Distal radial artery approach is safe and effective for cerebral angiography and neuroendovascular treatment: A single-center experience with ultrasonographic measurement

BACKGROUND

The transradial artery approach to cerebral angiography can reduce both patient stress following examination and the risk of major complications due to hematoma. Recently, the distal radial artery approach (DRA) has garnered attention in cardiology as a minimally invasive method. DRA is also considered applicable to neurosurgery, although concerns about procedural difficulty and complications persist. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the DRA in cerebral angiography and neuroendovascular treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected 30 consecutive patients for whom the DRA was attempted for cerebral angiography at our hospital. The patients' age, sex, height, weight, and medical history information was collected and correlated with successful puncture and complications. The diameter of the distal radial artery (RA) was measured using ultrasonography.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 67 years (range, 32-87 years) and 21 (70%) were men. The median diameter of the distal RA was 2.3 mm (range, 1.7-3.2 mm). Distal RA puncture was successful in 23 patients (77%) and no complications were noted; however there was no significant correlation between successful puncture and any of the patient factors. Carotid artery stenting and preoperative tumor embolization were performed via DRA in six and three cases, respectively. Although puncture site hematoma occurred in only one case, all treatments were successful, and no major complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

DRA can be safely used for cerebral angiography and neuroendovascular treatment.

Distal radial approach for arterial pressure monitoring with a long catheter provides safe and stable monitoring in the intensive care unit: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

To compare the distal radial artery approach (DRA) with a longer catheter to DRA with a shorter catheter in arterial catheter (AC) placement in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of DRA with a long catheter (60 mm) for arterial catheterization in the ICU. DRA with a short catheter (25-30 mm) was used in the control group, and the groups were compared using multivariate regression analysis. The primary study endpoint was the incidence of unplanned AC removal. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of other inappropriate events, namely loss of arterial pressure waveforms, bleeding, catheter-related infection, pressure ulcer, and other complications associated with the AC.

RESULTS

In this study, the DRA with a long catheter was used in 50 patients. No unplanned AC removals or other inappropriate events occurred, and there were no complications associated with the DRA. The DRA procedural success rate was 100%. There was no significant difference in hemostasis times between the groups. Loss of arterial waveforms was an early predictor of unplanned AC removal.

CONCLUSIONS

The DRA with a long catheter provided stable monitoring and was associated with a low unplanned removal rate. This method has the advantages of fewer complications and shorter hemostasis time compared with the DRA with a short catheter, and may become a new AC option in the ICU.

Distal radial access for neuroangiography and neurointerventions: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many studies have shown that coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via distal radial access (DRA) are safe and effective. Safety and efficacy of neuroangiography and neurointerventions via DRA are unknown.

PURPOSE

Search the literatures on neuroangiography and neurointerventions via DRA and conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were searched from inception to November 10, 2022. After literature screening, data extraction and assessment of literature quality, random effects model was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 236 literatures were retrieved, and 17 literatures including 1163 patients were finally included for meta-analysis.The pooled access success rate was 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.98), and the heterogeneity was obvious (I2 = 55.5%). The pooled access-related complications incidence rate was 0.03 (95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.05), and the heterogeneity was not obvious (I2 = 15.8%).

CONCLUSION

Neuroangiography and neurointerventions via DRA may be safe and effective. DRA is an alternative access for neuroangiography and neurointerventions.

Initial Experience Using the Transradial Approach for Endovascular Treatment of Vascular Pathologies: Safety and Feasibility

Background  Endovascular treatment of vascular pathologies through the transradial approach has been increasingly used and has demonstrated a low rate of complications.

Objective  To report our initial experience in the endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular diseases with the transradial approach and to determine its safety and feasibility.

Methods  Consecutive patients who underwent the transradial approach for endovascular treatment of aneurysms and vascular malformations were reviewed at a single institution. Technical success, fluoroscopy time, and access-related complications were analyzed.

