Efficacy of minimally invasive surfactant therapy in moderate and late preterm infants: A multicentre randomized control trial

Less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation-surfactant-extubation in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analyses

OBJECTIVES

To compare LISA with INSURE technique for surfactant administration in preterm with gestational age (GA) < 36 weeks with RDS in respect to the incidence of pneumothorax, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), need for mechanical ventilation (MV), regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2), peri‑intraventricular hemorrhage (PIVH) and mortality.

METHODS

A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, CINAHL, SciELO databases, Brazilian Registry of Randomized Clinical Trials (ReBEC), Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was performed. RCTs evaluating the effects of the LISA technique versus INSURE in preterm infants with gestational age < 36 weeks and that had as outcomes evaluation of the rates of pneumothorax, BPD, need for MV, rSO2, PIVH, and mortality were included in the meta-analysis. Random effects and hazard ratio models were used to combine all study results. Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane Q statistics and Higgin's I2 statistics.

RESULTS

Sixteen RCTs published between 2012 and 2020 met the inclusion criteria, a total of 1,944 preterms. Eleven studies showed a shorter duration of MV and CPAP in the LISA group than in INSURE group. Two studies evaluated rSO2 and suggested that LISA and INSURE transiently affect brain autoregulation during surfactant administration. INSURE group had a higher risk for MV in the first 72 h of life, pneumothorax, PIVH and mortality in comparison to the LISA group.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analyses provided evidence for the benefits of the LISA technique in the treatment of RDS, decreasing CPAP time, need for MV, BPD, pneumothorax, PIVH, and mortality when compared to INSURE.

Clinical decision thresholds for surfactant administration in preterm infants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

The ideal threshold at which surfactant administration in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is most beneficial is contentious. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the optimal clinical criteria to guide surfactant administration in preterm neonates with RDS.

Methods

The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022309433). Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and CINAHL were searched from inception till 16th May 2023. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. A Bayesian random effects network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluating 33 interventions was performed. The primary outcome was requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) within 7 days of life.

Findings

58 RCTs were included. In preterm neonates ≤30 weeks after adjusting for the confounding factor of modality of surfactant administration, an arterial alveolar oxygen tension ratio (aAO2) <0.36 (FiO2: 37-55%) was ranked the best threshold for decreasing the risk of IMV, very low certainty. Further, surfactant administration at an FiO2 40-45% possibly decreased mortality compared to rescue treatment when respiratory failure was diagnosed, certainty very low. The reasonable inference that could be drawn from these findings is that surfactant administration may be considered in preterm neonates of ≤30 weeks' with RDS requiring an FiO2 ≥ 40%. There was insufficient evidence for the comparison of FiO2 thresholds: 30% vs. 40%. The evidence was sparse for surfactant administration guided by lung ultrasound. For the sub-group >30 weeks, nebulized surfactant administration at an FiO2 < 30% possibly increased the risk of IMV compared to Intubate-Surfactant-Extubate at FiO2 < 30% and 40%, and less invasive surfactant administration at FiO2 40%, certainty very low.

Interpretation

Surfactant administration may be considered in preterm neonates of ≤30 weeks' with RDS if the FiO2 requirement is ≥40%. Future trials are required comparing lower FiO2 thresholds of 30% vs. 40% and that guided by lung ultrasound.

Funding

None.

Prevention of Chronic Morbidities in Extremely Premature Newborns with LISA-nCPAP Respiratory Therapy and Adjuvant Perinatal Strategies

Less invasive surfactant administration techniques, together with nasal continuous airway pressure (LISA-nCPAP) ventilation, an emerging noninvasive ventilation (NIV) technique in neonatology, are gaining more significance, even in extremely premature newborns (ELBW), under 27 weeks of gestational age. In this review, studies on LISA-nCPAP are compiled with an emphasis on short- and long-term morbidities associated with prematurity. Several perinatal preventative and therapeutic investigations are also discussed in order to start integrated therapies as numerous organ-saving techniques in addition to lung-protective ventilations. Two thirds of immature newborns can start their lives on NIV, and one third of them never need mechanical ventilation. With adjuvant intervention, these ratios are expected to be increased, resulting in better outcomes. Optimized cardiopulmonary transition, especially physiologic cord clamping, could have an additively beneficial effect on patient outcomes gained from NIV. Organ development and angiogenesis are strictly linked not only in the immature lung and retina, but also possibly in the kidney, and optimized interventions using angiogenic growth factors could lead to better morbidity-free survival. Corticosteroids, caffeine, insulin, thyroid hormones, antioxidants, N-acetylcysteine, and, moreover, the immunomodulatory components of mother's milk are also discussed as adjuvant treatments, since immature newborns deserve more complex neonatal interventions.

Should less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) become routine practice in US neonatal units?

The harmful effects of mechanical ventilation (MV) on the preterm lung are well established. Avoiding MV at birth and stabilization on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) decreases the composite outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Although preterm infants are increasingly being admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit on CPAP, centers differ in the ability to manage infants primarily on CPAP. Over the last decade, less invasive surfactant administration (LISA), a method of administering surfactant with a thin catheter, has been devised and has been shown to decrease the need for MV and improve outcomes compared to surfactant administration via an endotracheal tube following intubation. While LISA has been widely adopted in Europe and other countries, its use is not widespread in the United States. This article provides a summary of the existing evidence on LISA, and practical guidance for US units choosing to implement a change of practice incorporating optimization of CPAP and LISA. IMPACT: The accumulated body of evidence for less invasive surfactant administration (LISA), a widespread practice in other countries, justifies its use as an alternative to intubation and surfactant administration in US neonatal units. This article summarizes the current evidence for LISA, identifies gaps in knowledge, and offers practical tips for the implementation of LISA as part of a comprehensive non-invasive respiratory support strategy. This article will help neonatal units in the US develop guidelines for LISA, provide optimal respiratory support for infants with respiratory distress syndrome, improve short- and long-term outcomes of preterm infants, and potentially decrease costs of NICU care.

