The relationship between symptoms and abnormal magnetic resonance images of lumbar intervertebral disks

The basis of mechanical instability in degenerative disc disease: a cadaveric study of abnormal motion versus load distribution

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical study in cadaveric lumbar spine.

OBJECTIVE

To establish the basis of mechanical stability in degenerative disc disease from the relationship between range of motion (ROM), neutral zone motion (NZ), intradiscal pressure profile, and instantaneous axis or rotation (IAR) in advancing grades of disc degeneration.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The basis of mechanical instability in lumbar disc degeneration remains poorly understood. Controversy exists between abnormal motion and abnormal loading theories.

METHODS

Thirty-nine lumbar motion segments were graded for staging of disc degeneration with magnetic resonance scan. These specimens were tested for ROM and NZ in a 6 df spine simulator, with 7.5 N·m unconstrained, cyclical loading. Continuous tracking of IAR was derived from ROM data. Intradiscal pressure profiles were determined using needle-mounted pressure transducer, drawn across the disc space under constant loading.

RESULTS

The ROM showed insignificant change, but a trend of increase from grade I through III and a decrease with advanced degeneration. NZ increased significantly with advancing disc degeneration. Intradiscal pressure profile showed an even distribution of the load in normal discs but a depressurized nucleus and irregular spikes of excessive loading, with advancing degeneration. The IAR showed a smooth excursion in normal versus irregular jerky excursion in degenerated discs, without significant change in excursion. The center of rotation, derived from IAR, showed significantly increased vertical translation with advancing degeneration, indicating an abnormal quality of motion.

CONCLUSION

The study established a basis of mechanical instability in the lumbar spine with advancing disc degeneration as an abnormal quality of motion represented by variation in IAR and center of rotation, increased NZ motion without any increase in quantity of motion, and abnormal load distribution across the disc space with spikes of high load amidst depressurized nucleus. The study cannot identify clinical instability but finds an association between the abnormal motions and the abnormal load distribution in mechanical instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system: an emerging technology with potential to impact clinical decision making

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is an application of magnetic resonance imaging that allows the measurement of water movement within and between tissues. Originally developed as a way of detecting early signs of stroke or brain disease, DWI is now being used to study physiologic events within the musculoskeletal system. The accurate measurement of water diffusion can provide important information regarding tissue responses associated with trauma and disease, as well as offer insight toward the mechanism by which physical therapy interventions affect tissues. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the rationale for DWI and its potential clinical and research applications for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Specific examples of the use of DWI for patients with painful spinal disorders are used as illustrations.

Lumbar intervertebral instability: a review

Intervertebral instability of the lumbar spine is thought to be a possible pathomechanical mechanism underlying low back pain and sciatica and is often an important factor in determining surgical indication for spinal fusion and decompression. Instability of the lumbar spine, however, remains a controversial and poorly understood topic. At present, much controversy exists regarding the proper definition of the condition, the best diagnostic methods, and the most efficacious treatment approaches. Clinical presentation is not specific, and the relationship between radiologic evidence of instability and its symptoms is controversial. Because of its simplicity, low expense, and pervasive availability, functional flexion-extension radiography is the most thoroughly studied and the most widely used method in the imaging diagnosis of lumbar intervertebral instability. In this article, we provide an overview of the current concepts of vertebral instability, focusing on degenerative lumbar intervertebral instability, and review the different imaging modalities most indicated in diagnosing vertebral instability.

A feasibility study of in vivo T1rho imaging of the intervertebral disc

PURPOSE

Recent studies have proposed that magnetic resonance (MR) T1rho relaxation time is associated with loss of macromolecules. The depletion of macromolecules in the matrix of the intervertebral disc may be an initiating factor in degenerative disc disease. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of quantifying T1rho relaxation time in phantoms and intervertebral discs of healthy volunteers using in vivo MR imaging at 3 T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multislice T1rho spiral sequence was used to quantify T1rho relaxation time in phantoms with different agarose concentrations and in the intervertebral discs of 11 healthy volunteers (mean age=31.3 years; age range=23-60 years; gender: 5 females, 6 males).

RESULTS

The phantom studies demonstrated the feasibility of using spiral imaging at 3 T. The in vivo results indicate that the median T1rho value of the nucleus (116.6+/-21.4 ms) is significantly greater (P<0.05) than that of the annulus (84.1+/-11.7 ms). The correlations between the age of the volunteers and T1rho relaxation time in the nucleus (r2=-0.82; P=0.0001) and the annulus (r2=-0.37; P=0.04) were significant. A trend of decreasing T1rho values from L3-4 to L4-5 to L5-S1 was evident.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that in vivo T1rho quantification is feasible and may potentially be a clinical tool in identifying early degenerative changes in the intervertebral disc.

