2089. Effect of the Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON): A Multi-Center Time Series Analysis

Core Elements for Successful Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

Antimicrobial resistance has emerged as a serious global public health threat. One of the countermeasures to increased antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections is the use of an integrative intervention strategy for the selection and administration of appropriate antibiotics and for the monitoring of antibiotic use, collectively known as "Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs" (ASPs). However, since the medical environment and policies vary by country and medical facilities, ASPs also need to be applied to each facility and condition accordingly. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced the core elements for hospital ASPs, which outlines the specific structural and procedural components required to implement ASPs in 2014. As multidrug-resistant bacterial infections and use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in Korea are on the rise, ASPs must be urgently applied to medical facilities for appropriate management of antibiotic use. However, there is an ongoing limitation to the immediate adoption and application of ASPs in Korean medical facilities due to the lack of medical workforce and related financial resources. To address this issue, efforts of medical professionals and government are required, and core elements that match the characteristics and circumstances of Korean medical facilities must be urgently developed.

Assessing feasibility of establishing antimicrobial stewardship programmes in two provincial-level hospitals in Vietnam: an implementation research study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility of establishing hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes comprising action-planning, educational interventions and data feedback in two provincial-level hospitals in Viet Nam.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This was an implementation research using participatory action process and existing resources from the Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network with local adjustments. A national stakeholder meeting and Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) analysis were conducted to identify gaps and potential interventions.

PARTICIPANTS

Hospital AMS staff implemented activities throughout the study phases. Routinely collected patient data were analysed to support planning, implementation and evaluation.

INTERVENTIONS

Hospitals were considered as a complex adaptive system and leveraged their unique characteristics and interconnections to develop 1-year plans containing core interventions (data use, educational training, prospective audit with feedback (PAF) and evaluations).

OUTCOME MEASURES

We assessed feasibility using outputs from stakeholder meeting, SWOT analysis, baseline data, planning process and implementation.

RESULTS

The stakeholder meeting identified three gaps for AMS at national level: supportive policies, AMS training and core competencies and collaboration. At the hospitals, AMS programmes took 1 year for planning due to lack of hospital-specific procedures and relevant staff competencies. Baseline data (January-December 2019) showed variations in antibiotic consumption: 951 days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 days present in the control and 496 in the intervention wards in hospital 1, and 737 and 714 in hospital 2, respectively. During 1-year implementation, clinical pharmacists audited 1890 antibiotic prescriptions in hospital 1 (June 2020-May 2021) and 1628 in hospital 2 (July 2020-July 2021), and will continue PAF in their daily work.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirmed the need to contextualise AMS programmes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and demonstrated the usefulness of implementation research design in assessing programme feasibility. Developing staff competencies, using local data to stimulate actions and integrating programme activities in routine hospital work are key to success in LMICs.