Calcium binding and conformation of regulatory light chains of smooth muscle myosin of scallop

Invertebrate muscles: thin and thick filament structure; molecular basis of contraction and its regulation, catch and asynchronous muscle

This is the second in a series of canonical reviews on invertebrate muscle. We cover here thin and thick filament structure, the molecular basis of force generation and its regulation, and two special properties of some invertebrate muscle, catch and asynchronous muscle. Invertebrate thin filaments resemble vertebrate thin filaments, although helix structure and tropomyosin arrangement show small differences. Invertebrate thick filaments, alternatively, are very different from vertebrate striated thick filaments and show great variation within invertebrates. Part of this diversity stems from variation in paramyosin content, which is greatly increased in very large diameter invertebrate thick filaments. Other of it arises from relatively small changes in filament backbone structure, which results in filaments with grossly similar myosin head placements (rotating crowns of heads every 14.5 nm) but large changes in detail (distances between heads in azimuthal registration varying from three to thousands of crowns). The lever arm basis of force generation is common to both vertebrates and invertebrates, and in some invertebrates this process is understood on the near atomic level. Invertebrate actomyosin is both thin (tropomyosin:troponin) and thick (primarily via direct Ca(++) binding to myosin) filament regulated, and most invertebrate muscles are dually regulated. These mechanisms are well understood on the molecular level, but the behavioral utility of dual regulation is less so. The phosphorylation state of the thick filament associated giant protein, twitchin, has been recently shown to be the molecular basis of catch. The molecular basis of the stretch activation underlying asynchronous muscle activity, however, remains unresolved.

Theoretical estimation of the calcium-binding constants for proteins from the troponin C superfamily based on a secondary structure prediction method. I. Estimation procedure

Proteins belonging to the TNC superfamily are known to be built of two, three, four, or six domains of closely similar amino acid sequences. Each domain binds no more than one calcium ion and shows a characteristic helix-loop-helix structure when in the calcium-bound state. Conformational properties of all the domains known so far have been analysed by us using a secondary structure prediction method (Garnier, J., Osguthorpe, D.J. & Robson, B. (1978). J. molec. Biol. 120, 97). Significant differences in distribution of residues predicted as being in the helical, beta-turn, and coil conformations have been found between the strongly, weakly, and non-binding domains. We could determine the ideal prediction pattern characteristic for the domains with the highest affinity for calcium. On the basis of our analysis and observations made by other authors we worked out a few simple rules which made it possible to compare conformational properties of a given domain with the ideal reference pattern and estimate, in this way, the Ca2+-binding constant of the domain. In native proteins the domains are known to be organized in pairs. The Ca2+-binding constant for a two-domain region could be evaluated from the sum of the estimation points attributed to each of its components. Using our method it is possible to predict the binding constants of typical domains and two-domain regins with a precision of one order of magnitude. Data on amino acid sequences and calcium-binding constants of all known proteins, believed to be the members of the TNC superfamily, have been reviewed. References to virtually all papers published on this subject before the end of 1987 are given.