The Pipeline Embolization Device: Changes in Practice and Reduction of Complications in the Treatment of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms in a Multicenter Cohort

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Pipeline Embolization Device in Anterior and Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion using the pipeline embolization device (PED) has been a paradigm shift for anterior circulation (AC) aneurysms. However, only a few studies report the long-term (≥1 year) angiographic and clinical outcomes for posterior circulation (PC) aneurysms. This study aims to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of treatment of AC and PC aneurysms with PED.

METHODS

The databases included Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane, and Scopus. Studies with at least 10 patients and 1-year follow-up were included. Twenty-four studies met our inclusion criteria. A random effect meta-analysis was performed to estimate the ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed to estimate the pooled rates of long-term complete aneurysmal occlusion, symptomatic stroke, aneurysmal rupture, and intracranial hemorrhage.

RESULTS

There were 1952 aneurysms, of which 1547 (79.25%) were in the AC and 405 (20.75%) in the PC. The 1-year occlusion rate was 78% in AC compared to 73% in PC aneurysms (P < 0.01). The symptomatic infarct rate was 5% in AC compared to 13% in PC (P < 0.01). While the rupture rate was 1% in AC compared to 4% in PC (P = 0.01), the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 2% for both (P = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term occlusion rate after PED was higher in AC aneurysms, and the cumulative incidence of stroke and aneurysm rupture was higher in PC aneurysms.

Flow-diverter stents combined with flow-T stenting-assisted coiling for the treatment of a large basilar apex aneurysm: a case report with a 9-month follow-up

Background

Endovascular or surgical treatment of wide-neck, large basilar apex aneurysms is challenging. We present a novel concept for the treatment of complex basilar apex aneurysms using flow-diverter devices combined with the flow-T stenting-assisted coiling technique. Assess the efficacy and safety profile of the technique in this complex aneurysm.

Case description

A patient with multiple unruptured intracranial aneurysms underwent staged treatment. A large basilar apex aneurysm was treated with a flow-diverter stent combined with a flow-T stenting-assisted coiling technique in the first stage, and a giant supraclinoid aneurysm was treated with a flow-diverter stent applied in the second stage. Clinical presentations, technical details, intra- and perioperative complications, and clinical and angiographic outcomes were recorded, with a 9-month follow-up.

Results

The patient achieved full neurologic recovery postoperatively. Cerebral angiography performed postoperatively showed revascularization, good laminar flow, and no in-stent or adjacent stenosis.

Conclusion

Flow-diverter stents combined with flow-T stenting-assisted coiling for the treatment of giant basilar apex aneurysms is a feasible technique with efficacy demonstrated at a 9-month follow-up. Staged endovascular treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms may be a safe and viable option.

No Delayed Ruptures on Long-Term Follow-Up of a Case Series of Persistently Filling Saccular Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms After Flow Diversion With the Pipeline Embolization Device

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Flow diversion of intracranial aneurysms results in high occlusion rates. However, 10% to 20% remain persistently filling at 1 year. Often, these are retreated, but benefits of retreatment are not well established. A better understanding of the long-term rupture risk of persistently filling aneurysms after flow diversion is needed.

METHODS

Our institutional database of 974 flow diversion cases was queried for persistently filling saccular aneurysms of the clinoidal, ophthalmic, and communicating segments of the internal carotid artery treated with the pipeline embolization device (PED, Medtronic). Persistent filling was defined as continued flow into the aneurysm on 1 year catheter angiogram. The clinical record was queried for retreatments and delayed ruptures. Clinical follow-up was required for at least 2 years.

RESULTS

Ninety-four persistent aneurysms were identified. The average untreated aneurysm size was 5.6 mm. A branch vessel originated separately in 55% of cases from the body of the aneurysm in 10.6% of cases and from the neck in 34% of cases. Eighteen percent of aneurysms demonstrated >95% filling at 1 year, and 61% were filling 5% to 95% of their original size. The mean follow-up time was 4.9 years, including 41 cases with >5 years. No retreatment was undertaken in 91.5% of aneurysms. There were no cases of delayed subarachnoid hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Among saccular internal carotid artery aneurysms treated with PED that demonstrated persistent aneurysm filling at 1 year, there were no instances of delayed rupture on long-term follow-up. These data suggest that observation may be appropriate for continued aneurysm filling at least in the first several years after PED placement.

