The Effectiveness of Intraosseous Basivertebral Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Vertebrogenic Low Back Pain: An Updated Systematic Review with Single-Arm Meta-analysis

Radiofrequency ablation of basivertebral and sinuvertebral nerves for chronic discogenic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the basivertebral and sinuvertebral nerve is a relatively new intervention for patients with chronic discogenic low back pain. It aims to ablate the irritated nerve endings to improve pain control and disability. This meta-analysis includes prospective single and double-arm studies that determine if RFA is effective in improving chronic low back pain and disability for patients with degenerative spinal discs who have not yet required surgical decompression. The outcomes of interest were comprised of commonly used patient-reported outcomes, which included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores. Forest plots were generated to report associations as well as funnel plots to report the risk of publication bias. The meta-analysis included 429 patients from five eligible studies, comprising two randomized controlled trials and three prospective single-arm trials. A total of 280 patients underwent RFA whereas 149 served as controls. The baseline scores in the single-arm trials served as the outcomes of their control group. The RFA group (n = 280) had significantly lower ODI scores (mean difference = - 28.08; 95% CI: [- 43.53, - 12.63]) than the control group (n = 240). Similarly, the RFA group (n = 279) had significantly lower VAS scores (mean difference = - 3.16; 95% CI: [- 5.02, - 1.31]) than the control group (n = 238). Our study demonstrates RFA as a promising intervention for chronic discogenic low back pain, noting significant improvements in pain control and disability. Although not intended to substitute surgical decompression, it can serve as a better alternative to other non-operative therapies in patients who do not require surgical management. Clinical trial number: not applicable.

Modic changes: From potential molecular mechanisms to future research directions (Review)

Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Although not all patients with Modic changes (MCs) experience LBP, MC is often closely associated with LBP and disc degeneration. In clinical practice, the focus is usually on symptoms related to MC, which are hypothesized to be associated with LBP; however, the link between MC and nerve compression remains unclear. In cases of intervertebral disc herniation, nerve compression is often the definitive cause of symptoms. Recent advances have shed light on the pathophysiology of MC, partially elucidating its underlying mechanisms. The pathogenesis of MC involves complex bone marrow‑disc interactions, resulting in bone marrow inflammation and edema. Over time, hematopoietic cells are gradually replaced by adipocytes, ultimately resulting in localized bone marrow sclerosis. This process creates a barrier between the intervertebral disc and the bone marrow, thereby enhancing the stability of the vertebral body. The latest understanding of the pathophysiology of MC suggests that chronic inflammation plays a significant role in its development and hypothesizes that the complement system may contribute to its pathological progression. However, this hypothesis requires further research to be confirmed. The present review we proposed a pathological model based on current research, encompassing the transition from Modic type 1 changes (MC1) to Modic type 2 changes (MC2). It discussed key cellular functions and their alterations in the pathogenesis of MC and outlined potential future research directions to further elucidate its mechanisms. Additionally, it reviewed the current clinical staging and pathogenesis of MC, recommended the development of an updated staging system and explored the prospects of integrating emerging artificial intelligence technologies.

Intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation: A 5-year pooled analysis from three prospective clinical trials

Background

Vertebrogenic pain is a documented source of anterior column chronic low back pain (CLBP) that stems from damaged vertebral endplates. Nociceptive signals are transmitted by the basivertebral nerve (BVN) and endplate damage is observed as Type 1 or Type 2 Modic changes (MC) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The clinical impact and safety of intraosseous radiofrequency ablation of the BVN (BVNA) for the treatment of vertebrogenic pain has been demonstrated in three prospective clinical trials (two randomized and one single-arm study).

Objective

Report aggregate long-term BVNA outcomes at five years from three studies.

Methods

Pooled results at 5-years post-BVNA are reported for three clinical trials with similar inclusion/exclusion criteria and outcomes measurements: 1) a prospective, open label, single-arm follow-up of the treatment arm of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing BVNA to sham ablation (SMART); 2) a prospective, open label, single-arm follow-up of the treatment arm of an RCT comparing BVNA to standard care (INTRACEPT); and 3) a prospective, open label, single-arm long-term follow-up study of BVNA-treated participants (CLBP Single-Arm). Paired datasets (baseline and 5-years) for mean changes in Oswestry disability index (ODI) and numeric pain scores (NPS) were analyzed using a two-sided paired t-test with a 0.05 level of significance. Secondary outcomes included responder rates, patient satisfaction, adverse events, and healthcare utilization.

