Residual and Recurrent Disease Following Endoscopic Endonasal Approach as a Reflection of Anatomic Limitation for the Resection of Midline Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas

Endoscopic Endonasal Internal Carotid Artery Transposition Technique in Tumor With Parasellar Extension: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Lateralization or mobilization of the internal carotid artery (ICA) during a midline approach is required to expose lesions behind or lateral to the ICA. However, there have been no published data regarding the surgical outcomes of the endoscopic endonasal internal carotid transposition technique (EEITT). This study aimed to analyze the relevant surgical anatomy around the ICA and propose a grading scheme of EEITT.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent EEITT at a single institution was performed. Based on structures that limited the ICA and intraoperative findings, an anatomically surgical grading scheme of EEITT was proposed.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (mean age 45.6 years, 57.1% female patients) were included. Of them, 29 cases (69.0%) were Knosp grade 4 pituitary adenoma, 6 cases (14.3%) were chordoma, 6 cases (14.3%) were meningioma, and a single case (2.4%) was meningeal IgG4-related disease. The EEITT was categorized into Grades 1, 2 and 3, which was used in 24 (57.1%), 12 (28.6%), and 6 (14.3%) cases, respectively. The most common symptom was visual disturbance (45.2%). The gross total resection rate in Grade 1 (79.2%) and Grade 2 (83.3%) was much higher than that in Grade 3 (66.6%). The overall rate of visual function improvement, preoperative cranial nerve (CN) palsy improvement, and postoperative hormonal remission was 89.4%, 85.7%, and 88.9%, respectively. The rate for the following morbidities was cerebrospinal fluid leakage, 2.4%; permanent diabetes insipidus, 4.8%; new transient CN palsy, 9.5%; permanent CN palsy, 4.7%; panhypopituitarism, 7.1%; and ICA injury, 2.4%.

CONCLUSION

The EEITT is technically feasible and could be graded according to the extent of disconnection of limiting structures. For complex tumor with parasellar extensions, the distinction into Grades 1, 2, and 3 will be of benefit to clinicians in predicting risks, avoiding complications, and generating tailored individualized surgical strategies.

Endoscopic endonasal approach for olfactory groove meningioma resection: Strategies and outcomes in a retrospective case series

OBJECTIVE

Though the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is a widely accepted treatment for skull base tumors, the specific use of EEA for olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) is debated, with variable outcomes reported in the literature. We review the surgical results of OGM resections for one surgeon including the operative approach, surgical nuances, and outcomes, with a focus on factors relating to patient selection which favor EEA over transcranial approaches.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed thirteen cases of endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningiomas. Patient characteristics, clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and complications were analyzed. Extent of resection was determined based on volumetric analysis of pre- and postoperative MRI.

RESULTS

Anatomic characteristics that render a tumor difficult to access fully are lateral extension beyond the mid-orbit and anterior extension to the falx. Simpson Grade I resection was achieved in 11/13 (84.6 %) cases. Mean pre-operative tumor volume was 8.99 cm3 (range 2.19-16.79 cm3), and 92 % of tumors were WHO grade I. We demonstrate 2 cases of smell preservation, possible with small unilateral tumors and tumors that are confined to either the anterior or posterior portion of the cribriform plate. The post-operative CSF leak rate was 7.7 %, without prophylactic lumbar CSF drainage. The mortality rate was 7.7 % (n = 1) after infectious complications following CSF leak.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningiomas is an effective and safe operative method with outcomes and complication rates comparable to transcranial approaches. Key considerations include careful patient selection and familiarity with technical nuances of endoscopic endonasal approach for this specific tumor type.

International Tuberculum Sellae Meningioma Study: Surgical Outcomes and Management Trends

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) can be resected through transcranial (TCA) or expanded endonasal approach (EEA). The objective of this study was to report TSM management trends and outcomes in a large multicenter cohort.

METHODS

This is a 40-site retrospective study using standard statistical methods.

