Efficacy and safety of multiple intra-articular corticosteroid injections for osteoarthritis-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies

Evaluation of radiographic knee OA progression after arthroscopic meniscectomy compared with IACI for degenerative meniscus tear

The intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IACI) and arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) are crucial treatment options for meniscus tears and are widely used in clinical practice. To determine whether there are differences in the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) after APM and IACI treatments for degenerative meniscal tears, and to identify the influencing factors. We finally collected the minimum joint space width (JSW), WOMAC score, and KOOS score of 189 patients after 4 years of follow-up. The mixed effects model and general estimating equation were used to analyze the differences in the progression of knee osteoarthritis and the factors affecting the progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients with degenerative meniscus tears who received different treatments. Over a 48-month follow-up period, all three groups showed a decreasing trend in knee JSW, with the IACI group having the fastest JSW decline rate at -0.020 mm/month (95% CI: -0.027 to -0.013, p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the JSW decline rate among the three groups. The WOMAC total scores for both the IACI and APM groups showed an improving trend, at -0.123/month (95% CI: -0.211 to -0.036, p < 0.01) and - 0.115/month (95% CI: -0.201 to -0.028, p < 0.01) respectively, with no statistical difference between the two groups. BMI was also a significant factor affecting postoperative JSW (regression coefficients: -0.012, 95% CI: -0.022 to 0.001, p = 0.03) and WOMAC total scores (regression coefficients: 0.189, 95% CI: 0.008 to 0.370, p = 0.04). Compared to single IACI, multiple IACI treatments resulted in faster JSW decline (B: 0.430, 95% CI: 1.012 to 2.336, p = 0.04). Patients with degenerative meniscal tears who undergo either IACI or APM treatment exhibit more pronounced progression of knee osteoarthritis compared to those in the non-treatment group. This form of deterioration is mainly driven by BMI.

Assessing the quality of care for knee osteoarthritis in Singapore: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the self-reported quality of care for people with knee osteoarthritis in Singapore and to investigate the associations between participant characteristics and functional outcomes at 1 year in relation to the reported quality of care.

METHODS

Patients with knee osteoarthritis completed the osteoarthritis quality indicator (OA-QI) questionnaire, a validated patient-reported measure that assesses the clinician's adherence to evidence-based guidelines for non-surgical knee osteoarthritis education and patient education. The OA-QI includes 17 indicators, with "achievement" defined as a 'Yes' response for each. We calculated individual per-item, overall per-item mean, and per-person achievement rates (%) and examined associations between participant characteristics, achievement rates, and function at 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 314 participants completed the OA-QI. Referral for physical activity (87.5%) and referral for daily activity aid assessment (15.7%) had the highest and lowest per-item achievement rates, respectively. The overall mean per-item and per-person achievement rates were both 62.2%. Participants educated about steroid injections (adjusted coefficient [95% CI]: 7.23 [1.42-13.04]; p = 0.015) or surgery (adjusted coefficient [95% CI]: 12.65 [5.89-19.40]; p < 0.001) had worse functional outcomes at one year than those who were eligible but not informed. Those not assessed for walking aids and indicating walking issues had poorer outcomes one year later (adjusted coefficient [95% CI]: -9.89 (-19.63, -0.15); p = 0.0470). However, no significant associations were found between per-person achievement rates and 1-year functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of care in Singapore for people with knee osteoarthritis is suboptimal, especially for those needing walking aids and weight loss assistance. However, the quality of care alone does not fully account for long-term outcomes, suggesting that other factors need to be considered.

Dual intra-articular injections of corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid versus single corticosteroid injection for ankle osteoarthritis: a randomized comparative trial

BACKGROUND

Intra-articular corticosteroid injection is commonly used for pain relief in ankle osteoarthritis (OA). The effects of corticosteroids (CS) are short-lived, whereas hyaluronic acid (HA) have longer-lasting effects. The objective was to compare the efficacy of dual injections of CS and HA to CS alone. We hypothesized that intra-articular injections of dual agents would be more effective than CS alone.

