).

RESULTS

There were a total of 3241 subjects from 10 studies. SPD was shown to reduce recurrent CSDH (OR 0.66 [0.52, 0.84], p < 0.001; I²: 17%, p = 0.30) compared to SDD. Recurrent CSDH was lower in SPD group in subgroup analysis at 3-months (OR 0.63 [0.49, 0.81]; I²: 68%, p = 0.04) and 6-months (OR 0.66 [0.51, 0.85], p = 0.001; I²: 77%, p = 0.01) follow-up. However, there was no difference in CSDH recurrence upon subgroup analysis of RCTs. Similar mortality was demonstrated between SPD and SDD group (p = 0.13). The occurrence of parenchymal injury/new neurological deficit was significantly lower in SPD group (OR 0.26 [0.14, 0.51], p < 0.001; I²: 49%, p = 0.08). The rate of seizure, (p = 0.57), postoperative bleeding (p = 0.29), and infection (p = 0.25) were shown to be similar in both SPD and SDD group. Overall, the rate of surgical morbidity was significantly lower in SPD group (OR 0.61 [0.44, 0.85], p = 0.003; I²: 16%, p = 0.25). mRS at the end of follow-up was similar in SPD and SDD group (p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

SPD was associated with less CSDH recurrence, but similar rate of mortality, seizures, postoperative bleeding, and infections compared to SDD. The rate of parenchymal injury/new neurological deficit was lower in the SPD group.

Subperiosteal versus Subdural Drain After Burr Hole Drainage for Chronic Subdural Hematomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of drains has been considered to be superior to no drains after burr hole drainage of chronic subdural hematomas (CSDHs). Therefore, routine placement of a subdural drain (SDD) is supported by most neurosurgeons. However, whether the drain location after CSDH burr hole evacuation influences patient outcomes is unclear. Therefore, we compared the efficacy and safety of subperiosteal drains (SPDs) with those of SDDs for patients with CSDHs.

METHODS

Using the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines, eligible studies reported up to September 2019 were identified through a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. Pooled estimates, confidence intervals (CIs), and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for all outcomes.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 3169 patients were included. The use of a SPD after CSDH burr hole drainage resulted in a significant decrease in recurrences compared with the use of a SDD (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.92; I², 14%; P = 0.007). No significant differences were identified between the SPD and SDD groups in the favorable outcomes (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1-1.68; I², 0%; P = 0.05). Adverse event rates, including mortality, seizures, and surgical infection, were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, the use of SPDs was associated with a lower risk of parenchymal injuries compared with SDDs (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.76; I², 0%; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the present meta-analysis suggest that the use of an SPD is safer and might be more effective than an SDD in the treatment of CSDH. However, more large randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the use of SPDs in the management of CSDH.

A Comparison of Subperiosteal or Subgaleal Drainage with Subdural Drainage on the Outcomes of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of patients with chronic subdural hematoma after undergoing burr hole craniotomy with subperiosteal or subgaleal drainage (SPGD) with those of patients who have undergone burr hole craniotomy with subdural drainage.

METHODS

We searched 4 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library) for relevant reports from January 1995 to September 2019. Two reviewers recorded the major outcomes data as follows: recurrence, mortality, postoperative seizures, postoperative bleeding events, surgical infection, pneumocephalus, modified Rankin scale scores, and Glasgow outcome scale scores. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 3149 patients from 10 studies were included in our analysis. Compared with the SSD group, the SPGD group had a lower recurrence rate (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.91) and a smaller risk of postoperative bleeding (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.78). Also, no significant differences were found in the incidence of mortality (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.54-1.18), postoperative seizures (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.39-1.40), surgical infection (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.55-1.76), pneumocephalus (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.28-1.20), modified Rankin scale score 0-3 (OR, 1.04 at discharge; OR, 1.33 at 6 months), and Glasgow outcome scale score 4-5 (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.82-2.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Burr hole craniotomy with SPGD can be recommended as an effective and safe surgical therapy for patients with chronic subdural hematoma owing to its lower recurrence rate and reduced incidence of postoperative brain injuries, in addition to no increase in the rate of some postoperative complications. However, more studies are necessary for further confirmation.

Regional Variation in the Management of Nontraumatic Subdural Hematomas Across the United States

BACKGOUND

Nontraumatic subdural hematomas are a common indication for inpatient hospitalization in the United States, yet there is little high-quality evidence regarding which patients should receive surgical or medical treatment. We sought to assess variation in surgical management and medical treatment with steroids for nontraumatic subdural hematomas across the United States.