Surfactant administration in preterm babies (28-36 weeks) with respiratory distress syndrome: LISA versus InSurE, an open-label randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

INtubate-SURfactant-Extubate (InSurE) approach is traditional method of surfactant delivery in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Newer, less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) techniques lessen the need for mechanical ventilation and its adverse consequences. Evidence on the favorable effects of LISA can't be extrapolated from developed to developing countries. Aim of study is to compare the effectiveness of InSurE and LISA.

OBJECTIVES

Primary outcome was to find need of intubation and mechanical ventilation within 72 h of birth. Neonates were followed until discharge/death for adverse events and complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. Preterm neonates with diagnosis of RDS were randomized in two groups (InSurE or LISA) to receive surfactant soon after birth. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) was used as primary mode of respiratory support.

RESULTS

A total of 150 neonates were analyzed (75 in each group). Insignificant statistical difference was seen in the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation within 72 h of birth between the two groups (InSurE, 30 [40%] and LISA, 30 [40%], relative risk 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.48). Twelve percent (n = 9, LISA group) and 14.6% (n = 11 InSurE group) had adverse events during the procedure. Also, we observed insignificant statistical difference in the rates of major complications or duration of respiratory support, hospital stay, and mortality.

CONCLUSION

LISA and InSurE are equally effectiSpontaneously breathing pretermve for surfactant administration in the treatment of RDS, when NIPPV is the primary mode of respiratory support. More RCTs are required to compare the efficacy and long-term outcomes of LISA with InSurE.

Sedation for less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sedation to preterm neonates receiving less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) for respiratory distress syndrome is controversial.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OS) to evaluate the effect of sedative drugs for LISA on respiratory outcomes and adverse effects.

RESULTS

One RCT (78 neonates) and two OS (519 neonates) were analyzed in pairwise meta-analysis and 30 studies (2164 neonates) in proportion-based meta-analysis. Sedative drugs might not affect the duration of the procedure [RCT: mean difference (MD) (95% CI); -11 (-90; 67) s; OS: MD 95% CI: -60 (-178; 58) s; low certainty of evidence (CoE)]. Evidence for success at the first attempt and rescue intubation was uncertain (very low CoE). The risk of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation [RCT: 1.97 (1.38-2.81); OS: RR, 95% CI: 2.96 (1.46; 6.00), low CoE], desaturation [RCT: RR, 95% CI: 1.30 (1.03; 1.65), low CoE], and apnea [OS: RR, 95% CI: 3.13 (1.35; 7.24), very low CoE] might be increased with sedation. Bradycardia, hypotension, and mechanical ventilation were comparable between groups (low CoE).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of sedative drugs for LISA temporarily affects the newborn's breathing. Further trials are warranted to explore the use of sedation for LISA.

IMPACT

The effect of sedative drugs (analgesics, sedatives, anesthetics) compared to the effect of no-sedation for LISA in preterm infants with RDS is underexplored. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the impact of sedative drugs compared to no-sedation for LISA on short-term pulmonary outcomes and potential adverse events. Sedative drugs for LISA temporarily affect the newborn's breathing (desaturation, apnea) and increase the need for nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. For most outcomes, certainty of evidence is low/very low.

Surfactant therapy using a bronchofiberscope in respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Avoiding endotracheal intubation and using nasal continuous positive airway pressure as the initial treatment is recommended in infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and modes of lesser invasive surfactant administration have recently been reported. We report a pilot study assessing the feasibility of surfactant therapy using a bronchofiberscope (STUB) in RDS.

METHODS

Surfactant was administered to 31 preterm infants (gestational age range of 28 weeks 0 days to 36 weeks 6 days) diagnosed with RDS, through the working channel of the bronchofiberscope or endotracheal tubes. Patient characteristics, outcomes, adverse events, and comorbidities were assessed in the two groups.

RESULTS

Twelve infants received STUB. Two of the 12 infants (17%) needed subsequent intubation and additional surfactant administration. Nineteen infants received surfactant through endotracheal tubes. Four of the 19 infants (21%) required additional surfactants. There was no significant difference in the number of infants that needed additional surfactant (p = 1.00). Gestational age, birthweight, length of hospitalization, adverse events, such as desaturations and bradycardias, and comorbidities were similar between the two groups. Days of invasive ventilation were significantly shorter in the STUB group (p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

STUB was feasible in this small cohort and reduced the need for intubation to 17%, leading to fewer days of invasive ventilation, without increasing comorbidities and adverse events. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to administer surfactants using bronchofiberscopes.

Less Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Review of Current Evidence of Clinical Outcomes With Beractant

Evidence supporting clinical recommendations or approval for less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) has primarily examined heterogeneous or small-volume (e.g., 1.25-2.5 mL/kg) animal-derived surfactant regimens. To address the evidence gap for larger-volume (e.g., 4-5 mL/kg) animal-derived surfactants, the aim of this review was to evaluate and summarize LISA literature for widely used larger-volume beractant. Surfactant treatment and the LISA technique were initially summarized. The available literature on beractant with LISA was thoroughly assessed and reviewed, including a recent systematic analysis, studies from regions where access or preferences may influence reliance on larger-volume surfactants, and investigations of short- and long-term outcomes. The available literature indicated improved short-term outcomes, including less need for mechanical ventilation, death, or bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and no negative long-term developmental outcomes when beractant was administered via LISA compared with older, more invasive techniques. The rates of short-term outcomes were similar to those previously observed in examinations of LISA with small-volume surfactants, including in populations reflecting very preterm infants. As uptake of LISA is expected to increase, future research directions for larger-volume surfactants include cost-effectiveness evaluations and robust examinations of repeat dosing and surfactant reflux to further inform clinical practice. This review provides a detailed assessment of the literature describing surfactant and LISA, with a focus on studies of beractant. Collectively, the available evidence supports the use of beractant with LISA based both on short-term and long-term outcomes relative to more invasive techniques and comparability of outcomes with small-volume surfactants and may be valuable in guiding clinical decision-making.