Early clinical experience with the new generation Pipeline Vantage flow diverter in the treatment of unruptured saccular aneurysms using short-term dual antiplatelet therapy

PURPOSE

The Pipeline Vantage flow diverter with Shield technology (PV) used in this study is a 4th-generation flow diverter (FD) designed to reduce thrombogenicity, promote endothelialization of the implant and increase efficiency in achieving aneurysm closure. In this study, we report the aneurysm occlusion rate, complication rate and clinical outcome with short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the treatment of unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms using the PV.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients treated between September 2021 and January 2023 with the PV and subsequently underwent short-term DAPT for 3 months. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, peri- and post-procedural complications, clinical outcomes and the grade of aneurysm occlusion were documented.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with 32 aneurysms were treated. Successful FD implantation was achieved in all cases (100%). No periprocedural complications were documented. The overall symptomatic complication rate was 10% and the neurologic, treatment-related symptomatic complication rate was 6.6%. Only one symptomatic complication (3.3%) was device-related. Permanent clinical deterioration occurred in 2/30 patients (6.6%), leading to deterioration of the mRS within the first 3 months after treatment. No mortality was documented. The rate of complete aneurysm occlusion after 3 months and after a mean imaging follow-up of 9.9 months was 65.6% and 75%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Implantation of the PV for the treatment of saccular intracranial aneurysms achieves a good aneurysm occlusion rate with a low rate of complications. In addition, the use of short-term DAPT after PV implantation appears to be safe.

Long-term outcomes following pipeline embolization of unruptured aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion using the pipeline embolization device (PED) for unruptured aneurysms is associated with high occlusion and low morbidity and mortality. However, most reports have limited follow-up of 1-2 years. Therefore, we sought to report our outcomes after PED for unruptured aneurysms in patients with at least 5-years of follow-up.

METHODS

Review of patients undergoing PED for unruptured aneurysms from 2009 to 2016.

RESULTS

Overall, 135 patients with 138 aneurysms were included for analysis. Seventy-eight percent of aneurysms (n=107) over a median radiographic follow-up of 5.0 years underwent complete occlusion. Among aneurysms with at least 5-years of radiographic follow-up (n=71), 79% (n=56) achieved complete obliteration. No aneurysm recanalized after radiographic obliteration. Furthermore, over a median clinical follow-up period of 4.9 years, 84% of patients (n=115) self-reported mRS scores between 0 and 2. For patients with at least 5-years of clinical follow-up, 88% (n=61) reported mRS between 0 and 2. In total, 3% (n=4) of patients experienced a major, non-fatal neurologic complication related to the PED, 5% (n=7) of patients experienced a minor neurologic complication related to PED placement, and 2% (n=3) died from either delayed aneurysm rupture, delayed ipsilateral hemorrhage after PED placement, or delayed (9 months after treatment) neural compression after progressive thrombosis of a PED-treated dolichoectactic vertebrobasilar aneurysm.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of unruptured aneurysms with the PED is associated with high rates of long-term angiographic occlusion and low, albeit clinically important, rates of major neurologic morbidity and mortality. Thus, flow diversion via PED placement is safe, effective, and durable.

The Pipeline Embolization Device: a decade of lessons learned in the treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms in a multicenter cohort

OBJECTIVE

The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has prompted a paradigm shift in the approach to posterior circulation aneurysms. The year 2021 marks a decade since FDA approval of this flow diverter, and during this time operators have adapted to its off-label uses. The authors examined whether case selection, practice trends, and patient outcomes have changed over this 10-year period.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of consecutive posterior circulation aneurysms managed with the PED at four academic institutions in the US between January 1, 2011, and January 1, 2021. Factors related to case selection, rates of aneurysm occlusion, or complications were identified and evaluated. Angiographic outcomes as well as thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications were investigated.

