Tentorial Peeling: Surgical Extradural Navigation to Protect the Temporal Lobe in the Focused Combined Transpetrosal Approach

Combined Petrosal Intertentorial Approach: A Cadaveric Study of Comparison With the Standard Combined Petrosectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The combined petrosal intertentorial approach (CPIA) has been proposed as an alternative to standard combined petrosal approach (SCPA). CPIA has been designed to maintain integrity of the temporal dura with a view to reduce temporal lobe morbidity and venous complications. This study has been designed to perform a quantitative comparison between these approaches.

METHODS

Five human specimens were used for this study. CPIA was performed on one side and SCPA on the opposite side. The area of exposure (petroclival and brainstem), surgical freedom, and angles of attack to a predefined target were measured and compared.

RESULTS

SCPA provided a significantly larger petroclival area of exposure (6.81 ± 0.60 cm 2 ) over the CPIA (5.59 ± 0.59 cm 2 ), P = .012. The area of brainstem exposed with SCPA was greater than with CPIA (7.17 ± 0.84 vs 5.63 ± 0.72, P = .014). The area of surgical freedom was greater in SCPA rather than in CPIA (8.59 ± 0.55 and 7.13 ± 0.96 cm 2 , respectively, P = .019). There was no significative difference between CPIA and SCPA in the vertical angles of attack for the Meckel cave, Dorello canal, and root entry zone of cranial nerve VII. Conversely, the horizontal angles of attack permitted by the CPIA were significantly smaller for the Meckel cave (52.36° ± 5.01° vs 64.4° ± 5.3°, P = .006) and root entry zone of cranial nerve VII (30.7° ± 4.4° vs 40.1° ± 6.2°, P = .025).

CONCLUSION

CPIA is associated with a reduction in terms of the area of surgical freedom (22%), skull base (18%), brainstem exposure (17%), and horizontal angles of attack (18%-23%) when compared with SCPA. This loss in terms of exposure is counterbalanced by the advantage of keeping the temporal lobe covered by an extra layer of meningeal tissue, thus possibly reducing the risk of temporal lobe injury and venous infarction. These results need to be validated with adequate clinical experience.

The Extra-Extended Translabyrinthine Approach for Resection of Large Acoustic Neuroma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

The extended translabyrinthine approach to acoustic neuroma (AN) was created to allow improved visualization and access to larger tumors.1,2 The dural opening, however, remained confined to the presigmoid space. Other authors have introduced modifications to increase the dura exposure around the internal auditory canal (IAC).3-5 The extra-extended translabyrinthine approach was conceptualized by the senior author (CC) to maximize AN exposure and early cranial nerve identification. The tentorial peeling was added to allow extradural mobilization of the temporal lobe.6 This allows further safe bone removal around the IAC and petrous apex and consistent opening of the facial canal at IAC fundus. This modification creates 280-to-360-degree dura exposure at the IAC. The dural opening extends to the petrous apex superiorly and the prepontine arachnoid cistern inferiorly and includes resection of a tentorium dural flap created by the tentorial peeling.6 This exposure allows for near circumferential exposure of the tumor and early identification of the glossopharyngeal nerve in the cochlear aqueduct area, the trigeminal nerve at the porus trigeminal, and the facial nerve (FN) at IAC fundus. In addition, this ample exposure permits identification of the FN trajectory in the tumor capsule before any tumor dissection. We present a detailed video of extra-extended translabyrinthine approach technique in a patient with a large left AN (Hannover classification T4B).7 This video does not involve any human research projects not requiring Institutional Review Board/ethic committee approval. The patient consented to the procedure and to the publication of his image. Complete resection was obtained. The FN function was House-Brackman I/VI.

Partial Labyrinth Removal Restricted to the Superior Semicircular Canal in Focal Combined Transpetrosal Approach: Description and Illustrative Cases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The labyrinthine structures obstruct the surgical view of the deep petroclival region in the transpetrosal approach. Historically, labyrinthectomy and removal of all 3 semicircular canals, with resultant deafness, was used in patients with ipsilateral functional hearing deficits to improve access. The advent and systematization of superior and posterior semicircular canal removal (transcrusal approach) with good rates of hearing preservation has allowed a redefinition of the possibility of partial labyrinthectomy in patients without previous hearing deficits. The present manuscript is intended to describe a technical refinement of partial labyrinthectomy during focal combined petrosectomy, offering a customization of the approach through the selective removal of the superior semicircular canal for specific types of tumors.