Early surfactant and non-invasive ventilation versus intubation and surfactant: a propensity score-matched national study

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcome after less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and primary endotracheal intubation (non-LISA) in infants born before gestational age (GA) 28 weeks.

SETTING

All neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Norway during 2012-2018.

METHODS

Defined population-based data were prospectively entered into a national registry. We compared LISA infants with all non-LISA infants and with non-LISA infants who received surfactant following intubation. We used propensity score (PS) matching to identify non-LISA infants who were similar regarding potential confounders.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES

Rate and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), survival, neurological and gastrointestinal morbidity, and need of supplemental oxygen or positive pressure respiratory support at postmenstrual age (PMA) 36 and 40 weeks.

RESULTS

We restricted analyses to GA 25-27 weeks (n=843, 26% LISA) because LISA was rarely used at lower GAs. There was no significant association between NICUs regarding proportions treated with LISA and proportions receiving MV. In the PS-matched datasets, fewer LISA infants received MV (61% vs 78%, p<0.001), and they had fewer days on MV (mean difference 4.1, 95% CI 0.0 to 8.2 days) and lower mortality at PMA 40 weeks (absolute difference 6%, p=0.06) compared with all the non-LISA infants, but only a lower rate of MV (64% vs 97%, p<0.001) and fewer days on MV (mean difference 5.8, 95% CI 0.6 to 10.9 days) compared with non-LISA infants who received surfactant after intubation.

CONCLUSION

LISA reduced the rate and duration of MV but had no other clear benefits.

Comparison of minimally invasive surfactant therapy with intubation surfactant administration and extubation for treating preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a common cause of hospitalization and death in preterm infants who require surfactant treatment and respiratory support.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) and the INtubation, SURfactant administration, and Extubation (INSURE) technique in preterm infants with RDS.

METHODS

In this clinical trial, 112 preterm infants born at 28-36 weeks of gestation and diagnosed with RDS randomly received 200-mg/kg surfactant by MIST or the INSURE method. In the MIST group, surfactant was administered using a thin catheter (5F feeding tube); in the INSURE group, surfactant was administered after intubation using a feeding tube and the tracheal tube was removed after positive pressure ventilation was started. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure was applied in both groups for respiratory support and the postprocedure clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The mean hospitalization time was shorter for infants in the MIST group than for those in the INSURE group (9.19± 1.72 days vs. 10.21±2.15 days, P=0.006). Patent ductus arteriosus was less frequent in the MIST group (14.3% vs. 30.4%, P=0.041). Desaturation during surfactant administration occurred less commonly in the MIST group (19.6% vs. 39.3%, P=0.023). There were no significant intergroup differences in other early or late complications.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that surfactant administration using MIST could be a good replacement for INSURE in preterm infants with RDS since its use reduced the hospitalization time and the number of side effects.

Outcomes following less-invasive-surfactant-administration in the delivery-room

BACKGROUND

Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) on the neonatal unit reduces the need for mechanical ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).

AIMS

To assess the immediate and longer-term efficacy of LISA to prematurely born infants in the delivery-room.

STUDY DESIGN

A case control study with inborn historical controls matched for gestational age, birthweight and gender to each LISA infant.

SUBJECTS

Infants born between 26⁺⁰ weeks and 34⁺⁶ weeks of gestational age.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Respiratory function monitoring before and after LISA and need for mechanical ventilation within 72 h of birth.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine infants, median gestational age of 32⁺⁴(range:27⁺⁰-34⁺⁶) weeks, were prospectively recruited. The respiratory rate and inspired oxygen (FiO₂) decreased two minutes after LISA and there was a reduction in the FiO₂ requirement at two hours post birth. Compared to historical controls, LISA administration was associated with a reduction in the need for mechanical ventilation within 72 h after birth (20.2% versus 56.6% p < 0.001) the incidence of moderate to severe BPD (8.2% versus 20.2%, p = 0.02) and the median costs of neonatal intensive care stay (£1218 versus £2436, p = 0.03) and total neonatal unit stay (£12,888 versus £17,240, p = 0.04). A high FiO₂ in the delivery-room pre-LISA (median 0.75 versus 0.60, p = 0.02) was associated with LISA failure, that is mechanical ventilation within 72 h of birth.

CONCLUSIONS

LISA to prematurely born infants in the delivery-room was associated with reductions in the need for mechanical ventilation and costs of care, but was less successful in those with initial, more severe respiratory disease.

Thin-catheter Surfactant Application for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Spontaneously Breathing Preterm Infants: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Surfactant application by a thin catheter represented by the term less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) for respiratory distress syndrome in spontaneously breathing preterm infants was developed as an alternative to endotracheal intubation.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effects of LISA when compared to the socalled intubation-surfactant-extubation (INSURE) and the standard endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV). The primary outcome was the composite incidence of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia at a postmenstrual age of 36 weeks. The secondary outcome was the composite incidence of seven other severe adverse events. On 06 October 2021, we searched randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the ICTRP Registry.

RESULTS

We included 18 RCTs. The pooled data on the primary outcome favored LISA when compared to either INSURE (risk ratio 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.88) or MV (risk ratio 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.99). The pooled data on the second outcome also favored LISA when compared to INSURE (risk ratio 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.94) and MV (risk ratio 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.96).