RESULTS

This study included 117 patients (median age 60 years). At a median follow-up of 12 months, adequate occlusion (> 90%) was attained in 73.2% of aneurysms. Aneurysm occlusion rates were similar over the study interval. Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications were reported in 12.0% and 6.0% of the procedures, respectively. There was a nonsignificant trend toward a decline in the rate of thromboembolic (14.1% in 2011-2015 vs 9.4% in 2016-2021, p = 0.443) and hemorrhagic (9.4% in 2011-2015 vs 1.9% in 2016-2021, p = 0.089) complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors observed a trend toward a decline in the rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications with improved operator experience in using the PED for posterior circulation aneurysms. The use of single-device PED flow diversion significantly increased, as did the tendency to treat smaller aneurysms and observe large unruptured fusiform/dolichoectatic lesions. These findings reflect changes attributable to evolving judgment with maturing experience in PED use.

Learning Curve for Flow Diversion of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Long-Term International Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diversion has gradually become a standard treatment for intracranial aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Recently, the off-label use of the flow diverters to treat posterior circulation aneurysms has also increased despite initial concerns of rupture and the suboptimal results. This study aimed to explore the change in complication rates and treatment outcomes across time for posterior circulation aneurysms treated using flow diversion and to further evaluate the mechanisms and variables that could potentially explain the change and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review using a standardized data set at multiple international academic institutions was performed to identify patients with ruptured and unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms treated with flow diversion during a decade spanning January 2011 to January 2020. This period was then categorized into 4 intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 378 procedures were performed during the study period. Across time, there was an increasing tendency to treat more vertebral artery and fewer large vertebrobasilar aneurysms (P = .05). Moreover, interventionalists have been increasingly using fewer overlapping flow diverters per aneurysm (P = .07). There was a trend toward a decrease in the rate of thromboembolic complications from 15.8% in 2011-13 to 8.9% in 2018-19 (P = .34).

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter experience revealed a trend toward treating fewer basilar aneurysms, smaller aneurysms, and increased usage of a single flow diverter, leading to a decrease in the rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications.

National Survey on Flow-Diverting Stents for Intracranial Aneurysms in the United States

BACKGROUND

The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has been the only flow-diverting device (FDD) approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the U.S. market for nearly a decade, with more FDD choices in the United States following recent FDA approval of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device and Surpass. We sought to explore the integration patterns of these devices into practice by U.S. neurointerventionalists.

METHODS

A 34-question electronic survey was distributed to the U.S. neurointerventional community from different backgrounds (neurosurgery, neurology, radiology) through different organizational links, focusing on technical aspects of device selection and personal preferences/experiences regarding FDD in aneurysms treatment.

RESULTS

Responses were collected from 120 neurointerventionalists across the United States; operators from a neurosurgery background constituted the majority of respondents (47.5%; 85% of dual-trained). The largest age block was early-to mid-career operators (70.8% aged 36-50 years). Most participants (78.8%) treated a range of 25-100 aneurysms/year with FDDs, with 49.2% of respondents having all the FDA-approved FDDs available in their centers (80.8% academic practice). Femoral access was used by the 67.7% of respondents, without impact of FDD-device on access-type (89.2%). PED was the most commonly used device (70.9%), with 66.7% of respondents reporting using different FDD based on case specifics. Comparing devices preferences by training backgrounds, more neurosurgical operators endorsed PED as their most commonly used device, whereas more interventional neuroradiologists/neurologists reported Surpass and Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device as their most commonly used devices.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this survey identify common themes in FDD choices among neurointerventionalists in the U.S. market, along with their integration patterns of the newly introduced devices into clinical practice.

The Effect of Ticagrelor for Endovascular Intervention of Intracranial Aneurysm Patients with or without Clopidogrel Resistant: A Meta-Analysis

Endovascular interventional is an important treatment method for intracranial aneurysms. However, due to the risk of intracranial thrombosis, prophylactic use of antiplatelet drugs is generally required. Clinically, the most commonly used drugs are aspirin and clopidogrel; although the latter can significantly reduce the incidence of thromboembolic complications, there are still some patients with clopidogrel resistance who have ischemic adverse events during antiplatelet therapy. In this study, cohort studies of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library Databases were retrieved to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in endovascular interventional treatment of intracranial aneurysms. A total of 10 cohort studies involving 1377 patients were included in this study. All patients had intracranial aneurysms and underwent endovascular intervention. Platelet function was measured in four of the studies and switched the patients with clopidogrel resistance to ticagrelor, while the remaining six studies did not test platelet function, but were also treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel. The results of the study showed that ticagrelor, like clopidogrel, can effectively control thrombotic complications in endovascular interventional patients, and also control the occurrence of ischemic complications in clopidogrel-resistant patients. Ticagrelor, as a novel platelet aggregation inhibitor that can reversibly bind to P2Y12 receptor, can effectively control thromboembolic complications without increasing hemorrhagic complications, and is also effective in patients with clopidogrel resistance.

