2562. Re-Appraisal of Aminoglycoside (AG) Susceptibility Testing Breakpoints Based on the Application of Pharmacokinetics–Pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) and Contemporary Microbiology Surveillance Data

Update From The European Committee On Antimicrobial Suseptibility Testing (EUCAST)

The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) is an international susceptibility testing committee, organized by the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and functioning as the breakpoint advisory committee of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The original remit of EUCAST was to harmonize European clinical breakpoints, but very soon the activities expanded beyond the borders of Europe and included newly licensed agents in Europe. Among the milestones were the aggregating of large numbers of MIC distributions, creating a software to display these distributions, the EUCAST concept of identifying epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFF), and the development of a EUCAST disk diffusion method. The EUCAST Development Laboratory has played a critical role in the development of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methodology including development work for novel antimicrobial agents and for rapid AST directly from blood culture bottles. EUCAST has several standing subcommittees - for AST in fungi (AFST), mycobacteria (AMST) and for microorganisms of veterinary interest (VetCAST), and ad hoc subcommittees on subjects such as anaerobic bacteria, MIC and zone diameter distributions and epidemiological cut off values, the relationship between phenotypic and genotypic resistance, expert rules and methods for the detection of resistance mechanisms. All EUCAST decisions are subjected to the EUCAST public consultation process, the only exception being breakpoints of novel antimicrobial agents where confidentiality agreements during the licensing process prevents public participation. EUCAST has recently revised the definitions of clinical susceptibility interpretive categories S, I and R acknowledging the intimate relationship between drug exposure and susceptibility reporting.

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam vs Polymyxin or Aminoglycoside-based Regimens for the Treatment of Drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

BACKGROUND

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination that often retains activity against resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The comparative safety and efficacy vs polymyxins or aminoglycosides in this setting remains unknown.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort study was performed. Patients who received ceftolozane/tazobactam were compared with those treated with either polymyxin or aminoglycoside-based regimens for infections due to drug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Multivariate logistic regression was performed controlling for factors associated with treatment to assess the independent impact of ceftolozane/tazobactam on clinical cure, acute kidney injury (AKI), and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were included (100 in each treatment arm). The cohort represented an ill population with 69% in the intensive care unit, 63% mechanically ventilated, and 42% in severe sepsis or septic shock at infection onset. The most common infection type was ventilator-associated pneumonia (52%); 7% of patients were bacteremic. Combination therapy was more commonly used in polymyxin/aminoglycoside patients than those who received ceftolozane/tazobactam (72% vs 15%, P < .001). After adjusting for differences between groups, receipt of ceftolozane/tazobactam was independently associated with clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-5.30) and protective against AKI (aOR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.22). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality. The number needed to treat for a clinical cure with ceftolozane/tazobactam was 5, and the number needed to harm with AKI with a polymyxin/aminoglycoside was 4.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the preferential use of ceftolozane/tazobactam over polymyxins or aminoglycosides for drug-resistant P. aeruginosa infections.

Therapeutic Options for Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales

The spread of metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales worldwide without the simultaneous increase in active antibiotics makes these organisms an urgent public health threat. This review summarizes recent advancements in diagnostic and treatment strategies for infections caused by MBL-producing Enterobacterales. Adequate treatment of patients infected with MBL-producing Enterobacterales relies on detection of the β-lactamase in the clinic. There are several molecular platforms that are currently available to identify clinically relevant MBLs as well as other important serine-β-lactamases. Once detected, there are several antibiotics that have historically been used for the treatment of MBL-producing Enterobacterales. Antimicrobials such as aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, fosfomycin, and polymyxins often show promising in vitro activity though clinical data are currently lacking to support their widespread use. Ceftazidime-avibactam combined with aztreonam is promising for treatment of infections caused by MBL-producing Enterobacterales and currently has the most clinical data of any available antibiotic to support its use. While cefiderocol has displayed promising activity against MBL-producing Enterobacterales in vitro and in preliminary clinical studies, further clinical studies will better shed light on its place in treatment. Lastly, there are several promising MBL inhibitors in the pipeline, which may further improve the treatment of MBL-producing Enterobacterales.

In vitro activity of plazomicin compared to other clinically relevant aminoglycosides in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

We evaluated the in vitro activity of plazomicin against other aminoglycosides in 122 clinical carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates using several clinical susceptibility breakpoints. Plazomicin had excellent in vitro activity with 98% overall susceptibility. Amikacin was the next most active with 86% overall susceptibility. This dropped to 55% when switching from Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute to US Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints.

Prediction of bloodstream infection caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in patients with suspected community-onset sepsis

OBJECTIVES

In severe infections, time to appropriate therapy is decisive for survival. Patients with bloodstream infection caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (EPE-BSI) often receive inadequate empirical treatment. This study aimed to identify risk factors, to evaluate a previously suggested risk score and to suggest a new score for facilitating empirical treatment choice.

METHODS

Predictors for EPE-BSI were assessed through a retrospective case-control design. The diagnostic performance of the two scores was evaluated. Included patients had blood cultures sampled at four EDs in Stockholm (2012-2015), were admitted, and received antibiotics with activity against Gram-negative bacilli.

RESULTS

A total of 277 EPE-BSI cases and 400 controls were included. The strongest predictor of EPE-BSI was prior EPE-positive culture (cases 33% vs. controls 3%; multivariate (MV) OR = 19.1). Recent EPE-positivity within ≤3 months had a univariate OR of 32.8. Other major predictors were recent prostate biopsy (14% vs. 1%; MV OR = 22.2) and healthcare abroad (6% vs. 2%; MV OR = 3.9). Several previously suggested risk factors were not associated with EPE-BSI. The previously developed Utrecht score had a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 77%. The Stockholm score suggested herein (prior EPE-positive culture/prostate biopsy/healthcare abroad) showed comparable sensitivity (50%) but better specificity (96%). Prediction in patients lacking major predictors was difficult and caused high false-positive rates, which would cause unnecessary overtreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior EPE-positive culture, especially recently sampled, prostate biopsy and healthcare abroad were the strongest risk factors for community-onset EPE-BSI in Stockholm. Local data are needed when evaluating risk-scoring models before implementation.

Antimicrobial treatment challenges in the era of carbapenem resistance

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are burdened by high mortality and represent an urgent threat to address. Clinicians are currently at a dawn of a new era in which antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacilli is being dealt with by the availability of the first new antibiotics in this field for many years. Although new antibiotics have shown promising results in clinical trials, there is still uncertainty over whether their use will improve clinical outcomes in real world practice. Some observational studies have reported a survival benefit in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections using combination therapy, often including "old" antibiotics such as colistin, aminoglycosides, tigecycline, and carbapenems. These regimens, however, are linked to increased risk of antimicrobial resistance, and their efficacy has yet to be compared to new antimicrobial options. While awaiting more definitive evidence, antibiotic stewards need clear direction on how to optimize the use of old and novel antibiotic options. Furthermore, carbapenem-sparing regimens should be carefully considered as a potential tool to reduce selective antimicrobial pressure.