A randomized prospective study of gonadotrophin with or without gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist for treatment of unexplained infertility

The definition of unexplained infertility: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on tests required to either diagnose unexplained infertility or use for research inclusion criteria. This leads to heterogeneity and bias affecting meta-analysis and best practice advice.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review analyses the variability of inclusion criteria applied to couples with unexplained infertility. We propose standardised criteria for use both in future research studies and clinical diagnosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

CINAHL and MEDLINE online databases were searched up to November 2022 for all published studies recruiting couples with unexplained infertility, available in full text in the English language.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected in an Excel spreadsheet. Results were analysed per category and methodology or reference range.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 375 relevant studies, only 258 defined their inclusion criteria. The most commonly applied inclusion criteria were semen analysis, tubal patency and assessment of ovulation in 220 (85%), 232 (90%), 205 (79.5%) respectively. Only 87/220 (39.5%) studies reporting semen analysis used the World Health Organization (WHO) limits. Tubal patency was accepted if bilateral in 145/232 (62.5%) and if unilateral in 24/232 (10.3%). Ovulation was assessed using mid-luteal serum progesterone in 115/205 (56.1%) and by a history of regular cycles in 87/205 (42.4%). Other criteria, including uterine cavity assessment and hormone profile, were applied in less than 50% of included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the heterogeneity among studied populations with unexplained infertility. Development and application of internationally accepted criteria will improve the quality of research and future clinical care.

Agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in ovulatory women with infertility

BACKGROUND

Intrauterine insemination (IUI), combined with ovarian stimulation (OS), has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for infertile couples. Several agents for ovarian stimulation, combined with IUI, have been proposed, but it is still not clear which agents for stimulation are the most effective. This is an update of the review, first published in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination in infertile ovulatory women.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and two trial registers from their inception to November 2020. We performed reference checking and contacted study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included truly randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different agents for ovarian stimulation combined with IUI for infertile ovulatory women concerning couples with unexplained infertility. mild male factor infertility and minimal to mild endometriosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

In this updated review, we have included a total of 82 studies, involving 12,614 women. Due to the multitude of comparisons between different agents for ovarian stimulation, we highlight the seven most often reported here. Gonadotropins versus anti-oestrogens (13 studies) For live birth, the results of five studies were pooled and showed a probable improvement in the cumulative live birth rate for gonadotropins compared to anti-oestrogens (odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.79; I² = 30%; 5 studies, 1924 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following anti-oestrogens is assumed to be 22.8%, the chance following gonadotropins would be between 23.7% and 34.6%. The pooled effect of seven studies revealed that we are uncertain whether gonadotropins lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared with anti-oestrogens (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.60 to 4.17; I² = 58%; 7 studies, 2139 participants; low-certainty evidence). Aromatase inhibitors versus anti-oestrogens (8 studies) One study reported live birth rates for this comparison. We are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors improve live birth rate compared with anti-oestrogens (OR 0.75, CI 95% 0.51 to 1.11; 1 study, 599 participants; low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following anti-oestrogens is 23.4%, the chance following aromatase inhibitors would be between 13.5% and 25.3%. The results of pooling four studies revealed that we are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors compared with anti-oestrogens lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate (OR 1.28, CI 95% 0.61 to 2.68; I² = 0%; 4 studies, 1000 participants; low-certainty evidence).  Gonadotropins with GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) agonist versus gonadotropins alone (4 studies) No data were available for live birth. The pooled effect of two studies  revealed that we are uncertain whether gonadotropins with GnRH agonist lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared to gonadotropins alone (OR 2.53, 95% CI 0.82 to 7.86; I² = 0; 2 studies, 264 participants; very low-certainty evidence).  Gonadotropins with GnRH antagonist versus gonadotropins alone (14 studies) Three studies reported live birth rate per couple, and we are uncertain whether gonadotropins with GnRH antagonist improve live birth rate compared to gonadotropins (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.52 to 4.39; I² = 81%; 3 studies, 419 participants; very low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of a live birth following gonadotropins alone is 25.7%, the chance following gonadotropins combined with GnRH antagonist would be between 15.2% and 60.3%. We are also uncertain whether gonadotropins combined with GnRH antagonist lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared with gonadotropins alone (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.28; I² = 0%; 10 studies, 2095 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Gonadotropins with anti-oestrogens versus gonadotropins alone (2 studies) Neither of the studies reported data for live birth rate. We are uncertain whether gonadotropins combined with anti-oestrogens lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared with gonadotropins alone, based on one study (OR 3.03, 95% CI 0.12 to 75.1; 1 study, 230 participants; low-certainty evidence). Aromatase inhibitors versus gonadotropins (6 studies) Two studies  revealed that aromatase inhibitors may decrease live birth rate compared with gonadotropins (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.71; I²=0%; 2 studies, 651 participants; low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of a live birth following gonadotropins alone is 31.9%,  the chance of live birth following aromatase inhibitors would be between 13.7% and 25%. We are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors compared with gonadotropins lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.06 to 8.17; I²=77%; 3 studies, 731 participants; very low-certainty evidence).  Aromatase inhibitors with gonadotropins versus anti-oestrogens with gonadotropins (8 studies) We are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors combined with gonadotropins improve live birth rate compared with anti-oestrogens plus gonadotropins (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.3 8 to 2.54;  I² = 69%; 3 studies, 708 participants; very low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of a live birth following anti-oestrogens plus gonadotropins is 13.8%, the chance following aromatase inhibitors plus gonadotropins would be between 5.7% and 28.9%. We are uncertain of the effect of aromatase inhibitors combined with gonadotropins compared to anti-oestrogens combined with gonadotropins on multiple pregnancy rate (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.39 to 4.37;  I² = 0%; 5 studies, 901 participants; low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available results, gonadotropins probably improve cumulative live birth rate compared with anti-oestrogens (moderate-certainty evidence). Gonadotropins may also improve cumulative live birth rate when compared with aromatase inhibitors (low-certainty evidence). From the available data, there is no convincing evidence that aromatase inhibitors lead to higher live birth rates compared to anti-oestrogens. None of the agents compared lead to significantly higher multiple pregnancy rates. Based on low-certainty evidence, there does not seem to be a role for different combined therapies, nor for adding GnRH agonists or GnRH antagonists in IUI programs.

