1
|
Spoonemore SL, McConnell RC, Owen WE, Young JL, Clewley DJ, Rhon DI. The influence of pain-related comorbidities on pain intensity and pain-related psychological distress in patients presenting with musculoskeletal pain. Braz J Phys Ther 2023; 27:100532. [PMID: 37611373 PMCID: PMC10468365 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal pain (MSP) is the largest contributor to chronic pain and frequently occurs alongside other medical comorbidities. OBJECTIVE Explore the relationships between the presence of pain-related comorbidities, pain intensity, and pain-related psychological distress in patients with MSP. METHODS A longitudinal assessment of individuals 18-90 years old in the Midwestern United States beginning a new episode of physical therapy for MSP. Electronic medical records were assessed the full year prior for care-seeking of diagnoses for pain-related comorbidities (anxiety, metabolic disorder, chronic pain, depression, nicotine dependence, post-traumatic stress disorder, sleep apnea, and sleep insomnia). Pain intensity and pain-related psychological distress (Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome - Yellow Flags tool) were captured during the physical therapy evaluation. Generalized linear models were used to assess the association between pain intensity, psychological distress, and pain-related co-morbidities. Models were adjusted for variables shown in the literature to influence pain. RESULTS 532 participants were included in the cohort (56.4% female; median age of 59 years, Interquartile Range [IQR]:47, 69). Comorbid depression (beta coefficient (β) = 0.7; 95%CI: 0.2, 1.2), spine versus lower extremity pain ((β = 0.6; 95%CI: 0.1, 1.1), and prior surgery (β = 0.8, 95%CI: 0.3, 1.4) were associated with higher pain intensity scores. No pain-related comorbidities were associated with pain-related psychological distress (yellow flag count or number of domains). Female sex was associated with less pain-related psychological distress (β = -0.2, 95%CI: -0.3, -0.02). CONCLUSIONS Depression was associated with greater pain intensity. No comorbidities were able to account for the extent of pain-related psychological distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven L Spoonemore
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, United States; U.S. Public Health Service, Intrepid Spirit Center, Fort Carson, CO, United States.
| | - Ryan C McConnell
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, United States; Department of Physical Therapy, Belmont University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - William E Owen
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, United States
| | - Jodi L Young
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, United States
| | - Derek J Clewley
- Physical Therapy Division, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Daniel I Rhon
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Bellin College, Green Bay, WI, United States; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, The Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Helms J, Frankart L, Bradner M, Ebersole J, Regan B, Crouch T. Interprofessional Active Learning for Chronic Pain: Transforming Student Learning From Recall to Application. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT 2023; 10:23821205231221950. [PMID: 38152832 PMCID: PMC10752086 DOI: 10.1177/23821205231221950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Chronic pain (CP) affects over 50 million Americans daily and represents a unique challenge for healthcare professionals due to its complexity. Across all health professions, only a small percentage of the curriculum is devoted to treating patients with CP. Unfortunately, much of the content is delivered passively via lecture without giving students an opportunity to practice the communication skills to effectively treat patients in the clinic. An interprofessional team of health educators identified 5 essential messages that students frequently struggle to convey to patients with CP. Those messages were based on interprofessional and profession-specific competencies to treat patients with CP from the International Association for the Study of Pain. The 5 messages highlighted the importance of (1) therapeutic alliance, (2) consistent interdisciplinary language, (3) patient prognosis, (4) evidence for pain medicine, surgery, and imaging, and (5) early referral to the interprofessional team. For each message, the team summarized relevant research supporting the importance of each individual message that could serve as a foundation for didactic content. The team then developed active learning educational activities that educators could use to have students practice the skills tied to each message. Each learning activity was designed to be delivered in an interprofessional manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeb Helms
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, USA
| | - Laura Frankart
- Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| | - Melissa Bradner
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| | | | - Beck Regan
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| | - Taylor Crouch