METHODS

A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial was designed to investigate this hypothesis. 135 patients with ankle OA were enrolled into an intra-articular CS injection group (CS group, n = 61) or dual HA plus CS injection group (CS + HA group, n = 74). The CS group received 1 mL of corticosteroid and 1 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 1 mL of normal saline once, and the CS + HA group received 3 mL of a total of 5 mL mixtures containing 2 mL of HA, or 1 mL of corticosteroid, 0.5% bupivacaine, and normal saline in the first week, followed by 2 mL of HA in the second and third weeks. Clinical evaluations were performed before injection, 6 and 12 weeks after the first injections. The Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) was used as the primary outcome measure, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and complications were used as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean AOS change from baseline was significantly greater in the CS + HA group than in the CS group at 6 (p ≤ 0.01) and 12 weeks (p ≤ 0.01). The mean VAS change from baseline was significantly greater in the CS group than in the CS + HA group at 6 weeks (p = 0.023), but not at 12 weeks (p = 0.731). The mean SF-36 change from baseline was not significant between the CS and CS + HA groups at 6 (p = 0.416) and 12 weeks (p = 0.215).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of corticosteroid and HA injection is more effective than corticosteroid alone in relieving pain in ankle OA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Research Information Service in South Korea, KCT0008690 // Registration Date (First Posted): July 21th, 2023 ( http://cris.nih.go.kr ).

Transarterial Embolization for Musculoskeletal Pain Management: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Musculoskeletal embolization has emerged in recent years as a treatment of chronic joint pain, as the inflammatory cascade responsible for such pain has become better understood. Studies have shown a complex interplay between joint inflammation and synovial hypervascularity that causes growth of new unmyelinated nerve fibers responsible for pain. Embolization targets joint hypervascularity to disrupt the inflammatory cycle and provide pain relief. The standard treatment algorithm for chronic joint pain is well established and entails escalating therapeutic options that include exercise, self-management programs, analgesic medications, intraarticular injections, and finally surgical replacement or release. Genicular artery embolization (GAE), targeting abnormal vasculature around the knee joint, is the most studied musculoskeletal embolization procedure, reflecting the high worldwide prevalence and increasing incidence of knee osteoarthritis (OA). GAE is now supported by multiple prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials comparing GAE versus sham treatment. Embolization has also extended outside of the knee joint to include the shoulder (treatment of adhesive capsulitis or secondary stiff shoulder), elbow (medial or lateral epicondylitis), hip (OA, great trochanteric pain syndrome), and ankle (plantar fasciitis). This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review discusses the current status of transarterial embolization for musculoskeletal pain management, focusing on treatment of knee OA and chronic shoulder pain.

Targeted non-invasive Metformin-Curcumin co-loaded nanohyaluosomes halt osteoarthritis progression and improve articular cartilage structure: A preclinical study

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease that affects the quality of life in elderly and young populations. Current therapies using corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs via parenteral or oral routes show limited ability to retard progression of the disease and achieve long term effectiveness and safety. Herein, the potential of MT-Cur combinatorial nano-formulations in OA management was explored for the first time. MT-Cur loaded nanohyaluosomes (MT-Cur-HL1) were designed for topical administration of the combined therapy in OA. The optimized MT-Cur-HL1 showed particle size 247.7 ± 3.7 nm, zeta potential -37.3 ± 0.4 mV; and entrapment efficiency (%EE) 70.22 %±0.303 and 76.7 %±0.077 for MT and Cur, respectively. MT-Cur-HL1 exhibited sustained drug release over 24 h and were stable over 3 months at 4 °C in terms of P.S., ZP and %EE. A detailed preclinical study, using MIA-induced osteoarthritis rat model, revealed the most significant anti-arthritic effect and halted OA progression of MT-Cur-HL1. This was proved to be mainly through the potentiation of p-AMPK signaling that ultimately led to suppression of its downstream TLR4/ NF-κB signaling pathway with subsequent reduction in MMP13 and ADAMTS5 induced chondrocytes degeneration. This study proved that this trajectory effectively promotes a significant improvement in the articular cartilage structure and reinforcement of joint mobility with an efficient antinociceptive effect. In conclusion, the novel MT-Cur coloaded nanohyaluosomes offer a promising non-invasive approach for the local management of OA.

Less Pain with Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis Compared to Placebo: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

The present meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) injections for knee osteoarthritis. The outcomes of interest were the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Western Ontario McMaster Osteo-Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores. This study was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA statement. All the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of intra-articular HA injections versus placebo injections for knee osteoarthritis were accessed in September 2024. Data from 3851 patients were collected. In total, 64% (2467 of 3851 patients) were women, and the mean age of the patients was 63.5 ± 4.9 years. At baseline, good comparability was found for the mean age, BMI, percentage of women, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Studies which reported data from two to four weeks of follow-up evidenced a lower value of the subscales pain (p < 0.0001) and stiffness (p = 0.01) of the WOMAC score. No difference was observed in VAS at rest (p = 0.4), VAS at exercise (p = 0.1), and subscale function (p = 0.4) of the WOMAC score. Studies which reported data from five to eight weeks of follow-up evidenced lower VAS at rest in favour of the HA group (p = 0.01). No difference in the other PROMs of interest was observed: VAS at exercise (p = 0.1), and the subscales pain (p = 0.3), function (p = 0.4), and stiffness (p = 0.4) of the WOMAC score. The current level I of evidence suggests that intra-articular HA injections in the knee might reduce pain in the short term.