Minimal stimulation using gonadotropin combined with clomiphene citrate or letrozole for intrauterine insemination

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of minimal stimulation using discretely administered gonadotropin combined with clomiphene citrate (CC) or letrozole (LTZ) for intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Total 257 IUI cycles from 158 infertile couples were assessed. A CC dose of 100 mg/day (n=126 cycles) or a LTZ dose of 5 mg/day (n=131 cycles) was administered on days 3-5 of the menstrual cycle for 5 days. Each group received human menopausal gonadotropin at a dose of 150 IU by two or three alternative day: CC combined with alternate-day regimen for 2 or 3 days (CC+300, n=37; CC+450, n=89) and LTZ combined with alternate-day regimen for 2 or 3 days (LTZ+300, n=36; LTZ+450, n=95).

RESULTS

The clinical pregnancy rate was comparable between the CC and LTZ groups (18.3% vs. 13.0%, p=0.243). The clinical pregnancy rate also showed no significant difference among the 4 groups (21.6% vs. 16.9% vs. 11.1% vs. 12.6%, p=0.507). The multiple pregnancy rate was significantly higher in LTZ compared to CC group (37.5% vs. 8.7%, p=0.028) and in the LTZ+450 compared to CC+450 group (50% vs. 13.3%, p=0.038). Overall, there were 15 cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), with the prevalence being significantly lower in the LTZ compared to CC group (1.5% vs. 10.3%, p=0.003). OHSS was more prevalent in the CC+450 compared to the LTZ+450 group (12.4% vs. 1.1%, p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that minimal stimulation using two alternate-day gonadotropin with LTZ decreases the development of OHSS and multiple pregnancies, while maintaining comparable pregnancy rates in IUI cycles.

Ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination at the quarter centennial: implications for the multiple births epidemic

Ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination (OS/IUI), a mainstay of current infertility therapy and a common antecedent to IVF, is a significant driver of the multiple births epidemic. Redress of this challenge, now marking its quarter centennial, will require a rethinking of current practice patterns. Herein we explore prospects for prevention, mitigation, and eventual resolution. We conclude that the multiple births attributable to OS/IUI may not be entirely preventable but that the outlook for their mitigation is promising, if in need of solidification. Specifically, we observe that low-dose (≤ 75 IU) gondotropin, clomiphene, and especially off-label letrozole regimens outperform high-dose (≥ 150 IU) gonadotropin counterparts in the gestational plurality category while maintaining comparable per-cycle pregnancy rates. Accordingly we recommend that, subject to appropriate exceptions, high-dose gonadotropin regimens be used sparingly and that whenever possible they be replaced with emerging alternatives. Finally, we posit that OS/IUI is not likely to be superseded by IVF absent further commoditization and thus greater affordability.