RESULTS

In 947 cases, TCA was used 66.4% and EEA 33.6%. The median maximum diameter was 2.5 cm for TCA and 2.1 cm for EEA ( P < .0001). The median follow-up was 26 months. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 70.2% and did not differ between EEA and TCA ( P = .5395). Vision was the same or better in 87.5%. Vision improved in 73.0% of EEA patients with preoperative visual deficits compared with 57.1% of TCA patients ( P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, a TCA (odds ratio [OR] 1.78, P = .0258) was associated with vision worsening, while GTR was protective (OR 0.37, P < .0001). GTR decreased with increased diameter (OR: 0.80 per cm, P = .0036) and preoperative visual deficits (OR 0.56, P = .0075). Mortality was 0.5%. Complications occurred in 23.9%. New unilateral or bilateral blindness occurred in 3.3% and 0.4%, respectively. The cerebrospinal fluid leak rate was 17.3% for EEA and 2.2% for TCA (OR 9.1, P < .0001). The recurrence rate was 10.9% (n = 103). Longer follow-up (OR 1.01 per month, P < .0001), World Health Organization II/III (OR 2.20, P = .0262), and GTR (OR: 0.33, P < .0001) were associated with recurrence. The recurrence rate after GTR was lower after EEA compared with TCA (OR 0.33, P = .0027).

CONCLUSION

EEA for appropriately selected TSM may lead to better visual outcomes and decreased recurrence rates after GTR, but cerebrospinal fluid leak rates are high, and longer follow-up is needed. Tumors were smaller in the EEA group, and follow-up was shorter, reflecting selection, and observation bias. Nevertheless, EEA may be superior to TCA for appropriately selected TSM.

International Tuberculum Sellae Meningioma Study: Preoperative Grading Scale to Predict Outcomes and Propensity-Matched Outcomes by Endonasal Versus Transcranial Approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tuberculum sellae meningiomas are resected via an expanded endonasal (EEA) or transcranial approach (TCA). Which approach provides superior outcomes is debated. The Magill-McDermott (M-M) grading scale evaluating tumor size, optic canal invasion, and arterial involvement remains to be validated for outcome prediction. The objective of this study was to validate the M-M scale for predicting visual outcome, extent of resection (EOR), and recurrence, and to use propensity matching by M-M scale to determine whether visual outcome, EOR, or recurrence differ between EEA and TCA.

METHODS

Forty-site retrospective study of 947 patients undergoing tuberculum sellae meningiomas resection. Standard statistical methods and propensity matching were used.

RESULTS

The M-M scale predicted visual worsening (odds ratio [OR]/point: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.02-1.46, P = .0271) and gross total resection (GTR) (OR/point: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62-0.81, P < .0001), but not recurrence ( P = .4695). The scale was simplified and validated in an independent cohort for predicting visual worsening (OR/point: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.33-4.14, P = .0032) and GTR (OR/point: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57-0.93, P = .0127), but not recurrence ( P = .2572). In propensity-matched samples, there was no difference in visual worsening ( P = .8757) or recurrence ( P = .5678) between TCA and EEA, but GTR was more likely with TCA (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.02-2.18, P = .0409). Matched patients with preoperative visual deficits who had an EEA were more likely to have visual improvement than those undergoing TCA (72.9% vs 58.4%, P = .0010) with equal rates of visual worsening (EEA 8.0% vs TCA 8.6%, P = .8018).

CONCLUSION

The refined M-M scale predicts visual worsening and EOR preoperatively. Preoperative visual deficits are more likely to improve after EEA; however, individual tumor features must be considered during nuanced approach selection by experienced neurosurgeons.

The Evolution of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Olfactory Groove Meningiomas

BACKGROUND

There is controversy over the choice of optimal approach for olfactory groove meningiomas (OGM). The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is one of the most recently described corridors, which provides direct access to the tumor base.

OBJECTIVE

To detail the evolution of the endoscopic endonasal technique over the past 2 decades and demonstrate the impact of this evolution on patient outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study based on a prospectively maintained database of consecutive cases of OGM operated on at our institution via EEA. For analysis, the whole cohort has been divided into 3 equal "eras" according to the time period during which the surgery happened, creating early, middle, and contemporary groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were included, 25 in each group. The rate of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak significantly decreased over time (28%, 32%, and 8% in the early, middle, and contemporary groups, respectively, P = .020). The rate of postoperative encephalomalacia was significantly lower in more recent groups (24%, 16%, and 0% in the early, middle, and contemporary groups, respectively, P = .029), as was the time to resolution of postoperative brain edema (103.9 months, 87.3 months, and 16.8 months in the early, middle, and contemporary groups, respectively, P = .020).