Comparing dry needling or local acupuncture to various wet needling injection types for musculoskeletal pain and disability. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials

PURPOSE

Systematically evaluate the comparative effectiveness of dry needling (DN) or local acupuncture to various types of wet needling (WN) for musculoskeletal pain disorders (MPD).

METHODS

Seven databases (PubMed, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched following PROSPERO registration. Randomized clinical trials were included if they compared DN or local acupuncture with WN for MPD. Primary outcomes were pain and/or disability. The Revised Cochrane Collaboration tool (RoB 2.0) assessed the risk of bias.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were selected. Wet Needling types included cortisone (CSI) (N = 5), platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (N = 6), Botox (BoT) (N = 3), and local anesthetic injection (LAI) (N = 12). Evidence was rated as low to moderate quality. Results indicate DN produces similar effects to CSI in the short-medium term and superior outcomes in the long term. In addition, DN produces similar outcomes compared to PRP in the short and long term and similar outcomes as BoT in the short and medium term; however, LAI produces better pain outcomes in the short term.

CONCLUSION

Evidence suggests the effectiveness of DN to WN injections is variable depending on the injection type, outcome time frame, and diagnosis. In addition, adverse event data were similar but inconsistently reported. PROSPERO Registration: 2019 CRD42019131826Implications for rehabilitationDry needling produces similar effects for pain and disability in the short and medium term compared to cortisone, Botox, and platelet-rich plasma injections. Local anesthetic injection may be more effective at reducing short-term pain.Long-term effects on pain and disability are similar between dry needling and platelet-rich plasma injections, but dry needling may produce better long-term outcomes than cortisone injections.The available adverse event data is similar between dry and wet needling.The conclusions from this study may be beneficial for patients and clinicians for considering risk and cost benefit analyses.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Same-Knee Intra-Articular Injection of Corticosteroid and Lorecivivint Within 7 Days: An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel-Arm Study

INTRODUCTION

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common painful disorder. Intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid injections are frequently prescribed to treat knee pain. Lorecivivint (LOR), a novel IA cdc2-Like Kinase (CLK)/Dual-Specificity Tyrosine Phosphorylation-Regulated Kinase (DYRK) inhibitor thought to modulate Wnt and inflammatory pathways, has appeared safe and demonstrated improved patient-reported outcomes compared with placebo. While LOR is proposed for stand-alone use, in clinical practice, providers might administer LOR in close time proximity to IA corticosteroid. This open-label, parallel-arm, healthy volunteer study assessed potential short-term safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between IA LOR and triamcinolone acetonide (TCA) administered 7 days apart.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers were randomized to Treatment Sequence 1 (IA 40 mg TCA followed by IA 0.07 mg LOR) or Treatment Sequence 2 (IA 0.07 mg LOR followed by IA 40 mg TCA). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were categorized by "epoch", with epoch 1 spanning from first until second injection, and epoch 2 spanning from second injection until end of study. Plasma PK was assessed pre injection and out to 22 days after to assess PK treatment interaction.

RESULTS

A total of 18 TEAEs were reported by 11 (27.5%) of 40 enrolled participants, and there were no serious adverse events. Thirteen TEAEs were reported in Treatment Sequence 1 and five in Treatment Sequence 2, similarly distributed between epochs 1 and 2. In all participants and at all time points, plasma LOR concentrations were below the limit of quantification (0.100 ng/mL). Geometric mean concentrations and PK parameters for TCA were similar between treatment sequences.

CONCLUSION

No safety signals were observed. There were no quantifiable plasma concentrations of LOR in either Treatment Sequence. The PK of TCA was unaffected by previous LOR injection. These results suggest that IA administration of LOR and TCA in close time proximity is unlikely to pose a safety concern.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04598542.

