Does Falls Efficacy Influence the Relationship Between Forward and Backward Walking Speed After Stroke?

The influence of backward versus forward locomotor training on gait speed and balance control post-stroke: Recovery or compensation?

Backward walking training has been reported to improve gait speed and balance post-stroke. However, it is not known if gains are achieved through recovery of the paretic limb or compensations from the nonparetic limb. The purpose of this study was to compare the influence of backward locomotor training (BLT) versus forward locomotor training (FLT) on gait speed and dynamic balance control, and to quantify the underlying mechanisms used to achieve any gains. Eighteen participants post chronic stroke were randomly assigned to receive 18 sessions of either FLT (n = 8) or BLT (n = 10). Pre- and post-intervention outcomes included gait speed (10-meter Walk Test) and forward propulsion (time integral of anterior-posterior ground-reaction-forces during late stance for each limb). Dynamic balance control was assessed using clinical (Functional Gait Assessment) and biomechanical (peak-to-peak range of whole-body angular-momentum in the frontal plane) measures. Balance confidence was assessed using the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence scale. While gait speed and balance confidence improved significantly within the BLT group, these improvements were associated with an increased nonparetic limb propulsion generation, suggesting use of compensatory mechanisms. Although there were no improvements in gait speed within the FLT group, paretic limb propulsion generation significantly improved post-FLT, suggesting recovery of the paretic limb. Neither training group improved in dynamic balance control, implying the need of balance specific training along with locomotor training to improve balance control post-stroke. Despite the within-group differences, there were no significant differences between the FLT and BLT groups in the achieved gains in any of the outcomes.

A Hybrid Assessment of Clinical Mobility Test Items for Evaluating Individuals With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) and High Level Mobility Assessment Tool (HiMAT) are clinical batteries used to assess people with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). However, neither assessment was specifically developed for people with mTBI; the FGA was developed to evaluate vestibular deficits, and the HiMAT was developed for individuals with more severe TBI. To maximize the sensitivity and reduce the time burden of these assessments, the purpose of this study was to determine the combination of FGA and HiMAT items that best discriminates persons with persistent symptoms from mTBI from healthy controls.

METHODS

Fifty-three symptomatic civilians with persistent symptoms from mTBI (21% male, aged 31 (9.5) years, 328 [267] days since concussion) and 57 healthy adults (28% male, aged 32 (9.6) years) participated across 3 sites. The FGA and HiMAT were evaluated sequentially as part of a larger study. To determine the best combination of items, a lasso-based generalized linear model (glm) was fit to all data.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) for FGA and HiMAT total scores was 0.68 and 0.66, respectively. Lasso regression selected 4 items, including FGA Gait with Horizontal Head Turns and with Pivot Turn, and HiMAT Fast Forward and Backward Walk, and yielded an AUC (95% confidence interval) of 0.71 (0.61-0.79) using standard scoring.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The results provide initial evidence supporting a reduced, 4-Item Hybrid Assessment of Mobility for mTBI (HAM-4-mTBI) for monitoring individuals with mTBI. Future work should validate the HAM-4-mTBI and investigate its utility for tracking progression throughout rehabilitation.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A409 ).

Spatiotemporal strategies adopted to walk at fast speed in high- and low-functioning individuals post-stroke: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Walking at fast speed is a gait training strategy post-stroke. It is unknown how faster-than-preferred pace impacts spatiotemporal gait characteristics in survivors with different functional abilities.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that compared to high-functioning individuals, low-functioning individuals will be limited in modifying spatiotemporal gait parameters for walking at faster-than-preferred speed, and these limitations are associated with fear of falling.

METHODS

Forty-two adults, 17.6 ± 14.6 months post-stroke, traversed an instrumented walkway at preferred and fast speeds. Participants were categorized to a low-functioning group (LFG) (n = 20; <0.45 m/s) and high-functioning group (HFG) (n = 22; ≥0.45 m/s). Cadence, step length, stance time and spatiotemporal asymmetry measures were calculated. The Modified Falls-efficacy Scale examined fear of falling. Multivariate and correlational analysis tested hypotheses.

RESULTS

Increased speed from preferred to fast pace was significantly greater for HFG (0.27 ± 0.03 m/s) than LFG (0.10 ± 0.02 m/s) (p ≤ 0.001). Cadence gain from preferred to fast pace did not differ between groups. However, HFG exhibited greater change in paretic (∆6.1 ± 1.37 cm; p < .001) and non-paretic step lengths (∆4.5 ± 1.37 cm; p = .003) than LFG. Spatiotemporal asymmetry did not change for either group. Fear of falling had moderately positive correlation with ∆paretic step length (r = 0.43; p = .004) and ∆non-paretic step length (r = 0.32; p = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

While both low- and high-functioning individuals used a step-lengthening strategy to walk at faster-than-preferred speeds, the gain in step lengths was limited in low-functioning individuals and was partially explained by falls-efficacy.