The induction of ovulation with pulsatile gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) administration in hyperandrogenic women after down-regulation with buserelin or suppression with an oral contraceptive

Pulsatile gonadotrophin releasing hormone for ovulation induction in subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND

In normal menstrual cycles, gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion is pulsatile, with intervals of 60-120 minutes in the follicular phase. Treatment with pulsatile GnRH infusion by the intravenous or subcutaneous route using a portable pump has been used successfully in patients with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. Assuming that the results would be similar in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), pulsatile GnRH has been used to induce ovulation in these women. Although ovulation and pregnancy have been achieved, the effectiveness of pulsatile GnRH in women with PCOS has not been clearly demonstrated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of pulsatile GnRH administration in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), in terms of ongoing pregnancy, ovulation, clinical pregnancy, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), multiple pregnancy, miscarriage, and multifollicular growth.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders & Subfertility Group trials register (searched 13 August 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Cochrane Library Issue 2, August 2001), MEDLINE (January 1966 to August 2003), EMBASE (January 1985 to August 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All relevant published randomised clinical trials were selected for inclusion if treatment consisted of pulsatile GnRH administration versus another treatment for ovulation induction in subfertile women with PCOS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Relevant data were extracted independently by two reviewers (NB, MW). Validity was assessed in terms of method of randomisation, completeness of follow-up, presence or absence of crossover and co-intervention. All trials were screened and analysed for predetermined quality criteria.

DATA SYNTHESIS

2X2 tables were generated for all the relevant outcomes. Odds ratios were generated using the Peto method.

MAIN RESULTS

Four randomised clinical trials involving 57 women were identified comparing four different treatments: GnRH versus HMG, GnRH and FSH versus FSH, GnRH following pretreatment with GnRH agonist (GnRHa) versus GnRH only, GnRH following pretreatment with GnRHa versus clomiphene citrate. This means that there was only one trial in any one comparison. In two studies, data of pre- and post-crossover were not described separately. All trials were small and of too short duration to show any significant differences in pregnancy results. The odds ratio for ongoing pregnancy, only described in one trial, was 7.5 (95% CI 0.44 to 127) in the comparison GnRH following pretreatment with GnRHa versus GnRH only in favour of the first group. Multiple pregnancies were not seen. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was seen only in women allocated to ovulation induction with HMG.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The four trials describing four different comparisons with a short follow up (1 to 3 cycles) were too small to either prove or discard the value of pulsatile GnRH treatment in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Pulsatile luteinising hormone releasing hormone for ovulation induction in subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND

In normal menstrual cycles, gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion is pulsatile, with intervals of 60-120 minutes in the follicular phase. Treatment with pulsatile GnRH infusion by the intra-venous or subcutaneous route using a portable pump has been used successfully in patients with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. Assuming that the results would be similar in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), pulsatile GnRH has been used to induce ovulation in patients with PCOS. But, although ovulation and pregnancy has been achieved, the use of pulsatile GnRH in PCOS patients is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of pulsatile GnRH administration in women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), in terms of ovulation induction, pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).

SEARCH STRATEGY

The search strategy of the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility review group was used to identify all relevant trials. Please see Review Group details.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All relevant published RCTs were selected. Non-randomised controlled trials were eligible for inclusion if treatment consisted of GnRH administration versus another treatment to induce ovulation in subfertile women with PCOS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A computerised MEDLINE and EMBASE search was used to identify randomised and non randomised controlled trials. The reference lists of all studies found were checked for relevant articles. One RCT (Bringer 1985a) and one abstract (Coelingh 1983) were identified this way. Relevant data were extracted independently by two reviewers (NB, MW). Validity was assessed in terms of method of randomization, completeness of follow-up, presence or absence of cross-over and co-intervention. All trials were screened and analysed for predetermined quality criteria.

DATA SYNTHESIS

2X2 tables were generated for all the relevant outcomes. Odds ratios were generated using the Peto modified Mantel-Haenszel technique.

MAIN RESULTS

Three RCTs and one non-randomised comparative trial were identified comparing four different treatments: GnRH versus HMG, GnRH following GnRHa pre-treatment versus no pre-treatment, GnRH and FSH versus FSH, and GnRH following GnRHa pre-treatment versus GnRH following oral contraceptive pre-treatment. This means that there was only one trial in any one comparison. In the first two studies, data of pre- and post-cross-over were not described separately. Therefore, these results could not be included in the MetaView analysis. The odds ratio for ovulation rate was 16 (95 % CI: 1.1-239) in the study comparing GnRH and FSH with FSH. When GnRH after GnRHa pre-treatment was compared with GnRH after oral contraceptive pre-treatment, an odds ratio of 7.5 (95 % CI: 1.2-46) was obtained. All trials were small and of too short duration to show any significance in pregnancy results. Per study only one to four pregnancies occurred. Multiple pregnancies were not seen. OHSS was seen only in the patients stimulated with HMG.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The four trials describing four different comparisons with a short follow up (1 to 3 cycles) were too small to either prove or discard the value of pulsatile GnRH treatment in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Use of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists in polycystic ovary syndrome

Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists have been used in conjunction with gonadotrophins, and occasionally with pulsatile LHRH, for ovulation induction in women with clomiphene-citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and also for superovulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) and gamete intrafallopian transfer in women with PCOS. In IVF, LHRH agonists given by the 'long protocol' before gonadotrophins are commenced have consistently shown higher pregnancy rates and higher live birth rates. Although the optimal time to commence LHRH agonist is not clearly determined, commencement in the early follicular phase possibly with pre-treatment with the combined oral contraceptive pill would avoid the risk of inadvertent administration during early pregnancy. The role of LHRH agonists in ovulation induction is less clear cut, although there may be some advantages in patients with refractory PCOS. The role of LHRH agonists in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and recurrent miscarriage is also discussed.

From physiology to clinics--20 years of experience with pulsatile GnRH

The physiological and the pathophysiological basis of unvariant pulsatile administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) as well as the clinical results are reviewed. Pulsatile administration of GnRH not only proved to be a very effective treatment mode but also became an important tool for research in the central control of pituitary and ovarian function under normal and disease conditions.