CONCLUSION

The findings showed that surfactant application by non-intubation respiratory support and the use of a thin catheter may decrease the composite risk of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The included data support the view that LISA should be considered the preferred treatment option in eligible infants.

Premedication before laryngoscopy in neonates: Evidence-based statement from the French society of neonatology (SFN)

CONTEXT

Laryngoscopy is frequently required in neonatal intensive care. Awake laryngoscopy has deleterious effects but practice remains heterogeneous regarding premedication use. The goal of this statement was to provide evidence-based good practice guidance for clinicians regarding premedication before tracheal intubation, less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and laryngeal mask insertion in neonates.

METHODS

A group of experts brought together by the French Society of Neonatology (SFN) addressed 4 fields related to premedication before upper airway access in neonates: (1) tracheal intubation; (2) less invasive surfactant administration; (3) laryngeal mask insertion; (4) use of atropine for the 3 previous procedures. Evidence was gathered and assessed on predefined questions related to these fields. Consensual statements were issued using the GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

Among the 15 formalized good practice statements, 2 were strong recommendations to do (Grade 1+) or not to do (Grade 1-), and 4 were discretionary recommendations to do (Grade 2+). For 9 good practice statements, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in an expert opinion. For tracheal intubation premedication was considered mandatory except for life-threatening situations (Grade 1+). Recommended premedications were a combination of opioid + muscle blocker (Grade 2+) or propofol in the absence of hemodynamic compromise or hypotension (Grade 2+) while the use of a sole opioid was discouraged (Grade 1-). Statements regarding other molecules before tracheal intubation were expert opinions. For LISA premedication was recommended (Grade 2+) with the use of propofol (Grade 2+). Statements regarding other molecules before LISA were expert opinions. For laryngeal mask insertion and atropine use, no specific data was found and expert opinions were provided.

CONCLUSION

This statement should help clinical decision regarding premedication before neonatal upper airway access and favor standardization of practices.

Prophylactic or very early initiation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Cohort studies have suggested that nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) starting in the immediate postnatal period before the onset of respiratory disease (prophylactic CPAP) may be beneficial in reducing the need for intubation and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV), and in preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), in preterm or low birth weight infants.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if prophylactic nasal CPAP (started within the first 15 minutes) or very early nasal CPAP regardless of respiratory status (started within the first hour of life), reduces the use of mechanical ventilation and the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia without any adverse effects in preterm infants.

SEARCH METHODS

A comprehensive search was run on 6 November 2020 in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL via CRS Web) and MEDLINE via Ovid. We also searched the reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in preterm infants (under 37 weeks of gestation). We included trials if they compared prophylactic nasal CPAP (started within the first 15 minutes) or very early nasal CPAP (started within the first hour of life) in infants with minimal signs of respiratory distress with 'supportive care', such as supplemental oxygen therapy, standard nasal cannula, or mechanical ventilation. We excluded studies where prophylactic CPAP was compared with CPAP along with co-interventions.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methods of Cochrane Neonatal, including independent study selection, assessment of trial quality, and extraction of data by two review authors.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight trials (seven from the previous version of the review and one new study), recruiting 3201 babies, in the meta-analysis. Four trials, involving 765 babies, compared CPAP with supportive care, and three trials (2364 babies) compared CPAP with mechanical ventilation. One trial (72 babies) compared prophylactic CPAP with very early CPAP. Apart from a lack of blinding of the intervention, we judged seven studies to have a low risk of bias. However, one study had a high risk of selection bias. Prophylactic or very early CPAP compared to supportive care There may be a reduction in failed treatment (risk ratio (RR) 0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 0.74; risk difference (RD) -0.16, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.02; 4 studies, 765 infants; very low certainty evidence). CPAP possibly reduces BPD at 36 weeks (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.14; 3 studies, 683 infants, moderate certainty evidence); there may be little or no difference in death (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.93; 4 studies, 765 infants; moderate certainty evidence). Prophylactic CPAP may reduce the composite outcome of death or BPD (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.19; 1 study, 256 infants; low certainty evidence). There may be no difference in pulmonary air leak (pneumothorax) (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.16; 3 studies, 568 infants; low certainty evidence), or intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) Grade 3 or 4 (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.37; 2 studies, 486 infants; moderate certainty evidence). Neurodevelopmental impairment was not reported in any of the studies. Prophylactic or very early CPAP compared to mechanical ventilation There was probably a reduction in the incidence of BPD at 36 weeks (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.8 to 0.99; RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.00; 3 studies, 2150 infants; moderate certainty evidence); and death or BPD (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.97; RD -0.05, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.01; 3 studies, 2358 infants; moderate certainty evidence). There was also probably a reduction in the need for mechanical ventilation (failed treatment) (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.54; RD -0.50, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.45; 2 studies, 1042 infants; moderate certainty evidence). There was probably a reduction in the incidence of death (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.03; 3 studies, 2358 infants; moderate certainty evidence); pulmonary air leak (pneumothorax) (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.69; 3 studies, 2357 infants; low certainty evidence); and IVH Grade 3 or 4 (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.39; 3 studies, 2301 infants; moderate certainty evidence). One study in this comparison reported that there was probably little or no difference between the groups in the incidence of neurodevelopmental impairment at 18 to 22 months (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.32; 976 infants; moderate certainty evidence). Prophylactic CPAP compared with very early CPAP There was one study in this comparison. We are very uncertain whether there is any difference in the incidence of BPD (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.27; very low certainty evidence). The combined outcome of death and BPD was not reported, and failed treatment was reported but without data. There may have been little to no effect on death (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.29 to1.94; 1 study, 72 infants; very low certainty evidence). Intraventricular haemorrhage Grade 3 or 4 and neurodevelopmental outcomes were not reported in this study. Pulmonary air leak (pneumothorax) was reported in this study, but there were no events in either group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For preterm and very preterm infants, there is insufficient evidence to evaluate prophylactic CPAP compared to oxygen therapy and other supportive care. When compared to mechanical ventilation, prophylactic nasal CPAP in very preterm infants reduces the incidence of BPD, the combined outcome of death and BPD, and mechanical ventilation. There is probably no difference in neurodevelopmental impairment at 18 to 22 months of age. When prophylactic CPAP is compared to early CPAP, we are very uncertain about whether there is any difference between prophylactic and very early CPAP. There is no information about the effect of prophylactic or very early CPAP in late preterm infants. There is one study awaiting classification.