Results

Two hundred forty-nine (249) of 320 BVNA-treated participants (78 % participation rate) completed a five-year visit (mean of 5.6 years follow-up). At baseline, 71.9 % of these participants reported back pain for ≥5 years, 27.7 % were taking opioids, and 61.8 % had prior therapeutic lumbar spinal injections. Pain and functional improvements were significant at 5-years with a mean improvement in NPS of 4.32 ± 2.45 points (95 % CI 4.01, 4.63; p < 0.0001) from 6.79 ± 1.32 at baseline and a mean improvement in ODI of 28.0 ± 17.5 (95 % CI 25.8, 30.2; p < 0.0001) from 44.5 ± 11.0 at baseline. Nearly one-third (32.1 %) of patients reported being pain-free (NPS = 0) at five years, 72.7 % of patients indicated their condition improved and 68.7 % had resumed activity levels they had prior to onset of CLBP. In the sixty-nine participants taking opioids at baseline, 65.2 % were no longer taking them at 5-years, and spinal injections decreased by 58.1 %. The rate of lumbosacral treatment (therapeutic spinal injection, radiofrequency ablation, or surgery) for the same index pain source and vertebral level was 33/249 (13.2 %) at 5 years post BVNA; including a 6.0 % rate of lumbar fusion. There were no serious device or device-procedure related adverse events reported during the long-term follow-up.

Conclusion

In this 5-year aggregate analysis, BVNA significantly improved pain and function scores compared to baseline. Similarly, there were significant reductions in opioid consumption and spinal injections post BVNA. Data demonstrate a strong safety profile with no serious device or device-related events and low healthcare utilization rate for the same index pain source through a mean of 5.6 years. Results demonstrate that intraosseous BVNA treatment for patients with vertebrogenic pain is safe, effective, and durable through five years.

Radiation exposure during basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablations

Background

Basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablations (BVNRFA) is a relatively new procedure that has demonstrated positive effects to treat chronic low back pain. Fluoroscopy guidance is utilized to access the vertebral body via the pedicle and confirm the correct location of the probe for ablation. Radiation exposure during this procedure has not been previously reported.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the average fluoroscopic time and radiation exposure during BVNRFA.

Methods

Patients treated with BVNRFA that had failed conservative treatment, with primarily midline back pain, and corroborating Modic type I or Modic type II changes on MRI at a tertiary academic spine center were retrospectively analyzed. Chart review was conducted to obtain patient demographics, fluoroscopic time and radiation exposure, involvement of trainees, and vertebral levels treated. Average fluoroscopic and radiation exposure was calculated.

Results

A total of 55 patients were included in this study. The average fluoroscopic time was 152.5 s (±84.3 s). The average cumulative dose was 70.3 mGy (±53.0 mGy) and the average dose area product was 7.9 mGy·cm2 (±5.2 mGy·cm2).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that the average fluoroscopic time during BVNRFA to be about 2 and a half minutes.

Prospective cohort study of basivertebral nerve ablation for chronic low back pain in a real-world setting: 12 months follow-up

Background

The basivertebral nerve, which densely supplies the vertebral endplates, is a potential source of chronic low back pain transmission in patients with Modic changes. Basivertebral nerve ablation (BVNA), a minimally invasive procedure, aims to disrupt this pain signaling.

Objectives

In this study, we investigated BVNA's effectiveness in treatment of vertebrogenic low back pain and we followed patients for 12 months to assess long-term effectiveness.

Study design

Single group prospective cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05692440).

Setting

Single-center, community private practice.

Methods

Thirty-five patients were treated with the INTRACEPT® device (Boston Scientific, MA, USA). Thirty-one patients completed Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS), and SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) at baseline and follow-up visits up to 12 months.

Results

The average age of the 31 patients was 73.0 ± 6.34 years and 71.0 % of the population was male (N=22)) at baseline. All four self-reported outcomes (ODI, VAS, SF-36 PCS, and MCS) showed statistically and clinically significant improvements from baseline through 12 months (all p < 0.001, with the exception of the SF-36 MCS at 1 month, p = 0.165). Overall, 67.7 % of patients demonstrated ODI improvements above the minimal clinically important difference (decrease of at least 15 points) and 77.4 % of patients demonstrated a decrease on the VAS above the minimal clinically important difference (≥2 cm reduction) at 12 months.

