A community hospital outbreak of legionellosis. Transmission by potable hot water

An application for relating Legionella shower water monitoring results to estimated health outcomes

Exposure models are useful tools for relating environmental monitoring data to expected health outcomes. The objective of this study was to (1) compare two Legionella shower exposure models, and (2) develop a risk calculator tool for relating environmental monitoring data to estimated Legionella infection risks and Legionnaires' Disease (LD) illness risks. Legionella infection risks for a single shower event were compared using two shower Legionella exposure models. These models varied in their description of partitioning of Legionella in aerosols and aerosol deposition in the lung, where Model 1 had larger and fewer aerosol ranges than Model 2. Model 2 described conventional vs. water efficient showers separately, while Model 1 described exposure for an unspecified shower type (did not describe it as conventional or water efficient). A Monte Carlo approach was used to account for variability and uncertainty in these aerosolization and deposition parameters, Legionella concentrations, and the dose-response parameter. Methods for relating infection risks to illness risks accounting for demographic differences were used to inform the risk calculator web application ("app"). Model 2 consistently estimated higher infection risks than Model 1 for the same Legionella concentration in water and estimated deposited doses with less variability. For a 7.8-min shower with a Legionella concentration of 0.1 CFU/mL, the average infection risks estimated using Model 2 were 4.8 × 10^-6 (SD=3.0 × 10^-6) (conventional shower) and 2.3 × 10^-6 (SD=1.7 × 10^-6) (water efficient). Average infection risk estimated by Model 1 was 1.1 × 10^-6 (SD=9.7 × 10^-7). Model 2 was used for app development due to more conservative risk estimates and less variability in estimated dose. While multiple Legionella shower models are available for quantitative microbial risk assessments (QMRAs), they may yield notably different infection risks for the same environmental microbial concentration. Model comparisons will inform decisions regarding their integration with risk assessment tools. The development of risk calculator tools for relating environmental microbiology data to infection risks will increase the impact of exposure models for informing water treatment decisions and achieving risk targets.

Improvements to the Success of Outbreak Investigations of Legionnaires' Disease: 40 Years of Testing and Investigation in New York State

Since 1978, the New York State Department of Health's public health laboratory, Wadsworth Center (WC), in collaboration with epidemiology and environmental partners, has been committed to providing comprehensive public health testing for Legionella in New York. Statewide, clinical case counts have been increasing over time, with the highest numbers identified in 2017 and 2018 (1,022 and 1,426, respectively). Over the course of more than 40 years, the WC Legionella testing program has continuously implemented improved testing methods. The methods utilized have transitioned from solely culture-based methods for organism recovery to development of a suite of reference testing services, including identification and characterization by PCR and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). In the last decade, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has further refined the ability to link outbreak strains between clinical specimens and environmental samples. Here, we review Legionnaires' disease outbreak investigations during this time period, including comprehensive testing of both clinical and environmental samples. Between 1978 and 2017, 60 outbreaks involving clinical and environmental isolates with matching PFGE patterns were detected in 49 facilities from the 157 investigations at 146 facilities. However, 97 investigations were not solved due to the lack of clinical or environmental isolates or PFGE matches. We found 69% of patient specimens from New York State (NYS) were outbreak associated, a much higher rate than observed in other published reports. The consistent application of new cutting-edge technologies and environmental regulations has resulted in successful investigations resulting in remediation efforts. IMPORTANCE Legionella, the causative agent of Legionnaires' disease (LD), can cause severe respiratory illness. In 2018, there were nearly 10,000 cases of LD reported in the United States (https://www.cdc.gov/legionella/fastfacts.html; https://wonder.cdc.gov/nndss/static/2018/annual/2018-table2h.html), with actual incidence believed to be much higher. About 10% of patients with LD will die, and as high as 90% of patients diagnosed will be hospitalized. As Legionella is spread predominantly through engineered building water systems, identifying sources of outbreaks by assessing environmental sources is key to preventing further cases LD.