The Pennsylvania Postmarket Multicenter Experience With Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device

BACKGROUND

The flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) is a novel self-expanding double-layer nitinol braided flow diverter that recently received FDA approval. However, early postmarket studies from the United States are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To report our short-term multicenter experience.

METHODS

Series of consecutive patients undergoing FRED treatment for intracranial aneurysms were queried from prospectively maintained registries at 4 North-American Centers in Pennsylvania (February 2020-June 2021). The pertinent baseline demographics, aneurysmal characteristics, and procedural outcomes were collected and analyzed, with primary outcome of aneurysmal occlusion and secondary outcome of safety and complications.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (median age 58 years, 82% female) underwent 65 FRED treatment procedures for 72 aneurysms. Most (86.1%) of the aneurysms were unruptured; 80.5% were saccular in morphology, and 87.5% were located along the internal carotid artery, with a median size of 7.1 mm (IQR 5.2-11.9 mm). Radiographic follow-up was available in 86.1% of the aneurysms, showing complete occlusion in 74.2% (80% in catheter angiography-only group), and near-complete occlusion in 11.3% of the cases (median 6.3 months), with 2.8% re-treated. Permanent ischemic complications were encountered in 2.8% of the cases, with no procedural mortality. A modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 2 was documented in 98.1% of the patients at the last clinical follow-up (median 6.1 months).

CONCLUSION

The results of the early postmarket experience with the FRED device show reasonable safety and adequate aneurysmal occlusion rates comparable with other flow diverters. However, more extensive multicenter studies with more extended follow-up data are needed to assess the long-term safety and durability of the device.

Cost-Effectiveness Analytic Comparison of Neuroimaging Follow-Up Strategies After Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion via a Pipeline embolization device (PED [Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland]) is one of the established modalities for the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms that require a robust follow-up regimen. However, to date, no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal imaging modality and timing intervals for such a strategy. We studied the cost-effectiveness of different neuroimaging follow-up strategies after flow diversion with the PED.

METHODS

A decision-analytical study using Markov modeling was performed to compare 5 commonly used multistep follow-up strategies with different combinations of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): 1) DSA at 6 months and MRA at 12 and 24 months; 2) DSA at 6, 12, and 24 months; 3) MRA at 6, 12, and 24 months; 4) DSA at 6 and 12 months and MRA at 24 months; and 5) DSA at 12 months and MRA at 24 months. The input parameters were mainly collected from the latest meta-analysis, and 1-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of our model.

RESULTS

Strategy 5, incorporating DSA at 12 months and MRA at 24 months, was the most cost-effective strategy for >99% of the 10,000 iterations in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year. The result remained robust in the 1- and 2-way sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the current data, delayed imaging follow-up at 1 year with DSA and 2 years with MRA after PED treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms is more cost-effective than early follow-up at 6 months.

Repeat Flow Diversion for Cerebral Aneurysms Failing Prior Flow Diversion: Safety and Feasibility From Multicenter Experience

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Aneurysmal persistence after flow diversion (FD) occurs in 5% to 25% of aneurysms, which may necessitate retreatment. There are limited data on safety/efficacy of repeat FD-a frequently utilized strategy in such cases.

