GammaTile® brachytherapy in the treatment of recurrent glioblastomas

GammaTile® (GT) as a brachytherapy platform for rapidly proliferating glioblastomas: from case series to clinical trials

PURPOSE

Radiation plays a central role in glioblastoma treatment. Logistics related to coordinating clinic visits, radiation planning, and surgical recovery necessitate delay in radiation delivery from the time of diagnosis. Unimpeded tumor growth occurs during this period, and is associated with poor clinical outcome. Here we provide a pilot experience of GammaTile ® (GT), a collagen tile-embedded Cesium-131 (131Cs) brachytherapy platform for such aggressive tumors.

METHODS

We prospectively followed seven consecutive patients (2019-2023) with newly diagnosed (n = 3) or recurrent (n = 4) isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma that grew > 100% in volume during the 30 days between the time of initial diagnosis/surgery and the radiation planning MRI. These patients underwent re-resection followed by GT placement.

RESULTS

There were no surgical complications. One patient developed right hemiparesis prior to re-resection/GT placement and was discharged to rehabilitation, all others were discharged home-with a median hospital stay of 2 days (range: 1-5 days). There was no 30-day mortality and one 30-day readmission (hydrocephalus, requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunting (14%)). With a median follow-up of 347 days (11.6 months), median progression free survival of ≥ 320 days (10.6 months) was achieved for both newly and recurrent glioblastoma patients. The median overall survival (mOS) was 304 and 347 days (10 and 11.5 mo) for recurrent and newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our pilot experience suggests that GT offers favorable local control and safety profile for patients afflicted with rapidly proliferating glioblastomas and lay the foundation for future clinical trial design.

The role of GammaTile in the treatment of brain tumors: a technical and clinical overview

Malignant and benign brain tumors with a propensity to recur continue to be a clinical challenge despite decades-long efforts to develop systemic and more advanced local therapies. GammaTile (GT Medical Technologies Inc., Tempe AZ) has emerged as a novel brain brachytherapy device placed during surgery, which starts adjuvant radiotherapy immediately after resection. GammaTile received FDA clearance in 2018 for any recurrent brain tumor and expanded clearance in 2020 to include upfront use in any malignant brain tumor. More than 1,000 patients have been treated with GammaTile to date, and several publications have described technical aspects of the device, workflow, and clinical outcome data. Herein, we review the technical aspects of this brachytherapy treatment, including practical physics principles, discuss the available literature with an emphasis on clinical outcome data in the setting of brain metastases, glioblastoma, and meningioma, and provide an overview of the open and pending clinical trials that are further defining the efficacy and safety of GammaTile.

The surgical management of diffuse gliomas: Current state of neurosurgical management and future directions

After recent updates to the World Health Organization pathological criteria for diagnosing and grading diffuse gliomas, all major North American and European neuro-oncology societies recommend a maximal safe resection as the initial management of a diffuse glioma. For neurosurgeons to achieve this goal, the surgical plan for both low- and high-grade gliomas should be to perform a supramaximal resection when feasible based on preoperative imaging and the patient's performance status, utilizing every intraoperative adjunct to minimize postoperative neurological deficits. While the surgical approach and technique can vary, every effort must be taken to identify and preserve functional cortical and subcortical regions. In this summary statement on the current state of the field, we describe the tools and technologies that facilitate the safe removal of diffuse gliomas and highlight intraoperative and postoperative management strategies to minimize complications for these patients. Moreover, we discuss how surgical resections can go beyond cytoreduction by facilitating biological discoveries and improving the local delivery of adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapies.

Novel combination of GammaTile cesium-131 brachytherapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence-guided resection in the re-irradiation of pediatric recurrent high-grade glioma: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Herein, the authors describe the successful utilization of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and the first case of GammaTile cesium-131 therapy in a pediatric patient with recurrent high-grade glioma. 5-ALA was utilized to optimize gross-total resection prior to GammaTile implantation. After conversion to an equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2), a composite was made of the GammaTile dose with the initial external beam radiotherapy. Two hypothetical plans consisting of a standard hypofractionated strategy for glioma reirradiation and a CyberKnife plan using GammaTile's planning target volume were developed and likewise underwent EQD2 conversion and composite plan generation with the initial radiotherapy.