Limitations

Limitations of the study include the lack of a control group and potentially unintentional bias in patient selection.

Conclusions

BVNA demonstrates potential as an effective and minimally invasive treatment for chronic low back pain in a real-world patient cohort where substantial improvements were observed. These results align with those seen in previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and industry-funded studies of BVNA.

Potential Cost Savings with 60-day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Treatment in Chronic Axial Low Back Pain

INTRODUCTION

Chronic axial low back pain (CLBP) that is not responsive to medication management or physical therapy often requires significant clinical intervention. Several interventional pain management options exist, including a 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) treatment. This economic evaluation investigated the potential for projected cost savings associated with prioritizing 60-day PNS treatment relative to a 'standard of care' (SOC) approach (where patients do not have access to 60-day PNS).

METHODS

A decision tree (supervised machine learning) model tracked treatment progression across two hypothetical cohorts of US patients with CLBP in whom non-interventional options were ineffective (Cohort A: treatment starting with 60-day PNS followed by any additional interventional and surgical treatments versus Cohort B: standard of care interventional and surgical treatments without access to 60-day PNS). Treatment efficacy estimates were based on published success rates. Conditional on treatment failure, up to two additional interventions were considered within the 12-month time frame in both cohorts. SOC treatment options included epidural injection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), basivertebral nerve ablation (BVNA), PNS permanent implant (PNS-PI), spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial/implant, and spinal fusion surgery. Treatment choice probabilities in both cohort algorithms were based on clinician interviews. Costs were based on national Medicare reimbursement levels in the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) setting. Savings reflected the difference in projected costs between cohorts. A Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analyses were conducted to generate confidence intervals and identify important inputs.

RESULTS

The treatment algorithm which prioritized initial 60-day PNS treatment was projected to save $8056 (95% CI $6112-$9981) per patient during the first year of interventional treatment relative to the SOC approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the 60-day PNS treatment as an initial interventional treatment in patients with CLBP may result in significant savings for Medicare. Projected savings may be even larger for commercial payers covering non-Medicare patients.

Computed Tomographic Characterization for Basivertebral Nerve Ablation Utilizing a Radiofrequency Multitined Expandable Electrode

Background

A growing body of clinical evidence has demonstrated that intraosseous minimally invasive basivertebral nerve (BVN) ablation results in significant and durable improvements in vertebrogenic back pain. Thus, it is important to develop, refine and validate new and additional devices to accomplish this procedure.

Methods

Using reconstructions of 31 patient computed tomography (CT) scans of the lumbosacral spine (L1-S1), the primary objective was to simulate the intravertebral placement of a novel multitined expandable electrode in bipolar configuration at the targeted ablation site and determine if the proper trajectories could be achieved in order for the device tips to be in the correct position for lesion formation at the BVN plexus. Successful device deployment required that the distance between tips was between 10 mm and 20 mm.

Results

The mean distances between device tips ranged from 11.35 mm (L5) to 11.87 mm (L3), and there were no statistically significance differences across the six vertebral levels (F = 0.72, p = 0.61). The percentage of successful intraosseous device placements within the tip distance acceptable range (≥ 10 mm to ≤ 20 mm) was 90% (162 of 180), with no tip-to-tip distances > 20 mm. There was a notable association between decreasing vertebral level and mean degree of angulation between contralateral devices ranging from 50.90° at L1 to 91.51° at S1, and the difference between across the six vertebral levels was significant (F = 89.5, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Feasibility evidence is provided from real world CT imaging data that validates using the multitined electrode for proper intraosseous placement within the vertebral body to effectively ablate the BVN plexus.

Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Treatment of Lower Back Pain

Lower back pain (LBP) is a widely prevalent global health issue, affecting over half a billion people and remaining the leading cause of years lived with disability (YLDs). LBP significantly impacts healthcare systems, with substantial costs related to surgical procedures and lost workdays. Vertebrogenic back pain (VBP), characterized by specific clinical symptoms and associated with Modic changes (MC) in vertebral endplates, best seen on MRI, is a significant subset of LBP. This paper explores the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and current reports and studies focusing on VBP and the role of basivertebral nerve (BVN) ablation as a therapeutic intervention. Multiple studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses, demonstrate the efficacy of BVN ablation in reducing pain and improving function in patients with chronic LBP associated with MC.