Results  Eight patients underwent endovascular treatment with the transradial approach. One arteriovenous fistula, one superficial temporal artery aneurysm, three arteriovenous malformations, and four aneurysms were treated successfully. The radial artery was successfully approached and a 6-F sheath was used in all the cases. Navigation of guiding catheters (5 and 6 F) was done without complications. The most commonly approached artery was the right internal carotid artery, followed by the right vertebral artery. Postoperative vasospasm was identified in three patients. Mean fluoroscopy time was 34.7 minutes. Conversion to transfemoral approach was not required. No postoperative complications were reported.

Conclusions  In our initial experience, the transradial approach is a safe and feasible alternative for the endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular pathologies.

Distal radial artery approach for endovascular therapy

It has been reported that the distal transradial approach (dTRA) is safe and useful for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this study we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the dTRA for endovascular therapy (EVT). The dTRA for EVT was performed in 43 lesions from 35 patients. Approach site was determined at the discretion of the operator. Clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. Average patient age was 74.0 ± 6.5 years; 30 (86%) were male; average height was 161.1 ± 8.4 cm. Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking habit were present in 19 (54.3%), 31 (88.6%), 29 (82.9%), and 29 (82.9%) patients, respectively. Target lesions were iliac artery in 38 (88.4%) patients, superficial femoral artery in 4 (9.3%) and renal artery in the remaining patient (2.3%). Eight lesions (18.6%) were chronic total occlusions. Thirteen (30.2%), 2 (4.7%), and 28 (65.1%) lesions were treated using 4.5, 6, and 7 French long guiding systems, respectively. All lesions were successfully treated without any procedural or access site-related complications. No additional puncture sites were required. Ankle brachial index significantly improved from 0.62 ± 0.20 to 0.92 ± 0.17 (p < 0.0001) post-treatment for the lower limbs. There were no radial artery occlusions, target lesion revascularization, or complications 1 month later. Similar to PCI, the dTRA for EVT is safe and feasible without any specific complications in carefully selected patients.

Distal Radial Access: Consensus Report of the First Korea-Europe Transradial Intervention Meeting

Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures, transradial access, compared with transfemoral access, is associated with a reduced risk for complications including mortality, especially in higher risk patients. However, transradial access is limited by radial artery occlusion (RAO) that despite being mostly asymptomatic because of the extensive anastomoses between the forearm arteries restricts future use of the same radial artery. Distal radial access (DRA) in the anatomic snuffbox or on the dorsum of the hand has recently gained global popularity as an alternative access route for vascular procedures. A strong anatomic and physiological rationale yields potential for significantly reduced risk for RAO and positive impact on procedural outcome for better patient care. Indeed, currently published studies buttress very low rates of RAO after DRA, hence supporting its development. The authors provide an analysis of the foundation of DRA, provide historical background, and offer a critical review of its current status and future directions. Also, given the limited evidence currently available to properly perform DRA in the real world, consensus opinion on what is considered optimal practice is also presented to supplement this document and enhance the implementation of DRA while minimizing its complications.

Distal Transradial Access for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography and Neurointervention: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Radial artery access for cerebral angiography is traditionally performed in the wrist. Distal transradial access in the anatomic snuffbox is an alternative with several advantages.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to review the safety and efficacy of distal transradial access for diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventions.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a comprehensive search of the literature using PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE.

STUDY SELECTION

The study included all case series of at least 10 patients describing outcomes associated with distal transradial access for diagnostic cerebral angiography or a neurointervention.

DATA ANALYSIS

Random-effects models were used to obtain pooled rates of procedural success and complications.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 7 studies comprising 348 (75.8%) diagnostic cerebral angiograms and 111 (24.2%) interventions met the inclusion criteria. The pooled success rate was 95% (95% CI, 91%-98%; I² = 74.33). The pooled minor complication rate was 2% (95% CI, 1%-4%; I² = 0. No major complications were reported. For diagnostic procedures, the combined mean fluoroscopy time was 13.53 [SD, 8.82] minutes and the mean contrast dose was 74.9 [SD, 35.6] mL.

LIMITATIONS

A small number of studies met the inclusion criteria, all of them were retrospective, and none compared outcomes with proximal transradial or femoral access.

CONCLUSIONS

Early experience with distal transradial access suggests that it is a safe and effective alternative to proximal radial and femoral access for performing diagnostic cerebral angiography and interventions. Additional studies are needed to establish its efficacy and compare it with other access sites.