Decreasing Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Failure in Preterm Infants

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Many preterm infants stabilized on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) at birth require mechanical ventilation (MV) during the first 72 hours of life, which is defined as CPAP failure. Our objective was to decrease CPAP failure in infants ≤29 weeks' gestational age (GA).

METHODS

A quality improvement bundle named OPTISURF was implemented for infants ≤29 weeks' GA admitted on CPAP, consisting of stepwise escalation of CPAP and less invasive surfactant administration guided by fractional inspired oxygen concentration ≥0.3. The CPAP failure rate was tracked by using control charts. We compared practice and outcomes of a pre-OPTISURF cohort (January 2017 to September 2018) to a post-OPTISURF cohort (October 2018 to December 2019).

RESULTS

Of the 216 infants ≤29 weeks' GA admitted to NICU on CPAP, 125 infants belonged to the pre-OPTISURF cohort (OSC) and 91 to the post-OSC. Compared with the pre-OSC, a higher proportion of infants in the post-OSC received CPAP 7 cm H₂O within 4 hours of life (7% vs 32%; P < .01). The post-OSC also had lower rates of CPAP failure (54% vs 11%; P < .01), pneumothoraces (8% vs 1%; P < .03), need for MV (58% vs 31%; P < .01), and patent ductus arteriosus treatment (21% vs 9%; P = .02). Additionally, in a subgroup analysis, CPAP failure was lower in the post-OSC among infants 23 to 26 weeks (79% vs 27%; P < .01) and 27 to 29 weeks' GA (46% vs 3%; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a quality improvement bundle including CPAP optimization and less invasive surfactant administration decreased CPAP failure and need for MV in preterm infants.

Surfactant delivery via thin catheters: Methods, limitations, and outcomes

Various less invasive surfactant administration strategies like surfactant replacement therapy via thin catheters, laryngeal mask airway, pharyngeal instillation, and nebulized surfactant are increasingly being practiced to avoid the harmful effects of endotracheal intubation and ventilation. Numerous studies have been done to study surfactant replacement via thin catheters whereas little data is available for other methods. However, there are variations in premedication policies, type of respiratory support used in these studies. Surfactant delivery using thin catheters has been reported to be associated with decrease in the need for mechanical ventilation (MV), duration of MV, bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neonatal mortality. With the current evidence, among all the available surfactant delivery methods, the one using thin catheters appears to be the most feasible and beneficial to improve clinical neonatal outcomes.

Impact of Catheter Choice on Procedural Success of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy

OBJECTIVE

 Surfactant delivery via a thin endotracheal catheter during spontaneous breathing; a technique called minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) is an alternative to intubation and surfactant administration. Procedural details among different centers vary, with marked differences in the choice of catheter to instill surfactant. Studies report use of feeding catheters, multiaccess suction catheters, vascular catheters, and more recently custom-built catheters for this purpose. The impact of choice of catheter on procedural success and procedural adverse effects has not been reported. Our present study compares the procedural success and adverse effects of MIST using a semirigid vascular catheter (16G Angiocath-Hobart Method) versus a flexible multiaccess catheter (MAC).

STUDY DESIGN

 This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data at a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit in Southwestern Ontario. All neonates who received surfactant via MIST between May 1, 2016 and September 30, 2020 were included in the study. Relevant baseline characteristics and data on procedural details (premedication, type of catheter, etc.) were collected. The procedural success, number of attempts, and adverse effects between neonates who received MIST via MAC and 16G Angiocath was compared by using Chi-square test or Fisher's test as appropriate. A p-value of less that 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

 A total of 139 neonates received surfactant via MIST method during the study period. Moreover, 93 neonates received the surfactant via MAC, while 46 received it via Angiocath. The baseline demographic characteristics in the two group were similar. A higher proportion of neonates in Angiocath group received Atropine (100 vs. 76%, p = 0.002) and Fentanyl (98 vs. 36%, p < 0.001) than the MAC group.The procedural success was 91% in the Angiocath group and 89% in the MAC group (p > 0.99). Multiple attempts were needed in 24% of neonates in the Angiocath group and 37% in the MAC group (p = 0.158). More episodes of desaturations were noted in the Angiocath group (89%) than the MAC group (69%; p = 0.012). Other rates of common adverse effects were similar between the two groups. On exploratory analysis fentanyl use held significant association with less success, more desaturation, apneic episodes, and need of positive pressure ventilation /intubation.

CONCLUSION

 The overall procedural success of MIST is similar in both catheter groups. The proportion of neonates requiring multiple attempts was lower with the Angiocath, though difference was not statistically significant. Desaturation episodes were seen more frequently in the Angiocath group, which was related to higher use of procedural sedation in this group.

KEY POINTS

· MIST is emerging as a less invasive method of surfactant delivery that has proven clinical benefits.. · Considerable, procedural variation is reported, particularly regarding choice of catheter.. · Our present study compares the procedural success and adverse effects of MIST using a semirigid vascular catheter (16G Angiocath-Hobart method) versus a flexible MAC.. · High and comparable procedural success was seen in both groups..

