A Case Series of Double Bypass Technique Used for the Treatment of Internal Carotid Blood Blister-like Aneurysms in Patients in Poor Initial Neurological Condition at the Early Stage of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Comparison of clinical and histopathological characteristics of short-term progressive and non-progressive blood blister-like aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Many blood blister aneurysms (BBAs) have been documented with a rapid progression history in repeated angiography. The underlying mechanism and clinical significance remained elusive. This current study aims to clarify the clinical and histopathological differences between short-term progressive BBA and non-progressive BBAs.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighty-one patients with BBAs were consecutively included for this single-center retrospective analysis. Clinical and radiological data on these patients were retrieved from 2017 to 2019. BBAs were defined as either progressive or non-progressive based on observed growth based on repeated imaging. Histopathological examinations of a saccular aneurysm, a progressive BBA, and a non-progressive BBA were conducted using representative aneurysm samples.

RESULTS

Among all enrolled patients, 26 of the them were identified with progressive BBAs, while the other 55 with non-progressive BBAs. Progressive BBAs were diagnosed significantly earlier in angiography (3.36 ± 0.61 vs. 6.53 ± 1.31 days, p < 0.05) and showed a higher presence rate of daughter sacs (61.5 vs. 38.2%, p < 0.05). Three different progression patterns were identified. BBAs that developed daughter sac enlargement are diagnosed significantly later than BBAs exhibiting other progression patterns. Patients with progressive and non-progressive BBAs exhibited similar overall clinical outcomes and incidence for complications. For patients with non-progressive BBAs, microsurgery appears to be inferior to endovascular treatment, while for patients with progressive BBAs, the short-term outcomes between microsurgery and endovascular treatment were identical. Histopathological analysis revealed that both subtypes shared a similar pseudoaneurysms structure, but non-progressive BBAs had more histologically destructed aneurysm wall with less remnant fibrillar collagen in adventitia.

CONCLUSIONS

Progressive and non-progressive BBAs may not be distinct pathological lesions but represent different stages during the BBA development. Early intervention, regardless of treatment methods, is recommended for salvageable patients with progressive BBAs, but microsurgery should be performed with caution for non-progressive BBAs due to increased surgical risk.

Cerebrovascular bypass for ruptured aneurysms: A case series

In patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) unfavorable for endovascular or traditional open surgical techniques, surgical revascularization strategies comprise one of remaining limited options. There is nonetheless a paucity of data on the safety and efficacy of bypass in aSAH. In this study, we aimed to investigate complications and outcomes in a cohort of patients with aSAH treated with bypass. A prospective single-surgeon database of consecutive patients treated for aSAH between 2013 and 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Complications and functional status at discharge were recorded and analyzed for the patients that underwent bypass surgery. Forty patients with aSAH were treated with bypass surgery (23 extracranial-intracranial; 17 intracranial-intracranial). All-cause perioperative mortality was 13% (6 patients). At discharge and at mean 14-month follow up, respectively, 16/40 (40%) and 16/25 (64%) of patients achieved a Glasgow Outcome Score of 4-5. All-cause, in-hospital complications occurred in 28 patients (70%), of which any ischemic complication occurred in 20 patients (50%), 7 (18%) being open surgical complications. This work represents the largest modern series of bypass for aSAH to date. In cases of aSAH unfavorable for endovascular intervention or traditional open surgical techniques, bypass remains a viable option in this complex group of patients.

Comparison of Bypass and Non-Bypass Surgical Treatments for Internal Carotid Artery Blood Blister-Like Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical strategy for treating internal carotid artery (ICA) blood blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) has remained unclear. Although some have preferred bypass surgery, others have favored less-demanding surgical methods. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of bypass and non-bypass surgical methods when intended as primary treatment of ICA BBAs.

METHODS

Studies reporting data on the outcomes of interest for surgically treated patients with ICA BBAs were searched for in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Cochrane Central, ProQuest, and Scopus databases. The data were analyzed using random effects modeling.

RESULTS

Seven observational studies involving 140 patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients treated with bypass surgery, compared with those treated with non-bypass techniques, had lower odds of poor outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-2.02; P = 0.57; I² = 0%), postoperative vasospasm (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.38-7.92; P = 0.48; I² = 19%), intraoperative bleeding (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 0.82-13.90; P = 0.09; I² = 0%), postoperative bleeding (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.47-7.76; P = 0.36; I² = 0%), and postoperative recurrence of BBAs (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 0.54-8.66; P < 0.28; I² = 0%). No comparison, however, achieved statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

For surgeons who use both bypass and non-bypass surgical strategies, the 2 methods seemed comparable in terms of the outcomes of interest, although the bypass technique appeared superior. However, comparisons with studies reporting bypass as the uniquely preferred technique have indicated that specialization in, and preference for, the bypass procedure has been associated with more favorable outcomes.

The role of EC-IC bypass in ICA blood blister aneurysms-a systematic review

To perform a systematic review of extracranial-to-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery with parent vessel trapping for blood blister–like aneurysms (BBAs) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) according to PRISMA guidelines. Search of PubMed using “bypass” [all fields] and “ICA” [all fields] or “internal carotid artery” [all fields] and (“blood blister–like aneurysm” [MeSH terms]. Thirty-four original articles were identified, of which 21 were excluded (treatment not including bypass or insufficient details on complications or clinical outcomes). Thirteen articles published between 2008 and 2019 were included, totaling 98 patients, with a median of 7.5 patients per article (range 1–17). Mean age was 53.3 years (range 23–80). The main techniques were external carotid artery to middle cerebral artery (ECA-MCA) in 81% and superficial temporal artery to MCA (STA-MCA) in 19%. The most common grafts were radial artery (74%) and STA (19%). The risk of intraoperative rupture varied from 0 to 75%, with a mean of 12%. With respect to clinical outcomes, the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was not stated in 30% of the cases. When stated, mRS was ≤ 2 in 79%, mRS was 3–5 in 10%, and 4% had mRS 6 (death). We identified only 13 articles, with no prospective studies. Outcomes were better than generally reported for ruptured aneurysms, both with respect to poor outcome (mRS > 2) and in-hospital mortality, perhaps reflecting a selection bias. In general, the data reporting quality was low, precluding any firm conclusions, but EC-IC bypass with ICA trapping may be a valid treatment option for ruptured ICA BBAs.