The Short-term Effect of Graded Motor Imagery on the Affective Components of Pain in Subjects with Chronic Shoulder Pain Syndrome: Open-Label Single-Arm Prospective Study

The effectiveness of graded motor imagery training on pain and functionality in patients with subacromial pain syndrome: A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial

Background

Pain from subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) can limit individuals' daily activities and reduce physical performance. The effectiveness of graded motor imagery (GMI) training for this condition remains unexplored. This prospective, randomized controlled trial aimed to determine the effects of GMI training in patients with chronic painful SAPS.

Methods

Forty-two patients with SAPS were randomly assigned to the GMI (n = 21) and the control (n = 21) groups. Primary measures were the visual analogue scale (VAS), and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Secondary measures were Active Range of Motion (AROM), muscle strength, lateralization performance and Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ). Evaluations occurred at baseline, postintervention (6 weeks), and after a 6-week follow up.

Results

The GMI group showed significantly greater improvements in both primary and secondary outcomes compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Significantly larger effect sizes were found in favor of the GMI group for VAS, DASH, abduction, external rotation AROM, muscle strength, lateralization performance, and KVIQ (ηp2 < 0.14, p < 0.05, for all).

Conclusions

The integration of GMI training into conventional physiotherapy for SAPS rehabilitation provides more effective clinical results in improving pain intensity and increasing functionality.

Does Integration of Graded Motor Imagery Training Augment the Efficacy of a Multimodal Physiotherapy Program for Patients With Frozen Shoulder? A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of numerous treatment modalities for frozen shoulder, spanning from nonsurgical approaches to surgical interventions, a consensus regarding the most effective treatment remains elusive. Current studies emphasize that pain in frozen shoulder affects central nervous system activity and leads to changes in cortical structures, which are responsible for processing sensory information (like pain) and controlling motor functions (like movement). These cortical changes highlight the importance of including the central nervous system in the management of frozen shoulder. It is therefore recommended that treatment should provide more effective management by focusing not only on the shoulder region but also on the cortical areas thought to be affected.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Among patients treated nonsurgically for frozen shoulder, is graded motor imagery added to a multimodal physical therapy program more effective than multimodal physical therapy alone in terms of (1) Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores, (2) pain with activities and QuickDASH (Q-DASH) scores, and (3) ROM after 8 weeks of treatment?

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial, we considered the following as eligible for inclusion: (1) ROM < 50% compared with the unaffected shoulder, (2) clinically and radiologically confirmed primary frozen shoulder, and (3) 30% loss of joint ROM in at least two planes compared with the unaffected shoulder. Diagnosis of patients was based on patient history, symptoms, clinical examination, and exclusion of other conditions. A total of 38 patients with frozen shoulder were randomly assigned to either the graded motor imagery group (n = 19) or the multimodal physiotherapy group (n = 19). The groups did not differ in age, height, weight, gender, and dominant and affected side. In both groups, there were no losses to follow-up during the study period, and there was no crossover between groups. The multimodal physiotherapy program encompassed a variety of treatments, including stretching exercises, ROM exercises, joint-oriented mobilization techniques, scapular mobilization, strengthening exercises, and the application of cold agents. The graded motor imagery program, as an addition to the multimodal physiotherapy program, included the following steps: (1) left-right discrimination (identifying left and right body parts), (2) motor imagery (mentally visualizing movements), and (3) mirror therapy training (using mirrors to trick the brain into thinking the affected part is moving). Both groups of patients participated in a program of 12 sessions, each lasting approximately 45 minutes, twice a week for 6 weeks. Participants were assessed at baseline, after 6 weeks, and at 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the SPADI score, which ranges from 0 to 100, with higher values denoting greater disability. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for SPADI scores is reported to be 13.2 points. Secondary outcomes were shoulder ROM, Numeric Pain Rating Scale activity score (scored from 0 points, indicating "no pain," to 10 points, indicating "worst pain imaginable"), and Q-DASH score (ranging from 0 to 100 points, with a higher score indicating higher functional disability). Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare means between one or more variables based on repeated observations.