Prognostic value of serum progesterone and LH values on the day of hCG administration in IUI GnRH antagonist cycles

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the effect of LH surge and progesterone rise in IUI cycles under gonadotropin stimulation with GnRH antagonist coadministration on pregnancy rates (PR).

STUDY DESIGN

The population under study consisted of 152 women prospectively studied and subjected to IUI.

RESULTS

The higher the progesterone cutoff value, the lower the PR were 26.5% and 10.9% when the cutoff was 1 ng/mL, 26.0% and 8.6% when the cutoff was 1.2 ng/mL, 25.6% and 7.1% when the cutoff was 1.4 ng/mL and 25.3% and 0% when the cutoff was 1.6 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

In IUI cycles under GnRH antagonist coadministration, serum progesterone levels over 1.0 ng/mL are associated with lower PR, the higher the progesterone levels, the lower the PR.

Ovarian stimulation protocols (anti-oestrogens, gonadotrophins with and without GnRH agonists/antagonists) for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in women with subfertility

BACKGROUND

Intrauterine insemination (IUI) combined with ovarian hyperstimulation (OH) has been demonstrated to be an effective form of treatment for subfertile couples. Several ovarian stimulation protocols combined with IUI have been proposed, but it is still not clear which stimulation protocol and which dose is the most cost-effective.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate ovarian stimulation protocols for intrauterine insemination for all indications.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched for all publications which described randomised controlled trials comparing different ovarian stimulation protocols followed by IUI. We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's Central register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). We searched the electronic databases of MEDLINE (January 1966 to present) and EMBASE (1980 to present).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials only were considered for inclusion in this review. Trials comparing different ovarian stimulation protocols combined with IUI were selected and reviewed in detail.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent review authors independently assess trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty three trials involving 3957 women were included. There were 11 comparisons in this review. Pregnancy rates are reported here since results of live birth rates were lacking. Seven studies (n = 556) were pooled comparing gonadotrophins with anti-oestrogens showing significant higher pregnancy rates with gonadotrophins (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.7). Five studies (n = 313) compared anti-oestrogens with aromatase inhibitors reporting no significant difference (OR 1.2 95% CI 0.64 to 2.1). The same could be concluded comparing different types of gonadotrophins (9 studies included, n = 576). Four studies (n = 391) reported the effect of adding a GnRH agonist which did not improve pregnancy rates (OR 0.98 95% CI 0.6 to 1.6), although it resulted in significant higher multiple pregnancy rates (OR 2.9 95% CI 1.0 to 8). Data of three studies (n = 299) showed no convincing evidence of adding a GnRH antagonist to gonadotrophins (OR 1.5 95% CI 0.83 to 2.8). The results of two studies (n = 297) reported no evidence of benefit in doubling the dose of gonadotrophins (OR 1.2 95% 0.67 to 1.9) although the multiple pregnancy rates and OHSS rates were increased. For the remaining five comparisons only one or none studies were included.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Robust evidence is lacking but based on the available results gonadotrophins might be the most effective drugs when IUI is combined with ovarian hyperstimulation. When gonadotrophins are applied it might be done on a daily basis. When gonadotrophins are used for ovarian stimulation low dose protocols are advised since pregnancy rates do not differ from pregnancy rates which result from high dose regimen, whereas the chances to encounter negative effects from ovarian stimulation such as multiples and OHSS are limited with low dose gonadotrophins. Further research is needed for each comparison made.

Effect of GnRH antagonists in FSH mildly stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles: a multicentre randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The usefulness of GnRH antagonists in mild controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles is debated.

