A profile of the rheumatology nurse specialist in the United Kingdom

The effectiveness of nurse-led care in people with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of nurse-led care in rheumatoid arthritis.

DESIGN

Systematic review of effectiveness.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases (AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, HMIC, HTA, MEDLINE, NHEED, Ovid Nursing and PsycINFO) were searched from 1988 to January 2010 with no language restrictions. Inclusion criteria were: randomised controlled trials, nurse-led care being part of the intervention and including patients with RA.

REVIEW METHODS

Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. Quality assessment was conducted independently by two reviewers using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool. For each outcome measure, the effect size was assessed using risk ratio or ratio of means (RoM) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) as appropriate. Where possible, data from similar outcomes were pooled in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Seven records representing 4 RCTs with an overall low risk of bias (good quality) were included in the review. They included 431 patients and the interventions (nurse-led care vs usual care) lasted for 1-2years. Most effect sizes of disease activity measures were inconclusive (DAS28 RoM=0.96, 95%CI [0.90-1.02], P=0.16; plasma viscosity RoM=1 95%CI [0.8-1.26], p=0.99) except the Ritchie Articular Index (RoM=0.89, 95%CI [0.84-0.95], P<0.001) which favoured nurse-led care. Results from some secondary outcomes (functional status, stiffness and coping with arthritis) were also inconclusive. Other outcomes (satisfaction and pain) displayed mixed results when assessed using different tools making them also inconclusive. Significant effects of nurse-led care were seen in quality of life (RAQoL RoM=0.83, 95%CI [0.75-0.92], P<0.001), patient knowledge (PKQ RoM=4.39, 95%CI [3.35-5.72], P<0.001) and fatigue (median difference=-330, P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The estimates of the primary outcome and most secondary outcomes showed no significant difference between nurse-led care and the usual care. While few outcomes favoured nurse-led care, there is insufficient evidence to conclude whether this is the case. More good quality RCTs of nurse-led care effectiveness in rheumatoid arthritis are required.

Characterizing the clinical practice and professional behaviour of rheumatology nurse specialists: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

There is a need to characterize the practice of nurse specialists, for several reasons: to identify the skills and knowledge required for the role, to safeguard the role and to facilitate appropriate remuneration of activities.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an instrument, which characterizes the clinical and professional activities of rheumatology nurse specialists (RNSs).

METHODS

A questionnaire was produced, informed by the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), to assess competencies in advanced nursing practice and completed by senior clinical rheumatology nurses in the UK undertaking an MSc in rheumatology nursing. Consenting respondents were also interviewed, to enable triangulation of the data.

RESULTS

A 38-item questionnaire was produced. It comprised four sections: clinical activities, non-patient-based activities, professional behaviour and perceived confidence in a number of areas of practice. Thirteen nurses completed the questionnaire and seven of these took part in a telephone interview. All RNSs were engaged in the follow-up care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, providing education, psychological support, monitoring and changing of drug treatments, and referrals to other health professionals. The RNSs produced guidelines, conducted audits and provided mentorship. They had low levels of confidence in seeing new patients, presenting the results of an audit at a conference, and writing a business case.

CONCLUSIONS

We have begun the process of developing a questionnaire that can identify the clinical activities, perceived self-competence and professional behaviour of RNSs. This method of characterizing advanced nursing practice offers potential as a model for nurse specialists in other disciplines. Further work is required to validate the questionnaire on a large cohort of RNSs.

Rheumatoid arthritis patients' education - contents and methods

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to describe the contents and methods used by rheumatology nurses when they educate their patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND

Rheumatology nurses have an important role in educating patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the content provided and the methods used by rheumatology nurses.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The sample was drawn in using stratified random sampling and the data were collected from 80 rheumatology nurses with a questionnaire in 2003-2004 (response rate was 65.2%). The data were analysed using descriptive and non-parametric statistical tests.

RESULTS

Medical treatment was the most commonly taught issue, as 76% of rheumatology nurses gave information on anti-rheumatic drugs prescribed to the rheumatoid arthritis patients and blood tests (64%) which must be taken as follow-up controls. Only 45% of the nurses discussed self care at home. Individual oral patient education (88%) and written materials by the local hospitals or drug industries (71%), were the most commonly used methods. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were educated mostly in special health care units. A rheumatology nursing course did not have an effect on the chosen contents or methods when educating rheumatoid arthritis patients.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important that rheumatology nurses teach more self-care abilities to patients with rheumatoid arthritis and use also the other teaching methods than oral individual method such as group sessions, teleinformatics and internet. The contents of rheumatology nursing course should be developed further to stress the importance of appropriate teaching methods and to point out the importance of self care abilities for patients.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The results provided useful insight into education of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Nurses should avoid the routine teaching programmes. They should take time to discuss with their patients and plan together the contents and methods, that education of patients with rheumatoid arthritis is based on patients' information needs and their individual learning capabilities.

Rheumatology nurse practitioners' perceptions of their role

OBJECTIVES

To identify the current practices of rheumatology nurse practitioners and ascertain their perceptions of how their role could be enhanced.

METHOD

A cross-sectional questionnaire study of currently employed nurse practitioners in rheumatology in the United Kingdom (UK) was undertaken.