RESULTS

After 8 weeks of treatment, patients treated with graded motor imagery plus multimodal physical therapy experienced greater mean ± SD improvement from baseline in terms of SPADI scores than did the multimodal physical therapy group (65 ± 9 versus 55 ± 12, mean difference 10 points [95% confidence interval 4 to 17 points]; p = 0.01). Graded motor imagery when added to standard therapy did not produce a clinically important difference in pain scores with activity compared with physical therapy alone (7.0 ± 1.3 versus 5.9 ± 1.4, mean difference 1 point [95% CI 0.2 to 2.0 points], which was below our prespecified MCID; p = 0.04). However, improvements in Q-DASH score at 8 weeks were superior in the graded motor imagery group by a clinically important margin (58 ± 6 versus 50 ± 10, mean difference 9 points [95% CI 3 to 14 points], which was below our prespecified MCID; p = 0.01). ROM was generally better in the group that received the program augmented by graded motor imagery, but the differences were generally small.

CONCLUSION

Adding graded motor imagery to a multimodal physiotherapy program was clinically superior to multimodal physiotherapy alone in improving function in patients with frozen shoulder. However, no clinically superior scores were achieved in ROM or activity-related pain. Additionally, the follow-up period was short, considering the tendency of frozen shoulder to recur. Although adding graded motor imagery provides superiority in many scores and does not require high-budget equipment, the disadvantages such as the difference in some scores being sub-MCID and the need for expertise and experience should not be ignored. Consequently, while graded motor imagery shows promise, further research with longer follow-up periods is recommended to fully understand its benefits and limitations in the treatment of frozen shoulder.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Tactile acuity, left/right judgment performance, motor imagery ability, and pressure-pain threshold in patients with chronic rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a cross-sectional case-control study

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain can alter cortical pain representation, and tests like Two-Point Discrimination Test (TPDT), Left/Right Judgment Task (LRJT), motor imagery, and Pressure-Pain Threshold (PPT) can assess these changes. However, their applicability to all pain mechanisms is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the TPDT, LRJT, motor imagery ability, and PPT of chronic rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (C-RCRSP) patients with asymptomatic and pain-free controls.

METHODS

Forty-eight C-RCRSP patients and 45 pain-free controls were assessed using a caliper for TPDT and the Recognize® application for LRJT. Motor ability, PPT, physical function, fear avoidance, pain catastrophizing, and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) were also evaluated. As part of the subgroup analysis, C-RCRSP patients were divided into two groups based on their CSI (≥40, n = 19; <40, n = 29).

RESULTS

C-RCRSP patients demonstrated higher TPDT thresholds [acromion (F = 5.41, p = 0.001) and deltoid (F = 26.67, p < 0.001)] but no significant differences in LRJT performance [recognition accuracy (F = 2.47, p = 0.063) and response time (F = 0.98, p = 0.414)] than pain-free controls in both shoulder joints. C-RCRSP patients had poorer motor imagery abilities (p < 0.001). The deltoid region PPT differed significantly between the groups (F = 17.45, p < 0.001), but it was not significant for the tibialis anterior region (F = 1.16, p = 0.33). C-RCRSP patients with a CSI≥40 reported higher night pain, reduced shoulder range of motion, slower response times, poorer motor imagery ability, and higher scores on pain-related questionnaires compared to those with a CSI<40 (p = 0.043-<0.001).

CONCLUSION

C-RCRSP patients demonstrated poorer tactile acuity, mechanical sensitivity, and motor imagery ability especially in those with central sensitization, which should be considered in treatment planning.

Online Graded Motor Imagery Is Effective in Women Diagnosed With Pelvic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Effective therapeutic strategies are crucial for managing genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD), a condition presenting challenges for both patients and health care providers. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of an online graded motor imagery (GMI) program in alleviating pain intensity and improving sexual function in women diagnosed with GPPPD.

METHODS

Eighty-seven women were randomly assigned to either an online GMI group or a control group. The online GMI protocol involved engaging participants in 2-week segments of left/right judgment exercises, mental simulation of movements, and gradual exposure therapy. After 6 weeks, we assessed pain intensity and sexual function. The control group gained access to the program upon study completion.

RESULTS

The online GMI group demonstrated a significant reduction in pain intensity, coupled with improvements in sexual function. Notably, participants with enhanced movement imagery abilities experienced greater improvements, while those with negative beliefs and thoughts regarding vaginal penetration showed lower sexual function scores.

CONCLUSION

An online GMI program is effective in alleviating the pain burden faced by women dealing with GPPPD.

