1
|
Yan L, Wang X, Zhang Z, Li Z, Chi L, Wang L. Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus block combined with conscious sedation in ambulatory patients undergoing percutaneous microwave ablation of uterine myomas: Study protocol for a single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Heliyon 2024; 10:e26421. [PMID: 38434068 PMCID: PMC10906327 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Pain is a major challenge in performing ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA) of uterine myomas. Inadequate analgesia by local anesthetics hinders the possibility of conducting PMWA of uterine myomas in the Ambulatory Surgery Center (ASC) of the Department of Ultrasound. Objective The superior hypogastric plexus (SHP) forms a suitable target for pain relief through the blockade, as it contains nociceptive afferent fibers from pelvic organs such as the uterus, rectum, and bladder. Superior hypogastric plexus block (SHPB) has demonstrated promise as an alternative treatment option for alleviating pelvic pain, reducing opioid consumption, and improving quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided SHPB combined with conscious sedation as an alternative anesthesia option for ambulatory patients receiving ultrasound-guided PMWA of uterine myomas. Methods and analysis This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be carried out at the Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University. Women scheduled for ultrasound-guided PMWA of uterine myomas will be eligible. 86 patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the intervention or control groups in a 1:1 ratio. The intervention group will undergo ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus block (SHPB) combined with conscious sedation, while the control group will receive local anesthesia combined with conscious sedation. The primary outcome is the success rate of anesthesia, secondary outcomes include vasoactive drug consumption, acetaminophen consumption, sleep quality, sonographer satisfaction score, patient satisfaction score, the detained time in hospital, and adverse events. Discussions This RCT represents the inaugural effort to specifically evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided SHPB combined with conscious sedation in patients undergoing ultrasound-guided PMWA of uterine myomas and will provide valuable evidence and insight into the analgesic management of this ambulatory surgery. Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University (Scientific Research Ethics Review 2023, No. 139). The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijuan Yan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
| | - Xiao Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
| | - Zuobing Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
| | - Zhibin Li
- Epidemiology Research Unit, Translational Medicine Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Laiting Chi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Lijuan Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu R, Majdalany BS, Lilly M, Prologo JD, Kokabi N. Agents Used for Nerve Blocks and Neurolysis. Semin Intervent Radiol 2022; 39:387-393. [PMID: 36406019 PMCID: PMC9671686 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The recognition of pain and the treatments used for it are vital for all practitioners. Many types of pain can be treated in a locoregional fashion, which has significant implications not just for any individual patient but for society as a whole. These treatments are most effective when performed in a minimally invasive, image-guided fashion. Interventional radiologists should play a central role in providing these lifestyle-limiting treatments. This article describes the medications most typically used for spinal and extra-axial treatments in the management of patients in pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Wu
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Bill S. Majdalany
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Meghan Lilly
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - J. David Prologo
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aman MM, Mahmoud A, Deer T, Sayed D, Hagedorn JM, Brogan SE, Singh V, Gulati A, Strand N, Weisbein J, Goree JH, Xing F, Valimahomed A, Pak DJ, El Helou A, Ghosh P, Shah K, Patel V, Escobar A, Schmidt K, Shah J, Varshney V, Rosenberg W, Narang S. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Best Practices and Guidelines for the Interventional Management of Cancer-Associated Pain. J Pain Res 2021; 14:2139-2164. [PMID: 34295184 PMCID: PMC8292624 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s315585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Moderate to severe pain occurs in many cancer patients during their clinical course and may stem from the primary pathology, metastasis, or as treatment side effects. Uncontrolled pain using conservative medical therapy can often lead to patient distress, loss of productivity, shorter life expectancy, longer hospital stays, and increase in healthcare utilization. Various publications shed light on strategies for conservative medical management for cancer pain and a few international publications have reviewed limited interventional data. Our multi-institutional working group was assembled to review and highlight the body of evidence that exists for opioid utilization for cancer pain, adjunct medication such as ketamine and methadone and interventional therapies. We discuss neurolysis via injections, neuromodulation including targeted drug delivery and spinal cord stimulation, vertebral tumor ablation and augmentation, radiotherapy and surgical techniques. In the United States, there is a significant variance in the interventional treatment of cancer pain based on fellowship training. As a first of its kind, this best practices and interventional guideline will offer evidenced-based recommendations for reducing pain and suffering associated with malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansoor M Aman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Advocate Aurora Health, Oshkosh, WI, USA
| | - Ammar Mahmoud
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Northern Light Health Eastern Maine Medical Center, Bangor, ME, USA
| | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Shane E Brogan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Vinita Singh
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Amitabh Gulati
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Natalie Strand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Jacqueline Weisbein