Comparative efficacy of methods for surfactant administration: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare surfactant administration via thin catheters, laryngeal mask, nebulisation, pharyngeal instillation, intubation and surfactant administration followed by immediate extubation (InSurE) and no surfactant administration.

DESIGN

Network meta-analysis.

SETTING

Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Google-scholar and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were systematically searched from inception to 15 February 2020.

PATIENTS

Preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome.

INTERVENTIONS

Less invasive surfactant administration.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes were mortality, mechanical ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

RESULTS

Overall, 16 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 20 observational studies were included (N=13 234). For the InSurE group, the median risk of mortality, mechanical ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were 7.8%, 42.1% and 10%, respectively. Compared with InSurE, administration via thin catheter was associated with significantly lower rates of mortality (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.76), mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.63), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.73), periventricular leukomalacia (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.82) with moderate quality of evidence and necrotising enterocolitis (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.9, low quality of evidence). No significant differences were observed by comparing InSurE with administration via laryngeal mask, nebulisation or pharyngeal instillation. In RCTs, thin catheter administration lowered the rates of mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.60) but not the incidence of the remaining outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Among preterm infants, surfactant administration via thin catheters was associated with lower likelihood of mortality, need for mechanical ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia compared with InSurE. Further research is needed to reach firm conclusions about the efficacy of alternative minimally invasive techniques of surfactant administration.

Surfactant therapy via thin catheter in preterm infants with or at risk of respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive respiratory support is increasingly used for the management of respiratory dysfunction in preterm infants. This approach runs the risk of under-treating those with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), for whom surfactant administration is of paramount importance. Several techniques of minimally invasive surfactant therapy have been described. This review focuses on surfactant administration to spontaneously breathing infants via a thin catheter briefly inserted into the trachea.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objectives In non-intubated preterm infants with established RDS or at risk of developing RDS to compare surfactant administration via thin catheter with: 1. intubation and surfactant administration through an endotracheal tube (ETT); or 2. continuation of non-invasive respiratory support without surfactant administration or intubation. Secondary objective 1. To compare different methods of surfactant administration via thin catheter Planned subgroup analyses included gestational age, timing of intervention, and use of sedating pre-medication during the intervention.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library; Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Daily and Versions(R); and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), on 30 September 2020. We also searched clinical trials databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials comparing surfactant administration via thin catheter (S-TC) with (1) surfactant administration through an ETT (S-ETT), or (2) continuation of non-invasive respiratory support without surfactant administration or intubation. We also included trials comparing different methods/strategies of surfactant administration via thin catheter. We included preterm infants (at < 37 weeks' gestation) with or at risk of RDS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Review authors independently assessed study quality and risk of bias and extracted data. Authors of all studies were contacted regarding study design and/or missing or unpublished data. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 studies (18 publications; 2164 neonates) in this review. These studies compared surfactant administration via thin catheter with surfactant administration through an ETT with early extubation (Intubate, Surfactant, Extubate technique - InSurE) (12 studies) or with delayed extubation (2 studies), or with continuation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and rescue surfactant administration at pre-specified criteria (1 study), or compared different strategies of surfactant administration via thin catheter (1 study). Two trials reported neurosensory outcomes of of surviving participants at two years of age. Eight studies were of moderate certainty with low risk of bias, and eight studies were of lower certainty with unclear risk of bias. S-TC versus S-ETT in preterm infants with or at risk of RDS Meta-analyses of 14 studies in which S-TC was compared with S-ETT as a control demonstrated a significant decrease in risk of the composite outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (risk ratio (RR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 0.73; risk difference (RD) -0.11, 95% CI -0.15 to -0.07; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 9, 95% CI 7 to 16; 10 studies; 1324 infants; moderate-certainty evidence); the need for intubation within 72 hours (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.74; RD -0.14, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.09; NNTB 8, 95% CI; 6 to 12; 12 studies, 1422 infants; moderate-certainty evidence); severe intraventricular haemorrhage (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.96; RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.00; NNTB 22, 95% CI 12 to 193; 5 studies, 857 infants; low-certainty evidence); death during first hospitalisation (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.84; RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.06; NNTB 20, 95% CI 12 to 58; 11 studies, 1424 infants; low-certainty evidence); and BPD among survivors (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.74; RD -0.08, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.04; NNTB 13, 95% CI 9 to 24; 11 studies, 1567 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no significant difference in risk of air leak requiring drainage (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.02; RD -0.03, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.00; 6 studies, 1036 infants; low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported on the outcome of death or survival with neurosensory disability. Only one trial compared surfactant delivery via thin catheter with continuation of CPAP, and one trial compared different strategies of surfactant delivery via thin catheter, precluding meta-analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Administration of surfactant via thin catheter compared with administration via an ETT is associated with reduced risk of death or BPD, less intubation in the first 72 hours, and reduced incidence of major complications and in-hospital mortality. This procedure had a similar rate of adverse effects as surfactant administration through an ETT. Data suggest that treatment with surfactant via thin catheter may be preferable to surfactant therapy by ETT. Further well-designed studies of adequate size and power, as well as ongoing studies, will help confirm and refine these findings, clarify whether surfactant therapy via thin tracheal catheter provides benefits over continuation of non-invasive respiratory support without surfactant, address uncertainties within important subgroups, and clarify the role of sedation.

