Spinal Cord Stimulation for Intractable Pain Caused by Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Case Report

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is one of the causes of lower back pain, and although it has characteristic pain locations and aggravating factors, it is difficult to diagnose and is often overlooked. A case of relief of typical pain symptoms due to sacroiliac joint dysfunction by spinal cord stimulation is presented. A 60-year-old woman presented with severe chronic pain in the left lumbar, lower buttock, iliac, and groin areas that worsened even when sitting for short periods, as well as numbness in the right lower extremity. The patient had chronic lower back pain since experiencing acute lumbosacral sprains in her 20s and 40s, and her symptoms worsened without any trigger in her 60s. Standard imaging examinations showed no lesions that could be causing the pain, and blood tests showed no inflammation or other abnormalities. Although pharmacological treatment did not provide sufficient analgesia, sacroiliac joint block provided a significant analgesic effect, leading to a definitive diagnosis of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. A spinal cord stimulation trial was performed using percutaneous 8-contact leads placed at the thoracic vertebra 8-11 level, and pain relief was confirmed. One month later, 2 new percutaneous 16-contact leads and an implantable pulse generator were implanted simultaneously. One month after implantation, the visual analog scale and the quick inventory of depression symptomatology scores decreased dramatically from 83 to 8 and from 16 to 4, respectively. In addition, the numbness of the right lower extremity disappeared. These analgesic effects were sustained for 12 months.

Comparative Efficacy of Clinical Interventions for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis With Preliminary Design of Treatment Algorithm

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify the most effective clinical treatment method for sacroiliac joint (SIJ)-related pain based on the systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the comparative efficacy of clinical interventions for sacroiliac joint pain by pooling the randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Our team conducted a systematic review and NMA of RCTs to determine the most effective clinical treatment for SIJ-related pain. We searched the PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases for RCTs until February 2023. The PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines were followed. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Based on the search strategy and inclusion criteria, our systematic review and NMA included 9 randomized studies with 652 participants. Research has mainly focused on various radiofrequency sources, but their number is still low. In the network analysis, according to the NMA and mean ranking probabilities for the improvement of pain intensity (PI) and quality of life (QoL), sacroiliac joint fusion and cooled radiofrequency were associated with high treatment rank for improving PI and QoL in patients with sacroiliac joint pain.

CONCLUSION

This NMA suggest that SIJ fusion and cooled radiofrequency could be potential options for improving the QoL and relieving pain in patients with SIJ-related pain. Comparison studies of outcomes between these 2 procedures with solid methodology and a low risk of bias would be very beneficial to identify the optimal treatment option for this challenging disease.

Does Anesthetic Relief Correspond to Future Pain Relief?: A Prospective Trial Examining Future Pain Relief for Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid-Anesthetic Injections

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the association between immediate pain relief from injections of local anesthetic with corticosteroid and subsequent pain relief up to 3 mos. The secondary aim was to examine the time until subjective pain relief after these injections.

DESIGN

This was a single-center, prospective study of patients undergoing ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections for musculoskeletal pain. Subjects completed follow-up surveys at 2 wks, 1 mo, and 3 mos postinjections. χ 2 tests and sensitivity analysis were used to examine the primary outcome, at least 50% relief from the injection. Regression modeling examined the effects of demographic and injection-related variables on outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were enrolled (55% female, mean age 52 yrs). Response rates were 87.1% at 2 wks and 77.2% at 3 mos. The positive likelihood ratios from 50% initial pain relief ranged from 1.22 to 1.29 at the three time points, whereas the negative likelihood ratios ranged from 0.54 to 0.63. More than 75% of participants reported subjective pain relief by day 4 after injection.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive value of immediate pain relief for subsequent longer-term pain relief from corticosteroid-anesthetic injections is not particularly high. Most patients will obtain pain relief within 4 days of a corticosteroid injection.

The Sacroiliac Joint as a Cause of Pain - Review of the Sacroiliac Joint Morphology and Models for Pain Genesis

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, the sacroiliac joint has become increasingly important as a generator of low back pain with and without pseudo-radicular pain in the legs. Up to 27% of reported back pain is generated by disorders in the sacroiliac joint.

METHOD

This review is based on a selective literature search of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) as a possible pain generator. It also considers the anatomical structures and innervation of the sacroiliac joint.

RESULTS

The SIJ is a complex joint in the region of the posterior pelvis and is formed by the sacrum and the ilium bones. The SIJ is very limited in movement in all three planes. Joint stability is ensured by the shape and especially by strong interosseous and extraosseous ligaments. Different anatomical variants of the sacroiliac joint, such as additional extra-articular secondary joints or ossification centres, can be regularly observed in CT scans. There is still controversy in the literature regarding innervation. However, there is agreement on dorsal innervation of the sacroiliac joint from lateral branches of the dorsal rami of the spinal nerves S I-S III with proportions of L III and L IV as well S IV. Nerve fibres and mechanoreceptors can also be detected in the surrounding ligaments.

CONCLUSION

A closer look at the anatomy and innervation of the SIJ shows that the SIJ is more than a simple joint. The complex interaction of the SIJ with its surrounding structures opens the possibility that pain arises from this area. The SIJ and its surrounding structures should be included in the diagnosis and treatment of back and leg pain. Published literature include a number of plausible models for the sacroiliac joint as pain generator. The knowledge of the special anatomy, the complex innervation as well as the special and sometimes very individual functionality of this joint, enhance our understanding of associated pathologies and complaints.

