Is there an elevated risk of brain cancer among physicians performing interventional radiology procedures?

Cancer Risks in U.S. Radiologic Technologists Working With Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures, 1994-2008

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine risks of cancer incidence and mortality among U.S. radiation technologists performing or assisting with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A nationwide prospective cohort of 90,957 radiologic technologists, who responded to a 1994-1998 survey that collected information on whether they had ever worked with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures, was followed through completion of a subsequent cohort survey during 2003-2005 (for cancer incidence) or December 31, 2008 (for cancer mortality). Sex-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were calculated by use of Cox proportional hazards models for incidence and mortality from all cancers other than nonmelanoma skin cancer and for specific cancer outcomes in participants who reported ever performing fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures compared with technologists who never performed these procedures.

RESULTS

The analysis showed an approximately twofold increased risk of brain cancer mortality (HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.48-4.40) and modest elevations in incidence of melanoma (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.05-1.61) and in breast cancer incidence (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02-1.32) but not mortality (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.69-1.66) among technologists who performed fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures compared with those who never performed these procedures. Although there was a small suggestive increase in incidence of all cancers combined, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00-1.17), mortality from all cancers combined, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers, was not elevated (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.88-1.14). We similarly observed no elevated risk of cancers of the thyroid, skin other than melanoma, prostate, lung, or colon and rectum or of leukemia that was not chronic lymphocytic leukemia among workers who performed fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures.

CONCLUSION

We observed elevated risks of brain cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma among technologists who performed fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. Although exposure to low-dose radiation is one possible explanation for these increased risks, these results may also be due to chance or unmeasured confounding by nonradiation risk factors. Our results must be confirmed in other studies, preferably with individual radiation dose data.

Historical review of occupational exposures and cancer risks in medical radiation workers

Epidemiological studies of medical radiation workers have found excess risks of leukemia, skin and female breast cancer in those employed before 1950 but little consistent evidence of cancer risk increases subsequently. Occupational radiation-related dose-response data and recent and lifetime cancer risk data are limited for radiologists and radiologic technologists and lacking for physicians and technologists performing fluoroscopically guided procedures. Survey data demonstrate that occupational doses to radiologists and radiologic technologists have declined over time. Eighty mostly small studies of cardiologists and fewer studies of other physicians reveal that effective doses to physicians per interventional procedure vary by more than an order of magnitude. For medical radiation workers, there is an urgent need to expand the limited information on average annual, time-trend and organ doses from occupational radiation exposures and to assess lifetime cancer risks of these workers. For physicians and technologists performing interventional procedures, more information about occupational doses should be collected and long-term follow-up studies of cancer and other serious disease risks should be initiated. Such studies will help optimize standardized protocols for radiologic procedures, determine whether current radiation protection measures for medical radiation workers are adequate, provide guidance on cancer screening needs, and yield valuable insights on cancer risks associated with chronic radiation exposure.

Risks and causes of hospitalizations among physicians in Taiwan

OBJECTIVES

To assess the causes and cause-specific risks of hospitalization among physicians in Taiwan.

DATA SOURCE

The data used in this study were retrieved from filed claims and registries of the National Health Insurance Research Database. A cohort of 33,380 physicians contracted with the national insurance program between 1997 and 2002 were linked to the information on the inpatient claim data for hospitalization.

STUDY DESIGN

The physicians' incidence density of hospitalization was compared with that of the general population, other health personnel, and nurses to compute the calendar year-, age-, and gender-standardized hospitalization ratios (SHRs). A multivariate log-linear model was also used to assess the effects of gender, age, type of contract, and specialty on the risks of hospitalization.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Compared with the general population, physicians experienced significantly reduced risks of all causes (SHR=54.5, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] 53.4-55.5) and all major cause-specific hospitalizations, especially mental disorders (SHR=6.9, 95 percent CI 5.8-8.4). On the other hand, compared with other health personnel, physicians had a small but significantly higher risk of all causes of hospitalization (SHR=107.8, 95 percent CI 105.1-110.6). Higher risks of hospitalization were also noted for neoplasms (SHR=108.9, 95 percent CI 102.0-116.3) and diseases of the respiratory system (SHR=114.2, 95 percent CI 107.3-121.5). In addition to the above diagnoses, physicians also had significantly higher risks for genitourinary and musculoskeletal system and connective tissue problems than nurses. Compared with their physician colleagues, female physicians, young (<30 years) and older (> or =60 years) physicians, and those working with the health institutions and programs were at elevated risks of hospitalization for all causes as well as for certain specific diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians in Taiwan are at higher risks of developing specific diseases compared with their allied health colleagues. As the health of physicians is vital to the quality of care, Taiwanese health policy analysts should recognize that increased patient volume and satisfaction with public health care should not be achieved at the expense of physicians' health.

Level of patient and operator dose in the largest cardiac centre in Greece

The objective of this study was to investigate the patient and staff doses in the most frequent interventional cardiology (IC) procedures performed in Onassio, the largest Cardiac Centre in Greece. Data were collected from three digital X-ray systems for 212 coronary angiographies, 203 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties (PTCA) and 134 various electrophysiological studies. Patient skin dose was measured using suitably calibrated slow radiotherapy films and cardiologist dose using suitably calibrated thermoluminescent dosemeters placed on left arm, hand and foot. Patient median dose area product (DAP) (all examinations) ranged between 6.7 and 83.5 Gy cm2. Patient median skin dose in PTCA was 799 mGy (320-1660 mGy) and in RF ablation 160 mGy (35-1920 mGy). Median arm, hand and foot dose to the cardiologist were 12.6, 27 and 13 microSv, respectively, per procedure. The great range of radiation doses received by both patients and operators confirms the need for continuous monitoring of all IC techniques.

Correlation of patient and staff doses in interventional cardiology

The purpose of this study was to measure staff radiation doses in representative institutions of five European countries performing coronary angiographies (CA) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties (PTCA), as well as to investigate any correlation with patient doses. Patient doses were recorded in terms of dose-area product (DAP). Staff doses were measured by thermoluminescence dosemeters placed on the operator's left shoulder and left foot. Radiation protection measures were also recorded. Third quartile shoulder and foot doses were 90 and 66 microSv in CA, and 157 and 173 microSv in PTCA, respectively. Shoulder dose was poorly correlated with DAP in CA (R2 = 0.29) and only moderately correlated in PTCA (R2 = 0.69). DAP and foot dose correlation was poor both in CA (R2 = 0.16) and in PTCA (R2 = 0.02). Protective measures taken by staff varied between countries, which may explain the poor correlation of patient and staff radiation doses.