Hyaluronic acid/diminazene aceturate combination ameliorates osteoarthritic anomalies in a rodent model: a role of the ACE2/Ang1-7/MasR axis

The implication of the tissue-localized renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA) has been documented in the last decades. A combination of intraarticular (IA) corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid (HYAL) is approved for pain relief in patients with mild to moderate OA. Combining HYAL with an activator of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, diminazen aceturate (DIZE), was evaluated in this study for its therapeutic potential. Monosodium iodoacetate was used to induce OA. The effects of daily administration of DIZE versus once-per-week IA injection of HYAL and a combination of both drugs for 21 days on OA deformities in rats' knees were observed. Evaluation of motor activities, pain, and inflammatory response was done using rotarod, knee bend, and knee swelling tests. RAS components, inflammatory biomarkers, and oxidative stress mediators were measured in the knee joint. X-ray radiological examination and histopathological investigations were used to assess joint degeneration and regeneration. Levels of both inflammatory and oxidative markers in knee joint homogenate of OA rats rose, and these increments were mostly improved by the three therapies with a more prominent effect of the drug combination, an effect that was also reflected in the behavioral tests. RAS markers have shown better responsiveness to the combination therapy over both drugs individually, showing a pronounced increase in the angiotensin 1-7 amount. Both radiological and histopathology investigations came to confirm the biochemical results, nominating a combination of HYAL and DIZE as a possible therapeutic option for OA.

Recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Guideline adherence for hip and knee osteoarthritis management is often poor, possibly related to the quality and/or inconsistent recommendations. This systematic review of hip and knee osteoarthritis guidelines aimed to appraise the quality and consistency in recommendations across higher-quality guidelines.

METHODS

Eight databases, guideline repositories, and professional associations websites were searched on 27/10/2022. Guideline quality was appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II tool) (six domains). Higher quality was defined as scoring ≥60% for domains 3 (rigour of development), 6 (editorial independence), plus one other. Consistency in recommendations across higher-quality guidelines was reported descriptively. This review was registered prospectively (CRD42021216154).

RESULTS

Seven higher-quality and 18 lesser-quality guidelines were included. AGREE II domain scores for higher-quality guidelines were > 60% except for applicability (average 46%). Higher-quality guidelines consistently recommended in favour of education, exercise, and weight management and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (hip and knee), and intra-articular corticosteroid injections (knee). Higher quality guidelines consistently recommended against hyaluronic acid (hip) and stem cell (hip and knee) injections. Other pharmacological recommendations in higher-quality guidelines (e.g., paracetamol, intra-articular corticosteroid (hip), hyaluronic acid (knee)) and adjunctive treatments (e.g., acupuncture) were less consistent. Arthroscopy was consistently recommended against in higher-quality guidelines. No higher-quality guidelines considered arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Higher-quality guidelines for hip and knee osteoarthritis consistently recommend clinicians implement exercise, education, and weight management, alongside consideration of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and intra-articular corticosteroid injections (knee). Lack of consensus on some pharmacological options and adjunctive treatments creates challenges for guideline adherence. Future guidelines must prioritise providing implementation guidance, considering consistently low applicability scores.

Methods of Conservative Intra-Articular Treatment for Osteoarthritis of the Hip and Knee

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease that is becoming increasingly common as the population ages. Conservative treatment for hip or knee osteoarthritis has been limited to pain control. Intra-articular injections for targeted local treatment have been widely used in clinical practice for many years.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search, including recent meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and current guidelines.

RESULTS

In Germany, the 12-month prevalence of osteoarthritis in adults is 17.9%. Conservative treatments are intended to alleviate symptoms and do not affect the progression of the disease. Glucocorticoids can be used to relieve otherwise intractable pain in the short term, but their prolonged use increases the risk of cartilage loss and progression of osteoarthritis. According to multiple guidelines, there is only weak evidence for the use of hyaluronic acid. Evidence does exist that high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid may lead to better outcomes than the low-molecular-weight form. RCTs have revealed no more than short-term clinical efficacy for a variety of specific therapeutic approaches, including the use of cytokine inhibitors. Other treatments, e.g., with platelet-enriched plasma, aspirates from bone marrow or adipose tissue, or expanded mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), have not been found to have clinically relevant long-term effects.

CONCLUSION

In view of the scant available evidence, further standardized RCTs will be needed to give a more comprehensive picture of the efficacy of intra-articular treatments for hip and knee osteoarthritis.