IMPACT

Effectively addressing pelvic pain in patients remains a daunting challenge for physical therapists. Therefore, implementing efficient and easily accessible strategies is crucial. The incorporation of GMI intervention proves to be an effective approach for improving both pain and sexual functioning in women with GPPPD.

Effectiveness of movement representation techniques in non-specific shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the effects of movement representation techniques (MRT) on pain, range of motion, functional outcomes, and pain-related fear in patients with non-specific shoulder pain (NSSP). A literature search conducted in PubMed, PEDro, EBSCO, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and gray literature on April 31, 2023. We selected seven randomized controlled trials based on the PICOS framework. Incomplete data or non-NSSP excluded. Study quality was assessed using the PEDro scale (mean score = 6.43), and certainty of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE approach. MRT demonstrated a large effect size for pain reduction (high heterogeneity, I2 = 85.2%, Hedges'g = 1.324, 95% CI = 0.388-2.260, P = 0.006), functional improvement (moderate heterogeneity, I2 = 70.82%, Hedges'g = 1.263, 95% CI = 0.622-1.904, P < 0.001), and reduction of pain-related fear (moderate heterogeneity, I2 = 70.86%, Hedges'g = 0.968, 95% CI = 0.221-1.716, P < 0.001). MRT also showed significant benefits for range of motion, particularly in flexion (low heterogeneity, I2 = 26.38%, Hedges'g = 0.683), abduction (low heterogeneity, I2 = 33.27%, Hedges'g = 0.756), and external rotation (low heterogeneity, I2 = 48.33%, Hedges'g = 0.542) (P < 0.001 for all), while no significant effect was found for internal rotation (P > 0.05). No publication bias was detected. While limited evidence and methodological concerns necessitate further research, MRT appears to positively impact pain, range of motion, functional outcomes, and pain-related fear in NSSP patients.

Efficacy of mirror neuron system-based therapy for rehabilitation of upper limb orthopedic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of mirror neuron system-based therapy for managing pain and improving motor and upper limb function in patients with upper limb orthopedic conditions.

LITERATURE SURVEY

Systematic bibliographical searches of the PubMed, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL registries and databases up to September 2023 were conducted to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of mirror neuron system-based therapy for rehabilitation of upper limb orthopedic conditions.

METHODOLOGY

Two reviewers assessed the RCTs using a Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and extracted data from studies with similar outcome measures in the domains of pain, motor function, or functional score, which were pooled into meta-analyses.

SYNTHESIS

The review included 13 studies to compare the efficacy of mirror neuron system-based therapy with that of conventional rehabilitation programs. The therapy reduced pain intensity (mean difference [MD] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46-2.63) and kinesiophobia (MD 8.43, 95% CI 6.98 to 9.88), and increased grip strength (MD 1.86, 95% CI 0.28-3.45). The therapy also improved upper limb functional outcomes as assessed by the 30-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire score (MD 13.52, 95% CI 10.63-16.41). However, the outcomes as assessed by the 11-item QuickDASH questionnaire and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) were not superior to conventional rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Mirror neuron system-based therapy for rehabilitation of upper limb orthopedic conditions may reduce pain intensity and kinesophobia, and improve grip strength and DASH scores compared with conventional rehabilitation programs. However, this interpretation is limited by the heterogeneity and various quality of the RCTs included in our meta-analysis.

Affective and Clinical Outcomes Related to Pain After Graded Motor Imagery in Patients With Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Pre-Post-Single-Group Study

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess at 6-month and 1-year follow-up the effect of graded motor imagery (GMI) in addition to usual care on the affective and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic shoulder pain. Methods: A pre-post-intervention single-group study was conducted. One hundred forty-eight patients with chronic shoulder pain were included. All participants received a 6-week GMI program in addition to usual care. The primary outcome assessed was pain intensity using visual analog scale (VAS), the secondary outcomes were fear of movement with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), catastrophization with the pain catastrophization scale (PCS), shoulder flexion active range of motion (AROM) with a goniometer, and central sensitization with the central sensitization inventory (CSI). All outcomes were assessed at baseline and 6-month and 1-year follow-up. Results: At 6 months, GMI showed to be statistically significant for all outcomes assessed (p < 0.001). At 1-year follow-up, the VAS showed a decrease of 3.3 cm (p < 0.001), TSK showed a decrease of 16.1 points (p < 0.001), PCS showed a decrease of 17.4 points (p < 0.001), AROM showed an increase of 29.9° (p < 0.001), and CSI showed a decrease of 17.9 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: At medium- and long-term follow-up, the individuals who received the GMI program in addition to usual care showed a clinically and statistically significant change for all outcomes assessed. Further studies, including clinical trials, are needed to confirm our findings.

