Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis in rheumatic autoimmune diseases: a systematic literature review

Relationship between idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) and connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD): A narrative review

While idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) centering on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most prevalent interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially in the older adult population, connective tissue disease (CTD)-related ILD is the second most prevalent ILD. The pathogenesis of IPF is primarily fibrosis, whereas that of other ILDs, particularly CTD-ILD, is mainly inflammation. Therefore, a precise diagnosis is crucial for selecting appropriate treatments, such as antifibrotic or immunosuppressive agents. In addition, some patients with IIP have CTD-related features, such as arthritis and skin eruption, but do not meet the criteria for any CTD, this is referred to as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). IPAF is closely associated with idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP) and cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP). Furthermore, patients with iNSIP or those with NSIP with OP overlap frequently develop polymyositis/dermatomyositis after the diagnosis of IIP. Acute exacerbation of ILD, the most common cause of death, occurs more frequently in patients with IPF than in those with other ILDs. Although acute exacerbation of CTD-ILD occurs at a low rate of incidence, patients with rheumatoid arthritis, microscopic polyangiitis, or systemic sclerosis experience more acute exacerbation of CTD-ILD than those with other CTD. In this review, the features of each IIP, focusing on CTD-related signatures, are summarized, and the pathogenesis and appropriate treatments to improve the prognoses of patients with various ILDs are discussed.

Development of microscopic polyangiitis following idiopathic pleuroparenchymal l fibroelastosis: A case report

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a rare type of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, which is characterised by pleural fibrosis and subjacent parenchymal fibroelastosis of the upper lobes. Herein, we present a case of microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) following PPFE. The patient had abnormal shadows on chest radiographs 15 years before the onset of MPA, and the patient was diagnosed with PPFE. Four years after the PPFE diagnosis, the patient was diagnosed with MPA based on persistent fever, purpura, mononeuritis multiplex, myeloperoxidase-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positivity, and pathological findings of peritubular capillaritis on kidney biopsy. The patient was treated with glucocorticoids, including methylprednisolone pulse therapy and rituximab, followed by maintenance therapy with rituximab. One year after treatment, the PPFE had not worsened. PPFE occasionally occurs secondary to connective tissue disease, including MPA; however, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of PPFE preceding MPA. Our case suggests that PPFE, as other interstitial lung diseases, may be associated with MPA and precede the onset of MPA. The accumulation of more cases is needed to clarify the characteristics of MPA-associated PPFE.

Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis

The term idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis refers to a rare interstitial lung disease that predominantly involves the upper lobes. It has been considered a rare subtype of interstitial lung disease since 2013, when it was included in the joint consensus statement on the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases published by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Currently, two distinct types of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis are recognized: the idiopathic type for cases in which it has not been possible to establish a specific etiology and a secondary type associated with a variety of different causes. The diagnosis of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis must be managed from a combined clinical and radiological perspective. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the imaging method of choice for the evaluation and diagnosis of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis. In many cases, the diagnosis will be based exclusively on the HRCT findings and histologic confirmation will be unnecessary. This article describes the clinical, radiological, and histological characteristics of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis, discussing the different associations with this entity and its differential diagnosis.

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a clinico-radiologic-pathologic interstitial lung disease (ILD) characterized by fibrosis that has upper lobe and subpleural predominance, involving both the visceral pleura and the subjacent subpleural lung parenchyma, and comprises dense fibroelastic changes with prominent elastosis of the alveolar walls together with fibrous thickening of the visceral pleura. The goal of this review is to summarize the state-of-the-art understanding in PPFE.

RECENT FINDINGS

PPFE was described in an increasing number of conditions. The course of disease is heterogeneous. Idiopathic PPFE, cases associated with telomerase-related gene mutations, cases related to a history of chemotherapy, and cases combining PPFE with a pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia, may have a particularly poor prognosis. Well-conducted retrospective studies identified marked PPFE features in approximately 10% of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 11% of patients with systemic sclerosis-associated ILD, 6.5% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD, and 23% of patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Drug therapy has not been evaluated prospectively. A small retrospective study suggests that nintedanib may slow disease progression. However, whether the efficacy of antifibrotics is comparable in PPFE and in other forms of progressive pulmonary fibrosis warrants further evaluation.

SUMMARY

Accumulating data indicate that PPFE features are associated with poor prognosis in fibrosing ILDs. Further research on the management of PPFE is warranted.

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease

Background

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a rare interstitial lung disease (ILD) featuring dense fibrosis of the visceral pleura and subpleural parenchyma, mostly in the upper lobes. PPFE can present in other ILDs, including rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD (RA-ILD). The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the prevalence and clinical implications of coexistent PPFE in RA-ILD.

Methods

Overall, 477 patients with RA-ILD were recruited from two cohorts; their clinical data and HRCT images were analysed. The criteria for diagnosing PPFE were (1) pleural thickening with bilateral subpleural dense fibrosis in the upper lobes, (2) evidence of disease progression, and (3) absence of other identifiable aetiologies.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 3.3 years. The mean age of the patients was 63.4 years, and 60.0% were women. PPFE was identified in 31 patients (6.5%). The PPFE group showed significantly lower body mass index and forced vital capacity (FVC) and more frequent usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-like pattern on HRCT than no-PPFE group. The risk factors for all-cause mortality were older age, lower FVC, and the presence of UIP-like pattern on HRCT; PPFE was not significantly associated with mortality in both all patients and a subgroup with a UIP-like pattern. The presence of PPFE was associated with a significantly increased risk of pneumothorax and greater decline in diffusing capacity.

Conclusions

PPFE was not rare in patients with RA-ILD and was significantly associated with an increased risk of pneumothorax and greater lung function decline, though we found no significant association with mortality.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02064-z.

