First established pregnancy and birth after ovarian stimulation with recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (Org 32489)

Follicle-stimulating hormone in clinical practice: an update

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), a glycoprotein produced by the anterior pituitary gland, plays an important role in the regulation of fertility in both men and women. FSH is used clinically to treat women with anovulatory infertility, for controlled ovarian stimulation in women being treated with assisted reproductive technologies (ART), and in the treatment of male hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. Urine-derived gonadotropin preparations containing variable amounts of FSH together with urinary proteins have been available for many years. More recently, FSH preparations produced using recombinant DNA technology have become available. Recombinant FSH has a high specific activity, high purity, and guaranteed consistency among batches. Two recombinant FSH preparations have been available for clinical use for some years: follitropin-alpha and follitropin-beta. The continuing development of recombinant FSH has recently resulted in a new presentation (follitropin-alpha filled by mass [FbM]). This product can be filled by mass (microg) with an activity (IU), reflecting exceptional consistency as a result of refinement and improvement in the manufacturing process, allowing the clinician to deliver a guaranteed dose of FSH. Experience with recombinant FSH in the treatment of male hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism is limited, but the available data suggest that recombinant FSH has a similar efficacy to urine-derived preparations (urofollitropin). In patients with WHO group I anovulatory infertility, the use of recombinant FSH to stimulate follicular development is effective and well tolerated. In patients with WHO group II anovulation, protocols based on recombinant FSH are more effective than conventional protocols using urofollitropin. Comparative studies and a meta-analysis have shown that recombinant FSH is more effective than urofollitropin for controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing ART. Pharmacoeconomic modeling indicates that follitropin-alpha is more cost effective than urofollitropin in a range of different healthcare systems. The available evidence from comparative studies of the two recombinant FSH preparations suggests that follitropin-alpha may have an advantage over follitropin-beta in terms of efficacy. Follitropin-alpha is superior to follitropin-beta in terms of local tolerability. Recent preliminary studies suggest an efficacy advantage for follitropin-alpha FbM compared with standard follitropin-alpha. The FbM presentation appears to represent an advance on standard preparations of recombinant FSH in terms of consistency and clinical efficacy.

Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone: a scientific step to clinical improvement

Urinary-derived follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) preparations have been used clinically for many years. Although effective, these have a number of disadvantages, not least of which is their variable composition. The availability of recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH), produced from CHO cells, with its constant composition and exceptionally high purity, has, therefore, aroused great interest. This review focuses on the use of r-hFSH for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology protocols and the treatment of World Health Organization Group I and II anovulation. The use of r-hFSH has been shown to lead to improvements in efficacy over urinary-derived preparations, particularly in assisted reproductive treatment, and a recent meta-analysis has shown higher ongoing pregnancy rates with the recombinant product. Although the two available recombinant products from CHO cells (follitropin alpha [Gonal-F((R))] and beta [Puregon((R))]) are similar from a physicochemical perspective, some minor advantages have been reported for follitropin alpha in relation to pregnancy rates and better local tolerance to injections. The apparent higher bioactivity of r-hFSH has led to reduced total FSH consumption over shorter treatment periods compared with conventional preparations, thus reducing overall exposure for patients. This is likely to confer not only safety benefits, but also cost-effectiveness as demonstrated through pharmaco-economic modelling.

A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in three different in vitro fertilization protocols

OBJECTIVE

To compare the following IVF protocols: a short protocol and long protocols starting on day 2 or day 21. All protocols used recombinant FSH (rFSH) for ovarian stimulation.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

An assisted reproduction unit at a university center.

PATIENT(S)

Patients undergoing IVF (n = 150) were treated according to one of the three treatment protocols allocated by a random method.

INTERVENTION(S)

All patients used buserelin acetate and rFSH. Patients began the long protocol on day 2 (group 1) or day 21 (group 2) of the cycle. Patients in group 3 began the short protocol on day 2 of the cycle.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Ovarian response, implantation rates, and pregnancy rates (PRs).

RESULT(S)

Patients treated with the short protocol (group 3) were stimulated in a shorter time, required less rFSH, and achieved higher E(2) levels. The numbers of follicles, oocytes, and embryos were similar in all three groups. The implantation rates were similar in groups 1 and 2 (11.8% and 13.3%, respectively), and both were higher than in group 3 (4.1%). Clinical PRs per oocytes retrieved were 19.6%, 18.6%, and 8.3% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSION(S)

The implantation rate was significantly higher with the long protocols than with the short protocol, with a tendency for a higher PR as well.