App-Mohedo®: A mobile app for the management of chronic pelvic pain. A design and development study

BACKGROUND

Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP) has been described as a public health priority worldwide, and it is among the most prevalent and costly healthcare problems. Graded motor imagery (GMI) is a therapeutic tool that has been successfully used to improve pain in several chronic conditions. GMI therapy is divided into three stages: laterality training (LRJT, Left Right Judgement Task), imagined movements, and mirror therapy. No tool that allows working with LRJT in pelvic floor has been developed to date.

OBJECTIVE

This research aims to describe the process followed for the development of a highly usable, multi-language and multi-platform mobile application using GMI with LRJT to improve the treatment of patients with CPP. In addition, this will require achieving two other goals: firstly, to generate 550 pelvic floor images and, subsequently, to carry out an empirical study to objectively classify them into different difficulty levels of. This will allow the app to properly organize and plan the different therapy sessions to be followed by each patient.

METHODOLOGY

For the design, evaluation and development of the app, an open methodology of user-centered design (MPIu + a) was applied. Furthermore, to classify and establish the pelvic floor images of the app in different difficulty levels, an observational, cross-sectional study was conducted with 132 volunteers through non-probabilistic sampling.

RESULTS

On one hand, applying MPIu+a, a total of 5 phases were required to generate an easy-to-use mobile application. On the other hand, the 550 pelvic floor images were classified into 3 difficulty levels (based on the percentage of correct answers and response time used by the participants in the classification process of each image): Level 1 (191 images with Accuracy = 100 % and RT = [0-2.5] seconds); Level 2 (208 images with Accuracy = 75-100 % and RT = [2.5-5] seconds); and Level 3 (151 images with Accuracy = 50-75 % and RT > 5 s).

CONCLUSION

App-Mohedo® is the first multi-platform, multi-language and easy-to-use mobile application that, through GMI with LRJT, and with an adequate bank of images classified into three levels of difficulty, can be used as a complementary therapeutic tool in the treatment of patients with CPP. This work can also serve as an example, model or guide when applying a user-centered methodology, as MPIu + a, to the development of other apps, especially in the field of health.

Distorted body schema after mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: a 4-month follow up study

Background

After breast cancer, some patients report residual pain-related upper limb disability without physical impairment. Although pain and altered proprioception are known to affect the working body schema (WBS), there is little available evidence investigating the WBS of breast cancer survivors (BrCS). WBS-body representations in the brain-affect the "neuromatrix" that modulates pain sensitivity and the threshold for threatening stimuli. The aim of this study was to investigate whether WBS was disrupted after mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) for breast cancer and whether pain and proprioceptive changes affected WBS.

Methods

Thirty-five BrCS participated in the 4-month follow-up study. They were observed at 1 and 4 months postoperatively. The main outcome measures were the left right judgement test (LRJT) results, absolute angle error, pectoralis minor length index (PMI), pain, and Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Q-DASH) score. They were measured at each observation, and parametric tests were performed to identify the nature of WBS.

Results

Both the reaction time and accuracy of the hand LRJT were poorer than those of the foot and back LRJT (p < 0.001). The hand LRJT reaction time and accuracy were unchanged over the total follow-up period (p = 0.77 and p = 0.47, respectively). There was a weak correlation between the LRJT reaction time and PMI (r = -0.26, p = 0.07), pain severity (r = 0.37, p = 0.02), and Q-DASH score (r = 0.37, p = 0.02). There was also a weak correlation between LRJT accuracy and Q-DASH score (r = -0.31, p = 0.04). The LRJT accuracy of BrCS who underwent surgery on their dominant side was higher than that of BrCS who underwent surgery on their non-dominant side (p = 0.002). Regression analysis found a weak but significant relationship between the early hand LRJT results and late pain severity (adjusted R² = 0.179, p = 0.007). A similar relationship was found between early hand LRJT results and Q-DASH score (adjusted R² = 0.099, p = 0.039).