Demystifying idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: time for more etiology-focused nomenclature in interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

A major focus of interstitial lung disease (ILD) has centered on disorders termed idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) which include, among others, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, and respiratory bronchiolitis-interstitial lung disease.

AREAS COVERED

We review the radiologic and histologic patterns for the nine disorders classified by multidisciplinary approach as IIP, and describe the remarkable amount of published epidemiologic, translational, and molecular studies demonstrating their associations with numerous yet definitive environmental exposures, occupational exposures, pulmonary diseases, systemic diseases, medication toxicities, and genetic variants.

EXPERT OPINION

In the 21st century, these disorders termed IIPs are rarely idiopathic, but rather are well-described radiologic and histologic patterns of lung injury that are associated with a wide array of diverse etiologies. Accordingly, the idiopathic nomenclature is misleading and confusing, and may also promote a lack of inquisitiveness, suggesting the end rather than the beginning of a thorough diagnostic process to identify ILD etiology and initiate patient-centered management. A shift toward more etiology-focused nomenclature will be beneficial to all, including patients hoping for better life quality and disease outcome, general medicine and pulmonary physicians furthering their ILD knowledge, and expert ILD clinicians and researchers who are advancing the ILD field.

Computed Tomography Predictors of Mortality or Disease Progression in Systemic Sclerosis–Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review

Objective

Although interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc), its prognostication remains challenging. Given that CT represents the gold standard imaging technique in ILD assessment, a systematic review on chest CT findings as predictors of mortality or ILD progression in SSc-ILD was performed.

Materials and Methods

Three databases (Medline, Embase, and Web of Science) were searched to identify all studies analyzing CT mortality or ILD progression predictors in SSc-ILD, from inception to December 2020. ILD progression was defined by worsening of forced vital capacity and/or CT ILD findings. Manuscripts not written in English, with not available full-text, not focusing on SSc-ILD or with SSc-ILD not extrapolated, otherwise with overlap syndromes, pediatric patients, <10 cases or predictors other than CT features were excluded.

Results

Out of 3,513 citations, 15 full-texts (2,332 patients with SSc-ILD) met the inclusion criteria. ILD extent and extensive ILD, ILD densitometric analysis parameters, fibrotic extent and reticulation extent resulted as independent mortality predictors. Extensive ILD is also an independent predictor of death, need for supplemental oxygen or lung transplantation. Honeycombing extent is an independent risk factor for respiratory mortality. Independent predictors of ILD progression were not identified.

Conclusions

ILD extent and extensive ILD independently predict mortality in SSc-ILD on CT, as well as ILD densitometric analysis, fibrotic extent and reticulation extent. Extensive ILD is also a predictor of death, need for supplemental oxygen, or lung transplantation. Honeycombing extent predicts respiratory mortality. CT predictors of ILD progression need to be further investigated.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, PROSPERO, identifier: CRD420202005001.

Prognostic role of KL-6 in SSc-ILD patients with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis

BACKGROUND

Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is a high-molecular-weight (200kDa) glycoprotein proposed as a diagnostic biomarker for differentiating interstitial lung disease (ILD). Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare immune-mediated disorder, and ILD is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) has been described to have a poor prognosis in SSc-ILD patients. This study undertook to compare serial changes in KL-6 in SSc-ILD patients with and without PPFE, to verify its prognostic value as a disease biomarker.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five SSc-ILD patients (median IQR, 62 (56-58); 20% males) were retrospectively enrolled. 12 SSc-ILD patients (48%) had also a radiological diagnosis of PPFE. Serum KL-6 concentrations were measured by KL-6 reagent assay (Fujirebio Europe, Ghent, Belgium).

RESULTS

Serum KL-6 measurements were increased in SSc-ILD patients with and without PPFE compared with healthy controls (P < .0001). Comparative analysis of the rate of variation of KL-6 over the 6 years of follow-up was performed by serial two-yearly KL-6 measurements: Δ1(t1-t0), Δ2(t2-t1) and Δ3(t3-t2). In SSc-ILD patients with PPFE pattern, Δ3 was significantly different than those without PPFE pattern (P = .0020). Serum KL-6 levels were significantly different (P = .0455) either at Δ2 and Δ3 in the PPFE group. In SSc-ILD patients with PPFE, at t3 serum KL-6 concentrations were inversely correlated with FEV1 (r = -.76; P = .037) and FVC percentages (r = -.79; P = .028).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that serial measurements of KL-6 in the follow-up of these patients may help to monitor disease progression. In real life, in SSc-ILD patients PPFE should be always evaluated at CT and when present should suggest a tight follow-up to monitor its evolution.

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis: Clinical, radiological and histopathological features

Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a rare, generally idiopathic form of interstitial pneumonia with unique clinical, radiological and histopathological features. It is named after the presence of upper lobe pleural and subjacent parenchymal fibrosis, with accompanying elastic fibers. Although it is usually an idiopathic disease, it has been linked to other co-existent diseases. Diagnostic suspicion of PPFE is based on the identification of typical abnormalities on chest CT scan, which are prevailingly located in the upper lobes, adjacent to the apex of the lungs. Diagnosis can be confirmed by histological analysis, although biopsy is not always feasible. The disease is generally progressive, but not uniformly. The course of the disease is frequently slow and involves a progressive loss of upper lobe volume, which results in platythorax, associated with a significant reduction of body mass. PPFE concomitant to other interstitial lung diseases is associated with a poorer prognosis. The disease occasionally progresses rapidly causing irreversible respiratory insufficiency, which leads to death. Currently, there is no effective pharmacological therapy available, and lung transplantation is the best therapeutic option. The purpose of this review is to draw the attention to PPFE, describe its clinical, radiological and histopathological features, analyze its diagnostic criteria, and provide an update on the management of the disease.