Legionella Risk Management and Control in Potable Water Systems: Argument for the Abolishment of Routine Testing

Legionella is an opportunistic pathogen of public health significance. One of the main sources of Legionella is potable water systems. As a consequence of aging populations there is an increasing demographic considered at high risk for Legionellosis and, as such, a review of the guidelines is required. Worldwide, Legionella has been detected from many potable water sources, suggesting it is ubiquitous in this environment. Previous studies have identified the limitations of the current standard method for Legionella detection and the high possibility of it returning both false negative and false positive results. There is also huge variability in Legionella test results for the same water sample when conducted at different laboratories. However, many guidelines still recommend the testing of water systems. This commentary argues for the removal of routine Legionella monitoring from all water distribution guidelines. This procedure is financially consuming and false negatives may result in managers being over-confident with a system or a control mechanism. Instead, the presence of the pathogen should be assumed and focus spent on managing appropriate control measures and protecting high-risk population groups.

Confirmed and Potential Sources of Legionella Reviewed

Legionella bacteria are ubiquitous in natural matrices and man-made systems. However, it is not always clear if these reservoirs can act as source of infection resulting in cases of Legionnaires' disease. This review provides an overview of reservoirs of Legionella reported in the literature, other than drinking water distribution systems. Levels of evidence were developed to discriminate between potential and confirmed sources of Legionella. A total of 17 systems and matrices could be classified as confirmed sources of Legionella. Many other man-made systems or natural matrices were not classified as a confirmed source, since either no patients were linked to these reservoirs or the supporting evidence was weak. However, these systems or matrices could play an important role in the transmission of infectious Legionella bacteria; they might not yet be considered in source investigations, resulting in an underestimation of their importance. To optimize source investigations it is important to have knowledge about all the (potential) sources of Legionella. Further research is needed to unravel what the contribution is of each confirmed source, and possibly also potential sources, to the LD disease burden.

Current and emerging Legionella diagnostics for laboratory and outbreak investigations

Legionnaires' disease (LD) is an often severe and potentially fatal form of bacterial pneumonia caused by an extensive list of Legionella species. These ubiquitous freshwater and soil inhabitants cause human respiratory disease when amplified in man-made water or cooling systems and their aerosols expose a susceptible population. Treatment of sporadic cases and rapid control of LD outbreaks benefit from swift diagnosis in concert with discriminatory bacterial typing for immediate epidemiological responses. Traditional culture and serology were instrumental in describing disease incidence early in its history; currently, diagnosis of LD relies almost solely on the urinary antigen test, which captures only the dominant species and serogroup, Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 (Lp1). This has created a diagnostic "blind spot" for LD caused by non-Lp1 strains. This review focuses on historic, current, and emerging technologies that hold promise for increasing LD diagnostic efficiency and detection rates as part of a coherent testing regimen. The importance of cooperation between epidemiologists and laboratorians for a rapid outbreak response is also illustrated in field investigations conducted by the CDC with state and local authorities. Finally, challenges facing health care professionals, building managers, and the public health community in combating LD are highlighted, and potential solutions are discussed.

Uncertainties associated with assessing the public health risk from Legionella

Legionella is an opportunistic pathogen of public health concern. Current regulatory and management guidelines for the control of this organism are informed by risk assessments. However, there are many unanswered questions and uncertainties regarding Legionella epidemiology, strain infectivity, infectious dose, and detection methods. This review follows the EnHealth Risk Assessment Framework, to examine the current information available regarding Legionella risk and discuss the uncertainties and assumptions. This review can be used as a tool for understanding the uncertainties associated with Legionella risk assessment. It also serves to highlight the areas of Legionella research that require future focus. Improvement of these uncertainties will provide information to enhance risk management practices for Legionella, potentially improving public health protection and reducing the economic costs by streamlining current management practices.

The Role of Water in the Transmission of Healthcare-Associated Infections: Opportunities for Intervention through the Environment

OBJECTIVE:

To assess and synthesize available evidence in the infection control and healthcare design literature on strategies using the built environment to reduce the transmission of pathogens in water that cause healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).

BACKGROUND:

Water can serve as a reservoir or source for pathogens, which can lead to the transmission of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Water systems harboring pathogens, such as Legionella and Pseudomonas spp., can also foster the growth of persistent biofilms, presenting a great health risk.

