1
|
Zhang JK, Greenberg JK, Javeed S, Benedict B, Botterbush KS, Dibble CF, Khalifeh JM, Brehm S, Jain D, Dorward I, Santiago P, Molina C, Pennicooke BH, Ray WZ. Predictors of Postoperative Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Consecutive Case Series. Global Spine J 2025; 15:425-437. [PMID: 37522797 PMCID: PMC11877597 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231193610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Case-Series. OBJECTIVES Due to heterogeneity in previous studies, the effect of MI-TLIF on postoperative segmental lordosis (SL) and lumbar lordosis (LL) remains unclear. Therefore, we aim to identify radiographic factors associated with lordosis after surgery in a homogenous series of MI-TLIF patients. METHODS A single-center retrospective review identified consecutive patients who underwent single-level MI-TLIF for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis from 2015-2020. All surgeries underwent unilateral facetectomies and a contralateral facet release with expandable interbody cages. PROs included the ODI and NRS-BP for low-back pain. Radiographic measures included SL, disc height, percent spondylolisthesis, cage positioning, LL, PI-LL mismatch, sacral-slope, and pelvic-tilt. Surgeries were considered "lordosing" if the change in postoperative SL was ≥ +4° and "kyphosing" if ≤ -4°. Predictors of change in SL/LL were evaluated using Pearson's correlation and multivariable regression. RESULTS A total of 73 patients with an average follow-up of 22.5 (range 12-61) months were included. Patients experienced significant improvements in ODI (29% ± 22% improvement, P < .001) and NRS-BP (3.3 ± 3 point improvement, P < .001). There was a significant increase in mean SL (Δ3.43° ± 4.37°, P < .001) while LL (Δ0.17° ± 6.98°, P > .05) remained stable. Thirty-eight (52%) patients experienced lordosing MI-TLIFs, compared to 4 (5%) kyphosing and 31 (43%) neutral MI-TLIFs. A lower preoperative SL and more anterior cage placement were associated with the greatest improvement in SL (β = -.45° P = .001, β = 15.06° P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In our series, the majority of patients experienced lordosing or neutral MI-TLIFs (n = 69, 95%). Preoperative radiographic alignment and anterior cage placement were significantly associated with target SL following MI-TLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin K. Zhang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jacob K. Greenberg
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Saad Javeed
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Braeden Benedict
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Jawad M. Khalifeh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Samuel Brehm
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Deeptee Jain
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ian Dorward
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Paul Santiago
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Camilo Molina
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Wilson Z. Ray
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tabarestani TQ, Drossopoulos PN, Huang CC, Bartlett AM, Paturu MR, Shaffrey CI, Chi JH, Ray WZ, Goodwin CR, Amrhein TJ, Abd-El-Barr MM. The Importance of Planning Ahead: A Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Novel Trans-Facet Corridor for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Segmentation Technology. World Neurosurg 2024; 188:e247-e258. [PMID: 38777315 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rise of minimally invasive lumbar fusions and advanced imaging technologies has facilitated the introduction of novel surgical techniques with the trans-facet approach being one of the newest additions. We aimed to quantify any pathology-driven anatomic changes to the trans-facet corridor, which could thereby alter the ideal laterality of approach to the disc space. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we measured the areas and maximum permissible cannula diameters of the trans-facet corridor using commercially available software (BrainLab, Munich, Germany). Exiting and traversing nerve roots, thecal sacs, and lumbar vertebrae were manually segmented on T2-SPACE magnetic resonance imaging. Spondylolisthesis, disc protrusions, and disc space heights were recorded. RESULTS A total of 118 trans-facet corridors were segmented bilaterally in 16 patients (65.6 ± 12.1 years, 43.8% female, body mass index 29.2 ± 5.1 kg/m2). The mean areas at L1-L2, L2-L3, L3-L4, and L4-L5 were 89.4 ± 24.9 mm2, 124 ± 39.4 mm2, 123 ± 26.6 mm2, and 159 ± 42.7 mm2, respectively. The mean permissible cannula diameter at the same levels were 7.85 ± 1.43 mm, 8.98 ± 1.72 mm, 8.93 ± 1.26 mm, and 10.2 ± 1.94 mm, respectively. Both parameters increased caudally. Higher degrees for spondylolisthesis were associated with larger areas and maximum cannula diameters on regression analysis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our results illustrate that pathology, like spondylolisthesis, can increase the area of the trans-facet corridor. By understanding this effect, surgeons can better decide on the optimal approach to the disc while taking into consideration a patient's unique anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Troy Q Tabarestani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Peter N Drossopoulos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Chuan-Ching Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alyssa M Bartlett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mounica R Paturu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - John H Chi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, North Carolina, USA
| | - Wilson Z Ray