Minimally Invasive and Conservative Interventions for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Review of Recent Literature

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is responsible for approximately a third of reported back pain. Patients with SIJ pain report some of the lowest quality of life scores of any chronic disease. Understanding of the physiology and pathology of the SI joint has changed dramatically over the years, and SI joint pain and injury can now be thought of in two broad categories: traumatic and atraumatic. Both categories of SI joint injury are thought to be caused by inflammation or injury of the joint capsule, ligaments, or subchondral bone in the SI joint. Treatment of SI joint pain usually involves a multi-pronged approach, utilizing both, multi-modal medical pain control and interventional pain/surgical techniques such as steroid injections, radiofrequency nerve ablation, and minimally invasive sacroiliac arthrodesis. Though conservative management through multi-modal pain control and physical therapy have their role as first line therapies, an increasing body of evidence supports the use of minimally invasive procedures, both as adjuvant treatments to conservative management and as second line therapies for patient's that fail first line treatment.

Review of Sacroiliac Joint Injection Techniques

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of the review is to evaluate the current evidence on techniques for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injections using landmark, ultrasound, fluoroscopy, and computed tomography (CT) guidance.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to find all relevant retrospective, prospective, and randomized controlled (RCT) studies where SIJ injections were performed under ultrasound, fluoroscopy, and CT guidance.

RECENT FINDINGS

A total of eight studies were identified with suitable data for inclusion. There were two RCTs, four prospective, and two retrospective studies included. Case reports or case series were excluded. A total of 420 patients were enrolled across all eight studies. CT guidance provided the most accurate needle placement in the SIJ injections followed by fluoroscopy, which was more accurate than ultrasound. Landmark-guided injections were not accurate. Accurate needle placement in SIJ confirms SIJ-mediated pain and injection of corticosteroids leads to improvement in pain and/or disability outcome measures regardless of guidance technique. Diagnostic CT-guided SIJ injections should be performed prior to consideration of SIJ fusion.

Validity of Physical Exam Maneuvers in the Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Pathology

BACKGROUND

A combination of physical examination maneuvers is currently considered necessary to help predict who will respond to injections in the sacroiliac joint. However, the literature on this topic currently consists of conflicting studies, with one showing the value of a combination of exam maneuvers and the other showing no real value.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic validity of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) physical exam maneuvers using anesthetic intra-articular injection as a reference standard.

DESIGN

A single institution prospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with the clinical diagnosis of SIJ pain and referred for SIJ injection were enrolled.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Numeric rating scale (NRS) to assess pain intensity.

RESULTS

Participants underwent fluoroscopically guided SIJ intra-articular injection with 1 cc of 2% lidocaine and 1 cc of triamcinolone 40 mg. Patients' pain was assessed via 0-10 NRS pre-injection and immediately postinjection to determine positive anesthetic response to the injection. Six physical exam maneuvers (thigh thrust, Geanslen's test, FABER test, distraction test, compression test, and sacral thrust) were performed pre-injection and 15 minutes postinjection. The results of these SIJ physical exam maneuvers were evaluated singly and in combinations for diagnostic power in relation to a positive anesthetic response (>80% relief) to the injection. No association was found between a single SIJ physical exam maneuver or combination of maneuvers and anesthetic response to the injection.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, patient physical exam maneuvers to identify intra-articular SIJ pain did not demonstrate diagnostic value when compared with the reference standard of an intra-articular anesthetic block.

Nonoperative Treatment Options for Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Pain

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is thought to be a component of low back pain in 20% of people who suffer with it chronically. There is no consistent objective diagnostic testing that includes SIJ pain as the diagnosis and thereby it can become a diagnosis of exclusion. Treatment of SIJ pain is variable, and no set method or protocol of treatment has been found to be efficacious or reliable. Thus, the healthcare provider is often left to create an individual treatment plan based on their own experiences and expertise. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe and discuss nonoperative treatment options for patients with SIJ pain. Further, coordination of treatment options and progression of treatment will be offered.

Pain and Functional Outcomes After Sacroiliac Joint Injection with Anesthetic and Corticosteroid at Six Months, Stratified by Anesthetic Response and Physical Exam Maneuvers

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injection outcomes with local anesthetic and corticosteroid.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING

Single academic medical center.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients referred for SIJ injection with a clinical diagnosis of SIJ pain underwent injections with 1:1 mixture of 2% lidocaine and triamcinolone 40 mg/mL. Pain provocation physical exam (PE) maneuvers were recorded immediately before and after injection. Outcome measures at two to four weeks and six months included pain numeric rating scale (NRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

RESULTS

For the analysis of outcomes by the overall group (not stratified by PE and/or anesthetic block), a 58.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = +/-16.5%) ≥2 NRS reduction, a 32.4% (95% CI = +/-15.7%) ≥50% NRS reduction, and a 38.2% (95% CI = +/-16.3%) ≥30% ODI reduction were observed at two to four weeks, with similar improvements at six months. Outcomes stratified based on pre-injection PE did not reveal significant differences at either time point. The stratification based on the presence of 100% postinjection anesthetic response demonstrated a significant difference at two to four weeks for ≥50% NRS improvement. The true positive/true negative group (TP/TN) stratification demonstrated a significant difference for ≥50% NRS improvement at two to four weeks, whereas six-month outcomes for TP/TN demonstrated significant differences for ≥50% NRS and ≥30% ODI improvement. An increased injection response was observed with stratification of patients more likely to have true SIJ pain (i.e., TP), with TP/TN stratification demonstrating a 75% (95% CI = +/-30.0%) ≥2 NRS improvement and a 62.5% (95% CI = +/-33.5%) improvement of ≥50% NRS and ≥30% ODI for the TP group at two to four weeks, with similar results at six months.

CONCLUSIONS

SIJ steroid injection based on referral clinical diagnosis is unlikely to demonstrate true injection efficacy, and more specific selection criteria are warranted.