1
|
Alasmari F, Mukahal M, Alqurashi AA, Huq M, Alabdrabalnabi F, AlJurayyan A, Alkahtani SM, Assari FS, Bashaweeh R, Salam R, Aldera S, Alkinani OM, Almutairi T, AlEnizi K, Tleyjeh I. Seroprevalence and longevity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen-IgG among health care workers in a large COVID-19 public hospital in Saudi Arabia: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272818. [PMID: 35960736 PMCID: PMC9374211 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG among health care workers (HCWs) is crucial to inform infection control programs. Conflicting reports have emerged on the longevity of SARS-CoV-2 IgG. Our objective is to describe the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG in HCWs and perform 8 months longitudinal follow-up (FU) to assess the duration of detectable IgG. In addition, we aim to explore the risk factors associated with positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG. The study was conducted at a large COVID-19 public hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All HCWs were recruited by social media platform. The SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen was used. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine association between IgG seropositive status and clinical and epidemiological factors. A total of 2528 (33% of the 7737 eligible HCWs) participated in the survey and 2523 underwent baseline serological testing in June 2020. The largest occupation groups sampled were nurses [n = 1351(18%)], physicians [n = 456 (6%)], administrators [n = 277 (3.6%)], allied HCWs [n = 205(3%)], pharmacists [n = 95(1.2%)], respiratory therapists [n = 40(0.5%)], infection control staff [n = 21(0.27%], and others [n = 83 (1%)]. The total cohort median age was 36 (31–43) years and 66.3% were females. 273 were IgG seropositive at baseline with a seroprevalence of 10.8% 95% CI (9.6%-12.1%). 165/185 and 44/112 were persistently IgG positive, at 2–3 months and 6 months FU respectively. The median (25th– 75th percentile) IgG level at the 3 different time points was 5.86 (3.57–7.04), 3.91 (2.46–5.38), 2.52 (1.80–3.99) respectively. Respiratory therapists OR 2.38, (P = 0.035), and those with hypertension OR = 1.86, (P = 0.009) were more likely to be seropositive. A high proportion of seropositive staff had prior symptoms 214/273(78%), prior anosmia was associated with the presence of antibodies, with an odds ratio of 9.25 (P<0.001), as well as fever and cough. Being a non-smoker, non-Saudi, and previously diagnosed with COVID-19 infection by PCR were statistically significantly different by seroprevalence status. We found that the seroprevalence of IgG against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen was 10.8% in HCWs at the peak of the pandemic in Saudi Arabia. We also observed a decreasing temporal trend of IgG seropositivity over 8 months follow up period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Alasmari
- Infection Control and Environmental Health Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Infectious Diseases Section, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; College of Medicine, Al Faisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- * E-mail:
| | - Mahmoud Mukahal
- Infection Control and Environmental Health Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alaa Ashraf Alqurashi
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Molla Huq
- Immunology and Serology Laboratory, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fatima Alabdrabalnabi
- Infection Control and Environmental Health Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | | | - Rahaf Bashaweeh
- Public Health College, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rana Salam
- Infectious Diseases Section, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Solaf Aldera
- Infection Control and Environmental Health Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ohud Mohammed Alkinani
- Pathology and Clinical Laboratory Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Talal Almutairi
- Radiology Service Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kholoud AlEnizi
- Research Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Imad Tleyjeh
- Infectious Diseases Section, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; College of Medicine, Al Faisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Card L, Litwin CM, Curry S, Mack EH, Nietert PJ, Meissner EG. Self-Administered, Remote Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Health Care Workers. Am J Med Sci 2022; 364:281-288. [PMID: 35278364 PMCID: PMC8906004 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2022.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Our objective was to safely and remotely assess longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in at-risk health care workers at the onset of the epidemic. Methods Self-administered serologic testing was performed every 30 days up to 5 times using a point-of-care, lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG immunoassay in a cohort of at-risk health care workers (n = 339) and lower-risk controls (n = 100). Results Subjects were enrolled between 4/14/20–5/6/20 and most were clinicians (41%) or nurses (27%). Of 20 subjects who reported confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to (n = 5, 1%) or during the study (n = 15, 3%), half (10/20) were seropositive. Five additional subjects were seropositive and did not report documented infection. Estimated infection rates in health care workers did not differ from concurrent community rates. Conclusions This remotely conducted, contact-free study did not identify serologic evidence of widespread occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Card
- South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Christine M Litwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Scott Curry
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Elizabeth H Mack
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Paul J Nietert
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Eric G Meissner
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|