METHODS

A series of consecutive patients undergoing FD retreatment from 15 centers were reviewed (2011-2019), with inclusion criteria of repeat FD for the same aneurysm at least 6 months after initial treatment, with minimum of 6 months post-retreatment imaging. The primary outcome was aneurysmal occlusion, and secondary outcome was safety. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to identify predictors of incomplete occlusion (90%-99% and <90% occlusion) versus complete occlusion (100%) after retreatment.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients (median age, 57 years; 81% women) harboring 95 aneurysms underwent 198 treatment procedures. Majority of aneurysms were unruptured (87.4%), saccular (74.7%), and located in the internal carotid artery (79%; median size, 9 mm). Median elapsed time between the first and second treatment was 12.2 months. Last available follow-up was at median 12.8 months after retreatment, and median 30.6 months after the initial treatment, showing complete occlusion in 46.2% and near-complete occlusion (90%-99%) in 20.4% of aneurysms. There was no difference in ischemic complications following initial treatment and retreatment (4.2% versus 4.2%; P>0.99). On multivariable regression, fusiform morphology had higher nonocclusion odds after retreatment (odds ratio [OR], 7.2 [95% CI, 1.97-20.8]). Family history of aneurysms was associated with lower odds of nonocclusion (OR, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.04-0.78]). Likewise, positive smoking history was associated with lower odds of nonocclusion (OR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.1-0.86]). History of hypertension trended toward incomplete occlusion (OR, 3.10 [95% CI, 0.98-6.3]), similar to incorporated branch into aneurysms (OR, 2.78 [95% CI, 0.98-6.8]).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat FD for persistent aneurysms carries a reasonable success/safety profile. Satisfactory occlusion (100% and 90%-99% occlusion) was encountered in two-thirds of patients, with similar complications between the initial and subsequent retreatments. Fusiform morphology was the strongest predictor of retreatment failure.

Whether Intracranial Aneurysm Could Be Well Treated by Flow Diversion: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Large-Sample Studies including Anterior and Posterior Circulation

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion (FD) has become a widely adopted treatment method for intracranial aneurysms in the clinic, but a comprehensive meta-analysis of large-sample studies including anterior and posterior circulation is still lacking.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched between January 1, 2008, and December 1, 2019. A random-effect model was used to calculate the efficacy and safety data as well as 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The pooled sample size of all included studies was 6695 patients; the mean age was 55.5 years old, with a total of 7406 aneurysms. For efficacy, the complete occlusion rate in angiographic follow-up (AFU) at 6 months was 78% (95% CI, 0.77, 0.80), and the AFU rate at 6-12 months was 90% (95% CI, 0.88, 0.92). For safety, the hemorrhagic event rate was 2%, the ischemic event rate was 5%, and the mortality rate was 3%.

CONCLUSION

FD is an effective and safe treatment for intracranial aneurysm with high complete occlusion rate and acceptable complication rate.

Initial experience with the novel p64MW HPC flow diverter from a cohort study in unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms under dual antiplatelet medication

OBJECTIVE

p64MW HPC is a new low-profile flow diverter with reduced thrombogenicity due to hydrophilic coating. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its safety and efficacy in Mongolian patients under dual antiplatelet therapy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms were prospectively enrolled. All patients received aspirin and clopidogrel before and six months after the procedure, followed by lifelong aspirin medication. High platelet reactivity (VerifyNow) did not trigger further action. The safety and efficacy endpoints were clinical outcome and aneurysm occlusion.

RESULTS

In 29 patients (26 female, median age 57 years), 46 aneurysms (neck width 3.3 mm, fundus diameter 3.7 mm, median) were treated. Dual platelet function inhibition was confirmed in eight patients (28%). The response to Clopidogrel was between 100 and 239 P2Y12 reaction units (VerifyNow) in 13 patients (45%). Non-response to at least one drug was found in 8 of 29 patients (28%). One collapsed p64MW HPC required balloon angioplasty. No other periprocedural thrombus formation occurred. Postprocedural MRI revealed lesions with diffusion restriction in 3 of 29 patients. Digital subtraction angiography after three months for 42 of 46 (91%) aneurysms showed an adequate aneurysm occlusion in 25 (60%). Distal p64MW HPC migration of 3 implants was retreated with another p64MW HPC. Follow-up digital subtraction angiography of 26 of 46 (57%) aneurysms after six months showed adequate aneurysm occlusion in 22 (85%). Significant in-stent stenosis or thrombosis, morbidity or mortality was not encountered.

CONCLUSION

p64MW HPC implantation in patients under dual antiplatelet therapy with or without dual platelet function inhibition has a low procedural complication rate. The early aneurysm occlusion rate is high.

Treatment outcomes of large and giant intracranial aneurysms according to various treatment modalities

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of large (15-25 mm) and giant (> 25 mm) intracranial aneurysms (IAs), according to different treatment modalities.

METHODS

In total, 112 patients with large and giant IAs treated with various treatment modalities between January 2009 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and radiological parameters were analyzed and correlated with the treatment modality.