OBSERVATIONS

5-ALA was useful in achieving gross-total resection with no acute toxicity from the surgery or GammaTile irradiation. When compared with the hypothetical composite doses, GammaTile's composite, axium point dose (D0.03cc) to the brainstem was 32.9 Gy less than the hypofractionated and the CyberKnife composite plans at 38.7 Gy and 40.2 Gy, respectively. The right hippocampus demonstrated a substantially reduced composite plan dose with GammaTile with a D0.03cc of 62.4 Gy versus 71.7 and 80.7 Gy for the hypofractionated and CyberKnife composite plans, respectively.

LESSONS

Utilization of 5-ALA and GammaTile therapy yielded clinically superior tumor debulking and effective radiotherapy dose localization with sparing of organs at risk, respectively.

First application of GammaTile cesium-131 brachytherapy with maximal safe resection of a glioma in a patient with limited scleroderma

The purpose of this report is to present the first documented application of GammaTile to an intra-cranial tumor of a patient with a symptomatic radiosensitive connective tissue disorder, a case where there were significant concerns with standard oncologic strategies. We hypothesized that GammaTile® (GT Medical Technologies, Tempe, Arizona, USA) would also be advantageous in the application of intra-cranial tumors in patients with conditions of increased radiosensitivity. We generated a standard external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plan consisting of an overall 1.5 cm expansion to 59.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions. Also, we developed a CyberKnife (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) plan with a 5 mm expansion on the surgical cavity prescribed to 60 Gy in 30 fractions, to make an EBRT comparison using the same prescription volume as GammaTile. We report the first published application of GammaTile® brachytherapy to an intra-cranial malignancy in a patient with limited scleroderma. The dose delivered by GammaTile was compared to the dose that would be delivered with both typical volumes and small volumes of EBRT. The maximum dose delivered to the scar and scalp by GammaTile was reduced to half of that from other external beam techniques (~25 Gy vs. ~55 Gy). MRI imaging at 6 months and 12 months post-resection demonstrated no evidence of disease recurrence nor radiation necrosis. At the 12-month follow-up visit, the surgical scar was well-healed with no skin changes to the surrounding scalp. Dosimetrically and clinically, this report highlights the successful application of GammaTile to an intra-cranial tumor bed in a patient with scleroderma.

Safety and patterns of survivorship in recurrent GBM following resection and surgically targeted radiation therapy: Results from a prospective trial

Background

Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) remains problematic with survival after additional therapy typically less than 12 months. We prospectively evaluated whether outcomes might be improved with resection plus permanent implantation of a novel radiation device utilizing the gamma-emitting isotope Cs-131 embedded within bioresorbable collagen tiles.

Methods

Recurrent histologic GBM were treated in a single-arm trial. Following radiation, the surgical bed was lined with the tiles. Subsequent treatments were at the treating physician’s discretion.

Results

28 patients were treated (20 at first recurrence, range 1–3). Median age was 58 years, KPS was 80, female:male ratio was 10:18. Methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) was methylated in 11%, unmethylated in 18%, and unknown in 71%. Post implant, 17 patients (61%) received ≥1 course of systemic therapy. For all patients, Kaplan-Meier estimates of median time to local failure were 12.1 months, post-implant survival was 10.7 months for all patients and 15.1 months for patients who received systemic therapy; for all patients, median overall survival from diagnosis was 25.0 months (range 9.1–143.1). Sex, age, and number of prior progressions were not statistically significant. Local control was continuously maintained in 46% of patients. Two deaths within 30 days occurred, one from intracranial hemorrhage and one after persistent coma. Three symptomatic adverse events occurred: one wound infection requiring surgery and two late radiation brain injury, resolved non-surgically.

Conclusion

This pre-commercial trial demonstrated acceptable safety and favorable post-treatment local control and survival. The device has received FDA clearance for use in newly diagnosed malignant and all recurrent intracranial neoplasms.

Medical Device Advances in the Treatment of Glioblastoma

Despite decades of research and the growing emergence of new treatment modalities, Glioblastoma (GBM) frustratingly remains an incurable brain cancer with largely stagnant 5-year survival outcomes of around 5%. Historically, a significant challenge has been the effective delivery of anti-cancer treatment. This review aims to summarize key innovations in the field of medical devices, developed either to improve the delivery of existing treatments, for example that of chemo-radiotherapy, or provide novel treatments using devices, such as sonodynamic therapy, thermotherapy and electric field therapy. It will highlight current as well as emerging device technologies, non-invasive versus invasive approaches, and by doing so provide a detailed summary of evidence from clinical studies and trials undertaken to date. Potential limitations and current challenges are discussed whilst also highlighting the exciting potential of this developing field. It is hoped that this review will serve as a useful primer for clinicians, scientists, and engineers in the field, united by a shared goal to translate medical device innovations to help improve treatment outcomes for patients with this devastating disease.