Guidelines for surfactant replacement therapy in neonates

Surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) plays a pivotal role in the management of neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) because it improves survival and reduces respiratory morbidities. With the increasing use of noninvasive ventilation as the primary mode of respiratory support for preterm infants at delivery, prophylactic surfactant is no longer beneficial. For infants with worsening RDS, early rescue surfactant should be provided. While the strategy to intubate, give surfactant, and extubate (INSURE) has been widely accepted in clinical practice, newer methods of noninvasive surfactant administration, using thin catheter, laryngeal mask airway, or nebulization, are being adopted or investigated. Use of SRT as an adjunct for conditions other than RDS, such as meconium aspiration syndrome, may be effective based on limited evidence.

Les directives pour le traitement par surfactant exogène chez le nouveau-né

Le traitement par surfactant exogène joue un rôle essentiel dans la prise en charge des nouveau-nés atteints du syndrome de détresse respiratoire (maladie des membranes hyalines) parce qu’il améliore la survie et limite les troubles respiratoires. Puisque la ventilation non invasive est de plus en plus utilisée comme principal mode d’assistance respiratoire chez le nouveau-né prématuré à la naissance, l’administration prophylactique de surfactant n’est plus bénéfique. L’administration précoce de surfactant sous forme de traitement de rattrapage est préconisée chez les nouveau-nés dont le syndrome de détresse respiratoire s’aggrave. La stratégie qui consiste à intuber, administrer du surfactant, puis extuber (INSURE) est largement acceptée en pratique clinique, mais des méthodes non invasives plus récentes à l’aide d’un cathéter fin, d’un masque laryngé ou d’un nébuliseur sont en cours d’adoption ou d’exploration. Selon des données limitées, un traitement d’appoint par surfactant exogène pourrait être efficace pour traiter d’autres affections que le syndrome de détresse respiratoire, telles que le syndrome d’aspiration méconiale.

Less-Invasive Surfactant Administration for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Consensus Guideline

INTRODUCTION

Less-invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is a method of surfactant delivery to preterm infants for treating respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), which can reduce the composite risk of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia and the time on mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of studies published up to April 2021 on minimally invasive catheter surfactant delivery in preterm infants with RDS was conducted. Based on these studies, with parental feedback sought via an online questionnaire, 9 UK-based specialists in neonatal respiratory disease developed their consensus for implementing LISA. Recommendations were developed following a modified, iterative Delphi process using a questionnaire employing a 9-point Likert scale and an a priori level of agreement/disagreement.

RESULTS

Successful implementation of LISA can be achieved by training the multidisciplinary team and following locally agreed guidance. From the time of the decision to administer surfactant, LISA should take <30 min. The comfort of the baby and requirements to maintain non-invasive respiratory support are important. While many infants can be managed without requiring additional sedation/analgesia, fentanyl along with atropine may be considered. Parents should be provided with sufficient information about medication side effects and involved in treatment discussions.

CONCLUSION

LISA has the potential to improve outcomes for preterm infants with RDS and can be introduced as a safe and effective part of UK-based neonatal care with appropriate training.

New techniques, new challenges—The dilemma of pain management for less invasive surfactant administration?

Recent years have seen the increasing use of noninvasive respiratory support in preterm infants with the aim of minimizing the risk of mechanical ventilation and subsequent bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Respiratory distress syndrome is the most common respiratory diagnosis in preterm infants, and is best treated by administration of surfactant. Until recently, this has been performed via an endotracheal tube using premedication, which has often included opiate analgesia; subsequently, the infant has been ventilated. Avoidance of mechanical ventilation, however, does not negate the need for surfactant therapy. Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in spontaneously breathing infants is increasing in popularity, and appears to have beneficial effects. However, laryngoscopy is necessary, which carries adverse effects and is painful for the infant. Conventional methods of premedication for intubation tend to reduce respiratory drive, which increases the likelihood of ventilation being required. This has led to intense debate about the best strategy for providing appropriate treatment, taking into account both the respiratory needs of the infant and the need to alleviate procedural pain. Currently, clinical practice varies considerably and there is no consensus with respect to optimal management. This review seeks to summarize the benefits, risks, and challenges associated with this new approach.

Propofol versus placebo (with rescue with ketamine) before less invasive surfactant administration: study protocol for a multicenter, double-blind, placebo controlled trial (PROLISA)

Background

One major limitation for less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) is the difficulty in providing sedation before this procedure and the competitive risk of respiratory depression versus avoidance of intubation for most sedative or analgesic drugs used in this context.

The objective of this study is to compare the need for mechanical ventilation within 72 h of life following premedication with propofol, versus placebo (rescue with ketamine), for the LISA procedure in preterm neonates born before 32 weeks gestational age (wGA).

Methods

ProLISA is a phase III, non-inferiority, multicenter, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial designed according to the SPIRIT Statement. Neonates born before 32 wGA in 12 geographically dispersed Neonatal Intensive Care Units in France needing surfactant will be included from September 2019 to September 2022. A sample of 542 patients is needed. The neonate is randomized to the intervention (propofol) or control placebo group. Open label rescue treatment with ketamine is possible in both groups if FANS (Faceless Acute Neonatal pain Scale) is ≥6. To guide drug administration, FANS is scored before attempting laryngoscopy. Once an adequate score has been obtained, LISA is performed according to a standardized protocol. The primary outcome is the need for mechanical ventilation within 72 h of life. Secondary outcomes are tolerance of the procedure, pain evaluation, hemodynamic and neurologic parameters after the intervention, morbidities before discharge and neurodevelopmental assessment at 2 years of age.

Discussion

This paper describes the first multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on this topic and will provide crucial information to support implementation of the LISA procedure.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04016246. Registered 06 June 2019, N°EUDRACT: 2018–002876-41.

Minimally invasive surfactant therapy versus intubation for surfactant administration in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) is a new mode of surfactant administration without intubation to spontaneously breathing preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of using MIST to give surfactant for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with RDS.