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - C Rory Goodwin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Timothy J Amrhein
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tabarestani TQ, Salven DS, Sykes DAW, Bardeesi AM, Bartlett AM, Wang TY, Paturu MR, Dibble CF, Shaffrey CI, Ray WZ, Chi JH, Wiggins WF, Abd-El-Barr MM. Using Novel Segmentation Technology to Define Safe Corridors for Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2024; 27:14-22. [PMID: 38149852 DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES There has been a rise in minimally invasive methods to access the intervertebral disk space posteriorly given their decreased tissue destruction, lower blood loss, and earlier return to work. Two such options include the percutaneous lumbar interbody fusion through the Kambin triangle and the endoscopic transfacet approach. However, without accurate preoperative visualization, these approaches carry risks of damaging surrounding structures, especially the nerve roots. Using novel segmentation technology, our goal was to analyze the anatomic borders and relative sizes of the safe triangle, trans-Kambin, and the transfacet corridors to assist surgeons in planning a safe approach and determining cannula diameters. METHODS The areas of the safe triangle, Kambin, and transfacet corridors were measured using commercially available software (BrainLab, Munich, Germany). For each approach, the exiting nerve root, traversing nerve roots, theca, disk, and vertebrae were manually segmented on 3-dimensional T2-SPACE magnetic resonance imaging using a region-growing algorithm. The triangles' borders were delineated ensuring no overlap between the area and the nerves. RESULTS A total of 11 patients (65.4 ± 12.5 years, 33.3% female) were retrospectively reviewed. The Kambin, safe, and transfacet corridors were measured bilaterally at the operative level. The mean area (124.1 ± 19.7 mm 2 vs 83.0 ± 11.7 mm 2 vs 49.5 ± 11.4 mm 2 ) and maximum permissible cannula diameter (9.9 ± 0.7 mm vs 6.8 ± 0.5 mm vs 6.05 ± 0.7 mm) for the transfacet triangles were significantly larger than Kambin and the traditional safe triangles, respectively ( P < .001). CONCLUSION We identified, in 3-dimensional, the borders for the transfacet corridor: the traversing nerve root extending inferiorly until the caudal pedicle, the theca medially, and the exiting nerve root superiorly. These results illustrate the utility of preoperatively segmenting anatomic landmarks, specifically the nerve roots, to help guide decision-making when selecting the optimal operative approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Troy Q Tabarestani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham , North Carolina , USA
| | - David S Salven
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham , North Carolina , USA
| | - David A W Sykes
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham , North Carolina , USA
| | - Anas M Bardeesi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham , North Carolina , USA
| | - Alyssa M Bartlett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham , North Carolina , USA
| | - Timothy Y Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham , North Carolina , USA
| | - Mounica R Paturu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham , North Carolina , USA
| | - Christopher F Dibble
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham , North Carolina , USA
| | | | - Wilson Z Ray
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University, St. Louis , Missouri , USA
| | - John H Chi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston , Massachusetts , USA
| | - Walter F Wiggins
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham , North Carolina , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Drossopoulos PN, Ononogbu-uche FC, Tabarestani TQ, Huang CC, Paturu M, Bardeesi A, Ray WZ, Shaffrey CI, Goodwin CR, Erickson M, Chi JH, Abd-El-Barr MM. Evolution of the Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF): From Open to Percutaneous to Patient-Specific. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2271. [PMID: 38673544 PMCID: PMC11051479 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has seen significant evolution since its early inception, reflecting advancements in surgical techniques, patient safety, and outcomes. Originally described as an improvement over the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), the TLIF began as an open surgical procedure, that notably reduced the need for the extensive neural retractation that hindered the PLIF. In line with the broader practice of surgery, trending toward minimally invasive access, the TLIF was followed by the development of the minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF), a technique that further decreased tissue trauma and postoperative complications. Subsequent advancements, including Trans-Kambin's Triangle TLIF (percLIF) and transfacet LIF, have continued to refine surgical access, minimize surgical footprint, and reduce the risk of injury to the patient. The latest evolution, as we will describe it, the patient-specific TLIF, is a culmination of the aforementioned adaptations and incorporates advanced imaging and segmentation technologies into perioperative planning, allowing surgeons to tailor approaches based on individual patient anatomy and pathology. These developments signify a shift towards more precise methods in spine surgery. The ongoing evolution of the TLIF technique illustrates the dynamic nature of surgery and emphasizes the need for continued adaptation and refinement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter N. Drossopoulos
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA (T.Q.T.); (M.M.A.-E.-B.)