Elective Spinal Transpedicular Ablation of the Basivertebral Nerve of the Vertebral Segment in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients

BACKGROUND

Ablation of the basivertebral nerve (BVNA) innervating the vertebral endplate has become a standard treatment of vertebrogenic chronic low back pain (CLBP) arising from vertebral endplate damage. BVNA treatment of CLBP in clinical trials was successful and durable for pain relief and return to daily activities. This case review adds new information about older patients with adult degenerative spinal deformity (ASD) and associated comorbidities not previously described in clinical trials.

METHODS

One hundred and eighteen ASD patients with vertebrogenic CLBP in a community practice setting underwent 503 levels of BVNA (average 4.3 levels). Forty-one patients with minimal comorbidities (Group A) were compared to 77 patients with significant comorbidities (Group B). Visual analog scale (VAS 10 cm) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI 100-point scale) were obtained before BVNA and at a last follow-up (LFU).

RESULTS

Group A VAS at LFU was an average of 2 cm, a 7 cm improvement. Group B VAS at LFU was 3 cm, a 6 cm improvement. At LFU, Group A ODI mean was 14 points or minimal disability, with a 39-point improvement, and Group B improved 28 points to 29 but remained moderately disabled. At LFU, the lumbar stenosis with laminectomy and BVNA subgroup of 26 had mean VAS 2 cm and ODI 28-point improvement but remained on average 21 points with a final low moderate disability. Eleven laminectomy and BVNA patients had continued posterior column pain related to radiculopathy, and or peripheral neuropathy, and sacroiliac joint pain in 30%. Mobile spondylolisthesis in 21 patients in Group B at LFU had a 6 cm improvement of VAS and 25-point improvement of ODI but remained moderately disabled on ODI. At LFU in group B, there was a 20% incidence of continued stenosis and radiculopathy symptoms. At LFU, Lumbar fusion was recommended in 9. Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) occurred in 9 after BVNA (10%) of Group B. These patients were older (mean 78 years), and all had significant osteoporosis. Eight fractures were within the area of the BVNA, and 1 was an S2 sacral fracture. These VCF patients were treated with vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty and continued preventive care with added teriparatide. At LFU, the VCF subgroup had a modest 6 cm improvement in VAS to 4 cm and continued to have significant severe to moderate disability (Oswestry Disability Index average of 38 points).

CONCLUSION

Clinical trials of BVNA treatment of CLBP found success and durability for pain relief and daily activities. Patients with ASD without comorbidities showed durable pain relief of vertebrogenic CLBP and return of daily activities similar to clinical trials. In those with comorbidities, the result was an improvement in pain and disability that could be diminished by the complications related to the comorbidities. This is new information about BVNA for older patients with spinal deformity and other comorbidities. This study could impact research practice and policy to expand indications of BVNA to patients with adult spinal deformity.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This case series represents the only literature regarding patients with adult spinal deformity treated with BVNA. The results were predictable and reproducible. Many patients were satisfied, would have the procedure again and would recommend BVNA to friends and family. This finding should encourage acceptance of patients with ASD for BVNA and, in fact, BVNA should probably be done before any fusion to limit and choose levels for inclusion in fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Low back pain-related healthcare utilization following intraosseous basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation: a pooled analysis from three prospective clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation (BVNA) for treating vertebrogenic pain is established, but low back pain-related healthcare utilization (LBPr-HU) following BVNA continues to be defined.

METHODS

LBPr-HU data were pooled from 3 prospective studies. LBPr-HU categories of interest included non-invasive conservative care, opioid utilization, lumbosacral spinal injection (LSI), lumbosacral radiofrequency ablation (LRFA), and lumbosacral spinal surgery. Pre- and post-BVNA LBPr-HU were compared at both 1- and 5-years using McNemar's test for proportions and paired t-tests for means.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-seven patients received BVNA and had 1-year follow-up; 205 had long-term follow-up (mean of 5.3 ± 1.33 years). Twenty-seven percent fewer participants initiated conservative care in the year post-BVNA compared to the year preceding BVNA (P < .001; 95% CI 19.8-34.5). Of 77/247 participants taking opioids at baseline, 40.3% and 61.7% fewer were taking them at one-year and 5.3 ± 1.33 years post-BVNA, respectively (P < .001). Of participants receiving LSIs in the year preceding BVNA, 81.2% fewer received LSI(s) in the year post-BVNA (P < .001; 95% CI 70.7-90.7); a 76.4% reduction in LSIs was maintained through a mean of 5.3 ± 1.33 years post-BVNA. LRFA rates were 1.6% at 1-year post-BVNA and 8.3% at 5.3 ± 1.33 years post-BVNA. Lumbar fusion surgery was 0.8% at 1-year post-BVNA and 6.5% at 5.3 ± 1.33 years post-BVNA.

