Embolic stroke after unanticoagulated cardioversion despite prior exclusion of atrial thrombi by transoesophageal echocardiography

Atrial electromechanical delay assessment in early phase after catheter ablation for patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Variation of atrial electromechanical delay (AED) in early phase after catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is lacking.

METHODS

Fifty-five consecutive patients restored sinus rhythm after ablation was included. Echocardiography was performed at 4 h, 1 day, and 3 days after radiofrequency catheter ablation, and AED was measured simultaneously by echocardiography with pulse Doppler imaging and pulse wave tissue Doppler imaging.

RESULTS

AED parameters were significantly longer in the nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF) group than in the paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) group at each checking point after ablation (P < 0.05). Compared with other checking points, AED parameters were significantly longer 4 h postablation in the NPAF group, while no significant difference was found between different checking points in the PAF group. AED-leap, representing the variation of AED in NPAF patients, was significantly positively correlated with the duration of NPAF (r = 0.5291, P = 0.0113).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with PAF, NPAF patients have a longer AED postablation, and an abrupt decrease in the initial-h postablation. Such phenomenon gives rise to the different clinical features of PAF and NPAF, and could guide different assessment and treatment strategies for different types of AF.

Multiple potential molecular contributors to atrial hypocontractility caused by atrial tachycardia remodeling in dogs

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation impairs atrial contractility, inducing atrial stunning that promotes thromboembolic stroke. Action potential (AP)-prolonging drugs are reported to normalize atrial hypocontractility caused by atrial tachycardia remodeling (ATR). Here, we addressed the role of AP duration (APD) changes in ATR-induced hypocontractility.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ATR (7-day tachypacing) decreased APD (perforated patch recording) by ≈50%, atrial contractility (echocardiography, cardiomyocyte video edge detection), and [Ca(2+)](i) transients. ATR AP waveforms suppressed [Ca(2+)](i) transients and cell shortening of control cardiomyocytes; whereas control AP waveforms improved [Ca(2+)](i) transients and cell shortening in ATR cells. However, ATR cardiomyocytes clamped with the same control AP waveform had ≈60% smaller [Ca(2+)](i) transients and cell shortening than control cells. We therefore sought additional mechanisms of contractile impairment. Whole-cell voltage clamp revealed reduced I(CaL); I(CaL) inhibition superimposed on ATR APs further suppressed [Ca(2+)](i) transients in control cells. Confocal microscopy indicated ATR-impaired propagation of the Ca(2+) release signal to the cell center in association with loss of t-tubular structures. Myofilament function studies in skinned permeabilized cardiomyocytes showed altered Ca(2+) sensitivity and force redevelopment in ATR, possibly due to hypophosphorylation of myosin-binding protein C and myosin light-chain protein 2a (immunoblot). Hypophosphorylation was related to multiple phosphorylation system abnormalities where protein kinase A regulatory subunits were downregulated, whereas autophosphorylation and expression of Ca(2+)-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIδ and protein phosphatase 1 activity were enhanced. Recovery of [Ca(2+)](i) transients and cell shortening occurred in parallel after ATR cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

Shortening of APD contributes to hypocontractility induced by 1-week ATR but accounts for it only partially. Additional contractility-suppressing mechanisms include I(CaL) current reduction, impaired subcellular Ca(2+) signal transmission, and altered myofilament function associated with abnormal myosin and myosin-associated protein phosphorylation. The complex mechanistic basis of the atrial hypocontractility associated with AF argues for upstream therapeutic targeting rather than interventions directed toward specific downstream pathophysiological derangements.

Acute anticoagulation adjustment in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke: approaches, strategies, risks and benefits

The acute management of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation to prevent stroke and other thromboembolic complications includes the use of individualized strategies tailored to the patient and based on the situation (cardioversion, surgeries, dental procedures, cardiac interventions, other invasive procedures and initiation of, or adjustment to, warfarin dosing). The vast range of choices can cause confusion and few randomized controlled clinical trials in this area provide adequate guidance. Chronic anticoagulation management is more straightforward since clinical evidence is ample, randomized clinical trial data provides cogent informaiton and guidelines have been established. Acute management of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation to prevent thromboembolic complications is often unrecognized but is emerging as a crucial, but challenging, and increasingly complex aspect of the care of patients with atrial fibrillation. This review addresses issues regarding such patients who may be at risk for stroke and require acute adjustments of anticoagulation (in light of, or in lieu of, chronic anticoagulation). Several promising new strategies are considered in light of established medical care. This analysis provides practical recommendations based on available data and presents results from recent investigations that may provide insight into future strategies.

Atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained dysrhythmia in adults. It is ironic, then, that although mechanisms and effective treatments for most other supraventricular tachyarrhythmias have been discovered, AF remains incompletely understood and poorly treated. Nonetheless, our understanding of the pathophysiology of AF has improved in the last half-century, including some groundbreaking observations made in the last 10 years. Indeed, for some patients, the potential for cure now appears to be available. Because no unifying mechanism of AF has been proven, the aim of this review is to describe some of the common and important concepts behind current mechanistic theories of AF and how they contribute to our clinical understanding of AF.

Atrial stunning: basics and clinical considerations

Conversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter to sinus rhythm results in a transient mechanical dysfunction of atrium and atrial appendage, termed atrial stunning. Atrial stunning has been reported with all modes of conversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter to sinus rhythm including both transthoracic and low energy internal electrical, pharmacological, and spontaneous cardioversion, and conversion by overdrive pacing and by radiofrequency ablation. Atrial stunning is a function of the underlying arrhythmia becoming apparent at the restoration of sinus rhythm, not the function of the mode of conversion, and does not develop after the unsuccessful attempts of cardioversion or the delivery of electric current to the heart during rhythms other than atrial fibrillation or flutter. Tachycardia-induced atrial cardiomyopathy, cytosolic calcium accumulation, and atrial hibernation are the suggested mechanisms of atrial stunning. Atrial stunning is at maximum immediately after cardioversion and improves progressively with a complete resolution within a few minutes to 4-6 weeks depending on the duration of the preceding atrial fibrillation, atrial size, and structural heart disease. Atrial stunning causes postcardioversion thromboembolism despite restoration of sinus rhythm. Duration of anticoagulation therapy after successful cardioversion should depend on the duration of atrial stunning. Lack of improvement in cardiac output and functional recovery of patients immediately after cardioversion is attributed to the atrial stunning. Verapamil, acetylstrophenathidine, isoproterenol, and dofetilide have been reported to protect from atrial stunning in animal and small human studies. Right atrium stunning is less marked and improves earlier than that of left atrium, resulting in a differential atrial stunning explaining the rare occurrence of pulmonary edema after cardioversion.

Atrial stunning: determinants and cellular mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Atrial stunning is a transient depression of atrial and atrial-appendage mechanical function after successful cardioversion of atrial fibrillation compared with its precardioversion state.

METHOD

Atrial stunning associated with different methods of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and the determinants and cellular mechanisms of atrial stunning were elaborated by thoroughly examining the studies on the subject identified through a comprehensive literature search.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Atrial stunning has been reported with all methods of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, including transthoracic electrical, low-energy internal electrical, pharmacological, and spontaneous. It is a function of the underlying atrial fibrillation becoming apparent at the restoration of sinus rhythm, regardless of the method used for conversion. Unsuccessful cardioversion does not result in atrial stunning. The duration of the preceding atrial fibrillation, atrial size, and underlying structural heart disease are the determinants of atrial stunning. A shorter duration of atrial fibrillation and smaller atrial diameters are associated with a relatively less severe stunning, lasting for a shorter duration. Atrial stunning after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation of <1 week usually resolves within 24 hours, and atrial stunning after cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation usually resolves within 4 weeks. Tachycardia-induced atrial cardiomyopathy, atrial cytosolic calcium alterations with down-regulation of the L-type Ca2+ channels and up-regulation of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, atrial hibernation with myocyte dedifferentiation and myolysis, and atrial fibrosis are the suggested mechanisms underlying atrial stunning. Atrial stunning determines the risk of postcardioversion thrombus formation in atria and atrial appendages, the duration of postcardioversion anticoagulation therapy, the recovery of the atrial contribution to the ventricular function, and the functional recovery of the patients after successful cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

Transient atrial mechanical dysfunction (stunning) after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter

BACKGROUND

Conversion of atrial fibrillation (AFib) and flutter (AFlt) to sinus rhythm results in a transient mechanical dysfunction of atria (atrial stunning). Methods used as a means of assessing atrial stunning, atrial stunning after conversion of atrial fibrillation/flutter, and the cause, mechanisms, determinants of the extent, and drugs affecting atrial stunning were examined.