TOPICAL HEADINGS:

Strategies for interrupting the chain of transmission through the built environment can be proactive or reactive, and include three primary approaches: safe plumbing practices (maintaining optimal water temperature and pressure; eliminating dead ends), decontamination of water sources (inactivating or killing pathogens to prevent contamination), and selecting appropriate design elements (fixtures and materials that minimize the potential for contamination).

CONCLUSIONS:

Current evidence clearly identifying the environment's role in the chain of infection is limited by the variance in surveillance strategies and in the methods used to assess impact of these strategies. In order to optimize the built environment to serve as a tool for mitigating infection risk from waterborne pathogens—from selecting appropriate water features to maintaining the water system—multidisciplinary collaboration and planning is essential.

Facets of small RNA-mediated regulation in Legionella pneumophila

Legionella pneumophila is a water-borne pathogen that causes a severe lung infection in humans. It is able to replicate inside amoeba in the water environment, and inside lung macrophages in humans. Efficient regulation of gene expression is critical for responding to the conditions that L. pneumophila encounters and for intracellular multiplication in host cells. In the last two decades, many reports have contributed to our understanding of the critical importance of small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) in the regulatory network of bacterial species. This report presents the current state of knowledge about the sRNAs expressed by L. pneumophila and discusses a few regulatory pathways in which sRNAs should be involved in this pathogen.

Assessing risk of health care-acquired Legionnaires' disease from environmental sampling: the limits of using a strict percent positivity approach

BACKGROUND

Elevated percent positivity (≥30%) of Legionella in hospital domestic water systems has been suggested as a metric for assessing the risk of health care-acquired Legionnaires' disease (LD).

METHODS

We examined the validity of this metric by analyzing data from peer-reviewed studies containing reports of Legionella prevalence in hospital water (ie, percent positivity) and temporally matched reports of patients with health care-acquired LD.

RESULTS

Our literature review identified 31 peer-reviewed publications reporting matched data. We abstracted a total of 206 data points, representing 119 hospitals, from these articles. We determined that the proposed 30% positivity metric has 59% sensitivity and 74% specificity (ie, a 41% false-negative rate and a 26% false-positive rate). These notable error rates could have significant implications, given that we identified 16 peer-reviewed articles and 6 government guidance documents that referenced the 30% positivity metric as a risk assessment tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Environmental sampling of hospital water distribution systems for Legionella can be an important component of risk management for LD. However, the possible consequence of using a percent positivity metric with low sensitivity and specificity is that many hospitals might fail to mitigate when a true risk is present, or might unnecessarily allocate limited resources to deal with a negligible risk.

Legionella--every infection preventionist's dream--or is it?

Legionella is an underreported disease challenge within the hospital setting. In order to combat Legionella during times of construction and renovation, infection preventionists must become construction experts. The infection preventionist must be able to plan for potential waterborne disease outbreaks and protect the hospital staff, patients and visitors from waterborne pathogens. Legionella's history, signs and symptoms, diagnostic testing and treatment will be discussed. The hospital's convening of a multidisciplinary Legionella task force to work cohesively to develop a waterborne pathogens plan will also be discussed. This article was written from the perspective of the infection preventionist and employee health nurse at the time of the Legionella outbreak at their hospital.

[Diversity of Legionella pneumophila in cooling towers: coculture kinetics and virulence studies]

BACKGROUND

Legionella pneumophila (L. pneumophila) was isolated from three cooling towers involved in three community outbreaks of Legionnaireś disease. Each cooling tower had two different chromosomal DNA subtypes. However, only one matched identically to the clinical strains. To try to understand why only one of the environmental strains caused clinical cases we investigated the intrinsic virulence of these strains.

METHODS

We selected six strains of L. pneumophila sg.1: two strains (A1 and B1) from cooling tower 1, two strains (A2 and B2) from tower 2 and two strains (A3 and B3) from tower 3. One of the two subtypes (A) exhibited the same chromosomal DNA subtype as the strains isolated from the patients in each outbreak and the other exhibited a different subtype. The replication within macrophages, the presence of lipopolysaccharide epitope recognized by MAb 3/1 and the growth kinetics in BCYE broth were investigated. Isolates were typed by pulsed field electrophoresis.