CONCLUSIONS

In this aggregate analysis of patients with vertebrogenic pain, utilization of conservative care, opioids, LSIs, and LRFA were substantially reduced through 5 years post-BVNA compared to baseline. Lumbar fusion rates were less than half the published value at 5 years in similar populations.

Intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation: Pooled long-term outcomes from two prospective clinical trials

Background

Vertebrogenic pain is an established source of anterior column chronic low back pain (CLBP) resulting from damaged vertebral endplates with pain signals transmitted by the basivertebral nerve (BVN). Type 1 or Type 2 Modic changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are objective biomarkers for vertebrogenic pain. Radiofrequency ablation of the BVN (BVNA) has demonstrated both efficacy and effectiveness for the treatment of vertebrogenic pain in two randomized trials. Here, we report 3-year aggregate results from two prospective studies of BVNA-treated patients.

Methods

Pooled results at 3 years post-BVNA are reported for two studies with similar inclusion/exclusion criteria and outcomes measurements: 1) a prospective, open label, single-arm follow-up of the treatment arm of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing BVNA to standard care (INTRACEPT Trial), and 2) a prospective, open label, single cohort long-term follow-up study of BVNA-treated patients. Paired datasets (baseline and 3-years) for mean changes in Oswestry disability index (ODI) and numeric pain scores (NPS) were analyzed using a two-sided t-test with a 0.05 level of significance.

Results

There were 95/113 (84%) BVNA patients who completed a 3-year visit across 22 study sites. At baseline, 71% of patients reported back pain for ≥5 years, 28% were taking opioids, 34% had spinal injections in the prior 12 months, and 14% had prior low back surgery. Pain and functional improvements were significant at 3 years with a mean reduction in NPS of 4.3 points from 6.7 ​at baseline (95% CI 3.8, 4.8; p<0.0001) and a mean reduction in ODI of 31.2 points from 46.1 ​at baseline (95% CI 28.4, 34.0; p<0.0001). Responder rates, using minimal clinically important differences of ≥15-points for ODI and ≥50% reduction in NPS from baseline to three years, were 85.3% and 72.6%, respectively (combined response 69.5%), with 26.3% of patients reporting 100% pain relief at 3 years. There was a 74% reduction in the use of opioids and 84% reduction in the use of therapeutic spinal interventions from baseline to 3 years. There were no serious device or device-procedure related adverse events reported through three years.

Conclusion

Intraosseous BVNA demonstrates statistically significant, clinically meaningful, and durable improvements in pain and function through 3 years in patients with primary vertebrogenic low back pain. BVNA-treated patients significantly reduced opioid use and interventions for low back pain.

Basivertebral nerve ablation for the treatment of chronic low back pain in a community practice setting: 6 Months follow-up

Background

Strong innervation of the vertebral endplates by the basivertebral nerve makes it an ideal target for ablation in the treatment of vertebrogenic low back pain with Modic changes. This data represents the clinical outcomes for 16 consecutively treated patients in a community practice setting.

Methods

Basivertebral nerve ablations were performed on 16 consecutive patients by a single surgeon (WS) utilizing the INTRACEPT® device (Relievant Medsystems, Inc.). Evaluations were performed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and SF-36 were recorded in Medrio electronic data capture software. All patients (n = 16) completed the baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up.

Results

The ODI, VAS, and SF-36 Pain Component Summary showed statistically significant improvements above minimal clinically important differences at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months (all p values <0.05). Change in ODI pain impact declined 13.1 points [95% CI: 0.01,27.2] at one month from baseline, 16.5 points [95% CI: 2.5,30.6] at three months from baseline, and 21.1 points [95% CI: 7.0,35.2] six-months from baseline. SF-36 Mental Component Summary also showed some improvements, but with significance only at 3 months (p = 0.0091).

Conclusions

Basivertebral nerve ablation appears to be a durable, minimally invasive treatment for the relief of chronic low back pain that can be successfully implemented in a community practice setting. To our knowledge, this is the first independently funded US study on basivertebral nerve ablation.

