A phase II study of Tomudex in relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

A phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of BGC9331 and carboplatin in relapsed gynaecological malignancies

BGC9331 is a rationally designed, specific nonpolyglutamatable thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor that is active in gynaecological malignancies. In the light of the sensitivity of human ovarian tumour cell lines to BGC9331 and non-cross resistance to platinum drugs, we studied the combination BGC9331/carboplatin (BCA) in a phase I (PI) pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) study in platinum pretreated gynaecological malignancies. Patients were >or=18 years or over, with a histologically confirmed gynaecological malignancy, radiological evidence of relapse, and a platinum treatment free interval of at least 6 months. Up to three prior lines of chemotherapy were permitted. Carboplatin (AUC5) and BGC9331 were administered on day 1, and BGC9331 was also given on day 8 of a 21-day cycle. In total, 14 patients were enrolled, and treated with BGC9331 at four dose levels, 40, 65, 85 and 100 mg m-2. The principal grade 3 and 4 haematological toxicity was neutropaenia. The principal nonhaematological toxicities were lethargy and nausea. Dose-limiting toxicities were seen in two patients at 100 mg m-2 BGC9331 (grade 4 neutropaenia>7 days, and grade 4 fatigue>7 days). Plasma BGC9331 was measured by an ELISA that was adapted for use in humans. Carboplatin was assayed by flameless atomic absorption spectrometry. There was no PK interaction between the two drugs. Plasma deoxyuridine was elevated indicating TS inhibition to at least day 12. Antitumour activity was observed in four out of 14 (28%) of patients. In conclusion, the combination of BGC9331 and carboplatin is well tolerated with no significant PK interaction between the two drugs. There is evidence of TS inhibition with the combination. We have demonstrated antitumour activity in platinum pretreated gynaecological malignancy. Further exploration of this combination in this disease is warranted.

Phase I study of Tomudex and Doxorubicin in patients with locally advanced, inoperable or metastatic cancer (IND.98)

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose for Tomudex and Doxorubicin when given in combination to patients with advanced metastatic cancer. The secondary objective was to assess the toxicity profile.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Starting doses were Tomudex 2.5 mg/m2 i.v. bolus day 1 and Doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 i.v. bolus day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. Doxorubicin was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 to 60 mg/m2, followed by escalation of Tomudex in increments of 0.5 mg/m2 to 3.5 mg/m2, on six dose levels. Twenty-five patients received 127 cycles of therapy, with at least 3 patients treated at each dose level.

RESULTS

There was no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) observed in the first five dose levels. Three of six patients on dose level six had DLT. Further dose escalation was not warranted and this was declared the MTD. Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was observed in 16/25 patients, with associated fever in 3/25 patients. Responses were seen in this study with one complete response (duration 12.8 months) and 3 partial responses (median duration 8 months) in 21 evaluable patients. Fourteen patients had stable disease (median duration 2.5 months). All 4 responding patients and 10 patients with stable disease had gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended phase-II dose for this combination in future studies is Tomudex 3 mg/m2 and Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks.

Phase I trial of sequential administration of raltitrexed (Tomudex) and 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (IdUrd)

Raltitrexed (Tomudex) is a specific inhibitor of thymidylate synthase with clinical activity in colorectal cancer. The combination of raltitrexed and 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (IdUrd, a cytotoxic pyrimidine analog) resulted in increased IdUrd incorporation into DNA and exhibited in vitro synergism against colon and bladder human carcinoma cell lines. We designed a phase I trial to determine the MTD, pharmacokinetics, and biologic effects of escalating doses of the combination of IdUrd given as a 24-hour infusion after a raltitrexed 15-minute infusion every three weeks. Thirty-four patients received 95 courses of raltitrexed and IdUrd at doses ranging from raltitrexed 1 mg/m2 and IdUrd 750 mg/m2 to raltitrexed 2.5 mg/m2 and IdUrd 10,400 mg/m2. The median number of cycles administered was 2 (range 1-10). Dose limiting hematologic toxicity occurred at doses of raltitrexed 2.5 mg/m2 and IdUrd 10,400 mg/m2. In addition, we determined the mean plasma concentrations C(SS) of IdUrd, the iodouracil level at 22 hours and the IdUrd clearance. Raltitrexed did not appear to affect the pharmacokinetics of IdUrd in the dose range tested. The recommended phase II dose is raltitrexed 2 mg/m2 and IdUrd 10,400 mg/m2 repeated every three weeks. Evidence of potential antitumor activity was observed: 1 patient (with colon cancer) had a partial response while 15 others had stable disease.