METHODS

Studies on the subject, identified through a comprehensive literature search, were thoroughly evaluated.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Left atrial (LA) stunning has been reported with all modes of conversion of AFib/AFlt to sinus rhythm. The incidence of LA stunning is 38% to 80%. Spontaneous echocardiographic contrast, LA appendage (LAA) flow velocities and emptying fraction, transmitral inflow velocity of atrial wave (A-wave), time-velocity integral of A-wave, and atrial filling fraction have been used as means of assessing LA stunning. The data on right atrial (RA) stunning are limited, but parallel findings have been reported in the right atrium. Atrial stunning does not develop after the unsuccessful attempts of cardioversion or on delivery of electric current to the heart without AFib/AFlt, and it is a function of the underlying AFib/AFlt manifesting at the restoration of sinus rhythm. Tachycardia-induced atrial myopathy and chronic atrial hibernation are suggested mechanisms. Duration of preceding AFib/AFlt, atrial size, and underlying heart disease are determinants of the extent of atrial stunning. Verapamil, dofetilide, and acetylstrophenathidine have been shown to attenuate or protect from atrial stunning in animal or small human studies. A comprehensive knowledge of atrial stunning would be helpful in selecting the patients for, and the duration of, anticoagulation therapy after cardioversion.

The relation between transmitral early filling wave deceleration time and the recovery of atrial contractility after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm is associated with transient left atrial dysfunction and this phenomenon may lead to thrombus formation and embolic stroke. Delay of atrial mechanical function recovery may be related to ventricular diastolic function.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the effects of left ventricular diastolic function as well as the multiple clinical factors on the recovery of atrial systolic function after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A total of 44 patients (28 male, 16 female, 61+/-18 years) with chronic AF (> or =1 month) underwent electrical cardioversion. Deceleration time of early filling wave (pre-CV EDT) on transmitral inflow obtained by using Doppler echocardiography before cardioversion and serial transmitral inflow Doppler variables were recorded through a 1 week study period in all patients. Various clinical (age, gender, the duration of AF) and echocardiographic variables (pre-CV EDT, left atrial dimension, left ventricular ejection fraction) were tested for an association with peak atrial filling wave velocity (VA) on day 1, 3 and 7 after cardioversion.

RESULTS

EDT measured before cardioversion had a strong linear correlation with peak VA on every echocardiographic evaluation after cardioversion (Regression coefficient (R)=0.69, P<0.001; R=0.78, P<0.001 and R=0.83, P<0.001, on day 1, day 3 and day 7, respectively). The effect of left ventricular ejection fraction on peak VA was weaker than those of EDT. The duration of AF showed an inverse association with the recovery of atrial function, but this lost on multivariate analysis. None of the other parameters significantly correlated with peak VA after cardioversion.

CONCLUSION

The recovery of atrial mechanical function after cardioversion, as assessed by peak VA on transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is mainly associated with the left ventricular diastolic function as measured by EDT, whereas the left ventricular systolic function relatively a small effect on this outcome. The duration of AF does not have any association with peak VA, possibly if it is chronic.

Treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia observed in clinical practice, occurring in 0.4% of the general population and in up to 4% of people greater than 60 years old. It is often associated with other cardiovascular disorders, such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, or cardiomyopathy. Critical evaluation and management of patients with atrial fibrillation requires knowledge of etiology, prognosis, and treatment options of this arrhythmia. On initial presentation, emergency electrical cardioversion should be performed if the patient is hemodynamically unstable. If the patient is stable, initial rate control is recommended, using atrioventricular nodal blocking agents. Further treatment mainly depends upon the duration of the episode. Patients who are in atrial fibrillation <48 hours can be safely cardioverted. Patients who are in atrial fibrillation for >48 hours are commonly anticoagulated for 3 to 4 weeks before and after cardioversion because of the risk of thromboembolism formation in the left atrial appendage. An alternate strategy, which is especially attractive when immediate cardioversion is desired, is transesophageal echocardiography to exclude left atrial thrombus followed by prompt cardioversion. After cardioversion, sinus rhythm can be maintained with class I and III drugs, such as flecainide and propafenone or amiodarone and sotalol. New treatment options, such as atrial defibrillation, atrioventricular junctional ablation, or modification of atrial pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation, are currently under investigation. Although atrial fibrillation is so common in clinical practice, it still remains difficult to treat. Conversion and maintenance to sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic drug therapy has not shown any improvement in mortality, and some patients may benefit more from ventricular rate control. This review article discusses different treatment strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Clinical variables affecting recovery of left atrial mechanical function after cardioversion from atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the effect of clinical factors on recovery of atrial function after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND

Lack of effective mechanical atrial function (EMAF) after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation predisposes to thromboembolic complications and delays improvement in functional capacity.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients underwent cardioversion (group I, electrical cardioversion, n = 40; group II, pharmacologic or spontaneous cardioversion, n = 12) for atrial fibrillation. Serial transmitral inflow Doppler variables were recorded after cardioversion until EMAF (atrial filling velocity > 0.50 m/s) was seen. Clinical variables (age, duration of atrial fibrillation, left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial diameter, underlying cardiovascular disease, antiarrhythmic drug therapy and mode of cardioversion) were tested for an association with the outcomes of recovery of atrial function by day 3 and day 7.

RESULTS

Effective mechanical atrial function recovered in 68% of patients by day 3 and in 76% by day 7 after cardioversion. The mode of cardioversion was significantly associated with recovery of atrial function by day 3 in bivariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 1.0, for electrical cardioversion). None of the variables had an association with recovery of atrial function by day 7. Group I patients took a longer time to recover atrial function than group II patients (p = 0.012). In addition, group I patients had a significantly lower peak atrial filling velocity (mean [+/-SD] 0.39 +/- 0.19 m/s vs. 0.56 +/- 0.16 m/s) and a higher early filling to atrial filling velocity ratio (2.5 +/- 1.2 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.5) after cardioversion.

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of patients recover EMAF within 1 week after cardioversion. Patients who undergo electrical cardioversion display a greater degree and a longer duration of mechanical atrial dysfunction than those who convert pharmacologically or spontaneously.

Uncommon etiologies of atrial fibrillation

A newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation warrants a full investigation of the etiopathogenesis of this common arrhythmia. In the adult population, the most frequently associated conditions are systemic hypertension, coronary artery disease, mitral valvulopathy, congestive heart failure, and hyperthyroidism. Nevertheless, more infrequent and even rare, yet correctable, etiologies should not be overlooked. We describe three patients who presented to our hospital with a first episode of atrial fibrillation and who subsequently were demonstrated to have very unusual cardiovascular pathologies subtending this common arrhythmia. In all three cases, trans-esophageal echocardiography was instrumental in reaching an accurate diagnosis that was later confirmed at surgery.

Atrial fibrillation, transesophageal echo, electrical cardioversion, and anticoagulation

Although successful electrical cardioversion is accomplished in most cases without any evidence of embolic stroke, a few patients have experienced this catastrophe. The current thinking is that when electrical energy is applied to the chest wall, the atrium, although it returns to sinus rhythm, is stunned. It is not known how long this stunning lasts in the individual patient nor whether high energy produces stunning and low energy does not. Nor is it known whether chemical conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm affects the atrium in the same way. However, the atrium seems to recover more quickly in patients with a short duration of atrial fibrillation and these patients may not require the usual four weeks of postcardioversion anticoagulation. Based on what we know, or more precisely what we don't know, it seems reasonable to ensure that every patient with atrial fibrillation is anticoagulated during and after DC cardioversion to sinus rhythm. Of course, this is easy to do with intravenous heparin, but that requires hospitalization. Perhaps subcutaneous heparin in high doses would suffice until the patient can be anticoagulated with coumadin. From the research perspective it might be interesting to perform serial echo/Doppler studies on these patients to identify when the individual patient's atrial function returns to normal. This might provide a clinical rationale for discontinuing anticoagulation. Comparing the time to return of normal atrial function (as measured by Doppler echo) between patients undergoing pharmacologic cardioversion versus electrical cardioversion and studying the relationship of the amount of electrical energy required for cardioversion versus the duration of stunning would be clinical research projects of interest to clinicians.