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Richter RR, Chrusciel T, Salsich G, Austin T, Scherrer JF. Disparities Exist in Physical Therapy Utilization and Time to Utilization Between Black and White Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6649124. [PMID: 35871435 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzac095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Black patients are less likely than White patients to receive physical therapy for musculoskeletal pain conditions. Current evidence, however, is limited to self-reported conditions and health services use. The purpose of this study was to use a large electronic health record database to determine whether a race disparity existed in use of physical therapy within 90 days of a new musculoskeletal diagnosis. METHODS Eligible patients (n = 52,384) were sampled from an Optum deidentified electronic health record database of 5 million adults distributed throughout the United States. In this database, patients were designated as "Black" and "White." Patients were eligible if they had a new diagnosis for musculoskeletal neck, shoulder, back, or knee pain between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were computed before and after adjusting for covariates to estimate the association between race and receipt of physical therapy services within 90 days of musculoskeletal pain diagnoses. RESULTS Patients were on average 47.5 (SD = 14.9) years of age, 12.8% were Black, 87.2% were White, and 52.7% were female. Ten percent of Black patients and 15.5% of White patients received physical therapy services within 90 days of musculoskeletal pain diagnoses. After adjusting for covariates, White patients were 57% more likely (odds ratio = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.44-1.71) to receive physical therapy compared with Black patients and had significantly shorter time to physical therapy than Black patients (hazard ratio = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.42-1.66). CONCLUSIONS In a nationally distributed cohort, Black patients were less likely than White patients to utilize physical therapy and had a longer time to utilization of physical therapy for musculoskeletal pain. IMPACT These findings highlight the need to determine the mechanisms underlying the observed disparities and how these disparities influence health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randy R Richter
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Program in Physical Therapy, Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Timothy Chrusciel
- Department of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, Salus Center, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,The Advanced HEAlth Data (AHEAD) Research Institute, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Gretchen Salsich
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Program in Physical Therapy, Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Tricia Austin
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Program in Physical Therapy, Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jeffrey F Scherrer
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,The Advanced HEAlth Data (AHEAD) Research Institute, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carlesso LC, Jafarzadeh SR, Stokes A, Felson DT, Wang N, Frey-Law L, Lewis CE, Nevitt M, Neogi T. Depressive symptoms and multi-joint pain partially mediate the relationship between obesity and opioid use in people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2022; 30:1263-1269. [PMID: 35700904 PMCID: PMC9419857 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the relation of obesity to opioid use in people with or at risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA), and the extent to which this association is mediated by number of painful joints or depressive symptoms. METHODS We used data from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study, a longitudinal cohort of older adults with or at risk of knee OA. Opioid use was identified by prescription medications and self-report. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Multi-joint pain was assessed using a standardized body homunculus, and depressive symptoms using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale. We quantified the direct and indirect effect of obesity on opioid use through the number of painful joints or depressive symptoms using causal mediation analysis by natural-effects models. RESULTS We studied 2,335 participants (mean age: 68; mean BMI 31 kg/m2; 60% women). Persons with obesity had ∼50% higher odds of opioid use than those without. Estimates of indirect (mediated) effect by the number of painful joints and depressive symptoms suggested an increased odds of opioid use by 34% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.70) and 35% (OR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.71), respectively, in obese vs non-obese individuals. The total effect of obesity on opioid use was higher in women than in men. CONCLUSIONS Multi-joint pain and depressive symptoms partially explained greater opioid use among obese persons with knee OA, demonstrating that the negative impact of obesity on knee OA extends beyond its influence on knee pain and structural progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L C Carlesso
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | - A Stokes
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - D T Felson
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - N Wang
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center (BEDAC), Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - L Frey-Law
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
| | - C E Lewis
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - M Nevitt
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - T Neogi
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Etheridge T, Bostick GP, Hoens AM, Holly J, Ippersiel P, Bobos P, Arumugam V, Woods S, Gielen S, Woznowski-Vu A, Campbell N. Barriers to Physiotherapists’ Use of Professional Development Tools for Chronic Pain: A Knowledge Translation Study. Physiother Can 2022. [DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The Pain Science Division (PSD) is a special interest group of the Canadian Physiotherapy Association that serves physiotherapists who have an interest in better understanding and managing patients’ pain. The PSD developed evidence-based resources for its members with the goal of improving patient care by supporting professional development. However, online metrics tracking access to these resources indicated that access was low. The purpose of this study was to identify the barriers PSD members encountered to the use of PSD resources and to recommend interventions to address these barriers guided by the Theory and Techniques Tool (TTT). Method: We distributed an online survey to PSD members across Canada. We used the TTT, a knowledge translation tool, to guide the design of the questionnaire and identify actionable findings. Results: Response rates from 621 non-student members and 1,470 student members were 26.9% and 1.4%, respectively. Based on the frequency of practicing physiotherapists’ ( N = 167) agreement with items in the TTT, the primary barriers to use of the PSD resources were forgetting that the resources were available and forgetting to use them. Conclusions: The TTT can be used to identify barriers to use of professional development tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tori Etheridge