Subacromial injection of hydrolyzed collagen in the symptomatic treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy: an observational multicentric prospective study on 71 patients

Background

The purpose of the present observational multicentric prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new infiltration device (CHondroGrid, Bioteck S.p.A, Arcugnano, Italy) based on hydrolyzed collagen in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Methods

Seventy-one patients (53.3 ± 11.6 years old) affected by rotator cuff tendinopathy were treated in 2021 with two subacromial injections of CHondroGrid at 13 ± 2.9 days apart. The outcomes measured were the visual analog scale (VAS) score (in movement, during the night, and at rest), the Constant Score, the Simple Shoulder Test, and patient satisfaction. The outcome variables were measured before each injection, at 1 month and at 6 months after the last injection.

Results

The treatment was significantly effective from the first injection and up to the six-month follow-up. At the last follow-up, the VAS score on movement had improved by 71% (P < .001), while the VAS score at rest and during the night had ameliorated by 91% and 87%, respectively (P < .001). The Constant Score and Simple Shoulder Test improved by 32% and 61%, respectively (P < .001). No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

CHondroGrid resulted in a safe and effective treatment in pain relief and for the functional recovery of rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Local injection therapy in the complex treatment of musculoskeletal disorders: principles of application, evidence base, safety

Local injection therapy (LIT)  is an important component of the complex treatment of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), which is widely used in real clinical practice. Glucocorticoids, hyaluronic acid drugs (HA), autologous cell drugs, botulinum toxin type A, radioactive isotopes, etc. are used for LIT.  LIT makes it possible to achieve a pronounced symptomatic effect, while in some cases, for example, repeated HA treatments in patients with osteoarthritis, the possibility of slowing the progression of the disease and reducing the need for surgical treatment is discussed.

The performance of LIT requires special skills and abilities of the physician, careful compliance with the rules of asepsis and antisepsis, and instrumental visualization. LIT can be associated with serious complications and therefore must be performed according to strict indications.

The Expert Council was devoted to defining the basic principles of LIT. The indications for the use of certain types of this therapies, the evidence base for its efficacy and safety, the order of application of different drugs, and the need to combine LIT with other drug and non-drug treatments of MSD were reviewed.

The OA Trial Bank: Update of individual patient data meta-analysis of intra-articular glucocorticoids in persons with knee and hip osteoarthritis

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of intra--articular (IA) glucocorticoid for knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA) in specific subgroups of patients according to the baseline severity of pain and inflammatory signs using individual patient data (IPD) from existing trials. Furthermore, this study aims to assess if a baseline pain cut-off was associated with clinically important effectiveness of IA glucocorticoid. This is an update of an IA glucocorticoid IPD meta-analysis by the OA Trial Bank.

Method

Randomized trials evaluating one or more IA glucocorticoid preparations in hip and knee OA, published to May 2018 were selected. IPD of patient and disease characteristics and outcome measures were acquired. The primary outcome was pain severity at short-term follow-up (up to 4 weeks). Potential interaction effect of severe pain (≥70 points, 0-100 scale) and signs of inflammation at baseline were studied using a two-stage approach with general liner model followed by random effects model. Analysis of trend was conducted, assessing if a baseline pain cut-off was associated with the threshold for clinically important treatment effect of IA glucocorticoid compared to placebo.

Results

Four out of 16 eligible randomized clinical trials (n ​= ​641) were combined with the existing OA Trial Bank studies (n ​= ​620), yielding 1261 participants from eleven studies. Participants with severe baseline pain compared to those with less severe pain had greater pain reduction at mid-term (around 12 weeks) (mean reduction: -6.90 (95%CI -10.91; -2.90)), but not at short- and long-term. No interaction effects were found between inflammatory signs and IA glucocorticoid injections compared to placebo at all follow-up time-points. Analysis of trend demonstrated treatment response to IA glucocorticoid from baseline pain levels >50 (0-100 scale) and above.

Conclusion

This updated IPD meta-analysis demonstrated that participants with severe pain compared to those with less severe pain at baseline experienced significantly more pain relief with IA glucocorticoid compared with placebo at mid-term.

Joint interventions in osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is among the most common diseases affecting both axial and appendicular joints and the lead cause of disability worldwide. OA incidence is rising due to extended life expectancy and the increasing obesity epidemic. Several joint interventions are available to manage pain and joint function in patients with OA, most of these treatments being widely applied using intra-articular injections. In this chapter, we will describe the different joint interventions available for the management of pain in OA focusing on intra-articular injections, including discussion on the evidence regarding the efficacy of these treatments, based on the most recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses available. We also discuss the importance of imaging in guiding these treatments, including the different imaging modalities available for intra-articular injection guidance, their advantages, and disadvantages. Finally, we briefly discuss safety data and the consensus regarding the most used intra-articular treatments to manage pain in OA.