RESULTS

The A strains did not have a higher virulence level, but were able to grow and survive better than strains B in BCYE broth.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the strains better adapted to the environment will manage to displace the others and will be able to spread and infect humans. The adaptation to the environmental conditions could play an important role in the pathogenesis of the strains.

Domestic exposure to legionellae for Dutch Legionnaires' disease patients

The source of infection for travelers who develop Legionnaires' disease (LD) shortly after a journey abroad is difficult to ascertain. Infection is likely to have occurred abroad, but could also have occurred at the patient's own residence. The authors conducted a case-control study to determine risk for acquiring LD at home in the Netherlands after traveling abroad. They compared homes of 44 traveling LD patients with 44 homes of nontraveling LD patients, using logistic regression models. Geographic distribution was confounding the association between traveling and presence of Legionella spp. in residences; adjustment was necessary. In traveler's homes, legionellae were present more often, with crude and adjusted OR (95% CI) being 1.6 (0.5-5.0) and 1.4 (0.4-4.4), respectively. The authors' findings indicate that the patient's residence can be a potential source of infection after traveling.

Legionnaire's disease: a nosocomial outbreak in Turkey

Six nosocomial cases of Legionella pneumophila occurred over a two-week period, with one further case being diagnosed retrospectively after 30 days. Strains isolated from the hospital water system were clonally related to a single sputum isolate. A sero-epidemiological investigation into legionella exposure amongst staff and inpatients was undertaken at the eight-year-old Inonu University Medical Centre in Turkey, which has 600 beds and central air conditioning. There is no disinfection programme for the hospital water system. A total of 500 serum samples (400 hospital staff and 100 inpatients) were screened for antibody to L. pneumophila by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Seroreactive cases were confirmed by a four-fold antibody rise in ELISA, a high indirect immunofluorescent assay (IFA) antibody titre or a positive urinary antigen test. ELISA showed that 24 (6%) of the 400 hospital staff and seven (7%) of the 100 inpatients had antibody titres higher than the cut-off value. ELISA-seroreactive cases were followed for two to four weeks. Of these subjects, seven (three patients and four staff) showed a four-fold rise in antibody titre by ELISA, six (three patients and three staff) had a high IFA titre, three patients with pneumonia had a positive urinary antigen test, and one of these patients also had a positive sputum culture. In addition, 22 water distribution systems were screened for the presence of L. pneumophila by culture. L. pneumophila was isolated from 15 sites. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing indicated that all strains isolated from water systems were identical and clonally related to the strain isolated from sputum. Superheating and flushing of water systems were undertaken with legionella being re-isolated from four sites. Repeated superheating and flushing eliminated legionella completely. This study demonstrated that rapid detection of L. pneumophila and adequate superheating and flushing of water systems are effective for elimination and reduction of spread of this organism.

Surveillance, prevention, and control of legionellosis in a tropical city-state

Legionellosis is endemic in Singapore, with sporadic cases reported throughout the year. The absence of outbreak could be due to the low prevalence of the highly pathogenic Pontiac subtype of Legionella pneumophila in the urban environment. Mandatory maintenance of cooling towers and water fountains has been put in place, and the effectiveness of legislation in minimizing the occurrence and risk of outbreak of legionellosis is being evaluated.

Community spread of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 in temporal relation to a nosocomial outbreak