METHODS

Two-hundred and ninety-nine couples with unexplained or mild male factor infertility were enrolled in this international multicentre randomized controlled trial. Women allocated to the GnRH antagonist group (n=148) received 50 IU recombinant FSH starting on day 3 of the menstrual cycle and Ganirelix 0.25 mg daily starting from the day in which a follicle with a mean diameter of 13-14 mm was visualized at ultrasound. Women allocated to the control group (n=151) were administered only 50 IU recombinant FSH starting on day 3 of the menstrual cycle. Couples were recruited only for their first treatment cycle. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. Clinical pregnancy rates per initiated cycle in women who did and did not receive GnRH antagonists were 12.2 and 12.6%, respectively (P=1.00). The relative risk of conception (95% confidence interval) for the use of GnRH antagonists was 1.0 (0.5-1.9).

CONCLUSIONS

In mild COH and IUI cycles, any benefit of the use of GnRH antagonists in improving pregnancy rates is <2-fold increase.

GnRH antagonist-induced inhibition of the premature LH surge increases pregnancy rates in IUI-stimulated cycles. A prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Our prospective randomized controlled trial was designed to assess whether the use of GnRH antagonists can improve the success rate of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS)/intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatments, via inhibition of the premature LH rise.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients were randomly divided, using a randomization list, into two groups: in group A (n = 52), recombinant FSH (rFSH) was given with GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix, and in group B (n = 52), the patients received rFSH alone in a manner similar to that of group A. The primary outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate per couple.

RESULTS

The pregnancy rate per patient was 53.8% in group A and 30.8% in group B (P = 0.017). The rate of premature LH surge was 7% in group A and 35% in group B (P < 0.0001). A premature luteinization was observed in two cycles of 144 in group A (1.4%) and in 16 cycles of 154 in group B (10.4%) (P = 0.001). The mean values of LH and progesterone were significantly lower in patients receiving GnRH antagonist than in those who did not (3.3 +/- 3.3 mIU/ml in group A versus 9.9 +/- 7.9 mIU/ml in group B, P < 0.0001, for LH; 1.3 +/- 1.1 ng/ml versus 2.1 +/- 1.9 ng/ml for group A and B, respectively, P < 0.0001, for progesterone).

CONCLUSION

The use of GnRH antagonist in COS/IUI cycles improves pregnancy rate, preventing the premature LH rise and luteinization.

Treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix prevents premature LH rises and luteinization in stimulated intrauterine insemination: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial*

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to assess whether the use of ganirelix in women undergoing stimulated IUI could prevent the occurrence of premature LH rises and luteinization (LH+progesterone rises).

METHODS

Women of infertile couples, diagnosed with unexplained or male factor infertility, were randomized to receive either ganirelix (n=103) or placebo (n=100) in a double-blind design. All women were treated with an individualized, low-dose rFSH regimen started on day 2-3 of cycle. Ganirelix (0.25 mg/day) was started if one or more follicles>or=14 mm were visualized. Ovulation was triggered by HCG injection when at least one follicle>or=18 mm was observed and a single IUI was performed 34-42 h later. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of premature LH rises (+/-progesterone rise).

RESULTS

In the ganirelix group, four subjects had a premature LH rise (value>or=10 IU/l), one LH rise prior to the start of ganirelix and three LH rises during ganirelix treatment, whereas in the placebo group 28 subjects had a premature LH rise, six subjects prior to the start of placebo and 22 subjects during placebo treatment. The incidence of LH rises was significantly lower in ganirelix cycles compared to placebo cycles (3.9 versus 28.0%; P=0.003 for ITT analysis). When excluding subjects with an LH value>or=10 IU/l before the start of ganirelix/placebo the incidence of LH rises was also significantly lower in ganirelix cycles compared to placebo cycles (2.9 versus 23.4%; P=0.003 for ITT analysis). Premature luteinization (LH rise with concomitant progesterone rise>or=1 ng/ml) was observed in one subject in the ganirelix group and in 17 subjects in the placebo group of which three subjects had a premature spontaneous ovulation. Ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 12.6 and 12.0% for the ganirelix and placebo groups respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with ganirelix effectively prevents premature LH rises, luteinization in subjects undergoing stimulated IUI. Low-dose rFSH regimen combined with a GnRH antagonist may be an alternative treatment option for subjects with previous proven luteinization or in subjects who would otherwise require insemination when staff are not working.

A prospective randomized study comparing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists or gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in couples with unexplained infertility and/or mild oligozoospermia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of GnRH antagonist vs. GnRH agonist administration for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in assisted reproduction.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized trial.