Imaging of GBM in the Age of Molecular Markers and MRI Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy

Glioblastoma (GBM) continues to be one of the most lethal malignancies and is almost always fatal. In this review article, the role of radiation therapy, systemic therapy, as well as the molecular basis of classifying GBM is described. Technological advances in the treatment of GBM are outlined as well as the diagnostic imaging characteristics of this tumor. In addition, factors that affect prognosis such as differentiating progression from treatment effect is discussed. The role of MRI guided radiation therapy and how this technology may provide a mechanism to improve the care of patients with this disease are described.

GammaTile: Comprehensive Review of a Novel Radioactive Intraoperative Seed-Loading Device for the Treatment of Brain Tumors

GammaTile is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-licensed device consisting of four cesium-131 (Cs-131) radiation-emitting seeds in the collagen tile about the postage stamp size. The tiles are utilized to line the brain cavity immediately after tumor resection. GammaTile therapy is a surgically targeted radiation therapy (STaRT) that helps provide instant, dose-intense treatment after the completion of resection. The objective of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy of GammaTile surgically targeted radiation therapy for brain tumors. This study also reviews the differences between GammaTile surgically targeted radiation therapy (STaRT) and other traditional treatment options for brain tumors. The electronic database searches utilized in this study include PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. A total of 4,150 articles were identified based on the search strategy. Out of these articles, 900 articles were retrieved. A total of 650 articles were excluded for various reasons, thus retrieving 250 citations. We applied the exclusion and inclusion criteria to these retrieved articles by screening their full text and excluding 180 articles. Therefore, 70 citations were retrieved and included in this comprehensive literature review, as outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) diagram. Based on the findings of this study, GammaTile surgically targeted radiation therapy (STaRT) is safe and effective for treating brain tumors. Similarly, the findings have also shown that the efficacy of GammaTile therapy can be enhanced by combining it with other standard-of-care treatment options/external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Also, the results show that patients diagnosed with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) exhibit poor median overall survival because of the possibility of the tumor returning. Therefore, combining STaRT with other standard-of-care treatment options/EBRT can improve the patient's overall survival (OS). GammaTile therapy enhances access to care, guarantees 100% compliance, and eliminates patients' need to travel regularly to hospitals for radiation treatments. Its implementation requires collaboration from various specialties, such as radiation oncology, medical physics, and neurosurgery.

Patient‐specific radiological protection precautions following Cs collagen embedded Cs‐131 implantation in the brain

Objective

Cesium‐131 brachytherapy is an adjunct for brain tumor treatment, offering potential clinical and radiation protection advantages over other isotopes including iodine‐125. We present evidence‐based radiation safety recommendations from an initial experience with Cs‐131 brachytherapy in the resection cavities of recurrent, previously irradiated brain metastases.

Methods

Twenty‐two recurrent brain metastases in 18 patients were resected and treated with permanent Cs‐131 brachytherapy implantation using commercially procured seed‐impregnated collagen tiles (GammaTile, GT Medical Technologies). Exposure to intraoperative staff was monitored with NVLAP‐accredited ring dosimeters. For patient release considerations, NCRP guidelines were used to develop an algorithm for modeling lifetime exposure to family and ancillary staff caring for patients based on measured dose rates.

Results

A median of 16 Cs‐131 seeds were implanted (range 6–46) with median cumulative strength of 58.72U (20.64‐150.42). Resulting dose rates were 1.19 mSv/h (0.28–3.3) on contact, 0.08 mSv/h (0.01–0.35) at 30 cm, and 0.01 mSv/h (0.001–0.03) at 100 cm from the patient. Modeled total caregiver exposure was 0.91 mSv (0.16–3.26), and occupational exposure was 0.06 mSv (0.02–0.23) accounting for patient self‐shielding via skull and soft tissue attenuation. Real‐time dose rate measurements were grouped into brackets to provide close contact precautions for caregivers ranging from 1–3 weeks for adults and longer for pregnant women and children, including cases with multiple implantations.

Conclusions

Radiological protection precautions were developed based on patient‐specific emissions and accounted for multiple implantations of Cs‐131, to maintain exposure to staff and the public in accordance with relevant regulatory dose constraints.