To clarify whether a nosocomial outbreak of legionnaires' disease in the Värnamo hospital in Sweden was part of a wider outbreak in the Värnamo community a number of investigations were performed. First, the proportion of cases of legionnaires' disease in a group with nosocomially acquired pneumonia (11%) was compared to the proportion within a group with community-acquired pneumonia (14%) and the difference was found not to be significant (p > 0.05). Second, the proportion of the nursing staff at the Värnamo hospital with an elevated antibody titre (> or = 16) to Legionella pneumophila serogroup (sg) 1 (33%, 84/258) was compared to the proportion in a group of local residents of Värnamo community (26%, 25/96) and found not to be significant; in contrast, comparison with the proportion in a group from the assistant nursing staff at another hospital 60 km away (5%, 4/80) was highly significant (p < 0.001). Furthermore, Legionella species were cultured from samples drawn from the hospital water supply as well from the water supply from municipal buildings. In 1996 a follow-up study was conducted, which showed that < 1% of the assistant nurses and local residents had an elevated titre to L. pneumophila sg 1. These results indicate that there was a temporary spread of L. pneumophila sg 1 in the Värnamo community at the beginning of 1991, both in the local hospital and the surrounding community. This implies that physicians should be aware of community-acquired cases of legionnaires' disease when a nosocomial outbreak is detected.

A small outbreak of Legionnaires' disease in a cargo ship under repair

It was reported that two mechanics working on a cargo ship under repair in the port of Barcelona had died after having fever. An investigation was made into the possibility of any additional cases and the presence of Legionella pneumophila in the ship they were repairing and in their hotel. The contaminated water system was treated with sodium hypochlorite. Both patients died after having been repeatedly diagnosed as having influenza. The two cases occurred among those who had been working with the pump of the ship's water system, while no cases were observed among the other workers (p = 0.02). Various serogroups of L. pneumophila were isolated from the ship's water pump and distribution system. However, organism of serogroup 1, subgroup Pontiac (Knoxville) were identified with identical deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) patterns in the lung tissue of one patient and in the cooling water circuit valve of the ship's water pump. The first postintervention control water samples showed no further growth of legionella, but serogroups 4 and 8 were identified 8 months later. This legionellosis outbreak, although small, was highly lethal, probably due to the high levels of bacteria to which the patients were exposed and also because of the failure of correct diagnosis. International recommendations on prevention and control of legionellosis, which include ships under repair, are required.

Effect of monochloramine disinfection of municipal drinking water on risk of nosocomial Legionnaires' disease

BACKGROUND

Many Legionella infections are acquired through inhalation or aspiration of drinking water. Although about 25% of municipalities in the USA use monochloramine for disinfection of drinking water, the effect of monochloramine on the occurrence of Legionnaires' disease has never been studied.

METHODS

We used a case-control study to compare disinfection methods for drinking water supplied to 32 hospitals that had had outbreaks of Legionnaires' disease with the disinfection method for water supplied to 48 control-hospitals, with control for selected hospital characteristics and water treatment factors.

FINDINGS

Hospitals supplied with drinking water containing free chlorine as a residual disinfectant were more likely to have a reported outbreak of Legionnaires' disease than those that used water with monochloramine as a residual disinfectant (odds ratio 10.2 [95% CI 1.4-460]). This result suggests that 90% of outbreaks associated with drinking water might not have occurred if monochloramine had been used instead of free chlorine for residual disinfection (attributable proportion 0.90 [0.29-1.00]).

INTERPRETATION

The protective effect of monochloramine against legionella should be confirmed by other studies. Chloramination of drinking water may be a cost-effective method for control of Legionnaires' disease at the municipal level or in individual hospitals, and widespread implementation could prevent thousands of cases.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia

Mechanically ventilated patients are at a substantially higher risk for developing nosocomial pneumonia. Overall, there is a relatively constant 1&!TN!150;3% risk per day of developing pneumonia while receiving mechanical ventilation. The sensitivity and specificity of clinical criteria alone for diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonias (VAP) is low. Several techniques have been developed to sample and quantitate the lower respiratory tract to improve the diagnostic yield. Gram-negative bacillary pneumonias account for the majority of the VAP. Strategies for prevention of VAP such as use of sucralfate for stress ulcer prophylaxis and selective decontamination of the digestive tract have been the focus of many clinical studies. Cost-effective preventive measures are needed to combat the increasing antimicrobial resistance, growing population of immunocompromised patients and increasing number of mechanically ventilated patients.