SETTING

Clinical research unit at a tertiary care medical center.

PATIENT(S)

Sixty-five patients with unexplained infertility or mild male subfertility undergoing COH for IUI.

INTERVENTION(S)

Twenty-nine women (group A) were randomized to receive 600 microg of busereline acetate per day starting in the midluteal phase of the cycle (long protocol), whereas 36 women (group B) were treated with 0.25 mg/d of the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix starting from day 6 of the cycle. The starting dose of recombinant FSH was 150 IU in women of both groups. Insemination was performed 34 hours after hCG injection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical and successful ongoing pregnancy rate (PR), measurements of serum FSH, LH, E2, and P, number of recruited follicles, duration of stimulation period, and amount of gonadotropins used.

RESULT(S)

Women in group A required significantly more days of treatment (median: 12.0 vs. 9.0) and significantly more total units of recombinant FSH (median 1,800 vs. 1,550) as compared with the corresponding values of the antagonist group (group B). Serum FSH, LH, E2, and P were significantly higher on the antagonist group on days 2 and 6 of stimulation. However, these differences regress until the day of hCG administration.

CONCLUSION(S)

The GnRH antagonists have facilitated short and simple treatment, and are particularly attractive for administration in women undergoing COH, achieving comparable PR with the long protocol regimen.

Increased progesterone/estradiol ratio in the late follicular phase could be related to low ovarian reserve in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles with a long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist

OBJECTIVE

To gain insight into the physiologic as well as the clinical significance of premature luteinization in the long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) cycles and to evaluate whether it may be a manifestation of low ovarian reserve.

DESIGN

Prospective evaluation.

SETTING

A university-affiliated reproductive medicine unit.

PATIENT(S)

Seventy-six consecutive infertile women.

INTERVENTION(S)

The long GnRH-a protocol was used for IVF-ET treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Women in the study were prospectively evaluated in their first cycle of treatment and were divided into those with (study group) or without premature luteinization (control group). Premature luteinization was defined as P/E2 ratio of more than 1 on the day of hCG administration.

RESULTS(S)

Thirty-one (41%) of the women in the study demonstrated premature luteinization. Patients' characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Late follicular P/E2 ratio was significantly and considerably higher in the study as compared to the control group, 2.4 +/- 1.7 and 0.7 +/- 0.2, respectively. Ovarian reserve parameters including day 3 FSH, E2 level on hCG day, total amount of hMG, number of follicles, oocytes, and embryos were significantly inferior in the study as compared to the control group. P levels on hCG day were significantly higher in the study as compared to the control group, 1.9 +/- 0.7 ng/mL and 1.2 +/- 0.6 ng/mL, respectively. However, LH levels on hCG day did not differ between the groups, 1.4 +/- 0.7 mIU/mL and 1.2 +/- 0.7 mIU/mL, respectively. The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the premature luteinization group as opposed to controls, 13% and 42%, respectively.

CONCLUSION(S)

Premature luteinization, defined as late follicular P/E2 >1, in long GnRH-a cycles seems to adversely affect clinical outcome. Our findings in this setting support the notion that premature luteinization could be related to low ovarian reserve and that this manifestation is not necessarily an LH-dependent event.

Low-dose exogenous FSH initiated during the early, mid or late follicular phase can induce multiple dominant follicle development

This prospective, randomized trial in normo-ovulatory women was designed to test whether administration of low-dose exogenous FSH initiated during the early, mid to late follicular phase can induce multiple dominant follicle development. Forty normal weight women (age 19-35 years, cycle length 25-32 days) participated. A fixed dose (75 IU/day) of recombinant FSH was started on either cycle day 3 (n = 13), 5 (n = 13) or 7 (n = 14) until the induction of ovulation with human chorionic gonadotrophin. Frequent transvaginal ultrasound scans and blood sampling were performed. Multifollicular growth occurred in all groups (overall in 60%), although day 7 starters showed less multifollicular growth. Age, cycle length and initial FSH and inhibin B concentrations were similar between subjects with single or multiple follicle development. However, for all women the lower the body mass index (BMI), the more follicles emerged (r = -0.44, P = 0.007). If multifollicular growth occurred, the length of the luteal phase was reduced (P = 0.002) and midluteal serum concentrations of LH (P = 0.03) and FSH (P = 0.004) were decreased and oestradiol (P = 0.002) and inhibin A (P = 0.01) were increased. In conclusion, interference with decremental serum FSH concentrations by administration of low dose FSH starting on cycle day 3, 5 or as late as day 7, is capable of disrupting single dominant follicle selection. The role of BMI in determining ovarian response suggests that differences in pharmacokinetics of exogenous FSH are involved. Multifollicular growth per se has a distinct effect on luteal phase characteristics. These observations may be relevant for the design of mild ovarian stimulation protocols.