The role of functional status questionnaires for low back pain

This article provides an introduction to the use of functional status questionnaires in the management of patients with low back pain (LBP). The paper highlights some problems with traditional outcome measures such as the straight leg raise and argues for the use of outcomes that are more meaningful to patients. It is recommended that physiotherapists evaluate the effect of their treatment on the health-related quality of life of a patient with LBP by assessing the patient's functional limitations and disabilities. Three questionnaires appropriate for this purpose, which are also feasible for use in the typical physiotherapy clinic, are reviewed and the use of one of the questionnaires is demonstrated in a case study.

Structure and function of the lumbar intervertebral disk in health, aging, and pathologic conditions

This report is a comprehensive review of the basic and clinical science relating to the morphology and function of the intervertebral disc of the lumbar spine. The purpose is to review the anatomy, physiology, and biomechanics of the intervertebral disc of the lumbar spine in health, with aging, and in pathologic conditions. The complex morphology and ultrastructure of the intervertebral disc of the lumbar spine in the human provide the critical elements that permit normal mobility and transmission of force through the vertebral column. Alterations in this structure are manifest in a variety of clinical conditions routinely encountered in orthopaedic physical therapy practice. These structural and biomechanical changes are related to degenerative changes that occur in association with aging and trauma. Knowledge of the gross morphology and ultrastructure of the intervertebral disc and pathobiologic processes underlying associated conditions is essential to orthopaedic practice.

Imaging of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and aging, excluding disk herniations

With the advent of CT and MR imaging, physicians have been able to complement their clinical diagnosis of the cause of low back pain with a detailed in vivo image of the structure and soft tissues of the spine. At the same time, there has been an increasing realization that information about morphology alone is not enough to make a definitive diagnosis. Proponents of diskography claim that, through pain provocation, it can provide the specificity missing from the purely morphologic information that CT and MR imaging provide. The specificity of diskography, however, is far from clear.

Associations between patient report of symptoms and anatomic impairment visible on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study comparing the relationship of symptoms with anatomic impairment visible on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging in 408 symptomatic subjects.

OBJECTIVE

To determine how various anatomic impairments, including the magnitude and location of nerve compression visible on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging, are associated with patient reports of pain, weakness, and dysesthesia.

SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA

Anatomic impairments of the intervertebral disc, radicular canal, and associated soft tissues are prevalent in people with and those without low back pain or lower extremity radiculopathy. This has led to confusion in differentiating between symptom generators and benign variation visible on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. Recent literature has suggested that the presence of nerve compression is an important finding in the prediction of symptoms. However, the threshold for meaningful nerve compression has not been described.

METHODS

In this study, 408 participants undergoing a diagnostic workup for low back pain, radiculopathy, and/ or completed a survey and pain drawing. Participants underwent standardized lumbar magnetic resonance imaging using a 1.5-T scanner. Two classification systems describing the spatial distribution of symptoms were developed. An additional system to quantify the magnitude of nerve and thecal sac compression was created. All systems were assessed for reliability, after which comparisons among variables were performed using Chi2 as well as simple and multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The reliability coefficients for categorizing patients on the basis of pain drawing ranged from 0. 75 to 0.88. The S1-S2 segmental distribution was the most commonly reported location of symptoms, followed by L4-L5. The most common magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis was "unremarkable," followed by "disc impairment without nerve compression." Disc extrusion was present in 10.8% of participants. The reliability of classifying nerve compression visible on magnetic resonance imaging ranged from 0.27 to 1. Nerve compression was present in 37% of participants, and 18% had severe nerve compression. There were no significant associations between segmental distribution of symptoms and the presence of anatomic impairment. However, according to a collapsed classification scale, severe nerve compression and disc extrusion were predictive of pain distal to the knee (odds ratios, 2.72 and 3. 34). The self-report of weakness was associated mildly with severe nerve compression and disc extrusion, but not with other findings. Magnetic resonance imaging findings did not predict self-reports of dysesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of disc extrusion and/or ipsilateral, severe nerve compression at one or multiple sites is strongly associated with distal leg pain. Mild to moderate nerve compression, disc degeneration or bulging, and central spinal stenosis are not significantly associated with specific pain patterns. Although segmental distributions of pain can be determined reliably from pain drawings, this finding alone is of little use in predicting lumbar impairment. The self-report of lower extremity weakness or dysesthesia is not significantly related to any specific lumbar impairments. [Key words: back pain, diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging, nerve compression, pain drawing, pathology]