Evaluation of arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction analysis for typing Legionella pneumophila

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR) analysis in epidemiologic typing of Legionella pneumophila. METHODS: Sixty-two isolates of L. pneumophila of serogroups 1, 3, 6 and 10, including epidemiologically related and unrelated isolates, were analyzed by AP-PCR using the primer BG2. Twenty-six of the serogroup 1 isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). RESULTS: AP-PCR analysis showed 98% typeability and complete reproducibility. A majority of unrelated isolates of each serogroup could be distinguished (discrimination index: 92%). Clinical isolates showed AP-PCR patterns indistinguishable from those of the isolates of the related environmental source. PFGE and AP-PCR results were in agreement for 88% of isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Single-primer AP-PCR analysis can be used as a simple and reproducible screening method for typing L. pneumophila strains of different serogroups.

Uses of inorganic hypochlorite (bleach) in health-care facilities

Hypochlorite has been used as a disinfectant for more than 100 years. It has many of the properties of an ideal disinfectant, including a broad antimicrobial activity, rapid bactericidal action, reasonable persistence in treated potable water, ease of use, solubility in water, relative stability, relative nontoxicity at use concentrations, no poisonous residuals, no color, no staining, and low cost. The active species is undissociated hypochlorous acid (HOCl). Hypochlorites are lethal to most microbes, although viruses and vegetative bacteria are more susceptible than endospore-forming bacteria, fungi, and protozoa. Activity is reduced by the presence of heavy metal ions, a biofilm, organic material, low temperature, low pH, or UV radiation. Clinical uses in health-care facilities include hyperchlorination of potable water to prevent Legionella colonization, chlorination of water distribution systems used in hemodialysis centers, cleaning of environmental surfaces, disinfection of laundry, local use to decontaminate blood spills, disinfection of equipment, decontamination of medical waste prior to disposal, and dental therapy. Despite the increasing availability of other disinfectants, hypochlorites continue to find wide use in hospitals.

The role of arbitrarily primed PCR in identifying the source of an outbreak of Legionnaires' disease

An outbreak of community-acquired Legionnaires' disease (LD) occurred in Providence, R.I., in fall 1993. To find the outbreak source, exposures of 17 case patients were compared to those of 33 matched controls. Case patients were more likely than controls to have visited a section of downtown (area A) during the 2 weeks before illness (11 [65%] versus 9 [27%]; matched odds ratio, 6.5; P = 0.01). Water samples were cultured from 27 aerosol-producing devices within area A. Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates underwent monoclonal antibody (MAb) subtyping and arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR). All four L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates available from case patients who visited area A had identical MAb and AP-PCR patterns. Among 14 environmental isolates, 5 had MAb patterns that matched the case patient isolates, but only 1 had a matching AP-PCR pattern. This investigation implicates a cooling tower in area A as the outbreak source and illustrates the usefulness of AP-PCR for identifying sources of LD outbreaks.

Emerging Infectious Diseases in the Institutional Setting: Another Hot Zone

During the closing years of the 20th century, there has been an unprecedented number of newly recognized infectious agents and a resurgence of infectious diseases only recently thought to be conquered. These problems have been compounded by the increasing number of pathogens that have evolved resistance to antimicrobial agents. Hospitals and other institutional settings occupy a pivotal niche in the emergence of infectious agents due to factors such as the large concentrations of ill and immunocompromised persons, evolving technologies in healthcare settings, routine breeches of host defense mechanisms, and frequent use of antimicrobial agents. Any comprehensive strategy to address emerging infectious diseases must incorporate provisions for healthcare settings, including efforts to enhance surveillance, response capacity, training, education, applied research, and routine implementation of prevention measures.

Nosocomial Legionnaires' disease: aspiration as a primary mode of disease acquisition

PURPOSE

Nosocomial Legionnaires' disease remains a significant problem with many unresolved questions regarding transmission of legionella organisms to patients. We performed a case-control and environmental study to identify risk factors and modes of transmission of Legionella infection during an outbreak of nosocomial Legionnaires' disease in a military medical center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During the calendar year 1989, 14 cases of nosocomial Legionnaires' disease were identified by active surveillance following the discovery of 2 culture-proven cases among organ transplant recipients. Four control patients were matched to each case by age, sex, and date of admission. Cases and controls were compared with respect to past medical history and hospital exposure variables. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for matched variables. Environmental culturing of air and water supplies in and around the medical center was also performed.