Preferred treatment of infertile women older than 37 years of age who demonstrate premature luteinization in the first evaluation cycle

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of various treatments in abolishing premature luteinization in infertile women over 37 years old who are undergoing ovulation induction.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized study.

SETTING

Tertiary care medical clinic.

PATIENT(S)

Seventeen infertile women >37 years old in whom premature luteinization was detected during their evaluation (pretreatment) cycle.

INTERVENTION(S)

The patients underwent three consecutive treatment cycles with clomiphene citrate (group A), hMG (group B), and a GnRH agonist plus hMG (group C).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Premature luteinization, defined as a progesterone/E2 ratio of >1 on the day of hCG administration.

RESULT(S)

Fifteen (88%) of the 17 patients in group A and 13 (76%) of the 17 patients in group B demonstrated premature luteinization. In contrast, only 1 (6%) of the 17 patients in group C had a progesterone/E2 ratio of >1 on the day of hCG administration. The mean (+/-SD) E2 level on the day of hCG administration was significantly higher in group C (1.236 +/- 772.7 pg/mL) than in group A (214.02 +/- 104.46 pg/mL) or group B (412.5 +/- 337 pg/mL).

CONCLUSION(S)

Pituitary desensitization with a GnRH agonist in conjunction with hMG may be of benefit for older infertile women who demonstrate early luteinization in their first evaluation cycle.

Prediction of over-response to ovarian stimulation in an intrauterine insemination programme

Prediction of poor-response is of equal importance to prediction of over-response in intrauterine insemination programmes. The gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) stimulation test (GAST) was assessed as a predictor of over-response to ovarian stimulation in 81 patients. Blood samples were taken on cycle day 2 (before and 24 h after starting the GnRHa). Day 2 and 3 samples were assayed for oestradiol, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to assess age, day 2 FSH, day 2 FSH/LH, oestradiol ratio (oestradiol on day 3/oestradiol on day 2) and FSH ratio (FSH on day 3/FSH on day 2) as predictors of the number of follicles (total and > or = 14 mm), oestradiol on HCG day, and clinical pregnancy rate as appropriate. Several parameters were also compared between the patients who produced < or = 3 (> or = 14 mm) follicles (group A) and those who produced >3 (> or = 14 mm) follicles (group B). The mean +/- SEM age of the patients in the study was 32 +/- 0.4 years. The mean total dose of recombinant FSH was 800 +/- 20 IU and the mean duration of stimulation was 7.6 +/- 0.2 days. Nine (11%) and 12 (15%) patients were cancelled for poor and over-response respectively. The oestradiol ratio was significantly positively correlated with oestradiol on HCG day (P < 0.001), and with the number of mature follicles (> or = 14 mm) (P = 0.01). Age, day 2 FSH and FSH ratio were not significantly correlated with oestradiol on HCG day, total follicles and follicles > or = 14 mm. None of the above-mentioned variables was correlated with clinical pregnancy rate. Group A had significantly lower oestradiol ratio (P = 0.007), longer duration of stimulation (P = 0.002), higher total FSH dose (P = 0.001), and lower oestradiol on HCG day (P = 0.001). GAST is therefore useful in predicting the high responders to gonadotrophin stimulation.