- Centre for Neurology Studies, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Geoff P. Bostick
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Alison M. Hoens
- Department of Physical Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Janet Holly
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick Ippersiel
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pavlos Bobos
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Applied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vanitha Arumugam
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Pain Management Program, St. Joseph Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Arthur Woznowski-Vu
- Pain Science Division, Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Effect of Patient Use of Physical Therapy After Referral for Musculoskeletal Conditions on Future Medical Utilization: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2022; 44:621-636. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
7
|
Young JL, Snodgrass SJ, Cleland JA, Rhon DI. The relationship between knee radiographs and the timing of physical therapy in individuals with patellofemoral pain. PM R 2021; 14:496-503. [PMID: 34288533 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routine knee radiographs are discouraged for individuals with non-traumatic knee pain, but they are often still ordered despite limited evidence for their value in guiding treatment choices. Radiograph utilization may delay the use of physical therapy, which has been associated with improved outcomes and lower long-term costs. OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between obtaining knee radiographs for patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and the timing of physical therapy, and the association between ordering radiographs for patients who use physical therapy and the likelihood of knee pain recurrence. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING United States Military Health System civilian and military clinics. PATIENTS 23,332 individuals aged 18 to 50 diagnosed with PFP between 2010 and 2011 in the United States Military Health System who received physical therapy. INTERVENTIONS Physical therapy provided to individuals who did or did not receive an initial radiograph. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Timing of physical therapy and recurrence of knee pain were compared between groups (with and without initial radiographs). RESULTS If radiographs were used, the odds of initiating physical therapy (aOR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.94) within 30 days of the initial diagnosis were significantly lower. The mean days from diagnosis to initiating physical therapy was 12.1 (95% CI 9.1 to 16.1) if patients had radiographs versus 6.9 (95% CI 5.2 to 9.1) without. The odds of knee pain recurrence were no greater if radiographs were used (aOR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.22). CONCLUSIONS Receiving knee radiographs as part of initial care for PFP was associated with delayed initiation of physical therapy, but there was no association between early knee radiographs and recurrence of knee pain. Routine use of radiographs for PFP is not warranted, and can potentially delay appropriate treatment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodi L Young
- Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy, Bellin College, 3201 Eaton Rd., Green Bay, WI, USA.,Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Dr., Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Suzanne J Snodgrass
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Dr., Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Joshua A Cleland
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel I Rhon
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Dr., Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,TX, USA.,Physical Therapy Department, Baylor University, Stanley, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brown-Taylor L, Beckner A, Scaff KE, Fritz JM, Buys MJ, Patel S, Bayless K, Brooke BS. Relationships between physical therapy intervention and opioid use: A scoping review. PM R 2021; 14:837-854. [PMID: 34153178 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize available evidence that has examined the relationship between physical therapy (PT) and opioid use. TYPE: Scoping Review LITERATURE SURVEY: Data sources including Google Scholar, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched for English articles up to October 24, 2019 using terms ("physical therapy"[Title/Abstract] OR physiotherapy[Title/Abstract] OR rehabilitation[Title/Abstract]) AND (opiate*[Title/Abstract] OR opioid*[Title/Abstract]). METHODOLOGY Included studies evaluated a PT intervention and reported an opioid-use outcome. Data were extracted to describe the PT intervention, patient sample, opioid-use measurement, and results of any time or group comparisons. Study quality was evaluated with Joanna Briggs checklists based on study design. SYNTHESIS Thirty studies were included that evaluated PT in at least one of these seven categories: interdisciplinary program (n = 8), modalities (n = 3), treatment (n = 