METHODS

In total, 53 VLBW infants who were born before 32 gestational weeks with spontaneous breathing, respiratory distress, and requiring surfactant therapy were divided into two groups. The infants in group A (n = 29) were intubated and received surfactant replacement therapy via endotracheal tube, followed by mechanical ventilation (MV). The infants in group B (n = 24) received tracheal instillation of surfactant via a semirigid vascular catheter during spontaneous breathing under nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). After surfactant instillation, the infants in group B were still placed on nCPAP.

RESULTS

Our data showed that infants in group B (MIST group) had significantly lower rate (P < 0.05) of composite outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), duration of intermittent positive airway pressure ventilation (IPPV) or MV, drug treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), and surgical ligation of PDA than group A.

CONCLUSION

MIST is feasible, safe and it may reduce the composite outcome of death or BPD for VLBW infants with RDS requiring surfactant replacement therapy.

Fine Tuning Non-invasive Respiratory Support to Prevent Lung Injury in the Extremely Premature Infant

Within the last decades, therapeutic advances, such as antenatal corticosteroids, surfactant replacement, monitored administration of supplemental oxygen, and sophisticated ventilatory support have significantly improved the survival of extremely premature infants. In contrast, the incidence of some neonatal morbidities has not declined. Rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remain high and have prompted neonatologists to seek effective strategies of non-invasive respiratory support in high risk infants in order to avoid harmful effects associated with invasive mechanical ventilation. There has been a stepwise replacement of invasive mechanical ventilation by early continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as the preferred strategy for initial stabilization and for early respiratory support of the premature infant and management of respiratory distress syndrome. However, the vast majority of high risk babies are mechanically ventilated at least once during their NICU stay. Adjunctive therapies aiming at the prevention of CPAP failure and the support of functional residual capacity have been introduced into clinical practice, including alternative techniques of administering surfactant as well as non-invasive ventilation approaches. In contrast, the strategy of applying sustained lung inflations in the delivery room has recently been abandoned due to evidence of higher rates of death within the first 48 h of life.

Surfactant Administration via Thin Catheter: A Practical Guide

Exogenous surfactant replacement is the most effective evidence-based therapy for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. The mode of administration has evolved in the last decade towards less invasive techniques that aim to effectively provide an adequate dose of surfactant, while allowing spontaneous respiration to continue, and with the support of continuous positive airway pressure. Surfactant delivery via aerosolisation, pharyngeal instillation, and laryngeal mask are being actively pursued in research, but have not yet been adopted to any significant degree in clinical practice. Surfactant administration via thin catheter, on the other hand, is becoming more widely used in neonatal intensive care units worldwide and is now an acknowledged alternative to the standard mode of surfactant delivery. Different devices, including nasogastric tubes, vascular catheters, and purpose-built surfactant instillation catheters are used. We present here a contemporary review of surfactant administration via thin catheter, in a practical guide format that reflects the individual and collective scientific opinions of the clinicians who participated in formulating the guide.

Novel Surfactant Administration Techniques: Will They Change Outcome?

Traditionally, surfactant has been administered to preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome via an endotracheal tube and in conjunction with mechanical ventilation. However, negative consequences of mechanical ventilation such as pneumothorax and bronchopulmonary dysplasia are well known. In order to provide the benefits of surfactant administration without the negative effects of mechanical ventilation, several methods of less invasive surfactant administration have been developed. These methods include InSurE (intubate, surfactant, extubate), pharyngeal administration, laryngeal mask administration, aerosolized surfactant administration, and thin catheter administration (TCA). Of these, TCA has been studied most extensively and holds the most promise as a less invasive and effective mode of surfactant administration to preterm infants. Further studies will aid in determining which patients would benefit most from less invasive surfactant administration.

High-volume surfactant administration using a minimally invasive technique: Experience from a Canadian Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Background

Surfactant delivery via a thin endotracheal catheter during spontaneous breathing, a technique called minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST), is an alternative to intubation and surfactant administration. There is paucity of data regarding the administration of high-volume surfactant using this technique.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to review the safety, efficacy, and procedural details pertaining to the delivery of 5 mL/kg of BLES® via MIST approach. In 2016, our centre initiated a practice change allowing the use of MIST as an alternative method of surfactant delivery in infants born at ≥28 weeks and/or with a birth weight ≥ 1,000 g with respiratory distress syndrome. In this study, we identified all neonates who received surfactant via MIST between May 1, 2016 and July 30, 2018 and collected relevant procedural data.

Results

Since this practice change, MIST technique was attempted in 43 neonates with successful instillation of surfactant in 41 (95.3%) of the neonates. Intubation and positive pressure ventilation was avoided in 35 neonates (85.3%). No serious adverse effect was noted.

Conclusions

Our study reports successful use of higher volume surfactant via MIST. This should encourage other similar centres to consider this technique, in order to avoid unnecessary intubation and positive pressure ventilation.

Surfactant, steroids and non-invasive ventilation in the prevention of BPD

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a complex disorder with multiple factors implicated in its etiopathogenesis. Despite the scientific advances in the field of neonatology, the incidence of BPD has remained somewhat constant due to increased survival of extremely premature infants. Surfactant deficiency in the immature lung, exposure to invasive mechanical ventilation leading to volutrauma, barotrauma and lung inflammation are some of the critical contributing factors to the pathogenesis of BPD. Hence, strategies to prevent BPD in the postnatal period revolve around mitigation of this injury and inflammation. This article reviews the progress made in the last 5 years in the development of new preparations of surfactant, use of corticosteroids and non-invasive ventilation in the prevention of BPD. Emerging techniques of surfactant delivery through minimally invasive and non-invasive routes are also discussed.