METHODS

The use of the technique is demonstrated through surgical drawings, pictures, and videos. The rationale to indicate this new approach is discussed based on clinical cases.

RESULTS

Three illustrative clinical cases (petroclival meningiomas) are demonstrated. Functional hearing on the approach side has been preserved in all of them.

CONCLUSION

The focal combined transpetrosal approach associated with the superior semicircular canal resection has been a promising surgical technique in the treatment of selected petroclival tumors. It has the potential to further decrease the risks of postoperative auditory and vestibular dysfunctions associated with labyrinthectomies.

Anterior Petrosectomy With Intertentorial Approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The extradural anterior petrosal approach (EAPA) can present a challenge because it deals with critical structures in a narrow, confined corridor. It is associated with several potential approach-related risks including temporal lobe and venous injuries. Tentorial peeling has the potential to largely eliminate these risks during the approach and may offer more options for tailoring the dural opening to the anatomic region that one wants to expose.

METHODS

Anatomic dissections of five adult injected non-formalin-fixed cadaveric heads were performed. Anterior petrosectomy with intertentorial approach (APIA) through a tentorial peeling was completed. Step-by-step documentation of the cadaveric dissections and diagrammatic representations are presented along with an illustrative case.

RESULTS

Tentorial peeling separates the tentorium into a temporal tentorial leaf and posterior fossa tentorial leaf, adding a fourth dural layer to the three classic ones described during a standard EAPA. This opens out the intertentorial space and offers more options for tailoring the dural incisions specific to the pathology being treated. This represents a unique possibility to address brainstem or skull base pathology along the mid- and upper clivus with the ability to keep the entire temporal lobe and basal temporal veins covered by the temporal tentorial leaf. The APIA was successfully used for the resection of a large clival chordoma in the illustrative case.

CONCLUSION

APIA is an interesting modification to the classic EAPA to reduce the approach-related morbidity. The risk reduction achieved is by eliminating the exposure of the temporal lobe while maintaining the excellent access to the petroclival region. It also provides several options to tailor the durotomies based on the localization of the lesion.

Tentorial peeling during combined petrosal approach: a cadaveric dissection

BACKGROUND

The combined petrosal approach is an excellent method to access the petroclival region but has the inherent risk of injury to the temporal lobe and Vein of Labbé. Tentorial peeling has the potential to largely eliminate these risks during the classic combined transpetrosal approach.

METHODS

Anatomical dissection of three adult injected non-formalin fixed cadaveric heads was performed. Combined petrosal approach with tentorial peeling was completed. A tentorial incision just superior and parallel to the superior petrosal sinus was made to enable peeling of the tentorium into two layers, the posterior fossa tentorial leaf (PFTL), and the temporal tentorial leaf (TTL).

RESULTS

Tentorial peeling clearly exposed the continuity between the temporal dura and the TTL as well as the continuity between the presigmoid dura and the PFTL. This enabled the creation of a large dural flap extending to the tentorial incisura, providing wide access to the petroclival region without any exposure of the temporal lobe and/or basal temporal veins. Techniques to create the dural flap without trochlear nerve injury were also explored.

CONCLUSION

The technique of tentorial peeling into two distinct layers has the potential to reduce the morbidity associated with temporal lobe retraction and venous injury. Further cadaveric studies and surgical case series are needed to validate this important surgical nuance in transpetrosal approaches.

Hearing preservation middle fossa approach for intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma in a NF2 patient

Hearing preservation is a cornerstone in the management of intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas. This video demonstrates a middle fossa approach to an intracanalicular schwannoma and highlights some technical and anatomical nuances relevant to the procedure. The patient had sustained hearing preservation in the postoperative period. There are potential benefits in favor of the middle fossa when the tumor reaches the fundus of the internal auditory canal, but the surgeon’s individual experience plays a decisive role in the choice of approach.

The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2021.7.FOCVID21121