RESULTS

A total of 141 procedures were performed on 112 patients. We initially treated 47 cases with coil embolization, 39 with flow diverter (FD), 13 with direct clipping, and 13 with parent artery occlusion (PAO). Recurrence (46.8%) and retreatment (31.9%) rates were significantly higher in the coiling group (p < 0.001). Complete occlusion rate (36.3%) was significantly lower in the coiling group (p = 0.027). PAO could achieve a high complete occlusion rate (90.9%) with low complication rate (12.5%). The total complication rate was 17%. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, FD (OR 3.406, p = 0.036) and direct clipping (OR 5.732, p = 0.017) showed a significantly higher complication rate than coiling. The overall mortality rate was 8% (8/139 procedures). At the last follow-up (mean 30.6 ± 26.4 months), 70 of 96 patients (72.9%) showed complete or near-complete occlusion. Good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2) was observed in 90 of 112 (80.3%) patients at the last follow-up (mean 33.2 ± 30.5 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Good clinical and radiologic outcomes with acceptable complication and mortality rates can be achieved by various treatment modalities. The selection of appropriate modality should be individualized based on the angiographic findings and clinical symptoms.

Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms: Anatomical Considerations and Microsurgical Strategies

Anterior communicating artery aneurysms account for 23–40% of ruptured intracranial aneurysms and 12–15% of unruptured aneurysms and are the most common intracranial ruptured or unruptured aneurysms. Because they have relatively complex anatomical structures and anatomical variations and are adjacent to important blood vessels and structures, in the process of microsurgical exposure of an Anterior communicating artery aneurysm, attention should be paid not only to the anatomical characteristics of the aneurysm itself but also to the adjacent important blood vessels and perforating arteries; therefore, both surgical clipping and endovascular embolization are serious challenges for neurosurgeons. No matter which treatment is chosen, it is necessary to determine the structure of the Anterior communicating artery and its perforating arteries as well as whether there is a fenestration deformity of the Anterior communicating artery and the relationship between bilateral A1-A2 before surgery. The shape and size of the aneurysm itself and its location relative to adjacent blood vessels also need to be considered to better complete the procedure, and this is especially true for microsurgical clipping. Clarifying the anatomy before surgery is helpful for better selecting the surgical approach and surgical side, which could affect the intraoperative exposure of the aneurysm and adjacent arteries, the surgical difficulty, the resection rate, and the postoperative complications. Therefore, starting with Anterior communicating artery aneurysms and their adjacent structures and variations, this paper reviews the latest progress in surgical treatment based on anatomic specificity as well as the most recent clinical studies.

Vertebral artery aneurysms and the risk of cord infarction following spinal artery coverage during flow diversion

OBJECTIVE

Coverage of the anterior spinal artery (ASA) ostia is a source of considerable consternation regarding flow diversion (FD) in vertebral artery (VA) aneurysms due to cord supply. The authors sought to assess the association between coverage of the ASA, posterior spinal artery (PSA), or lateral spinal artery (LSA) ostia when placing flow diverters in distal VAs and clinical outcomes, with emphasis on cord infarction.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study of 7 institutions in which VA aneurysms were treated with FD between 2011 and 2019 was performed. The authors evaluated the risk of ASA and PSA/LSA occlusion, associated thromboembolic complication, complications overall, aneurysm occlusion status, and functional outcome.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with 63 VA and posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms treated with FD were identified. The median aneurysm diameter was 7 mm and fusiform type was the commonest morphology (42.9%). During a procedure, 1 (61.7%) or 2 (33.3%) flow diverters were placed. Complete occlusion was achieved in 71.9%. Symptomatic thromboembolic complications occurred in 7.4% of cases and intracranial hemorrhage in 10.0% of cases. The ASA and PSA/LSA were identified in 51 (80.9%) and 35 (55.6%) complications and covered by the flow diverter in 29 (56.9%) and 13 (37.1%) of the procedures, respectively. Patency after flow diverter coverage on last follow-up was 89.2% for ASA and 100% for PSA/LSA, not significantly different between covered and noncovered groups (p = 0.5 and p > 0.99, respectively). No complications arose from coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

FD aneurysm treatment in the posterior circulation with coverage of ASA or PSA/LSA was not associated with higher rates of occlusion of these branches or any instances of cord infarction.