METHODS

Using the Premier database, we analyzed patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of nontraumatic subdural hematoma in 2014. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, procedure codes were used to identify patients who underwent surgical management, and pharmacy data were used to identify patients treated with dexamethasone. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to examine the association of age, race, sex, academic versus nonacademic center, and regions of the United States with conservative or surgical management.

RESULTS

There were 3915 inpatient hospitalizations for nontraumatic subdural hematomas in 2014 in the Premier database, of whom 1860 (47.5%) underwent surgery, and 360 (9.2%) underwent treatment with dexamethasone, either as a primary treatment or as an adjuvant to surgery. Older age, female sex, and being managed outside of the Western U.S. region were associated with a lower likelihood of undergoing surgical management on multivariable analysis; only younger age was associated with a greater likelihood of being treated with dexamethasone.

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable variability in surgical management of nontraumatic subdural hematomas across the United States based on age, sex, and region. Future studies should explore the reasons for the variability and attempt to better clarify indications for surgical management of subdural hematomas.

Factors influencing the results of surgical therapy of non-acute subdural haematomas

PURPOSE

To identify predictive factors with an impact on the outcome of surgical treatment of non-acute subdural haematomas (NASH).

METHODS

One hundred eleven patients who underwent an evacuation of 132 NASH by means of burr hole or craniotomy from January 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated the impact of factors that could possibly predict the result of surgical treatment. The assessment was focused on the impact of factors, such as age, gender, pre-operative clinical symptoms, timing and extent of surgical procedure, intake of anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs, morphological type, recurrence, side localization or bilateral occurrence of NASH. Patients' functional outcome was quantified using the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) with a follow-up period of 3 months.

RESULTS

Morphological type of NASH did not have any significant impact on the final GOS. The risk factors associated with less favorable GOS included preoperative intake of anticoagulants and preoperative finding of phatic disorder, quantitative disorder of consciousness and disorientation. Preoperative intake of antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants and craniotomy were risk factors for postoperative development of a surgically significant acute extracerebral haematoma. The complications occurred significantly more often after a craniotomy when compared to the burr hole evacuation (p = 0.0163), but the incidence of recurrence of NASH was significantly lower (p = 0.0439).

CONCLUSION

The risk factors for the surgical treatment of NASH included preoperative intake of antithrombotic drugs and evacuation of NASH through craniotomy. Craniotomy resulted in a significantly lower incidence of recurrence.

Seizure and status epilepticus in chronic subdural hematoma

BACKGROUND

Acute symptomatic seizure (ASz) and status epilepticus (SE) are serious conditions associated with poor quality of life, with unfavorable psychosocial and functional outcome. Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common neurosurgical disease related to those complications; therefore, we aimed to evaluate incidence, predictors of ASz/SE, and outcome in this cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patient diagnosed cSDH between 2010 and 2017. Beside their incidence of ASz/SE, patient characteristics, symptoms at admission, comorbidities, and all previously published relevant parameters were assessed. Recurrence rate and functional outcome were analyzed at hospital discharge and 90-day follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 375 patients were included; incidence of ASz was 15.2% and of SE, 1.9%. In the univariate analysis, drainage insertion (P =  0.004; OR = 0.3) was a significant negative predictor for ASz/SE and multivariate analysis, including all significant parameters, designated GCS ≤13 at admission (P = 0.09; OR = 1.9), remote stroke (P = 0.009; OR = 2.9), and recurrence rate within 14 days (P = 0.001; OR = 3.3; with an incidence of 13%) as independent predictors for ASz/SE. Overall, patients with ASz/SE had significantly unfavorable outcome at discharge (54.7%; P < 0.001) and follow-up (39.5%; P < 0.001) with only slight improvement. Late seizures occurred in 3.8% within follow-up period. Any patient with SE had an unfavorable outcome at discharge without any improvement at follow-up having a mortality rate of 14.2%.

CONCLUSION

Independent predictors for ASz/SE are GCS ≤13 at admission, remote stroke, and recurrent hematoma in patients with cSDH, which is associated with worse functional outcome, particularly those with SE. Due to the higher rate of seizures than recurrence rate, a routine pre- and postoperative EEG besides CT is recommended.