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chronic Pain Division, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Johnathan H Goree
- Interventional Pain Medicine, Napa Valley Orthopedic Medical Group, Napa, CA, USA
| | - Fangfang Xing
- Swedish Pain Services, Swedish Health Services, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ali Valimahomed
- Gramercy Pain Center, Holmdel, NJ, & Advanced Orthopedics Sports Medicine Institute, Freehold, NJ, USA
| | - Daniel J Pak
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Antonios El Helou
- Department of Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, The Moncton Hospital, Moncton, NB. Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Krishna Shah
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vishal Patel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Advocate Aurora Health, Oshkosh, WI, USA
| | - Alexander Escobar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Keith Schmidt
- AMITA Neurosciences Institute, Comprehensive Pain Management Program, St. Alexius Medical Center, Hoffman Estates, IL, USA
| | - Jay Shah
- SamWell Institute for Pain Management, Colonia, NJ, USA
| | - Vishal Varshney
- Department of Anesthesia, Providence Healthcare, Vancouver, BC, Canada & Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - William Rosenberg
- Center for the Relief of Pain, Midwest Neurosurgery Associates, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Sanjeet Narang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Urits I, Schwartz R, Herman J, Berger AA, Lee D, Lee C, Zamarripa AM, Slovek A, Habib K, Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Viswanath O. A Comprehensive Update of the Superior Hypogastric Block for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2021; 25:13. [PMID: 33630172 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-020-00933-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This is a comprehensive review of the superior hypogastric block for the management of chronic pelvic pain. It reviews the background, including etiology, epidemiology, and current treatment available for chronic pelvic pain. It then presents the superior hypogastric block and reviews the seminal and most recent evidence about its use in chronic pelvic pain. RECENT FINDINGS Several definitions exist for chronic pelvic pain (CPP), making the diagnosis more challenging for the clinician; however, they commonly describe continuous pain lasting 6 months in the pelvis, with an overwhelming majority of patients being reproductive-aged women. This pain is often one of mechanical, inflammatory, or neuropathic. It is generally underdiagnosed and affects anywhere between 5 and 26% of women. The diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain is clinical, consisting of mainly of a thorough history and physical and ruling out other causes. The pathophysiology is often endometriosis (70%) and also includes PID, adhesions, adenomyosis, uterine fibroids, chronic processes of the GI and urinary tracts, as well as pelvic-intrinsic musculoskeletal causes. Treatment includes physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and oral and parenteral opioids. Interventional techniques provide an added tier of treatment and may help to reduce the requirement for chronic opioid use. Superior hypogastric plexus block is one of the available interventional techniques; first described in 1990, it has been shown to provide long-lasting relief in 50-70% of patients who underwent the procedure. Two approaches described so far, both under fluoroscopy, have seen similar results. More recently, ultrasound and CT-guided procedures have also been described with similar success. The injectate includes local anesthetic, steroids, and neurolytic agents such as phenol or ethanol. CPP is a common debilitating condition. It is diagnosed clinically and is underdiagnosed globally. Current treatments can be helpful at times but may fall short of satisfactory pain relief. Interventional techniques provide an added layer of treatment as well as reduce the requirement for opioids. Superior hypogastric plexus block provides long-lasting relief in many patients, regardless of approach. Evidence level is limited, and further RCTs could help provide better tools for evaluation and patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Urits
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Ruben Schwartz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA.
| | - Jared Herman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Amnon A Berger
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Christopher Lee
- Creighton University School of Medicine - Phoenix Regional Campus, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Alec M Zamarripa
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Annabel Slovek
- Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Kelly Habib
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Alan D Kaye
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Omar Viswanath
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.,Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This paper aims to give the specialist and non-specialist alike an overview of the considerations involved in the management of cancer-related pain in the older population. RECENT FINDINGS Comprehensive guidelines on cancer pain management have been published recently by expert bodies. Cancer pain differs in many respects to other pain conditions and we are likely to encounter it more frequently in older patients in the future. The elderly are more sensitive to the effects of many analgesic medications. The elderly patient with cancer pain presents a unique challenge to the treating physician. The biological effects of ageing impact on the efficacy of many pain management strategies as well as its diagnosis and assessment. Treatment options can be broadly divided into pharmacological, non-pharmacological and interventional. A multidisciplinary approach and frequent re-assessment are essential in achieving favourable outcomes in this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Finnerty
- Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Level 4, Whitty Building, Eccles Street, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland.
| | - Áine O'Gara
- Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Level 4, Whitty Building, Eccles Street, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland
| | - Donal J Buggy
- Department of Anaesthesia, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Level 4, Whitty Building, Eccles Street, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|