Effects of amino acid restriction during starter and grower periods on subsequent performance and incidence of leg disorders in two strains of male large white turkeys

Response of Male BUT Big 6 Turkeys to Varying Amino Acid Feeding Programs

Dietary protein is a major cost contributor in turkey nutrition. Therefore, a feeding trial with male BUT Big 6 turkeys to 154 d of age was conducted to examine how live performance and economics are affected when dietary amino acid levels are altered in different phases. Six dietary treatments were run with treatment 1 as the control in which balanced protein levels were according to recommendations during all 6 phases. Treatments 2 through 6 used combinations of balanced protein (based on lysine) that ranged from 90 to 120% of those used in treatment 1. The combinations for the 6 phases of feeding were 120, 120, 120, 120, 90, and 90% for treatment 2; 120, 120, 120, 100, 90, and 90% for treatment 3; 120, 120, 100, 100, 90, and 90% for treatment 4; 120, 120, 120, 120, 100, and 100% for treatment 5; and 90, 90, 90, 100, 100, and 100 for treatment 6. Final BW was highest in treatment 4 and lowest in treatment 2 (P < 0.05), whereas final BW were intermediate and statistically not different in treatments 1, 3, 5, and 6. Breast meat yield was highest in treatment 5 and lowest in treatments 2 and 3 (P < 0.05). Mortality seemed to be reduced in treatment 6 compared with treatments 2, 3, and 5 (P < 0.10). Performance data in combination with economic simulations suggested that the feeding regimens of treatments 4 or 6 might be alternative strategies to treatment 1 to improve overall profitability.

Dietary arginine and lysine in Large White toms. 1. Increasing arginine:lysine ratios does not improve performance when lysine levels are adequate

A study was conducted utilizing two strains of male Large White turkeys (BUT Big 6 and Nicholas 700) to determine the effects of increasing Arg:Lys ratios on live performance and carcass composition. Diets were formulated to provide 100, 110, and 120% of NRC (1994) Lys levels, adjusted for dietary energy level, with Arg:Lys ratios of 1.0:1, 1.1:1, 1.2:1, and 1.3:1 in a 3 x 4 factorial arrangement. Eight pens of 15 poults (four pens of each strain) were fed each of the 12 test diets for an 18-wk period. Diets were changed at 3-wk intervals rather than the 4-wk interval suggested by NRC. The results of this study suggest that the Arg and Lys levels suggested by the NRC (1994) are not sufficient when diets are fed on 3-wk intervals, rather than the 4-wk intervals suggested by NRC. This conclusion is in agreement with the studies of Waldroup et al. (1997b). Increasing Arg:Lys ratios improved performance of turkeys only when the diets contained insufficient amounts of Arg in association with low levels of Lys. Increasing Arg:Lys ratios when diets contained sufficient amounts of these two amino acids was without benefit, in contrast to the report of Brake et al. (1994). Turkeys of the BUT Big 6 strain appeared to be more sensitive to marginal deficiencies of Lys and Arg than did turkeys of Nicholas 700 strain.