| | - Favour C. Ononogbu-uche
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA (T.Q.T.); (M.M.A.-E.-B.)
| | - Troy Q. Tabarestani
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA (T.Q.T.); (M.M.A.-E.-B.)
| | - Chuan-Ching Huang
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA (T.Q.T.); (M.M.A.-E.-B.)
| | - Mounica Paturu
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA (T.Q.T.); (M.M.A.-E.-B.)
| | - Anas Bardeesi
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA (T.Q.T.); (M.M.A.-E.-B.)
| | - Wilson Z. Ray
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Christopher I. Shaffrey
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA (T.Q.T.); (M.M.A.-E.-B.)
| | - C. Rory Goodwin
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA (T.Q.T.); (M.M.A.-E.-B.)
| | - Melissa Erickson
- Division of Spine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - John H. Chi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA (T.Q.T.); (M.M.A.-E.-B.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Keister A, Duru O, Grossbach A, S. Xu D. A novel technique for decortication of the lumbar facet joints for posterolateral fusion with percutaneous exposure: A cadaveric feasibility study. World Neurosurg X 2024; 22:100290. [PMID: 38455246 PMCID: PMC10918256 DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Percutaneous approaches to the spine have been explored recently for various procedures, including transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. It is known that facet decortication leads to higher rates of fusion, but effective percutaneous approaches have not been well documented. There are a set of instruments used in the cervical spine for percutaneous decortication, the CORUS™ Spinal System-X (DI# 00852776006508), which may be useful in this setting. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of decorticating the lumbar facet joints with these instruments in cadavers to aid in minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Methods We performed percutaneous facet joint decortication at each facet joint in the lumbar spine in two adult cadavers. We tested varying degrees of laterality for entry points and angulation for access at each level to optimize the innovative procedure. Results When using the CORUS™ Spinal System-X to obtain percutaneous access for facet decortication in the lumbar spine, we successfully dissected down to the facet joint without neurovascular injury. At the L1-L2 and L2-L3 levels, access was best obtained at 4 cm from midline with an angulation of 10°. At the L3-L4 and L4-L5 level, access was best obtained at 4 cm from midline with an angulation of 20°. Conclusions This study demonstrates that percutaneous lumbar facet joint decortication is feasible with the CORUS™ Spinal System-X instruments, and warrants further, comparative study in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Keister
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Olivia Duru
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Andrew Grossbach
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David S. Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bardeesi A, Tabarestani TQ, Bergin SM, Huang CC, Shaffrey CI, Wiggins WF, Abd-El-Barr MM. Using Augmented Reality Technology to Optimize Transfacet Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Case Report. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1513. [PMID: 38592365 PMCID: PMC10934424 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
The transfacet minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is a novel approach available for the management of lumbar spondylolisthesis. It avoids the need to manipulate either of the exiting or traversing nerve roots, both protected by the bony boundaries of the approach. With the advancement in operative technologies such as navigation, mapping, segmentation, and augmented reality (AR), surgeons are prompted to utilize these technologies to enhance their surgical outcomes. A 36-year-old male patient was complaining of chronic progressive lower back pain. He was found to have grade 2 L4/5 spondylolisthesis. We studied the feasibility of a trans-Kambin or a transfacet MIS-TLIF, and decided to proceed with the latter given the wider corridor it provides. Preoperative trajectory planning and level segmentation in addition to intraoperative navigation and image merging were all utilized to provide an AR model to guide us through the surgery. The use of AR can build on the safety and learning of novel surgical approaches to spine pathologies. However, larger high-quality studies are needed to further objectively analyze its impact on surgical outcomes and to expand on its application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anas Bardeesi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | - Stephen M. Bergin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Chuan-Ching Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | - Walter F. Wiggins