Salvage resection plus cesium-131 brachytherapy durably controls post-SRS recurrent brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Salvage of recurrent previously irradiated brain metastases (rBrM) is a significant challenge. Resection without adjuvant re-irradiation is associated with a high local failure rate, while reirradiation only partially reduces failure but is associated with greater radiation necrosis risk. Salvage resection plus Cs131 brachytherapy may offer dosimetric and biologic advantages including improved local control versus observation, with reduced normal brain dose versus re-irradiation, however data are limited.

METHODS

A prospective registry of consecutive patients with post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) rBrM undergoing resection plus implantation of collagen-matrix embedded Cs131 seeds (GammaTile, GT Medical Technologies) prescribed to 60 Gy at 5 mm from the cavity was analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty patients underwent 24 operations with Cs131 implantation in 25 tumor cavities. Median maximum preoperative diameter was 3.0 cm (range 1.1-6.3). Gross- or near-total resection was achieved in 80% of lesions. A median of 16 Cs131 seeds (range 6-30), with a median air-kerma strength of 3.5 U/seed were implanted. There was one postoperative wound dehiscence. With median follow-up of 1.6 years for survivors, two tumors recurred (one in-field, one marginal) resulting in 8.4% 1-year progression incidence (95%CI = 0.0-19.9). Radiographic seed settling was identified in 7/25 cavities (28%) 1.9-11.7 months post-implantation, with 1 case of distant migration (4%), without clinical sequelae. There were 8 cases of radiation necrosis, of which 4 were symptomatic.

CONCLUSIONS

With > 1.5 years of follow-up, intraoperative brachytherapy with commercially available Cs131 implants was associated with favorable local control and toxicity profiles. Weak correlation between preoperative tumor geometry and implanted tiles highlights a need to optimize planning criteria.

The role of cesium-131 brachytherapy in brain tumors: a scoping review of the literature and ongoing clinical trials

PURPOSE

Cesium-131 radioactive isotope has favored the resurgence of intracavitary brachytherapy in neuro-oncology, minimizing radiation-induced complications and maximizing logistical and clinical outcomes. We reviewed the literature on cesium-131 brachytherapy for brain tumors.

METHODS

PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, Clinicaltrial.gov, and Cochrane were searched following the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews to include published studies and ongoing trials reporting cesium-131 brachytherapy for brain tumors.

RESULTS

We included 27 published studies comprising 279 patients with 293 lesions, and 3 ongoing trials. Most patients had brain metastases (63.1%), followed by high-grade gliomas (23.3%), of WHO Grade III (15.2%) and Grade IV (84.8%), and meningiomas (13.6%), mostly of WHO Grade II (62.8%) and Grade III (27.9%). Most brain metastases were newly diagnosed (72.3%), while most gliomas and meningiomas were recurrent (95.4% and 88.4%). Patients underwent gross-total (91.1%) or subtotal (8.9%) resection, with median postoperative cavity size of 3.5 cm (range 1-5.8 cm). A median of 20, 28, and 16 seeds were implanted in gliomas, meningiomas, and brain metastases, with median seed activity of 3.8 mCi (range 2.4-5 mCi). Median follow-up was 16.2 months (range 0.6-72 months). 1-year freedom from progression rates were local 94% (range 57-100%), regional 85.1% (range 55.6-93.8%), and distant 53.5% (range 26.3-67.4%). Post-treatment radiation necrosis, seizure, and surgical wound infection occurred in 3.4%, 4.7%, and 4.3% patients.

CONCLUSION

Initial data suggest that cesium-131 brachytherapy is safe and effective in primary or metastatic malignant brain tumors. Ongoing trials are evaluating long-term locoregional tumor control and future studies should analyze its role in multimodal systemic tumor management.

Brachytherapy for central nervous system tumors

Radiation is a mainstay of treatment for central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Brachytherapy involves the placement of a localized/interstitial radiation source into a tumor or resection bed and has distinct advantages that can make it an attractive form of radiation when used in the appropriate setting. However, the data supporting use of brachytherapy is clouded by variability in radiation sources, techniques, delivered doses, and trial designs. The goal of this manuscript is to identify consistent themes, review the highest-level evidence and potential indications for brachytherapy in CNS tumors, as well as highlight avenues for future work. Improved understanding of the underlying biology, indications, complications, and evolving industry-academic collaborations, place brachytherapy on the brink of a resurgence.