Exploring why people with back pain use the pain management strategies they do: Is research looking in the wrong places?

'Despite the Pain, I Keep Moving Forward': A Qualitative Study on Brazilian Older Adults' Experiences With Chronic Low Back Pain

OBJECTIVE

The burden of chronic low back pain (CLBP) is increasing rapidly along with the global population ageing. Such an increase will occur more rapidly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Yet, few studies have explored the experiences of older adults with CLBP, and these are primarily conducted in high-income countries. To address this concern, we explored the experiences of older Brazilian adults with CLBP.

METHODS

We used a descriptive qualitative study and gathered data through interviews and drawings from participants representing their experiences. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis principles.

RESULTS

We interviewed 22 participants and identified the following themes: (1) Low back pain: an intense sensory and emotional experience; (2) causes of pain: wear and tear due to ageing, physical overload and emotional overload; (3) seeking treatment and not improving; (4) health professionals with a biomedical and pessimistic view; (5) the impact of pain on life: functional limitations and social repercussions; and (6) dealing with pain through movement, resilience and passive strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants described CLBP as a sensory and emotional experience that impacts various aspects of their lives. Wear and tear due to ageing, physical and emotional overload were highlighted as causes of pain, and health professionals as a source of pessimism. Despite this, many participants discussed coping through movement, resilience, and passive strategies. Health professionals should address the emotional aspects associated with CLBP, explore its impact on their patients' lives and provide information that aligns with current evidence, promoting reassurance and a multidimensional understanding of CLBP.

Unraveling Negative Expectations and Nocebo-Related Effects in Musculoskeletal Pain

This Perspective adapts the ViolEx Model, a framework validated in several clinical conditions, to better understand the role of expectations in the recovery and/or maintenance of musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. Here, particular attention is given to the condition in which dysfunctional expectations are maintained despite no longer being supported by confirmatory evidence (i.e., belief-lifting the arm leads to permanent tendon damage; evidence-after the patient lifts the arm no tendon damage occurs). While the ViolEx Model suggests that cognitive immunization strategies are responsible for the maintenance of dysfunctional expectations, we suggest that such phenomenon can also be understood from a Bayesian Brain perspective, according to which the level of precision of the priors (i.e., expectations) is the determinant factor accounting for the extent of priors' updating (i.e., we merge the two frameworks, suggesting that highly precise prior can lead to cognitive immunization responses). Importantly, this Perspective translates the theory behind these two frameworks into clinical suggestions. Precisely, it is argued that different strategies should be implemented when treating MSK pain patients, depending on the nature of their expectations (i.e., positive or negative and the level of their precision).