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Matsoukas S, Karabacak M, Margetis K. Exploring the differences in radiologic and clinical outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with single- and bi-planar expandable cages: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2024; 47:36. [PMID: 38191751 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02277-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a universal surgical technique used to achieve lumbar fusion. Traditionally static cages have been used to restore the disc space after discectomy. However, newer technological advancements have brought up uniplanar expandable cages (UECs) and more recently bi-planar expandable cages (BECs), the latter with the hope of reducing the events of intra- or postoperative subsidence compared to UECs. However, since BECs are relatively new, there has been no comparison to UECs. In this PRISMA-compliant systematic review, we sought to identify all Medline and Embase reports that used UECs and/or BECs for TLIF or posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Primary outcomes included subsidence and fusion rates. Secondary outcomes included VAS back pain score, VAS leg pain score, ODI, and other complications. A meta-analysis of proportions was the main method used to evaluate the extracted data. Bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. A total of 15 studies were pooled in the analysis, 3 of which described BECs. There were no studies directly comparing the UECs to BECs. A statistically significant difference in fusion rates was found between UECs and BECs (p = 0.04). Due to lack of direct comparative literature, definitive conclusions cannot be made about differences between UECs and BECs. The analysis showed a statistically higher fusion rate for BECs versus UECs, but this should be interpreted cautiously. No other statistically significant differences were found. As more direct comparative studies emerge, future meta-analyses may clarify potential differences between these cage types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros Matsoukas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, 1468 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| | - Mert Karabacak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, 1468 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Konstantinos Margetis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, 1468 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dibble CF, Zhang JK, Greenberg JK, Javeed S, Khalifeh JM, Jain D, Dorward I, Santiago P, Molina C, Pennicooke B, Ray WZ. Comparison of local and regional radiographic outcomes in minimally invasive and open TLIF: a propensity score-matched cohort. J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 37:384-394. [PMID: 35276656 DOI: 10.3171/2022.1.spine211254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Local and regional radiographic outcomes following minimally invasive (MI) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus open TLIF remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive assessment of local and regional radiographic parameters following MI-TLIF and open TLIF. The authors hypothesized that open TLIF provides greater segmental and global lordosis correction than MI-TLIF. METHODS A single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing MI- or open TLIF for grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis was performed. One-to-one nearest-neighbor propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match patients who underwent open TLIF to those who underwent MI-TLIF. Sagittal segmental radiographic measures included segmental lordosis (SL), anterior disc height (ADH), posterior disc height (PDH), foraminal height (FH), percent spondylolisthesis, and cage position. Lumbopelvic radiographic parameters included overall lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, sacral slope (SS), and pelvic tilt (PT). Change in segmental or overall lordosis after surgery was considered "lordosing" if the change was > 0° and "kyphosing" if it was ≤ 0°. Student t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare outcomes between MI-TLIF and open-TLIF groups. RESULTS A total of 267 patients were included in the study, 114 (43%) who underwent MI-TLIF and 153 (57%) who underwent open TLIF, with an average follow-up of 56.6 weeks (SD 23.5 weeks). After PSM, there were 75 patients in each group. At the latest follow-up both MI- and open-TLIF patients experienced significant improvements in assessment scores obtained with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the numeric rating scale for low-back pain (NRS-BP), without significant differences between groups (p > 0.05). Both MI- and open-TLIF patients experienced significant improvements in SL, ADH, and percent corrected spondylolisthesis compared to baseline (p < 0.001). However, the MI-TLIF group experienced significantly larger magnitudes of correction with respect to these metrics (ΔSL 4.14° ± 4.35° vs 1.15° ± 3.88°, p < 0.001; ΔADH 4.25 ± 3.68 vs 1.41 ± 3.77 mm, p < 0.001; percent corrected spondylolisthesis: -10.82% ± 6.47% vs -5.87% ± 8.32%, p < 0.001). In the MI-TLIF group, LL improved in 44% (0.3° ± 8.5°) of the cases, compared to 48% (0.9° ± 6.4°) of the cases in the open-TLIF group (p > 0.05). Stratification by operative technique (unilateral vs bilateral facetectomy) and by interbody device (static vs expandable) did not yield statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Both MI- and open-TLIF patients experienced significant improvements in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and local radiographic parameters, with neutral effects on regional alignment. Surprisingly, in our cohort, change in SL was significantly greater in MI-TLIF patients, perhaps reflecting the effect of operative techniques, technological innovations, and the preservation of the posterior tension band. Taking these results together, no significant overall differences in LL between groups were demonstrated, which suggests that MI-TLIF is comparable to open approaches in providing radiographic correction after surgery. These findings suggest that alignment targets can be achieved by either MI- or open-TLIF approaches, highlighting the importance of surgeon attention to these variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jawad M Khalifeh
- 3Department of Neurological Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Deeptee Jain
- 2Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri; and
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Khalifeh JM, Massie LW, Dibble CF, Dorward IG, Macki M, Khandpur U, Alshohatee K, Jain D, Chang V, Ray WZ. Decompression of Lumbar Central Spinal Canal Stenosis Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Clin Spine Surg 2021; 34:E439-E449. [PMID: 33979102 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective clinical series. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate radiologic changes in central spinal canal dimensions following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) with placement of a static or an expandable interbody device. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA MIS-TLIF is used to treat lumbar degenerative diseases and low-grade spondylolisthesis. MIS-TLIF enables direct and indirect decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis, with patients experiencing relief from radiculopathy and neurogenic claudication. However, the effects of MIS-TLIF on the central spinal canal are not well-characterized. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified patients who underwent MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and concurrent moderate to severe spinal stenosis. We selected patients who had both preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and upright lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine. Measurements on axial T2-weighted MRI scans include anteroposterior and transverse dimensions of the dural sac and osseous spinal canal. Measurements on radiographs include disk height, neural foraminal height, segmental lordosis, and spondylolisthesis. We made pairwise comparisons between each of the central canal dimensions and lumbar sagittal segmental radiologic outcome measures relative to their corresponding preoperative values. Correlation coefficients were used to quantify the association between changes in lumbar sagittal segmental parameters relative to changes in radiologic outcomes of central canal dimensions. Statistical analysis was performed for "all patients" and further stratified by interbody device subgroups (static and expandable). RESULTS Fifty-one patients (age 60.4 y, 68.6% female) who underwent MIS-TLIF at 55 levels (65.5% at L4-L5) were included in the analysis. Expandable interbody devices were used in 45/55 (81.8%) levels. Mean duration from surgery to postoperative MRI scan was 16.5 months (SD 11.9). MIS-TLIF was associated with significant improvements in dural sac dimensions (anteroposterior +0.31 cm, transverse +0.38 cm) and osseous spinal canal dimensions (anteroposterior +0.16 cm, transverse +0.32 cm). Sagittal lumbar segmental parameters of disk height (+0.56 cm), neural foraminal height (+0.35 cm), segmental lordosis (+4.26 degrees), and spondylolisthesis (-7.5%) were also improved following MIS-TLIF. We did not find meaningful associations between the changes in central canal dimensions relative to the corresponding changes in any of the sagittal lumbar segmental parameters. Stratified analysis by interbody device type (static and expandable) revealed similar within-group changes as in the overall cohort and minimal between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS MIS-TLIF is associated with radiologic decompression of neural foraminal and central spinal canal stenosis. The mechanism for neural foraminal and central canal decompression is likely driven by a combination of direct and indirect corrective techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jawad M Khalifeh
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lara W Massie
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Christopher F Dibble
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ian G Dorward
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Mohamed Macki
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Umang Khandpur
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Kafa Alshohatee
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Deeptee Jain
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Victor Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Wilson Z Ray
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|