Efficacy of corticosteroids for hand osteoarthritis - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

There is some evidence that corticosteroids may have a beneficial effect in hand osteoarthritis. We examined the efficacy of corticosteroids on symptoms and structural outcomes in hand osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to October 2021 for randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of corticosteroids in hand osteoarthritis. Two authors independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the RoB 2 tool. Standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) was calculated, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 13 included trials, 3 examined oral corticosteroids and clinical outcomes in any hand joints, 9 examined intra-articular injection of corticosteroids and clinical outcomes at the first carpometacarpal joint and one in the interphalangeal joints. In meta-analysis, oral corticosteroids reduced pain (SMD -0.53, 95% CI -0.79 to -0.28) and improved stiffness (MD -5.03, 95% CI -9.91 to -0.15; Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index stiffness subscale) and function (SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.63 to -0.12) at 4-6 weeks. However, there was no significant persistent effect on pain and function at 3 months which was 6-8 weeks after study medication was stopped. There was no significant effect of intra-articular corticosteroids on pain or function at 4-6 weeks or over 3-12 months in first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. Two trials evaluated joint structure at 4-6 weeks: one study showed oral corticosteroids reduced synovial thickening, neither showed an effect on synovitis.

CONCLUSIONS

There was low-certainty evidence for a medium effect of oral corticosteroids on pain relief and stiffness improvement and small-to-medium effect on functional improvement at 4-6 weeks, with no significant effect for intra-articular corticosteroids. Corticosteroids had no significant effect on any outcomes over longer term (3-12 months) off treatment. No trials examined the effect of corticosteroids on disease progression. The role of corticosteroids in hand osteoarthritis is limited.

Connection between Mesenchymal Stem Cells Therapy and Osteoclasts in Osteoarthritis

The use of mesenchymal stem cells constitutes a promising therapeutic approach, as it has shown beneficial effects in different pathologies. Numerous in vitro, pre-clinical, and, to a lesser extent, clinical trials have been published for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis is a type of arthritis that affects diarthritic joints in which the most common and studied effect is cartilage degradation. Nowadays, it is known that osteoarthritis is a disease with a very powerful inflammatory component that affects the subchondral bone and the rest of the tissues that make up the joint. This inflammatory component may induce the differentiation of osteoclasts, the bone-resorbing cells. Subchondral bone degradation has been suggested as a key process in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. However, very few published studies directly focus on the activity of mesenchymal stem cells on osteoclasts, contrary to what happens with other cell types of the joint, such as chondrocytes, synoviocytes, and osteoblasts. In this review, we try to gather the published bibliography in relation to the effects of mesenchymal stem cells on osteoclastogenesis. Although we find promising results, we point out the need for further studies that can support mesenchymal stem cells as a therapeutic tool for osteoclasts and their consequences on the osteoarthritic joint.

Injections in the osteoarthritic knee: a review of current treatment options

Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative condition characterized by progressive cartilage degradation, subchondral damage, and bone remodelling. Among the approaches implemented to achieve symptomatic and functional improvements, injection treatments have gained increasing attention due to the possibility of intra-articular delivery with reduced side effects compared to systemic therapies.

In addition to well-established treatment options such as hyaluronic acid (HA), cortico-steroids (CS) and oxygen-ozone therapy, many other promising products have been employed in the last decades such as polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) and biologic agents such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Moreover, ultrasound-guided intra-meniscal injection and X-ray-guided subchondral injection techniques have been introduced into clinical practice.

Even when not supported by high evidence consensus, intra-articular CS and HA injections have gained precise indications for symptomatic relief and clinical improvement in OA. Biological products are strongly supported by in vitro evidence but there is still a lack of robust clinical evidence. PRP and MSCs seem to relieve OA symptoms through a regulation of the joint homeostasis, even if their capability to restore articular cartilage is still to be proved in vivo.

Due to increasing interest in the subchondral bone pathology, subchondral injections have been developed with promising results in delaying joint replacement. Nevertheless, due to their recent development and the heterogeneity of the injected products (biologic agents or calcium phosphate), this approach still lacks strong enough evidence to be fully endorsed.

Combined biological treatments, nano-molecular approaches, monoclonal antibodies and ‘personalized’ target therapies are currently under development or under investigation with the aim of expanding our armamentarium against knee OA.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:501-509. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210026