RESULTS

The case-control study revealed the following significant risk factors for the acquisition of nosocomial Legionnaires' disease: immunosuppressive therapy (OR = 32.7, CI = 4.5 to 302.6), nasogastric tube use (OR = 18.4, CI = 2.6 to 166.2), bedbathing (OR = 10.7, CI = 2.2 to 59.0), and antibiotic therapy (OR = 14.6, CI = 2.9 to 84.4). Shower use (OR = 0.1, CI = 0 to 0.4) appeared to be a negative risk factor. Water cultures revealed Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, monoclonal antibody subtype Philadelphia (identical to all patient isolates) in the ground-water supply to the hospital, 1 hot-water tank, and 15% of 85 potable water sites tested. Air sampling of cooling towers, hospital air intakes, and medical air and oxygen supplies were negative for Legionella organisms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the importance of potable water in transmitting nosocomial Legionnaires' disease and suggests that the organism gains access to the hospital via external water supplies. The risk factors identified in this case-control study provide evidence that Legionnaires' disease may act as a superinfection in a nosocomial setting and is likely acquired by aspiration, similar to other nosocomial pneumonias.

Plumbing system shock absorbers as a source of Legionella pneumophila

BACKGROUND

Water distribution systems have been demonstrated to be a major source of nosocomial legionellosis. We describe an outbreak in our institution in which a novel source of Legionella pneumophila was identified in the plumbing system.

METHODS

After an outbreak of 10 cases of legionellosis in our hospital, recommended measures including superheating of the hot water to 80 degrees C, hyperchlorination to 2 ppm, and flushing resulted in no new cases in the following 5 years. Recently, despite these control measures, three new cases occurred. Surveillance cultures of shower heads and water tanks were negative; cultures of tap water samples remained positive. This prompted a search for another reservoir. Shock absorbers installed within water pipes to decrease noise were suspected.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five shock absorbers were removed and cultured. A total of 13 (10%) yielded heavy growth of L. pneumophila (serogroup 1). Since their removal, no new cases have been found and the percentage of positive results of random tap water culture has dropped from 20% to 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report that identifies shock absorbers as a possible reservoir for L. pneumophila. We recommend that institutions with endemic legionellosis assess the water system for possible removal of shock absorbers.

Isolation of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 5 from empyema following esophageal perforation. Source of the organism and mode of transmission

A patient undergoing esophageal dilatation for carcinoma of the esophagus suffered esophageal perforation and development of an empyema. Culture of pleural fluid yielded multiple organisms, including Legionella pneumophila serogroup 5. Epidemiologic investigation showed that the source of L pneumophila was a tap used by the nursing personnel to fill patients' water pitchers. Whole-cell restriction endonuclease analysis of DNA from the clinical and environmental isolates of L pneumophila serogroup 5 yielded identical patterns. Our findings suggest that L pneumophila was acquired by the patient at least 12 h prior to the procedure causing the esophageal perforation and empyema, suggesting that the organism can persist in an infectious form in the upper aerodigestive tract.

Subtyping of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 strains isolated in Germany using monoclonal antibodies

Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 (Lp1) strains isolated from patients and hot water supplies in different locations of Germany were subtyped using seven monoclonal antibodies (mabs) in the indirect immunofluorescence test (IFA) and in part, using a dot blot assay. Four of these mabs were produced in Dresden. Three mabs (mab 33G3, mab 32A12 and mab 144c2) were kindly supplied by J. Joly, Quebec, Canada. Altogether, seven antigenic variants were found among Lp1 strains isolated in Germany. Patient strains belonged to the Philadelphia, Benidorm, Knoxville, France, Olda-Heysham and Bellingham subgroups, whereas environmental isolates reacted like the Bellingham, Oxford, Philadelphia, Knoxville and France strains. The majority of patient strains (15 out of 26, 58%) reacted with our mab 3/1 (corresponding to mab 2 of the standard panel), but only 26 out of 118 environmental strains (22%) isolated from 4 of 15 hot water supplies did so (p less than 0.05). The majority of water-borne Lp1 strains reacted with a mab specific of the Bellingham subgroup. Three water systems under study were associated with human legionellosis. Two of them contained Bellingham-like strains, one Philadelphia-like legionellae.