RESULTS

200 questionnaires were distributed and 118 nurses responded. Ninety-five respondents met the inclusion criteria for undertaking an advanced nursing role. Typical conditions dealt with included: rheumatoid arthritis (96.8%); psoriatic arthritis (95.8%); osteoarthritis (63.2%); ankylosing spondylitis (62.8%); systemic lupus erythematosus (51.6%); and scleroderma (34.7%). Drug monitoring, education, counselling of patients and arranging basic investigations were routinely performed by more than 80% of respondents. A smaller proportion performed an extended role that included dealing with referrals, research and audit, the administration of intra-articular injections, and admission of patients. Specific attributes identified as being necessary for competence were: knowledge and understanding of rheumatic diseases (48.4%); drug therapy (33.7%); good communication skills (35.8%); understanding of the roles of the team (27.4%); working effectively (23.2%) as part of a multidisciplinary team; assessment of patients by physical examination (28.4%); teaching (26.3%), research (17.9%); organizational skills (14.7%); and the interpretation of investigations (9.5%). Factors that could enhance their role included: attendance at postgraduate courses (30.5%); obtaining further qualifications (13.7%); active participation in the delivery of medical education (41.1%); training in practical procedures (31.6%); protected time and resources for audit and research (11.6%); formal training in counselling (11.6%); and implementation of nurse prescribing (10.5%).

CONCLUSION

Nurse practitioners already have a wide remit and play an invaluable part in the delivery of modern rheumatology services. An extended role could improve patient care and enhance nursing career pathways in rheumatology.

Impact of a rheumatology expert nurse on the wellbeing of patients attending a drug monitoring clinic

AIM

This paper reports a study to test the hypothesis that consultation with a clinical nurse specialist in a drug monitor clinic has a measurable impact on the well-being of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHOD

A single blinded randomized controlled trial was carried out with 71 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were starting new disease-modifying anti-rheumatic therapy at a district general hospital. Patients were randomized into two groups over a 3-year recruitment period. Intervention group patients were monitored by a rheumatology clinical nurse specialist using Pendelton's framework to assess patient needs alongside safety monitoring. Control group patients were seen by an outpatient staff nurse for safety monitoring only over a 1-year period. The primary outcome measures were the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales and the Rheumatology Attitude Index. Data were also collected on the Disease Activity Score, number of consultations with healthcare professionals and changes in drug therapy. Data were collected at baseline, 3, 7 and 12 months between 1999 and 2002.

RESULTS

The Intervention group had greater change scores than the Control group for the Arthritis Impact Scale, with statistical significance shown at 7 months (P = 0.03). At 12 months the Rheumatology Attitude Index had improved by a mean of 1.8 in the Intervention group and deteriorated by 0.3 in the Control group. Changes in the Disease Activity Score were greater in the Intervention group at all time points, with statistical significance at 12 months (P = 0.048). There was little difference in the number of consultations or changes in drug therapy between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Consultation with an expert rheumatology nurse in a drug monitor clinic may add value in terms of improving patients' perceived ability to cope with the arthritis.

Outcomes for patients with RA: a rheumatology nurse practitioner clinic compared to standard outpatient care

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to extend our previous work by comparing the outcome of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) attending a rheumatology nurse practitioner (RNP) clinic with those of patients attending the more traditional junior hospital doctor's clinic (JHD).

METHOD

A randomised controlled trial of 80 people with RA were allocated to either an RNP or JHD clinic and seen six times in 12 months. The primary outcome measure was the DAS28. Secondary measures included stiffness, fatigue, physical function, psychological status, knowledge and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Number of patients: RNP 39 (8 males); JHD 41 (9 males). Age of patients: RNP 36-76 years (median 57); JHD 35-74 years (median 57). Median disease duration: RNP 12 years (range 2-40); JHD 17 years (range 1.5-41). Years of full time education: RNP 8-17 years (median 10); JHD 9-20 years (median 10). Week 48 DAS scores compared to baseline: RNP 19 unchanged, 6 worse and 11 better; JHD 22 unchanged, 7 worse, 6 better. Length of morning stiffness increased significantly at week 24 (p = 0.05) in the JHD cohort but improved to become non-significant at week 48 (p = 0.09). By week 48 fatigue had improved in the RNP cohort (p = 0.038) and deteriorated in JHD patients (p = 0.008). The AIMS showed decreases in pain in the RNP cohort (p = 0.044) and worsening physical function in JHD patients (p = 0.038). Patient satisfaction in the RNP cohort increased significantly (overall satisfaction p = 0.000). The JHD cohort showed a decrease in satisfaction with access and continuity (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this research confirm that care from the RNP is both effective and safe. Furthermore, a specialist RNP can bring additional benefits in the form of greater symptom control and enhanced patient self-care.

Coping with rheumatoid arthritis. How can specialist nurses influence it and promote better outcomes?

Psychological stressors are said to be an important influence on the outcome of chronic illness such as rheumatoid arthritis (Engel, 1977). Helping patients to cope with stressors is identified as a central concept in the delivery of nursing care (Khan et al., 1994). It is thus reasonable to suggest that rheumatology nurses may be key players in the process of coping with rheumatoid arthritis. But in order for rheumatology nurses to be effective players in this process, they need to discourage coping behaviour(s) linked to poor outcomes, and/or promote an overall behaviour pattern linked to a better outcome. Literature showing the link between different coping behaviours and outcome is examined, and cognitive restructuring is emphasized as one method nurses could use. Having identified coping behaviour which is optimal in terms of future outcome, further study of different forms of coping-based educational intervention is suggested, to reveal how such patterns of behaviour can be taught by nurses in the most effective way.