Early resort to ovarian stimulation improves the cost-effectiveness of a donor insemination programme

Women undergoing donor insemination (DI) are usually regularly ovulating, therefore the role of ovulation induction in this modality of treatment has been controversial. Some recent studies reported higher pregnancy rates in stimulated cycles in comparison with natural cycles. We employed a sequential step-up protocol in which treatment was started in a natural cycle, continued with a clomiphene citrate-stimulated cycle, and finished with an ovulation induction cycle. The patients were allowed three attempts at each step before moving to the next if conception did not occur. The aim of this protocol was to enhance the cost-effectiveness of the DI programme by increasing the cycle fecundability. A total of 101 patients underwent 216 cycles of DI, including 44 patients in 80 natural cycles, 38 patients in 89 CC-stimulated cycles, and 19 patients in 47 ovulation induction cycles. The clinical pregnancy rate per started cycle (CPR/C) and per patient during this period was 14% and 30% respectively. The pregnancy rates per started cycle and per patient in the natural, CC-stimulated and ovulation induction cycles were: 13 and 32%, 10 and 18%, and 21 and 53% respectively. There was no significant difference in the CPR/C in the three groups; however, the CPR per patient in the induced ovulation cycles was significantly higher than in the CC-stimulated cycles (P = 0.005). Only one patient during this period had a multiple pregnancy in the ovulation induction group, giving an overall multiple pregnancy of 3%. By using this treatment strategy, we achieved a high clinical pregnancy rate, a low multiple pregnancy rate and a low cost of treatment per pregnancy.

The management of unexplained infertility

Unexplained infertility is a diagnosis made by exclusion after all of the standard investigations have revealed no abnormality (1). The range of the prevalence is from 6 to 60 percent (23), depending on the diagnostic criteria. This article reviews the literature in the management of unexplained infertility; published data suggest no benefit of danazol or bromocriptine. The empirical use of clomiphene citrate suggests that ovarian stimulation using clomiphene citrate can double the spontaneous pregnancy rate (52, 58, 59). Induction of ovulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG) yields an overall pregnancy rate between 2 and 26 percent per cycle (68, 74). These results seem to be lower than those reported for in vitro fertilization (IVF) or gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) procedures in similar patients (25-30 percent (92, 95)). Based on the literature, a rational treatment plan for treating infertility in couples with unexplained infertility includes up to four cycles of clomiphene citrate with or without intrauterine insemination (IUI). Superovulation with hMG and IUI or stimulated intrauterine insemination (SIUI) is the next step for three-cycle treatments and if unsuccessful, one of the variants of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) should be considered.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader will understand the appropriate tests and work up for unexplained infertility, the various treatment options for the unexplained infertility couple including which drugs are effective and not effective, and to be able to outline an appropriate treatment plan for such patients.

Premature luteinization: could it be an early manifestation of low ovarian reserve?

OBJECTIVE

To gain insight into the physiologic significance of premature luteinization and to evaluate whether it could be a manifestation of low ovarian reserve.

DESIGN

Retrospective evaluation.

SETTING

Reproductive medicine unit.

PATIENT(S)

Thirty-one consecutively seen women with normal ovulation and unexplained infertility.

INTERVENTION(S)

Induction of superovulation with hMG coupled with synchronized IUI. A GnRH agonist was not used during the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Premature luteinization was defined as a progesterone/estradiol ratio of > 1 on the day of hCG administration. Patients were evaluated during their first cycles of hMG treatment and then were divided into those with (study group) and those without (control group) premature luteinization. The ovarian reserve parameters were compared between the two groups.

RESULT(S)

Nineteen of the 31 patients with unexplained infertility demonstrated premature luteinization. Patient characteristics were similar between the study and control groups. Mean (+/- SD) day 3 FSH levels were 8.2 +/- 3.3 and 6.6 +/- 1.7 mIU/mL in the study and control groups, respectively. Mean (+/- SD) day 3 estradiol levels were significantly higher in the study than in the control group (74 +/- 49 pg/mL vs. 30 +/- 17 pg/mL, respectively). Mean (+/- SD) estradiol levels on the day of hCG administration also differed significantly between the study and control groups (760 +/- 539 pg/mL vs. 1,568 +/- 675 pg/mL, respectively). Likewise, the number of follicles that were > or = 15 mm on the day of hCG administration was significantly lower in the study than in the control group (2.9 +/- 1.5 vs. 4.3 +/- 1.3, respectively). The total dose of hMG and duration of administration were similar in the two groups. The clinical pregnancy rates after four cycles of treatment were 15.8% and 41.7% in the study and control groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION(S)

This preliminary work suggests that, in cycles that are not treated with a GnRH agonist, signs of premature luteinization in patients with unexplained infertility could be an early manifestation of low ovarian reserve. It appears that hMG treatment in this group of patients could uncover the pathogenesis of their infertility.