A dose-finding study of raltitrexed (tomudex) with cisplatin and epirubicin in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma

The standard treatment for advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer in the UK is epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusion 5-fluoruracil by an indwelling central venous catheter (ECF), which has significant morbidity. Raltitrexed (tomudex), a specific inhibitor of thymidylate synthase with a long plasma terminal half-life (50-100 h) has activity in gastro-intestinal tract malignancy. To reduce the Hickman line-associated morbidity of ECF; we have conducted a dose-finding study of tomudex combined with epirubicin and cisplatin. Twenty-four patients (22 males, two female), median age 63 years (range 21-75), ECOG performance status < or =2 with histologically proven, unresectable or metastatic gastric (14 patients), gastro-oesophageal junction (nine patients) or oesophageal (one patient) adenocarcinoma received treatment with 3-weekly cisplatin 60 mg m(-2), epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) and tomudex at doses of 2 mg m(-2), 2.5 mg m(-2) or 3 mg m(-2) in successive cohorts. Six patients were treated per dose level with no intra-patient dose escalation. Dose escalation occurred after six patients had completed at least one cycle of chemotherapy at the previous dose level. After defining the maximum tolerated dose a further six patients were treated at the preceding dose level to assess toxicity at the proposed phase II dose. A total of 102 cycles (50% completed 6 cycles) were administered. The dose-limiting toxicities are neutropenia and diarrhoea occurring in 2/6 patients at the 3 mg m(-2) dose level. Of those patients evaluable for response, there were eight partial and one complete response (overall response rate 38%). The median survival was 9.9 months. ECT is an active regimen in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The recommended dose of tomudex for further study in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin is 2.5 mg m(-2).

Selection of active drugs for ovarian cancer based on CA-125 and standard response rates in phase II trials

PURPOSE

To determine whether precise definitions of response based on serial CA-125 levels can predict the activity of drugs in phase II trials for ovarian cancer as accurately as standard criteria.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourteen different drugs for relapsed ovarian cancer were analyzed in 25 treatment groups in 19 clinical trials. Response rates were estimated in 1,457 assessable patients according to standard criteria and in 1,092 assessable patients according to CA-125. For each drug trial, the observed response rates acted as the input data for an evaluation of how the two criteria would perform in a hypothetical Gehan two-stage phase II trial, accepting a target drug efficacy rate of 20% and a rejection error of 5%.

RESULTS

CA-125 and clinical response criteria were concordant in 20 of the 25 groups, with less than 5% chance of rejecting the drug in nine groups and greater than 5% in 11 groups. In four groups, the drug had less than 5% chance of being rejected by CA-125 but greater than 5% chance of being rejected by standard criteria. The difference in the classification of drugs by the standard and CA-125 response criteria was not statistically significant (P =.38, McNemar's test). CA-125 response rates were slightly higher than standard response rates by a factor of 1.11.

CONCLUSION

Definitions based on a 50% or 75% decrease of CA-125 levels accurately predicted which drugs in phase II trials for relapsed ovarian cancer were active and justified further investigation.

Effects of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics of raltitrexed (Tomudex ZD1694)

This open-label, non-randomized, parallel-group trial investigated the pharmacokinetics of raltitrexed (Tomudex, formerly ZD1694) after a single intravenous dose of 3.0 mg m(-2), comparing eight cancer patients with mild to moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance 25-65 ml min(-1)) with eight cancer patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance >65 ml min(-1)). The primary end points were area under the plasma raltitrexed concentration-time curve from the start of the infusion to the last determined concentration (AUC(0-tldc)) and AUC to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)); secondary end points were peak concentrations of raltitrexed (Cmax) and elimination half-life (t(1/2gamma)). The groups were compared statistically using analysis of covariance. The AUCs were greater for patients with renal impairment than for patients with normal renal function (2452.2 compared with 1247.3 ng h ml(-1) for AUC(0-tldc) (ratio 1.97; 95% CI 1.36-2.84); 2961.5 compared with 1457.0 ng h ml(-1) for AUC(0-infinity) (ratio 2.03; 1.25-3.29). These differences were statistically significant (P = 0.002 and P = 0.008 for AUC(0-tldc) and AUC(0-infinity) respectively. Terminal half-life was longer for the renally impaired patients (271.2 compared with 143.3; P = 0.030). There was no significant statistical difference between the groups for Cmax (652.9 compared with 564.7 ng ml(-1) for patients with impaired and normal renal function respectively: ratio 1.16; 0.91-1.46; P = 0.204). There was a clear relationship between raltitrexed clearance and creatinine clearance. Adverse events, severe (WHO grade 3 or 4) toxicity and hospitalization due to adverse events were more frequent in the group with renal impairment. Therefore, a reduction in raltitrexed dose and increased interval between doses is recommended for patients with mild to moderate renal impairment.