3), utilization (n = 2), content (n = 3), timing (n = 13), and location (n = 2). Mixed results were reported for reduced opioid-use after interdisciplinary care and after PT modalities. Utilizing PT was associated with lower odds (ranging from 0.2-0.8) of using opioid medication for persons with low back pain (LBP) and injured workers; however, guideline-adherent care did not further reduce opioid use for persons with LBP. Early PT utilization after index visit for spine or joint pain and after orthopedic surgery was also associated with lower odds of using opioid medications (ranging from 0.27-0.93). Emergency department PT care was not associated with fewer opioid prescriptions than standard emergency department care. PT in a rehabilitation center after total knee replacement was not associated with lower opioid use than inpatient PT. CONCLUSIONS The relationship between timing of PT and opioid use was evaluated in 13 of 30 studies for a variety of patient populations. Eight of these 13 studies reported a relationship between early PT and reduced subsequent opioid use, making the largest sample of studies in this scoping review with supporting evidence. There is limited and inconclusive evidence to establish whether the content and/or location of PT interventions improves outcomes because of heterogeneity between studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Brown-Taylor
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center of Innovation, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Medpace Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Aaron Beckner
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center of Innovation, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Katie E Scaff
- Jonathan M. Wainwright Memorial VA Medical Center, Walla Walla, Washington, USA
| | - Julie M Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Michael J Buys
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Shardool Patel
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center of Innovation, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kim Bayless
- Department of Anesthesiology, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Benjamin S Brooke
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center of Innovation, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.,Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Best TM, Petterson S, Plancher K. Sustained acoustic medicine as a non-surgical and non-opioid knee osteoarthritis treatment option: a health economic cost-effectiveness analysis for symptom management. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15:481. [PMID: 33076955 PMCID: PMC7574225 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01987-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA) and presenting with symptoms are seeking conservative treatment options to reduce pain, improve function, and avoid surgery. Sustained acoustic medicine (SAM), a multi-hour treatment has demonstrated improved clinical outcomes for patients with knee OA. The purpose of this analysis was to compare the costs and effectiveness of multi-hour SAM treatment versus the standard of care (SOC) over a 6-month timeframe for OA symptom management. Methods A decision tree analysis was used to compare the costs and effectiveness of SAM treatment versus SOC in patients with OA. Probabilities of success for OA treatment and effectiveness were derived from the literature using systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Costs were derived from Medicare payment rates and manufacturer prices. Functional effectiveness was measured as the effect size of a therapy and treatment pathways compared to a SOC treatment pathway. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine which cost variables had the greatest effect on deciding which option was the least costly. An incremental cost-effectiveness plot comparing SAM treatment vs. SOC was also generated using 1000 iterations of the model. Lastly, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the (cost of SAM minus cost of SOC) divided by (functional effectiveness of SAM minus functional effectiveness of SOC). Results Base case demonstrated that over 6 months, the cost and functional effectiveness of SAM was $8641 and 0.52 versus SOC at: $6281 and 0.39, respectively. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that in order for SAM to be the less expensive option, the cost per 15-min session of PT would need to be greater than $88, or SAM would need to be priced at less than or equal to $2276. Incremental cost-effectiveness demonstrated that most of the time (84%) SAM treatment resulted in improved functional effectiveness but at a higher cost than SOC. Conclusion In patients with osteoarthritis, SAM treatment demonstrated improved pain and functional gains compared to SOC but at an increased cost. Based on the SAM treatment ICER score being ≤ $50,000, it appears that SAM is a cost-effective treatment for knee OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M Best
- Department of Orthopedics, UHealth Sports Medicine Institute, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
| | | | - Kevin Plancher
