Novel Surgical Treatment Strategies for Unstable Lumbar Osteodiscitis: A 3-Patient Case Series

Vascularized Bone Grafts for Spinal Fusion-Part 3: The Occiput

BACKGROUND

Obtaining successful arthrodesis at the craniocervical junction and atlantoaxial joint can be more challenging than in other segments of the cervical spine. This challenge stems from the relatively hypermobile joints between the occipital condyles, the motion that occurs at C1 and C2, as well as the paucity of dorsal bony surfaces for posterior arthrodesis. While multiple different techniques for spinal fixation in this region have been well described, there has been little investigation into auxiliary methods to improve fusion rates.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of an occipital bone graft to augment bony arthrodesis in the supraaxial cervical spine using a multidisciplinary approach.

METHODS

We review the technique for harvesting and placing a vascularized occipital bone graft in 2 patients undergoing revision surgery at the craniocervical junction.

RESULTS

The differentiation from nonvascularized bone graft, either allograft or autograft, to a bone graft using vascularized tissue is a key principle of this technique. It has been well established that vascularized bone heals and fuses in the spine better than structural autogenous grafts. However, the morbidity and added operative time of harvesting a vascularized flap, such as from the fibula or rib, precludes its utility in most degenerative spine surgeries.

CONCLUSION

By adapting the standard neurosurgical procedure for a suboccipital craniectomy and utilizing the tenets of flap-based reconstructive surgery to maintain the periosteal and muscular blood supply, we describe the feasibility of using a vascularized and pedicled occipital bone graft to augment instrumented upper cervical spinal fusion. The use of this vascularized bone graft may increase fusion rates in complex spine surgeries.

Vascularized Scapular Bone Grafting: Indications, Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Alternatives

Spinal fusion can be challenging to obtain in patients with complex spinal pathology. Medial scapular vascularized bone grafts (S-VBGs) are a novel approach to supplement cervicothoracic arthrodesis in patients at high risk of failed spinal fusion. In this article, we discuss the benefits of using VBGs compared with both nonvascularized bone grafts and free vascularized bone flaps and the surgical technique, feasibility, and limitations specific to the S-VBG.

Vascularized Bone Grafts in Spinal Reconstruction: An Overview of Nomenclature and Indications

Several vascularized bone grafts (VBGs) have been introduced for reconstruction and augmenting fusion of the spine. The expanding use of VBGs in the field of spinoplastic reconstruction, however, has highlighted the need to clarify the nomenclature for bony reconstruction as well as establish the position of VBGs on the bony reconstructive algorithm. In the current literature, the terms "flap" and "graft" are often applied inconsistently when describing vascularized bone transfer. Such inconsistency creates barriers in communication between physicians, confusion in interpreting the existing studies, and difficulty in comparing surgical techniques. VBGs are defined as bone segments transferred on their corresponding muscular attachments without a named major feeding vessel. The bone is directly vascularized by the muscle attachments and unnamed periosteal feeding vessels. VBGs are best positioned as a separate entity in the bony reconstruction algorithm between nonvascularized bone grafts (N-VBGs) and bone flaps. VBGs offer numerous advantages as they supply fully vascularized bone to the recipient site without the microsurgical techniques or pedicle dissection required for raising bone flaps. Multiple VBGs have been introduced in recent years to optimize these benefits for spinoplastic reconstruction.

Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Stand-Alone Cages for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Study with 1-Year Follow-Up

Patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) often suffer from years of low back pain (LBP) due to instability of the lumbar spine and the reduction of disc height. Since January 2016, we have performed oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) on 154 patients. Among these, 56 patients who suffered from DLS underwent OLIF with stand-alone cages. Forty-two patients with a follow-up time that exceeded 1-year were enrolled for this study. The forty-two patients were followed up for at least one year. Operation segments ranged from L3-4 to L4-5. All the patients were with 1-level fusion. The mean postoperative ventral-disc height and dorsal-disc height increased significantly compared with preoperative (P < 0.05). A significant postoperative increase was also observed in the mean operative segmental lordotic angle and the whole lumbar lordotic angle (P < 0.05). Compared with preoperative, the postoperative VAS significantly decreased with no significant increase in the VAS in the last follow-up. The LBP was significantly relieved. The mean postoperative VAS of LBP decreased significantly compared with the preoperative ((1.6 ± 0.8) vs. (7.8 ± 0.8)). Postoperative complications included psoas major abscess and intervertebral space infection (1/56). Except for one patient whose cage subsided during the last follow-up, the other patients had good cage position. The one whose cage collapsed complained no symptoms including LBP. OLIF with stand-alone cages should be considered as a safe and effective option which can effectively alleviate LBP for the treatment of DLS.

Bone Grafts, Bone Substitutes, and Orthobiologics: Applications in Plastic Surgery

As reconstructive needs often extend past the soft tissue alone, a plastic surgeon must also be well versed in the methods of bony reconstruction. Understanding of the basic science of fracture healing and the biochemical mechanisms of the different bone grafts, bone substitutes, and orthobiologics is essential to selecting among the many different options available to the modern plastic surgeon. This review provides a broad overview of these different options and the specific applications for plastic surgeons based on anatomic location.