Resection of Spinal Meningioma Using Ultrasonic BoneScalpel Microshaver: Cases, Technique, and Review of the Literature

Spinal Meningiomas: A Comprehensive Review and Update on Advancements in Molecular Characterization, Diagnostics, Surgical Approach and Technology, and Alternative Therapies

Spinal meningiomas are the most common intradural, extramedullary tumor in adults, yet the least common entity when accounting for all meningiomas spanning the neuraxis. While traditionally considered a benign recapitulation of their intracranial counterpart, a paucity of knowledge exists regarding the differences between meningiomas arising from these two anatomic compartments in terms of histopathologic subtypes, molecular tumor biology, surgical principles, long-term functional outcomes, and recurrence rates. To date, advancements at the bench have largely been made for intracranial meningiomas, including the discovery of novel gene targets, DNA methylation profiles, integrated diagnoses, and alternative systemic therapies, with few exceptions reserved for spinal pathology. Likewise, evolving clinical research offers significant updates to our understanding of guiding surgical principles, intraoperative technology, and perioperative patient management for intracranial meningiomas. Nonetheless, spinal meningiomas are predominantly relegated to studies considering non-specific intradural extramedullary spinal tumors of all histopathologic types. The aim of this review is to comprehensively report updates in both basic science and clinical research regarding intraspinal meningiomas and to provide illustrative case examples thereof, thereby lending a better understanding of this heterogenous class of central nervous system tumors.

Calcified spinal meningiomas: a systematic review of clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Calcified meningiomas involving the spine are rare but can pose significant surgical challenges. We systematically reviewed the literature on calcified spinal meningiomas.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web-of-Science, and Scopus databases were searched to include studies reporting clinical data of patients with calcified spinal meningioma. Included articles were analyzed for symptoms, imaging, spine level of the tumor, tumor location relative to the spinal cord, calcification status, treatment regimen, recurrence, progression-free survival, and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 35 articles encompassing 94 patients were included. Most patients were female (90.4%), presenting with lower extremity weakness (44%) and/or lower extremity paresthesia (38.1%). Most calcified spinal meningiomas occurred in the thoracic spine (82%) and on the dorsal (33.3%) or ventral (27.2%) side relative to the spinal cord. Most tumors were intradural (87.2%). Histologically, most calcified spinal meningiomas were WHO grade I (97.4%) and psammomatous (50.7%). Most tumors demonstrated macroscopic calcification (48.9%). Most patients underwent gross total resection (91.5%) through a posterior approach (100%). Two patients (2.1%) received adjunctive radiotherapy. The most common treatment related complication was CSF leakage. Post-operatively, most patients demonstrated symptomatic improvement (75.5%) and 2 (2.1%) had local tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcified spinal meningiomas are uncommon but benign entities. These neoplasms tend to adhere to surrounding tissues and nerves and, thus, can be surgically challenging to remove. In most patients, safe gross total resection remains the standard of care, but accurate surgical planning is necessary to reduce the risks of postoperative complications.

Effect of Ultrasonic Osteotome on Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Spinal Surgery: A System Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ultrasonic osteotomes in spine surgery to standard spinal surgery procedures. Methods. Using the search keywords “bone curette”, “cutter”, “scalpel”, “bone shaver”, “aspirator”, “osteotome”, “ultrasonic”, “piezosurgery”, and “ ${\text{dent}\hspace{0.17em}\hspace{0.17em}}^{\ast }$ ” in the databases of PubMed (1966-2021.12), Cochrane Library, Embase (1986-2018.12), Web of Science (1978-2021.12), and China Academic Journals Full-Text Database (CNKI, 1979-2021.12). Two researchers reviewed the literature, extracted and extensively assessed the data, and included information on the study quality. RevMan v5.3.5.0 was used for the meta-analysis. Results. A total of 10 trials with a total of 911 patients were included. The meta-analysis findings revealed that, when compared to traditional methods, ultrasonic osteotomes could save operation time ( $\text{OR}=-18.83$ , 95 percent CI (-22.76, -14.99), $P=0.03$ ) and reduce intraoperative bleeding ( $\text{OR}=-66.73$ , 95 percent CI (-75.70, -57.76), $P=0.04$ ) and postoperative complications ( $\text{OR}=0.38$ , 95 percent CI (0.21, 0.69), $P=0.001$ ). There was, however, no significant difference in the hospital stay ( $\text{OR}=-1.34$ , 95 percent CI (-1.90, -0.77), $P=0.23$ ) and symptom improvement rate ( $\text{OR}=1.03$ , 95 percent CI (0.73, 1.45), $P=0.86$ ). Conclusion. There is evidence that using an ultrasonic osteotome in spine surgery is safe and effective and may minimize intraoperative bleeding and save time. However, there is no significant difference in symptom improvement rate, hospital stay length, or postoperative complications compared to standard surgical equipment. Therefore, more high-quality investigations are needed to corroborate the initial results.