- Orthopaedic Foundation, Stamford, CT, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Plancher Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shen Y, Bhagwandass H, Branchcomb T, Galvez SA, Grande I, Lessing J, Mollanazar M, Ourhaan N, Oueini R, Sasser M, Valdes IL, Jadubans A, Hollmann J, Maguire M, Usmani S, Vouri SM, Hincapie-Castillo JM, Adkins LE, Goodin AJ. Chronic Opioid Therapy: A Scoping Literature Review on Evolving Clinical and Scientific Definitions. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2020; 22:246-262. [PMID: 33031943 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The management of chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) with chronic opioid therapy (COT) is controversial. There is a lack of consensus on how COT is defined resulting in unclear clinical guidance. This scoping review identifies and evaluates evolving COT definitions throughout the published clinical and scientific literature. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. A total of 227 studies were identified from 8,866 studies published between January 2000 and July 2019. COT definitions were classified by pain population of application and specific dosage/duration definition parameters, with results reported according to PRISMA-ScR. Approximately half of studies defined COT as "days' supply duration >90 days" and 9.3% defined as ">120 days' supply," with other days' supply cut-off points (>30, >60, or >70) each appearing in <5% of total studies. COT was defined by number of prescriptions in 63 studies, with 16.3% and 11.0% using number of initiations or refills, respectively. Few studies explicitly distinguished acute treatment and COT. Episode duration/dosage criteria was used in 90 studies, with 7.5% by Morphine Milligram Equivalents + days' supply and 32.2% by other "episode" combination definitions. COT definitions were applied in musculoskeletal CNCP (60.8%) most often, and typically in adults aged 18 to 64 (69.6%). The usage of ">90 days' supply" COT definitions increased from 3.2 publications/year before 2016 to 20.7 publications/year after 2016. An increasing proportion of studies define COT as ">90 days' supply." The most recent literature trends toward shorter duration criteria, suggesting that contemporary COT definitions are increasingly conservative. PERSPECTIVE: This study summarized the most common, current definition criteria for chronic opioid therapy (COT) and recommends adoption of consistent definition criteria to be utilized in practice and research. The most recent literature trends toward shorter duration criteria overall, suggesting that COT definition criteria are increasingly stringent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Shen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Hemita Bhagwandass
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Tychell Branchcomb
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Sophia A Galvez
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ivanna Grande
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Julia Lessing
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Mikela Mollanazar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Natalie Ourhaan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Razanne Oueini
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Michael Sasser
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ivelisse L Valdes
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ashmita Jadubans
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Josef Hollmann
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Michael Maguire
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Silken Usmani
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Scott M Vouri
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Juan M Hincapie-Castillo
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Lauren E Adkins
- University of Florida Health Science Center Libraries, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Amie J Goodin
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety (CoDES), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Davenport TE, DeVoght AC, Sisneros H, Bezruchka S. Navigating the Intersection Between Persistent Pain and the Opioid Crisis: Population Health Perspectives for Physical Therapy. Phys Ther 2020; 100:995-1007. [PMID: 32115638 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 11/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
The physical therapy profession has recently begun to address its role in preventing and managing opioid use disorder (OUD). This topic calls for discussion of the scope of physical therapist practice, and the profession's role, in the prevention and treatment of complex chronic illnesses, such as OUD. OUD is not just an individual-level problem. Abundant scientific literature indicates OUD is a problem that warrants interventions at the societal level. This upstream orientation is supported in the American Physical Therapy Association's vision statement compelling societal transformation and its mission of building communities. Applying a population health framework to these efforts could provide physical therapists with a useful viewpoint that can inform clinical practice and research, as well as develop new cross-disciplinary partnerships. This Perspective discusses the intersection of OUD and persistent pain using the disease prevention model. Primordial, primary, secondary, and tertiary preventive strategies are defined and discussed. This Perspective then explains the potential contributions of this model to current practices in physical therapy, as well as providing actionable suggestions for physical therapists to help develop and implement upstream interventions that could reduce the impact of OUD in their communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd E Davenport
- Department of Physical Therapy, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Avenue, Stockton, CA 95211 USA
| | | | | | - Stephen Bezruchka
- Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Garrity BM, McDonough CM, Ameli O, Rothendler JA, Carey KM, Cabral HJ, Stein MD, Saper RB, Kazis LE. Unrestricted Direct Access to Physical Therapist Services Is Associated With Lower Health Care Utilization and Costs in Patients With New-Onset Low Back Pain. Phys Ther 2020; 100:107-115. [PMID: 31665461 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzz152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Revised: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent conditions for which patients seek physical therapy in the United States. The American Physical Therapy Association categorizes direct access to physical therapist services into 3 levels: limited, provisional, and unrestricted. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of level of access to physical therapist services with LBP-related health care utilization and costs. DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with new-onset LBP between 2008 and 2013; data were from OptumLabs Data Warehouse. METHODS We identified 59,670 individuals who were 18 years old or older, who had new-onset LBP, and who had commercial or Medicare Advantage insurance through a private health plan. We examined 2 samples. The first was health care utilization among individuals who saw a physical therapist first in states with either unrestricted access or provisional access. The second was LBP-related costs among individuals who saw either a physical therapist or a primary care physician first. RESULTS Individuals who saw a physical therapist first in states with provisional access had significantly higher measures of health care utilization within 30 days, including plain imaging and frequency of physician visits, than individuals who saw a physical therapist first in states with unrestricted access. Compared with individuals who saw a primary care physician first, pooled across provisional-access and unrestricted-access states, those who saw a physical therapist first in provisional-access states had 25% higher relative costs at 30 days and 32% higher relative costs at 90 days, whereas those who saw a physical therapist first in unrestricted-access states had 13% lower costs at 30 days and 32% lower costs at 90 days. LIMITATIONS This was a claims-based study with limited information on patient characteristics, including severity and duration of pain. CONCLUSIONS Short-term LBP-related health care utilization and costs were lower for individuals in unrestricted-access states than in provisional-access states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigid M Garrity
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Talbot 5 West (532), Boston, MA 02118 (USA)
| | - Christine M McDonough
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Omid Ameli
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health; OptumLabs Visiting Scholar, Cambridge, Massachusetts; and OptumLabs, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - James A Rothendler
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health
| | - Kathleen M Carey
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health
| | - Howard J Cabral
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health
| | - Michael D Stein
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health
| | - Robert B Saper
- Department of Family Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health
| | - Lewis E Kazis
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nonoperative Management Prior to Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: An Investigation Into the Utilization and Content of Physical Therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019; 49:593-600. [PMID: 31092124 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been a significant increase in surgeries for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in recent years, but little is known about the use of physical therapy prior to surgery. OBJECTIVES To investigate the use of physical therapy prior to hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, by assessing the number of visits and use of exercise. A secondary objective was to evaluate whether comorbidities prior to surgery were associated with the use of physical therapy. METHODS In this retrospective observational cohort study, eligible participants between the ages of 18 and 50 years undergoing hip arthroscopy between 2004 and 2013 in the Military Health System were included. Patients were categorized based on whether they saw a physical therapist for their hip in the year prior to surgery. For physical therapy patients, dosing variables were identified, including total number of visits and visits that included an exercise therapy procedure code. RESULTS Of 1870 participants, 1106 (59.1%) did not see a physical therapist for their hip prior to surgery. For those who did, the median number of visits was 2. Only 220 (11.8%) had 6 or more unique visits with an exercise therapy procedure code. Exercise was coded in 43.4% to 63.0% of the total visits in each individual course of care (mean, 52.3%). There was an association between substance abuse and exercise utilization. No other comorbidities were associated with physical therapy or exercise therapy utilization. CONCLUSION Physical therapy was not commonly used before undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery by patients seeking care in the Military Health System. Further research is needed to understand the reasons for poor utilization and better define failed nonoperative management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapy, level 2b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(8):593-600. Epub 15 May 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8581.
Collapse
|
14
|
Jette AM. Scientific Journals Are Not Advocacy Organizations. Phys Ther 2018; 98:731-732. [PMID: 30169800 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzy073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
|
15
|
George SZ, Greenspan AI. Nonpharmacological Management of Pain: Convergence in Priorities Fuels the Drive for More Evidence. Phys Ther 2018; 98:287-289. [PMID: 29617872 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzy034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Z George
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Vice Chair of Clinical Research, Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. He is a Catherine Worthingham Fellow of the American Physical Therapy Association
| | - Arlene I Greenspan
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dr Greenspan's contribution as guest co-editor was done as a personal outside activity. The content of this editorial is that of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
| |
Collapse
|