Modic changes as seen on MRI are associated with nonspecific chronic lower back pain and disability

BACKGROUND

Estimating the contribution of endplate oedema known as Modic changes to lower back pain (LBP) has been the subject of multiple observational studies and reviews, some of which conclude that the evidence for an association of Modic change with LBP is uncertain while others demonstrate a clear link. The clinical trials demonstrating the benefit of basivertebral nerve ablation, a therapeutic intervention, in a tightly defined homogenous patient group with chronic LBP and Modic changes type 1 or type 2, provides further evidence for the contribution of Modic changes to LBP and shows that in these subjects, nerve ablation substantially reduces pain and disability. These interventional studies provide direct evidence that Modic changes can be associated with lower back pain and disability. This review set out to explore why the literature to date has been conflicting.

METHODS

A narrative, forensic, non-systematic literature review of selected articles to investigate why the published literature investigating the association between Modic imaging changes and chronic low back pain is inconsistent.

RESULTS

This review found that previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses included both heterogeneous study designs and diverse patient syndromes resulting in an inconsistent association between Modic changes and nonspecific chronic lower back pain. Re-analysis of literature data focussing on more homogenous patient populations provides clearer evidence that Modic changes are associated with nonspecific chronic lower back pain and that type 1 Modic changes are more painful than type 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies using tightly defined homogenous patient groups may provide the best test for association between MRI-findings and pain and disability. Clinical benefit of basivertebral nerve ablation observed in randomised controlled trials further supports the association between type 1 and type 2 Modic changes with pain and disability.

The Effectiveness of Intraosseous Basivertebral Nerve Ablation in the Treatment of Nonradiating Vertebrogenic Pain: A Systematic Review

Intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation has shown sustained efficacy in treating chronic axial low back pain (LBP) in patients with type 1 or 2 Modic changes. This systematic review aims to determine the efficacy of intraosseous basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation in treating nonradiating axial chronic LBP compared to standard therapy, sham, or without contrast. The population of interest is individuals greater than or equal to 18 years old with chronic nonradiating vertebrogenic pain. The key outcome was the percentage of patients with greater than or equal to 50% pain reduction, greater than or equal to 10-point improvement in function and disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), greater than or equal to two-point pain reduction in the visual analog scale (VAS) or numerical pain rating scale, and a decrease in opioid utilization by 10 morphine milligram equivalents. Three databases, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar, were used to retrieve the studies for the review. Two independent reviewers assessed the studies for inclusion using the validated tools for quality appraisal. There were 286 articles in total; however, only 11 publications with extensive data on 413 participants matched the inclusion criteria and were used for this review. At three months, a majority of the participants reported greater than or equal to 10-point improvement in the ODI, a measure of functional and disability improvement on a 10-point scale, and greater than or equal to two-point improvement in the VAS. A good number of patients in the basivertebral nerve ablation (BVNA) arm reported complete pain resolution demonstrating therapy success and the superiority of BVNA over sham and standard treatment.  Basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation, among other criteria, is a safe and minimally invasive therapy that significantly lowers pain and impairment in individuals with vertebrogenic pain with distinct Modic type 1 and 2 changes at lumbar vertebra three-sacral vertebra one (L3-S1) vertebral levels. Proper patient selection and exact procedural methods are essential to the success of basivertebral nerve neurotomy. The findings of the existing investigations require confirmation by nonindustry-funded, large-scale, high-quality trials using generalizable study participants.

ISASS Policy Statement 2022: Literature Review of Intraosseous Basivertebral Nerve Ablation

The index 2020 ISASS Guideline Statement "Intraosseous Ablation of the Basivertebral Nerve for the Relief of Chronic Low Back Pain" was generated in response to growing requests for background, supporting literature, evidence, as well as proper coding for intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation. Since the guideline was published, the American Medical Association has added Current Procedural Terminology category I codes for basivertebral nerve ablation: 64628 and 64629. Additionally, the has recognized a need for greater specificity in differentiating various types of low back pain and has designatedthe International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, Clinical Modification code M54.51, vertebrogenic low back pain, to ensure correct diagnosis. The timing of these additions provides an opportunity to refresh the ISASS Guideline to ensure proper diagnosis and procedural coding and to update the supporting literature and evidence.