Comparison of ribotyping and restriction enzyme analysis using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for distinguishing Legionella pneumophila isolates obtained during a nosocomial outbreak

Because of the ubiquity of Legionella isolates in aquatic habitats, epidemiologic evaluation of Legionella pneumophila strains is important in the investigation and subsequent control of nosocomial outbreaks of legionellosis. In this study, ribotyping and restriction enzyme analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were used to compare isolates of L. pneumophila obtained from patients and the environment during a nosocomial outbreak with unrelated control strains. Restriction enzyme analysis by PFGE resolved 14 different patterns among the L. pneumophila serogroup 1 and L. pneumophila serogroup 6 isolates involved in the study. Two of the patterns were observed in the three L. pneumophila serogroup 6 isolates from patients with confirmed nosocomial infections and environmental isolates from the potable water supply, which was, therefore, believed to be the source of the patients' infections. Three more patterns that were not present in isolates from patients with legionellosis were seen in isolates from the hospital environment, demonstrating the presence of multiple strains in the hospital environment. In the outbreak, one distinct pattern occurred among the L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates from patients with nosocomial infections, suggesting a common source; however, the source could not be determined. By comparison, ribotyping generated five patterns. However, some control strains of both L. pneumophila serogroups 1 and 6 possessed the same ribotypes as were present in the outbreak isolates. Both techniques were used successfully to subtype the isolates obtained during the investigation of the outbreak. Furthermore, restriction enzyme analysis by PFGE was useful for subdividing ribotypes and for distinguishing strains involved in the outbreak from epidemiologically unrelated strains.

Nosocomial infection with Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 and 8 in a neonate

A case of pneumonia related to 2 serogroups (1 and 8) of Legionella pneumophila (Lp) in a 10-day-old boy is described together with the epidemiological survey in the maternity ward which made it possible to establish its nosocomial origin. Rodshaped bacteria reacting with an Lp genus-specific monoclonal antibody and serogroup 1 and 8 polyclonal sera were detected in bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) collected on day 13. Serogroups 1 and 8 were recovered from cultures of BAL collected on days 12 and 13. Fourfold or more antibody rises to serogroups 1, 5, 8 and 10 of Lp were observed in sequential serum specimens. Water samples collected from the tank and mixer of the maternity ward grew serogroups 1 and 8 of Lp. Serogroup 1 was detected in large amounts in water samples taken at several points of the hot water supply system and from the oxygen nebulizers and the feeding-bottle heater. Analysis of the Lp serogroup 1 strains isolated from the water by subgroup-specific monoclonal antibodies revealed the presence of 4 different subgroups, one of which was identical to the Lp 1 subgroup isolated from the neonate's BAL. This latter subgroup, reactive with McKinney monoclonal antibody Mab 2, has been described as highly virulent. No other case of legionellosis was recorded in the maternity ward.

Nosocomial legionella pneumonia: demonstration of potable water as the source of infection

From January 1983 until December 1985, 35 cases of sporadic nosocomial legionella pneumonia, all caused by Legionella pneumophila, were diagnosed in a university hospital. L. pneumophila serogroup (SG) 1 was cultured from 12 of the 35 cases and compared to corresponding L. pneumophila SG 1 isolates from water outlets in the patients' immediate environment by subtyping with monoclonal antibodies. The corresponding environmental isolates were identical to 9 out of 12 (75%) of those from the cases. However, even in the remaining three cases identical subtypes were found distributed throughout the hospital water supply. From the hospital water supply four different subtypes of L. pneumophila SG 1 were isolated, three of which were implicated in legionella pneumonia. Of 453 water samples taken during the study 298 (65.8%) were positive for legionellae. Species of Legionella other than L. pneumophila have not been isolated. This may explain the exclusiveness of L. pneumophila as the legionella pneumonia-causing agent. Our results suggest that the water supply system was the source of infection.