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic endonasal approach for OGM significantly evolved over time, achieving lower cerebrospinal fluid leak rates while providing a high rate of Simpson grade 1 resection. Technical improvements minimized the frontal lobe impact. Current data support EEA as a safe and effective corridor to treat OGM.

Endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for planum sphenoidale versus tuberculum sellae meningiomas

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if the distinction between planum sphenoidale (PS) and tuberculum sellae (TS) meningiomas is clinically meaningful and impacts the results of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA).

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients who were 18 years of age or older and underwent EEA for newly diagnosed grade I PS meningiomas (PSMs) and TS meningiomas (TSMs) between October 2007 and May 2021 were included. The PS and TS were distinguished by drawing a line passing through the center of the TS and perpendicular to the PS on postcontrast T1-weighted MRI. Probabilistic heatmaps were created to display the actual distribution of tumor volumes. Tumor volume, extent of resection (EOR), visual outcome, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

The 47 tumors were distributed in a smooth continuum. Using an arbitrary definition, 24 (51%) were PSMs and 23 (49%) were TSMs. The mean volume of PSMs was 5.6 cm3 compared with 4.5 cm3 for TSMs. Canal invasion was present in 87.5% of PSMs and 52% of TSMs. GTR was achieved in 38 (84%) of 45 cases in which it was the goal, slightly less frequently for PSMs (78%) compared with TSMs (91%), although the difference was not significant. Th mean EOR was 99% ± 2% for PSMs and 98% ± 11% for TSMs. Neither the suprasellar notch angle nor the percentage of tumor above the PS impacted the rate of GTR. After a median follow-up of 28.5 months (range 0.1–131 months), there were 2 (5%) recurrences after GTR (n = 38) both of which occurred in patients with PSMs. Forty-two (89%) patients presented with preoperative impaired vision. Postoperative vision was stable or improved in 96% of patients with PSMs and 91% of patients with TSMs. CSF leakage occurred in 4 (16.6%) patients with a PSM, which resolved with only lumbar drainage, and in 1 (4.3%) patient with a TSM, which required reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

PSM and TSMs arise in a smooth distribution, making the distinction arbitrary. Those classified as PSMs were larger and more likely to invade the optic canals. Surgical outcome for both locations was similar, slightly favoring TSMs. The arbitrary distinction between PSMs and TSMs is less useful at predicting outcome than the lateral extent of the tumor, regardless of the site of origin.

Midline Skull Base Meningiomas: Transcranial and Endonasal Perspectives

Simple Summary

Skull base meningiomas have always represented a challenge for neurosurgeons. Despite their histological nature, they may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to their deep-seated location and the surrounding neurovascular structures. Over time, several corridors have been proposed, each one carrying its own pros and cons. During the last decades, the endoscopic endonasal route has been asserted among the classic routes for a growing number of midline and paramedian lesions. Therefore, the aim of our paper is to present a comprehensive review of the indications and techniques for the management of skull base meningiomas, emphasizing the ambivalent and complementary role of the low and high routes.

Abstract

Skull base meningiomas have always represented a challenge for neurosurgeons. Despite their histological nature, they may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to their deep-seated location and the surrounding neurovascular structures. The state of the art of skull base meningiomas accounts for both transcranial, or high, and endonasal, or low, routes. A comprehensive review of the pertinent literature was performed to address the surgical strategies and outcomes of skull base meningioma patients treated through a transcranial approach, an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), or both. Three databases (PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Ovid Embase) have been searched. The review of the literature provided 328 papers reporting the surgical, oncological, and clinical results of different approaches for the treatment of skull base meningiomas. The most suitable surgical corridors for olfactory groove, tuberculum sellae, clival and petroclival and cavernous sinus meningiomas have been analyzed. The EEA was proven to be associated with a lower extent of resection rates and better clinical outcomes compared with transcranial corridors, offering the possibility of achieving the so-called maximal safe resection.