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study providing the nature of WBS after mastectomy with IBR. In this population, it is necessary to postoperatively preserve WBS integrity for pain and upper limb disability.

The efficacy of graded motor imagery in post-traumatic stiffness of elbow: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Physiotherapy improves the movement range after the onset of post-traumatic elbow stiffness and reduces the pain, which is a factor limiting elbow range of motion. However, no results have been reported for motor-cognitive intervention programs in post-traumatic elbow stiffness management. The objective was to investigate the efficacy of graded motor imagery (GMI) in post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

Fifty patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness (18 female; mean age, 41.9 ± 10.9 years) were divided into 2 groups. The GMI group (n = 25) received a program consisting of left-right discrimination, motor imagery, and mirror therapy (twice a week for 6 weeks); the structured exercise (SE) group (n = 25) received a program consisting of range-of-motion, stretching, and strengthening exercises (twice a week for 6 weeks). Both groups received a 6-week home exercise program. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were the active range of motion (AROM), visual analog scale (VAS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), muscle strength of elbow flexors and extensors, grip strength, left-right discrimination, and Global Rating of Change. Patients were assessed at baseline, at the end of treatment (12 sessions), and a 6-week follow-up.

RESULTS

The results indicated that both GMI and SE interventions significantly improved outcomes (P < .05). After a 6-week intervention, the DASH score was significantly improved with a medium effect size in the GMI group compared with the SE group, and improvement continued at the 6-week follow-up (F_1,45 = 3.10, P = .01). The results with a medium to large effect size were also significant for elbow flexion AROM (P = .02), elbow extension AROM (P = .03), VAS-activity (P = .001), TSK (P = .01), and muscle strength of elbow flexors and elbow extensors (P = .03) in favor of the GMI group.

CONCLUSION

The GMI is an effective motor-cognitive intervention program that might be applied to the rehabilitation of post-traumatic elbow stiffness to improve function, elbow AROM, pain, fear of movement-related pain, and muscle strength.

Advances in the Non-Operative Management of Multidirectional Instability of the Glenohumeral Joint

Multidirectional instability (MDI) of the glenohumeral joint refers to symptomatic subluxations or dislocations in more than one direction. The aetiology of MDI is multifactorial, which makes the classification of this condition challenging. A shoulder rehabilitation program is the initial recommended treatment for MDI, however available rehabilitation programs have varying levels of evidence to support their effectiveness. In 2016, we published the details of an evidence-based program for MDI that has been evaluated for efficacy in two single-group studies and a randomised controlled trial. In 2017, we published a clinical commentary on the aetiology, classification, and treatment of this condition. The aim of this paper is to provide an update on the components of these publications with a particular focus on new advances in the non-operative management of this condition.

Linking Pain and Motor Control: Conceptualization of Movement Deficits in Patients With Painful Conditions

When people experience or expect pain, they move differently. Pain-altered movement strategies, collectively described here as pain-related movement dysfunction (PRMD), may persist well after pain resolves and, ultimately, may result in altered kinematics and kinetics, future reinjury, and disability. Although PRMD may manifest as abnormal movements that are often evident in clinical assessment, the underlying mechanisms are complex, engaging sensory-perceptual, cognitive, psychological, and motor processes. Motor control theories provide a conceptual framework to determine, assess, and target processes that contribute to normal and abnormal movement and thus are important for physical therapy and rehabilitation practice. Contemporary understanding of motor control has evolved from reflex-based understanding to a more complex task-dependent interaction between cognitive and motor systems, each with distinct neuroanatomic substrates. Though experts have recognized the importance of motor control in the management of painful conditions, there is no comprehensive framework that explicates the processes engaged in the control of goal-directed actions, particularly in the presence of pain. This Perspective outlines sensory-perceptual, cognitive, psychological, and motor processes in the contemporary model of motor control, describing the neural substrates underlying each process and highlighting how pain and anticipation of pain influence motor control processes and consequently contribute to PRMD. Finally, potential lines of future inquiry-grounded in the contemporary model of motor control-are outlined to advance understanding and improve the assessment and treatment of PRMD.

IMPACT

This Perspective proposes that approaching PRMD from a contemporary motor control perspective will uncover key mechanisms, identify treatment targets, inform assessments, and innovate treatments across sensory-perceptual, cognitive, and motor domains, all of which have the potential to improve movement and functional outcomes in patients with painful conditions.